Pakistan Launches ‘Operation Ghazab Lil Haq’ After Afghan Taliban Attack

[Wasim Ghulam]

My point is, NAP was going to be introduced through the parliament, not through GHQ. GHQ's job was to only follow and implement the NAP. Once NAP was abolished due to change in foreign relations and not renewing the NAP, millitary cant do anything or be held responsible.

The parliament was required to renew NAP. NAP was directly destroyed due to the foreign policy adopted.

People here bash the millitary alot, but often forget national assembly and senate is still in the hands of civil govt, and its the civil govt that hold powers. If parliament gets abolished and martial law is implaced, than millitary becomes directly responsible.

Ammendments were also introduced through Parliament and Senate that were directly influenced by De facto power ( Establishment ). I do not know whether you truly believe what you wrote but we believed it when we had book of social Studies in Class 10

If Military leadership really wanted NAP in place you think they could nt do that through parliament? come on now

you say IK was brought in by Establishment , but in same breath you absolve them by saying they are sub ordinates of parliament. Both cant be true. Make up your Mind

 

[Kianig89]

Ironic the mafia supporters emphasising the importance of Parliament, Pakistan has no Parliament a fake bogus club which is selected through a form 47. Do we all need to be reminded of this

 

[Major]

Ammendments were also introduced through Parliament and Senate that were directly influenced by De facto power ( Establishment ). I do not know whether you truly believe what you wrote but we believed it when we had book of social Studies in Class 10

If Military leadership really wanted NAP in place you think they could nt do that through parliament? come on now

you say IK was brought in by Establishment , but in same breath you absolve them by saying they are sub ordinates of parliament. Both cant be true. Make up your Mind

Im talking about responsibility. You are right millitary can pass any law it wants as it had its stooges like amir liaqut to their bidding in the national assembly.

Point is, responsibility cannot fall on them, it falls on the Parliament, because constitutionally its under them.

They would be responsible if martial law was imposed.

 

[Wasim Ghulam]

Im talking about responsibility. You are right millitary can pass any law it wants as it had its stooges like amir liaqut to their bidding in the national assembly.

Point is, responsibility cannot fall on them, it falls on the Parliament, because constitutionally its under them.

They would be responsible if martial law was imposed.

why cant it fall on them?

if they influence what they should nt , they cannot be absolved.

You cannot break constitution in first place ( influencing Parliamemt and go against Oath ) and then hide behind the same thing if fingers are pointed

 

[Major]

why cant it fall on them?

if they influence what they should nt , they cannot be absolved.

You cannot break constitution in first place ( influencing Parliamemt and go against Oath ) and then hide behind the same thing if fingers are pointed

Because of the constitution.

Bhai im talking from a constitutional responsibility aspect.

And yes your are right you cant be influencing parliament. But thats the thing, influence cant be proven.

Parliamentarians like Amir Liaqut become responsible here who do the millitary's bidding on bills or ordinance.

The abolished NAP falls on the political govt

 

[Wasim Ghulam]

Because of the constitution.

Bhai im talking from a constitutional responsibility aspect.

And yes your are right you cant be influencing parliament. But thats the thing, influence cant be proven.

Parliamentarians like Amir Liaqut become responsible here who do the millitary's bidding on bills or ordinance.

The abolished NAP falls on the political govt

you refuse to see fallacy of your argument

Amir Liaqut is Responsible for doing bidding but the one who is influencing him is not? its like saying Sirf Rishwat lainay wala Saza ka haqdar ha.. Dainy wala nahi.. its going against principles of Justice

 

[Major]

you refuse to see fallacy of your argument

Amir Liaqut is Responsible for doing bidding but the one who is influencing him is not? its like saying Sirf Rishwat lainay wala Saza ka haqdar ha.. Dainy wala nahi.. its going against principles of Justice

Point is, the person being influenced should not be influenced. Simple.

 

[Wasim Ghulam]

Point is, the person being influenced should not be influenced. Simple.

and person who is trying to influence what he should nt . Both are responsible

Its not Simple argument of not being able to prove the influence. but in your heart if you know its wrong then its wrong. Do not maneuvar around it

 

[Rana]

Ironic the mafia supporters emphasising the importance of Parliament, Pakistan has no Parliament a fake bogus club which is selected through a form 47. Do we all need to be reminded of this

Who should they support?

 

[BouncerGuy]

WHY ARE WE DISCUSSING THE CONSTITUTION HERE???

HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT THE OPERATION?? IF NO THEN KEEP QUIET

 

[Patriot]

Sad state of affairs, Muslims killing Muslims in Ramadan. I worry for the civilian casualties. May Allah protect them.