Kroll
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2017
- Runs
- 10,041
- Post of the Week
- 1
Hopefully Mr Concede 12 RPO has picked a new job, cricket isn't for him.Where is Haris Rauf?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Hopefully Mr Concede 12 RPO has picked a new job, cricket isn't for him.Where is Haris Rauf?
Haris??The guy Harris should replace is Rizwan
Yes it's hilarious really. What kind of rotation policy is implemented when all main players who are in playing 11 since last 3-4 years are selected. I really feel Salman Agha & Wasim Jnr are not in good books of team management and may be threat to few players, that's why they don't get regular chancesTwo very notable omissions.. selected Azam khan parchi this guy can’t complete 2km run that means he is just a normal fatso not an athlete to play cricket belongs to gully cricket , many guy with his physique who are even better players rot in gully cricket because their father is not Moin khan.
Wahab says rotation policy , workload management blah blah but have selected all the frontline players to play against Newzealand C team out of fear of losing and gonna oversee them as Senior team Manager
Yousuf - head coach u-19 , national team selector , batting coach of senior team
Wahab - Sports Minister, chief selector (under the name as selector) , Senior team manag
Who said he got rid of Rauf? Hes injured. Good to see “captain azam” fan attributing the squad selection to him. I hope you stick by captain azam when he chokes in the worldcup against actual playing 11s.Good decision by Captain Azam getting rid of Rauf. Niazi is a good pick ,guy is a great fielder too.
Azam Khan fills the terrible selection quota once again.
Other than that its a decent squad.
My 11 in batting order
Saim Rizwan Babar Usman Niazi Iftikhar Imad Amir Shaheen Naseem Abrar
Naw, they need to show the world why their goats via 2nd string bashing.PCB should not have picked so many top order batsmen if the batting order will not be changed. Babar and Rizwan have nothing to gain from this series.
Babar Azam (captain)
Fakhar Zaman
Mohammad Rizwan
Saim Ayub
Usman Khan
Yes I'll stick by him as captain although he does have his faults. He almost won us the WC in 2021 and 2022.Who said he got rid of Rauf? Hes injured. Good to see “captain azam” fan attributing the squad selection to him. I hope you stick by captain azam when he chokes in the worldcup against actual playing 11s.
Zaman khan > Ali is not a major suprise? Since when?Decent squad. No major surprises.
When a team loses, its a failure for the whole squad, agreed.There's serious delusion among fans that PSL performers will be equally good at international level. We don't have guys who can score 20-30 runs consistently yet some fans have the audacity to constantly bash Rizwan and Babar and even hold them responsible for our losses. They want us to believe that other 9 players are not accountable
He's been in the squad for a while and is a rated bowler..I'm glad they stuck by him during a bad patch.Zaman khan > Ali is not a major suprise? Since when?
Fair point and fair arguments, we do need to back our players more, and I've always believed in team buildingHe's been in the squad for a while and is a rated bowler..I'm glad they stuck by him during a bad patch.
Respectable squad if we ignore the elephant in the room.
Bowling depth will be excellent for the WC but the batting is dodgy. They need Irfan Niazi/Usman to do well from game 1 to secure a spot in that fragile middle order. Fakhar is an option to.
It’s the biggest question that needs an answer in the coming series with hopefully someone grabbing the chance with two hands.
Potential XI for WC
Saim Ayub
Babar Azam (C)
Mohammad Rizwan (WK)
Usman Khan/Irfan Niazi/Fakhar
Iftikhar Ahmed
Imad Wasim
Shadab Khan
Mohammad Amir
Shaheen Afridi
Naseem Shah
Abrar Ahmed
They have 7-8 varied bowling options here, which is incredible with six being capable of the full four overs if needed.
Batting depth is good too but the quality is lacking big time. That middle order might ruin their campaign.
He's been in the squad for a while and is a rated bowler..I'm glad they stuck by him during a bad patch.
When a team loses, its a failure for the whole squad, agreed.
But no one praises anyone else upto cloud 9. Fakhar has so many notable performances in odi yet he never gets insanely praised on this forumn or anywhere else on the entire Internet?
I don't ever do that and can't speak for othersYet when babar and rizwan make a cake video or do some nonsense interview it gets praised to cloud 9 by his loyalist cult?
I haven't seen any poster do that. But yes I have seen people criticize Babar and Rizwan for every ill that affects Pak cricketArgument goes both ways as its a team game, if you want people to stop bashing babar and rizzu and talk about the whole teamz then stop attributing wins to only babar and rizzu and start talking about the entire team.
Even loyal sarfraz fans from 2017 never attributed the whole CT to his name, they acknowledged everyone who contributed except for Ahmed shehzad ofcourse who was the only useless member.
"I haven't seen any poster do that"I think Fakhar does get his due credit on this forum for his ODI performances. But if most of the conversations are about Babar and Rizwan, then obviously there will be less mention of other players
I don't ever do that and can't speak for others
I haven't seen any poster do that. But yes I have seen people criticize Babar and Rizwan for every ill that affects Pak cricket
Now you’ve taken your embarrassment to another thread as well.Are you kidding? 90% of the time I deal with comments such as
If everyone played like rizwan in Australia Test series we would have cremeated Australia even though one of aussie bats averaged 86 on that series lol,
You're ironically starting to sound, text and chat like Pakengfan now.Now you’ve taken your embarrassment to another thread as well.
I said if our other batsmen played as good as Rizwan, who was by far our best performing batsmen in the series, we would have had a higher chance of winning at least one match and could probably have won one.
And also you’re the one who brought this argument up because you lied about what I said and instead of admitting you lied or misremembered you doubled down.
How does that equate to attributing every Pak win to only Babar and Rizwan? I don't think poster tried to imply that. He just stated others didn't bat as well as Rizwan."I haven't seen any poster do that"
Are you kidding? 90% of the time I deal with comments such as
If everyone played like rizwan in Australia Test series we would have cremeated Australia even though one of aussie bats averaged 86 on that series lol,
Or comments such as Rizwan was so amazing and it's because of his contributions Pakistan was able to chase 301 against Afghanistan even though shadab was the main contributor and rizwan was a footnote in that game.
Here are quotes to the whole discussion:You're ironically starting to sound, text and chat like Pakengfan now.
When did I LIE exactly? I have never lied on PP lol.
Also stop saying embrassment, as I said your opinion on me means nothing.
If all of the other batsmen had performed as good as Rizwan we did we would have won a match, it’s that simple.
Rizwan and Abdullah didn't make up for anything, Abdullah and rizwan ended up soft scoring minus that Sri lanka game, his snail pace 46 against Australia wouldn't have done anything if as @160KPH Wrongfully said that if every player had played like rizzu then we would have won against Australia.
You’re mixing up formats again, I made that comment about the Australian Test series.
No pur talk was about the world cup.
I said rizzu only performed during the Sri lankan game, and you said so his 46 and 49 against India don't count?
I responded with did he manage to win?
The og point is irrelevant, dont push and move forward.
What about comments during the 2021 t20 wc against India where everyone attributed everything to babar and rizwan and excluded the bowlers?How does that equate to attributing every Pak win to only Babar and Rizwan? I don't think poster tried to imply that. He just stated others didn't bat as well as Rizwan.
How on earth is any of this misremembering anything?Here are quotes to the whole discussion:
Here is the original quote that I said, you can click on it and see that I was talking about the Australian Test series:
Now you can read what you said today:
Once again, I don’t think you lied. I think you misremembered. My issue is when I point out what I originally said and you double down even though I provide you with the quotes. If you’re wrong just admit it man, we all misremember things, it’s not a big deal.
At this point, I really think you have zero clue of what you’re talking about.How on earth is any of this misremembering anything?
Is this the same nonsense of when you accused me of insulting you? Or calling you a snow flake which I never did.
In none of these posts am I misremembering anything or accusing you of claiming something you didn't?
What are you even on about?
I never ever said this about the WC match. That’s what you’re misremembering.Rizwan and Abdullah didn't make up for anything, Abdullah and rizwan ended up soft scoring minus that Sri lanka game, his snail pace 46 against Australia wouldn't have done anything if as @160KPH Wrongfully said that if every player had played like rizzu then we would have won against Australia.
So how is this me lying or misrembering?At this point, I really think you have zero clue of what you’re talking about.
Here is the quote:
I never ever said this about the WC match. That’s what you’re misremembering.
You’re misremembering because I said this way later on about the Australian Test series, not about the WC match.
You liked a comment making fun of my username and calling me a snowflake.Is this the same nonsense of when you accused me of insulting you? Or calling you a snow flake which I never did.
I didn't like any comment on calling you a snowflake though? Genuinely I didn't. I'm 200% sure I wouldn't?You liked a comment making fun of my username and calling me a snowflake.
Also you don’t like when I say that what you’re doing is embarrassing but you take zero issue with things like you calling me a rat. That’s a bad double standard.
It’s misremembering because you said I was talking about the WC match.. I never made that statement about the WC match.So how is this me lying or misrembering?
You claimed if every player played like rizwan did against Australia we would have won?
I addressed why that's wrong in test and why your 46 claim is wrong as well as rr was the issue in wc and in test the main issue was 2nd innings?
What am I misremembering?
Literally this post is what you’re misremembering. I never said this about the WC match. What don’t you understand?Rizwan and Abdullah didn't make up for anything, Abdullah and rizwan ended up soft scoring minus that Sri lanka game, his snail pace 46 against Australia wouldn't have done anything if as @160KPH Wrongfully said that if every player had played like rizzu then we would have won against Australia.
We wouldn't have, the score was 364 in that game, Imam and Abdullah had outscored rizzu with a 64 and 70, problem was the pace that they played at, the rr was already over 10.
It’s misremembering because you said I was talking about the WC match.. I never made that statement about the WC match.It’s misremembering because you said I was talking about the WC match.. I never made that statement about the WC match.
Literally this post is what you’re misremembering. I never said this about the WC match. What don’t you understand?
@160KPHIt’s misremembering because you said I was talking about the WC match.. I never made that statement about the WC match.
Bruh? You didn't state anything about this game? Only test series? Why didn't you tell me at the beginning, rather then making me go on a goose chase .
It’s misremembering because you said I was talking about the WC match.. I never made that statement about the WC match.
Bruh? You didn't state anything about this game? Only test series? Why didn't you tell me at the beginning, rather then making me go on a goose chase .
Bro that is what I’ve been trying to tell you. We already agree on that Australia match. We were never gonna win after that Warner knock in the WC match, it was already too far gone.
Bro that is what I’ve been trying to tell you. We already agree on that Australia match. We were never gonna win after that Warner knock in the WC match, it was already too far gone.
That’s why I was getting so frustrated. Because I never said that about the WC match. We already agree about that WC match.
Don’t worry about it man and don’t worry there’s no hostility. The thing is that we both already agreed on one of the big arguments and we were both talking past each other. That’s why we were both getting so frustrated, because we both already agree..@160KPH
I apologise for the rat statements, cause I usually use them alot, but
I didn't misremember or lie or anything, that's all I'm saying nor did I make any statement on rizwan solely being to blame for Australia.
Regardless this conversation has gotten confusing and cluttered, and even heated so I'll respectfully back off and I hope theirs no hostility, I also never said anything regarding to any snowflake either.
Anyway I'll back off now.
I'm gonna be honest. I actually have no clue as to what just happened .Don’t worry about it man and don’t worry there’s no hostility. The thing is that we both already agreed on one of the big arguments and we were both talking past each other. That’s why we were both getting so frustrated, because we both already agree..
On the same end though, I also apologize for saying that you were embarassing yourself. I didn’t really mean it, but I think we were both just getting frustrated because we were talking about different things.
No bro we already agree about many of the WC matches.Bro that is what I’ve been trying to tell you. We already agree on that Australia match. We were never gonna win after that Warner knock in the WC match, it was already too far gone.
^^ This is what I've been trying to tell you for the past Hour and a half? I'm now genuinely confused as to what's going on .
Bro same, I tried to stop talking about Imad for the same reason.I'm gonna be honest. I actually have no clue as to what just happened .
Anyway this is the last time I'm mentioning rizwan and Australia again . Just gonna focus on the upcoming NZ series now.
I can’t believe we just debated for like an hour even though we mostly agree on all of the points. We were talking about different things.I'm gonna be honest. I actually have no clue as to what just happened .
Anyway this is the last time I'm mentioning rizwan and Australia again . Just gonna focus on the upcoming NZ series now.
So you already agree thatNo bro we already agree about many of the WC matches.
We had bad opening bowling. Bad spinners. And our batting was not that good.
I think Rizwan is fine as a test bat, but I disagree about Australia because every pakistani batsmen have been historically poor in Australian Test IN THE 2ND INNINGS.I can’t believe we just debated for like an hour even though we mostly agree on all of the points. We were talking about different things.
Just to make it clear, I think Rizwan is a good Test batsmen in SENA conditions, pretty decent in ODI, but way too slow in T20.
Yes all of our bowling was horrible. Shaheen Shah was not the same post injury and I think he was rushed back too fast. Naseem Shah was also our best ODI bowler since his debut but he was gone due to injury.A) Our bowling was terrible
Yes, they have not been good ODI bowlers. Shadab was a good ODI bowler early in his career but not anymore. I hope he goes back to his old self in ODI. Although I think Shadab is a solid T20 bowler.B) We had non existent spin to the point that usama, Shadab and Nawaz were worse then part timers.
Also yes, almost all of our batsmen underperformed. The performances you listed are our few good performances. I think Saim + Fakhar opening duo in ODI will help our batting a lot once Saim hits his full form.C) And our batting was dreadful besides 2 bats(Abdullah and Rizwan) from Sri Lanka game and one bat( Fakhar) from NZ game?
The disagreement I had about Rizwan’s test performances in Australia were not with you, it was with someone else, and that’s part of the reason the argument got so confusing.Acha khair let it rest here, cause I'm totally lost on what the agreements are and what disagreements there are at this point.
Read between the lines. It's a metaphor and sarcasm which you have failed to detect."I haven't seen any poster do that"
Are you kidding? 90% of the time I deal with comments such as
If everyone played like rizwan in Australia Test series we would have cremeated Australia even though one of aussie bats averaged 86 on that series lol,
Or comments such as Rizwan was so amazing and it's because of his contributions Pakistan was able to chase 301 against Afghanistan even though shadab was the main contributor and rizwan was a footnote in that game.
How can something be a metaphorical and sarcastic and read between the lines at the same time .Read between the lines. It's a metaphor and sarcasm which you have failed to detect.
While he didn't deserve chances over performing Sahibzada Farhan, but Pak awam is too sentimental to accept the facts. Better to give him one more series to prove himself so that we don't see any social media trends thereafter.After doing so poorly in fitness tests, can't understand why he was selected.
Basically he's setting a precedent to all the emerging players in Pakistan that fitness doesn't matter.
As for the rest of the squad, I'm not too disappointed. We have way more match winners than I could have hoped for.
the only reason why i think Zaman made the squad is becouse he can bowl all his four overs outside the powerplay and is a specalist death bowler.They already have Amir,Shaheen,Naseem and Imad who can bowl with new ball.This squad is stronger then our 2023 drama, but I still don't get some the decisions.
Ali was our best psl bowler so to see zaman khan given the go ahead makes zeronsense to me.
How did Azam get selected again? So many better options to take. And you already have a backup keeper now.
Rest of the squad is fine, but I'd have taken saud or Abdullah over Azam, better to have a backup opener then a backup keeper.
Even if he didnt make the 15 how an earth is Haseebullah prefered over Haris is absolutely ridicilous.Haris left out again? What a joke. Haris is 10 times the player Azam Khan will ever be. Like for like replacement but a far superior player.
Rauf is getting back to fitness pluss he had a injury not long ago he will make the squad unless Zaman bowls extrodinary.Good decision by Captain Azam getting rid of Rauf. Niazi is a good pick ,guy is a great fielder too.
Azam Khan fills the terrible selection quota once again.
Other than that its a decent squad.
My 11 in batting order
Saim Rizwan Babar Usman Niazi Iftikhar Imad Amir Shaheen Naseem Abrar
InjuredWhere is Haris Rauf?
I like Abrar in there. He was the 3rd highest wicket taker in the PSL and his econ was under 8. The rest of your points i agree.Zaman Khan a rubbish selection and even more useless selection is that of haseebullah.
Abrar is also a mediocre selection.
Irfan Niazi is also mediocre and struggles to hit sixes, which is essential batting down the order.
The rest looks fine.
If you’re having to choose between Fakhar and Usama for the playing xi when you have 7 bowling options then you can easily take out one of the all rounders for a genuine batsman.
Your bowling attack won’t be affected but it’ll strengthen your batting line up.
Saim Ayub
Mohammad Rizwan
Babar Azam
Fakhar Zaman
Usman Khan
That’s the top 5 (Rizbar ain’t going anywhere)
Now it’s a toss up between Ifthikar Ahmed, Imad Wasim, Shadab Khan and Abrar Ahmed.
There’s two ways you can go about this, if you’re playing Abrar, then Shadab isn’t need. You don’t need to leggies in an xi.
If you’re playing both Shadab and Abrar then you have to choose between Imad and Ifthikar.
These are your words.How can something be a metaphorical and sarcastic and read between the lines at the same time .
what baffles me is you want Muhammad Harris to play 6 down, we already have 5 openers in the squad unless you want to drop babar or rizwanThe lack of Mohammad Haris and the inclusion of Azam Khan is baffling.
Azam Khan’s fitness has only gotten worse and he’s failed in every single international match he’s ever played. Yet he continues to get selected.
People focus to much on PSL performances. If you have performed for the national team in the recent series pre-psl, then it don’t really make much difference how that players PSL went .
Same also applies vice -versa.
National performance should always come before PSL performances.
Case being —
Fakhar. Had a decent tour at number for Pak against New Zealand . Was by far the most impactful player . Him having a poor PSL don’t really matter .
Ifti- Azam- very poor in the New Zealand series . Had decent PSL but both selected again.
Saim Ayub- has had a very poor start to his t20 career . Like the guy and has potential but he was pretty dismal in the New Zealand series . Selected again on the back of PSL.
Basically have the latter 3 batsmen who have been selected on PSL , but not really delivered for the national team ( especially Saim and Azam).
A bit concerning for me. Some players are just not cut for the top level .
Don’t think it matters. Some players are domestic bullies.bro it does matter upcoming series is going to be played on the same grounds as PSL was played on same conditions too, the previous series was in newzealnd players perform different under diffrent condions pitches etc..
selectors didn’t watch the New Zealand series ? Ifthikhar ???? When was the last time Ifthikhar performed against top teams? Nepal ? Anyways it’s New Zealand C team. Hope Ifthikhar gets exposed.
I do want to drop Rizwan from opening and play Haris at 3. But Haris has actually had some success against international attacks including in the T20 WC, while Azam Khan hasn’t even gotten past the run 10 run mark in any of the 8 T20 internationals he’s played. Haris hits from ball one, he could play #6 better than Azam Khan.what baffles me is you want Muhammad Harris to play 6 down, we already have 5 openers in the squad unless you want to drop babar or rizwan
azam khans inclusion has nothing to do with harris not being selected
I still remember the match thread, everybody agreed that Shaheen won the match in the first innings itself. Rizwan and Babar just ensured it was an amphatic victoryWhat about comments during the 2021 t20 wc against India where everyone attributed everything to babar and rizwan and excluded the bowlers?
In fact despite the bowlers restricting India to a subpar total, people were making comments such as "Shaheen could have bowled and fielded better but instead had to rely on his drama bazi hero antics".
Not everybodyI still remember the match thread, everybody agreed that Shaheen won the match in the first innings itself. Rizwan and Babar just ensured it was an amphatic victory
babar - openerI do want to drop Rizwan from opening and play Haris at 3. But Haris has actually had some success against international attacks including in the T20 WC, while Azam Khan hasn’t even gotten past the run 10 run mark in any of the 8 T20 internationals he’s played. Haris hits from ball one, he could play #6 better than Azam Khan.
He shouldn't have been selected in the first place, but yeah I guess no choice. If he performs then I wont complain either as it can only be beneficial for the team, but still cannot agree with his initial selection on merit.While he didn't deserve chances over performing Sahibzada Farhan, but Pak awam is too sentimental to accept the facts. Better to give him one more series to prove himself so that we don't see any social media trends thereafter.
I initially misread and thought you posted a clip of yourself with your views.I believe the nepotism culture is strong in Pakistan.
Idk if you watched my clip on YouTube that I sent about Azam, I posted it here somewhere, but in that video azam Khan talked about how moin Khan decided to drop him for a year until azam does gym and the moment he did gym azam got rehired to play psl.
Similarly ik for a fact that Hasebullah is connected or belongs to a cricketing family. Same case for imam and shan.
These types of players keep finding a way in.
Also key thing to note: I watched azam khan's innings on YouTube with the highlights being listed 4 years back.
Azam 4 to 5 years ago wasn't obese, he was overweight yes, but his fitness looks similar to Sharjeel Khan or Inzimam, he seemed around 100 KG or 105 at most.
Flashforward 4 years he's hella obese now and looks 100x more plumb? He was recorded at 130KG, horrible fitness standards.
Just imagine ICC pull a fast one on Pakistan and decide the tournament will be a Test championship with a dukes red ball.babar - opener
rizwan - opener
saim - opener
fakhar - opener
usman - opener
harris - opener
where are you going to fit your middle order? are you going in with you no bowlers or no middle order?
and who are you going to to drop from your top order?
you cant just stick in a player just because you want to you also have to look at team combination