offstump
First Class Player
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Runs
- 2,731
wow amazing catch by ganguly..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im sure the united nations and other international bodies will be monitoring that nuke attack by Afridi very closely to adminster itsa effects on bilateral relations and stability in the region.DM said:To be frank, I think his actions today were in breach of the geneva conventions.
Nice catch that was mind blowing come on manGasherbrum said:nice catch by Ganguly!! was he the only one celebrating ?
DM said:To be frank, I think his actions today were in breach of the geneva conventions.
cavin420 said:...they should have sent shoaib akhtar rather rana...saying that...rana goes...same as always ganguly easy catch extra actinggg..over acting i should say similar to saeed anwars catch he took
nafajafam said:shoaib is gonna bowl soon. no need for him to bat
True, and I think India are within their rights to invoke the Nuremberg tribunals code that are normally reserved for war crimesUJ said:Im sure the united nations and other international bodies will be monitoring that nuke attack by Afridi very closely to adminster itsa effects on bilateral relations and stability in the region.![]()
They will have to score atleast 480 to avoid the follow on.tahaqureshi said:What is the folllow on mark?
Afridi scored it of 78 balls after he got his century he stopped ball number 79 and got out on ball number 80.Geordie Ahmed said:actually i think it was the 10th fastest cos Afridi's was quicker than 81 balls - infact it might still be 9th fastest, depends how much Afridi got it in?
yes it is, if team gets out conceeding a leed of more than 200 runs then the other captain has the option to enforce the follow on.tahaqureshi said:480 is follow on score I think..?
kashmiri said:should pakistan not have stayed on 10 overs more and declared on 750+, that couldhave messed india up psychologically
DM said:) - Current Cricinfo headline:
"Afridi and Akmal bleed India"
Cricinfo are joining in on the brutal metaphor!!
kashmiri said:should pakistan not have stayed on 10 overs more and declared on 750+, that couldhave messed india up psychologically
Nauman said:yes it is, if team gets out conceeding a leed of more than 200 runs then the other captain has the option to enforce the follow on.
Baron said:You know what, we should start calling Kami the silent assassin, the man made his 102 in a 81 balls, i more than Afridi. The guy was brilliant. Never made any mistakes and looked so comfortable. But what about Afridi, 4 sixers in a row against Harbi, that was awesome. Never have i experienced such exciting test batting!
But whats with the commentators, Holding and Jones. They dont seem to think we can bowl them out? They seem to talk about India batting for 3 days or that kinda crap. Please dont confuse our bowling attack with theres!
Nauman said:Afridi scored it of 78 balls after he got his century he stopped ball number 79 and got out on ball number 80.
Asim2Good said:even in commentary they wrote " India Bleeding runs here")
)
)
badxhah said:how do u calculate a follow on score ?
badxhah said:how do u calculate a follow on score ?
badxhah said:how do u calculate a follow on score ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kashmiri
should pakistan not have stayed on 10 overs more and declared on 750+, that couldhave messed india up psychologically
dont you think he have unleashed enough psychological trauma already - have some compassion
cavin420 said:hey which no is afridi on the list of hitting sixers now??? @ ahmed