What's new

Pakistani bowling is outdated compared to other teams

AlphaFighter

First Class Captain
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Runs
4,443
Post of the Week
1
I read a gem of a post in this thread and i will quote it i.e Post 54 in the following thread

http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...elephant-in-the-room-the-Pakistan-pace-attack

In Austalia's second innings, it was disappointing to see that all the bowlers were attacking the batsmen by targeting stumps, and were thrashed eventually. It was really a bad strategy. If you know you can not get batsman out and know their intentions that they are looking for quick runs. You can not feed them balls to their body and that too in MCG. I wonder why they did not bowl the negative lines on 5th morning to ensure that australia do not score quickly. I still remember a test match between India and South Africa where South Africa was on sails to chase 450+ target, but then suddenly for last 30 overs or so. Indian bowlers started bowling negatively: overs were full of wides, slower balls, high bouncers -- just to kill time, and finally came out with a draw where there seemed to be an evident loss for them. Why pakistan bowlers are not that smart? What is stopping them to think before they bowl to a batsman. Changing bowlers, captain, coaches will not change anything (which is happening erringly for last 10-15 years) unless our cricketers become strategically smart. India, no matter how poor their bowling resources are, but they play their cricket smartly and with less effort, and on the field I don't think it has something to do with BCCI. The quicker we realise our shortcomings, instead of blaming PCB,BCCI,ICC, foreign/local coaches,etc. the better it is for our cricket. Different match situations demand different reactions, and these players, not coaches, need to learn how to execute plans for expected outcomes. If it was clear that Steve smith was after quick runs, why on earth bowlers did not bowl negatively to him. The question is not about changing players, but should be about, do we have smart capable players who know what to do, how to do and when? Untill then, it will always be PANICSTAN.

I have always had these views but i just didn't know how to express it but well done to the poster for correctly diagnosing the issue well.

Indian pace bowlers may not be the most talented or gifted world wide although the gap between the Pakistani and Indian pace attack in the last 6-7 years has significantly narrowed and in fact i take no shame in admitting the Indian pace attack as of now is more dependable and reliable compared to the Pakistani pace attack and under Kohli they will operate with the right attitude.

But one massive benefit of the IPL is that the Indian bowlers have learnt how to operate under pressure. When the batsmen are going after them, they don't panic because they know they have the batting strength to chase down any score unlike the Pakistani batting line up. But another thing which impresses me a lot is that if the conditions are absolutely flat with no assistance for the pacers or spinners, they don't blindly follow the Imran Khan doctrine of "Attack and get wickets", they understand that the conditions just does not suit aggressive, attacking bowling. They instead choose to minimize the damage where they resort to a disciplined approach of bowling to a batsman's weakness, bowling to their captain's fields, eliminating the boundaries and being content to give away singles instead. They have also learn't thanks to the ten years of IPL exposure to bowl negative lines i.e. the wide outside the off stump yorker, the slower ball bouncers, the back of the hand slower ball, the finger spin slower ball, understanding the angles in the field and the batsmen's hitting zones and where likely the batsmen are going to hit out.

Apart from the SA match which the poster excellently quoted where Dhoni's masterful defensive tactics ensured a clear shot SA win became a draw. India has done this masterfully many other times as well. If people watch the India-Bangladesh match in the T-20 WC, in the final over Dhoni specifically instructed the bowler to bowl outside the offstump to minimize boundary hitting and to ensure dot balls and the bowler obliged.

Similarly in the T-20 games against Pakistan in the WC in 2014 and 2016, the Pakistani batsmen again followed the 90's philosophy of going slow in the first 10 overs assuming that they will successfully go all guns blazing in the final 10 overs. Guess what, Indian bowlers weren't even striving for wickets, they were content with bowling dot balls after dot balls and the pressure told on the players.

If you contrast this with the Pakistani pace attack, we are still operating like the 80's and 90's where the pacers don't mix things up well, continue to attack and attack and don't have the intelligence to understand that in flat wickets, you can't strive for wickets and you have to instead strive to bowl dot balls, eliminate boundary balls and restrict the opposition to singles. The captain's that we have do not have the creativity, imagination to set run restricting fields neither do they have the discipline to bowl to their fields either.

Just as an example Wahab Riaz's delivery to Steve Smith in the T-20 WC match where he kept on bowling at 145-150 km/hr, he didn't change a single thing, smith exposed his stumps and instead of firing one in on the stumps he followed the batsman.

I don't know how and when our pacers will adapt to modern times. The Pakistani players have definately suffered from being banned from the IPL as they would have been exposed to the very best players, in absolutely flat conditions. BPL, CPL is an inferior league where the top international players dont take part, and when you don't face the top notch players you don't learn from the best. The English T-20 and BBL are in the middle.

Not sure how much the PSL will teach the players, if it continues to be held in UAE, i am not sure it will be that useful because our players will only be continuously be playing on spinning, UAE conditions which are not like high run scoring conditions you find in India and Pakistan.

Once the Australian tour is over, i hope Mickey Arthur will be given a full reign to do what he deems to be the best for the team. Since June the team has been on the run and he hasn't even had time to hold a full fledged off season training camp and proper time to meet the selectors, observe domestic players e.t.c.
 
The problem is that most of the players do not use their brain.

As you pointed out that delivery from Wahab to Smith in the T20 WC. Anyone else would have gone for the fully exposed stumps.

These guys need to try new things but if they can't even do the basics then clearly something is wrong in the head.
 
The problem is that most of the players do not use their brain.

As you pointed out that delivery from Wahab to Smith in the T20 WC. Anyone else would have gone for the fully exposed stumps.

These guys need to try new things but if they can't even do the basics then clearly something is wrong in the head.

It's the environment. When the most mediocre player continues to play against the best i.e. Indian bowlers in the IPL vs the very best every year in a grueling 2-3 month period, even they will develop and pick up things and take it to water. Pakistani players being banned from IPL is what has resulted in us being 10 years behind the rest.
 
Bowling negative line in Test cricket should not be encouraged. It's not good for the format. The problem is with your batting unit, if they are unable to survive for some 50 odd overs on a flat patta, there's not much your bowlers can do at that stage.
 
It's the environment. When the most mediocre player continues to play against the best i.e. Indian bowlers in the IPL vs the very best every year in a grueling 2-3 month period, even they will develop and pick up things and take it to water. Pakistani players being banned from IPL is what has resulted in us being 10 years behind the rest.

Past Pakistani bowlers like Wasim, Waqar, Akther didn't play in IPL. They performed well against India because of their unique skills and as surprise package (Indian batmen having not played against that kind of bowlers!) I think this is lame excuse (not playing in IPL), in that case actually Pakistani bowlers (and batsmen) should act as "surprise package" to rest of the world as they are not exposed much! Every coin has two faces!

IPL alone cannot improve performances! During IPL, Indian team also faced worst circumstances (whitewashes in England and Australia) and FYI again IPL was blamed for this! The actual reason for that was different (transition) and pointing everything towards IPL was rubbish!

The reason India (and other teams) are doing well is because of proper professionalism and of course talent! IPL is there mainly for money and partially for development.

England doesn't play in IPL, then how they are doing so well? Except that they play at home and you don't! (which is your own problem!) Anyhow UAE is better home for you especially the pitches! Now please don't tell that Pakistani Cricket has not improved just because they don't play against India (only difference between Pak and England)! That will backfire and put India as the top-most team for your discomforts!

So the reason for Pak's cricketing decline (like WI) is simply because of poor administration/management and also maybe lack of talent (though I'm not sure of this, because both WI & Pak are capable of producing special talents! Just worst administration and pointing-towards-others-cheap-game)
 
Blaming entirely to the batting unit when the bowl was reversing is not valid.In fact, except for some collapses, Pakistan's batting has little bit improved over the years. We don't see totals of under 100 or 120's too many these days. Obviously, they are not the best, but they are on the right path because of reasonable backing of players such as Sami, Azhar, Asad and Sarfaraz, by the PCB. At least, one thing pakistan admin. has done is getting rid of sloggers such as Umar Akmal, Shehzad completely from the test cricket, which is just fine.
 
And btw, its Indian bowling who bowls negatively most often than not..Only thing in their favour is the great fielding which saves almost 100 runs in every ODI.
 
Add to that, Pakistan players also pay no heed to how the other team is playing and what strategy they are executing.

When asked to Dhoni in T20 WC match in 2016 vs pakistan that, why he bowled fast bowlers for last 3/4 overs when spinners were performing superbly . And his reply was , "I just wanted to see how the pitch is behaving for the fast bowlers as they have to face 4 fast bowlers in their innings, and I am happy that there is nothing in it for fast bowlers..". It was this match where Pakistan played 4 fast bowlers on a rank turner. I mean, how can they misread the pitch which behaved entirely opposite.


I am not sure anyone in the present Pakistan team even thinks to that level. Cricket has now become a bit of mind game, where you have to show your smartness on the field. First Australians, now Indians have been doing this quite effectively. Still remember, in most of India vs Pakistan matches in post 2003 world cup, trick was to throw the ball at the end where Inzi is running.

I am not sure whether Pakistan players even discuss these things. They only know to work in one mode that is to attack-&-implode. And these things can not be taught be coaches. These are certain things which the players learn themselves when they play domestic cricket, or even the learning goes on in international cricket.

In this regard, I really like the attitude of Imad Wasim, who said that he takes every game as a learning opportunity, instead of a test. That is why, he does not panic much.
 
And btw, its Indian bowling who bowls negatively most often than not..Only thing in their favour is the great fielding which saves almost 100 runs in every ODI.

Sometimes, conditions force bowlers to use tactics, but even then, Indian bowling overall has hardly been negative. Shami, Umesh and Bumrah have amazing Strike Rates, so not sure if we can call the attack negative.
 
And btw, its Indian bowling who bowls negatively most often than not..Only thing in their favour is the great fielding which saves almost 100 runs in every ODI.

Er in the 5 matches how many times did we bowl negatively? Or in the NZ and WI series before? Even the example stated above is under Dhoni and not Kohli
 
No bowler bowls negatively in bowler friendly wickets.. Since Kohli been captain, this team is playing mostly on rank turners at home..The question raised in this thread is whether at the time of bowler adverse conditions should bowler resort to negative tactics to stem the flow of the runs or not? And I think, it is deemed good if that can help you win / draw matches.

Since the advent of T20, modern batsman lose patience and control when they are not scoring runs. Gone are the days of Dravid's, Chanderpaul's, when they stay at the crease for days and do not pick boundaries frequently. Bowlers must react to the conditions and the situation of match, instead of bowling with single-minded madness, which happened in Australia's innings.

Bowling negatively is like not batting aggressively, and only looking for singles.
 
Not to disparage Indian bowlers..

Negative bowling is an arsenal that can make a bowler complete.And in my opinion, Indian bowlers, despite their limited skill set are very good learners of the game, and highlighting that SA match is to make a point that even when things were not going in their favour, they tried bowling differently for their team. They know what to do, and try their best to deliver under constraints, and Indian fielding which has improved by leaps and bounds supports their bowlers.
 
And btw, its Indian bowling who bowls negatively most often than not..Only thing in their favour is the great fielding which saves almost 100 runs in every ODI.

you think Indian Bowlers are bad enough to concede 400 runs in every ODI.

kuch to sharam karo bhai.
 
Past Pakistani bowlers like Wasim, Waqar, Akther didn't play in IPL. They performed well against India because of their unique skills and as surprise package (Indian batmen having not played against that kind of bowlers!) I think this is lame excuse (not playing in IPL), in that case actually Pakistani bowlers (and batsmen) should act as "surprise package" to rest of the world as they are not exposed much! Every coin has two faces!

IPL alone cannot improve performances! During IPL, Indian team also faced worst circumstances (whitewashes in England and Australia) and FYI again IPL was blamed for this! The actual reason for that was different (transition) and pointing everything towards IPL was rubbish!

The reason India (and other teams) are doing well is because of proper professionalism and of course talent! IPL is there mainly for money and partially for development.

England doesn't play in IPL, then how they are doing so well? Except that they play at home and you don't! (which is your own problem!) Anyhow UAE is better home for you especially the pitches! Now please don't tell that Pakistani Cricket has not improved just because they don't play against India (only difference between Pak and England)! That will backfire and put India as the top-most team for your discomforts!

So the reason for Pak's cricketing decline (like WI) is simply because of poor administration/management and also maybe lack of talent (though I'm not sure of this, because both WI & Pak are capable of producing special talents! Just worst administration and pointing-towards-others-cheap-game)
[MENTION=5942]AlphaFighter[/MENTION] this is a better explanation. IPL can teach the players a bit about dealing with pressure but not the fundamentals of the game.
 
India has good fielding unit that shields the weaknesses of Indian bowlers. I did not quote any number. Got to know how well you regard them when you pointed out 400.:jimmy

Anyway, crux is not whether Indian bowlers are good or not. It is about how well they operate with limited capabilities, and why can not Pak bowlers learn something from them..
 
India has good fielding unit that shields the weaknesses of Indian bowlers. I did not quote any number. Got to know how well you regard them when you pointed out 400.:jimmy

Anyway, crux is not whether Indian bowlers are good or not. It is about how well they operate with limited capabilities, and why can not Pak bowlers learn something from them..

Why do you think their abilities are limited when compared to Amir, Wahab, Rahat Ali, Sohail Khan? To me this bowling lineup seems more limited than Shami, Bhuvi, Yadav, Ishant
 
The thing with Indian bowlers is that they get the basics right- put the ball in the right areas. They don't panic & then lose the plot.

Having said that, Aus is a nightmare for most touring sides.
 
It's the environment. When the most mediocre player continues to play against the best i.e. Indian bowlers in the IPL vs the very best every year in a grueling 2-3 month period, even they will develop and pick up things and take it to water. Pakistani players being banned from IPL is what has resulted in us being 10 years behind the rest.
Not sure which mediocre indian bowler have developed after playing in IPL. :inti
 
Limited capabilities in terms of speed, not-bowling-bouncers-at-will,etc.
There could be other aspects on which a fast bowler is judged. Even with these short-comings Indian bowlers are bowling superbly to produce favourable results.
 
Also, speed should not be only criteria to judge a fast bowler, which is quite prevalent here in pakistan. In early days, teams did not have bowling machines and other equipment to train themselves, so speed was an important aspect to intimidate batsmen. Now,opposing teams can train easily with a bowling machine that can feed them even 180 kph+ balls. So just to ball fast, to fulfil the sentiment and remain glorious in books of pakistan media, Pakistani bowlers just want to ball fast without even considering the outcome. Time has changed, T20 made batsmen more aggressive. They are not worried whether they are scoring runs through edges, or mishits, and they don't even bog down. Modern day successful batsmen is a run accumulator with string defence. On the other hand, modern day fast bowler, is a smart operator, who is even ready to compromise his speed, if that can fetch him results.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Absolutely, very good OP.

Also there is nothing like negative or positive bowling, if it is within the rules and legal then I'm doing it? If it is negative then why is it within the rules. It is as rightly said playing smart intelligent cricket.

I remember some occasions when MS had placed a 7-2 field and bowlers bowled wide outside the off stump, to ensure nothing more than singles are given at the very max.
 
[MENTION=5942]AlphaFighter[/MENTION] this is a better explanation. IPL can teach the players a bit about dealing with pressure but not the fundamentals of the game.

People are undervaluing the IPL, i fail to see how can inferior players playing against, with and even sharing a dressing room, practice sessions with the best players in the world is a complete waste. If 100 players have this privilege, then you can surely bet that atleast 5 players will benefit massively.
 
Absolutely, very good OP.

Also there is nothing like negative or positive bowling, if it is within the rules and legal then I'm doing it? If it is negative then why is it within the rules. It is as rightly said playing smart intelligent cricket.

I remember some occasions when MS had placed a 7-2 field and bowlers bowled wide outside the off stump, to ensure nothing more than singles are given at the very max.

Hahaha, Dhoni did that against Australia in a test match to stem the flow of runs after they got off to a solid start and it worked like a masterstroke where the run rate slowed down and the Australian batsmen got frustrated.

Ian Chappel was so mad that he wrote an article lobbying against it the very next day.
 
Yes, but more importantly, it is up to individual how much he learns from the discussion with other great players and in the international games they play. A bowler like Mohammad Sami will play in a same way even you make him play 2000 international games, and make him sit and get guide lines from Akram, Mcgrath, or anyone else. Much better and living example is of Afridi, who has not changed a single bit in his batting even after playing for so long. That simply means some players do not want to learn.

On the other hand, there are examples of Rahul Dravid, who transformed his batting style completely to suit every situation. Even though he could not generate much power to hit sixes at will, but he compensated his shortcomings by hitting more frequent fours and running quick singles. I do not know whether any player in the current squad, except for Quad of Misbah-Azhar-Asad-Younis are analysing their own game, and where they can improve.

Further, in my opinion, getting few sermons from legends can not help much.Anyone in this age can watch videos of previous matches and learn. However, more important aspect is how much an individual player carry himself in a game and wants to learn based on given team requirements. Whether playing a rash shot or not when 80 odd runs are needed of 25 overs with 5 wickets is a good choice or not, is up to the individual players judgement. And these things can only be learnt or felt in a match (domestic/international) and not by getting guide lines from coaches and mentors.

Of course, coaches and mentors have a role to play, and that is to guide a player to some extent; but execution is under the player's control. A player of Umar Akmal/Afridi's mindset would try to play a rash shot in this situation, which produces an opportunity for the opposing team; while, a sensible player like MSD will try to play overs and only when needed will try to hit. So there are many approaches to solve a problem. Important is, which approach is a better fit in a game is what players should be learnt.

Now coming to my second point, IPL/PSL/BPL/CCL, etc. are a good platform where a player can show his calibre. So even if, Pak players are not playing IPL should not be taken for granted. They have their own PSL, where they should be learning to overcome their weaker areas.
 
People are undervaluing the IPL, i fail to see how can inferior players playing against, with and even sharing a dressing room, practice sessions with the best players in the world is a complete waste. If 100 players have this privilege, then you can surely bet that atleast 5 players will benefit massively.

No one is saying IPL doesn't benefit Indian cricket. However, you are over doing it.

You are arguing that Pakistani bowlers do not mix it up and that isn't completely true. The current crop doesn't mix it up, but remember Akthar? He bowled slow balls long before the IPL came along and that's because he understood the game. The current bowlers just run in and throw the ball.

Mixing it up has more to do with intelligence rather than skill developed in IPL.
 
IPL helps batsmen more than bowlers.

Rahul is a good recent example of it. He has grown from backup test opener to arguably India's second best all-format batsman and the metamorphosis all happened over a single IPL season where he suddenly learned how to rotate the strike and added a lot more shots to his repertoire.

One would think the likes of Akmal, Babar Azam would have benefited (or benefit) if they had spent multiple seasons in IPL playing together with the likes of Kohli, AB, Gayle (as Rahul has) and against some of the best LOI bowlers of recent times.
 
I am just curious, why Pakistan team don't have full-time psychologist with them. I remember, they sought psychologist help before 2009 WC and in Champions Trophy, and on both occasions team performed brilliantly.And I did not hear about that guy Maqbool Babri after that.

This team really needs help in mental conditioning, so that they do not hesitate to experiment a little in the game.
 
I am just curious, why Pakistan team don't have full-time psychologist with them. I remember, they sought psychologist help before 2009 WC and in Champions Trophy, and on both occasions team performed brilliantly.And I did not hear about that guy Maqbool Babri after that.

This team really needs help in mental conditioning, so that they do not hesitate to experiment a little in the game.
Mental conditioning only helps players who want to learn, how many in the current Pak setup are ready to evolve, that goes for players & coaches at various levels?
 
Fair point:

But there are people such as Azhar, Asad, Sarfaraz, Sami, Younis, Misbah who are willing to evolve and put in hard work. Poor learners such as Akmals should be discarded forever for the betterment of the team.
 
Some very good discussion. More that out dated, I'll say it's out aged.

I haven't seen any post regarding this, from which, I feel it's not taken seriously by any poster here. Apart from very few individuals like Hadlee, Imran, McGrath, Walsh & may be Anderson/Styen heading to that list - more or less I haven't seen top quality pace bowlers performing after 35 in Internationals - that's by PAK standard 29-31. Most of the top pace bowlers reached pick as a complete bowler at around 29 & 2/3 years either side. After that, they played few years in their 30s & retired from Internationals.

Also, one critical point missed by Inzi is that, whenever you have couple of aged pacers, you need couple of young pair to do the donkey job. Most successful attacks with 3 pacers had the same formula - I can name one by one, but anyone can check that from CI. Inzi has sent a pace attack with 3 pacers in their mid to late 30s - only man under 26 is coming back after 5 years - skill, pace, out-date/advanced ..... nothing will work if your pacers start to breathe heavy after 5 overs spell & almost on their knees after 2nd spell. Besides, PAK plays with 4 bowler strategy - this is bound to happen. In UAE, it's not exposed because of 85 overs slavery from Yasir, which already has started to impact his game; but it has to change in WI.

Unless, at least 3 U25 pacers are not picked, excluding Amir for WI; I don't think we'll see much difference. Once that happens, we can actually know what's the situation, at present, 35-38 years old Wahab or Sohail or Irfan is not the conclusive evidence.
 
Nice point, but at the same time it is not ideal to blame inzi. Sohail, Rahat performed in bits and pieces in England, and he is giving them enough continuous chances before they will be discarded for longer time period.Any new bowler, would not have produced different result in MCG, and at the sametime it would also be unfair for the newcomer. Inzi, played for 120 matches, knows all these factors, and he is doing his work very well.

Sohail's fitness is exposed and at the same time everyone saw the pathetic bowling by Wahab & Yasir. Amir, on the other hand, is still not fully ready for tests, and should focus more on ODI and T20's to deliver some match winning performances to get his confidence back. He still has not lost his mojo, but his over-desperation to get wickets is a bigger mind block for him. He really needs some time away from tests may be 6 months or an year, and start things afresh. He has shown that after his come back that he can bowl those in swingers and can bait any batsmen. But his luck not is not in his favour that so many catches were dropped off his bowling. And someone who has not played a competitive cricket for 5 years and suddenly playing almost every game is little bit not good for his body. And this why, Inzi is not rushing Asif into the team, as Amir still have time left in his career, and can get many more chances to make a comeback, but for Asif, if he is selected , this will be his last chance.

Hard work has started for Yasir: He now knows he is toothless outside subcontinent, and needs to work really hard to develop more variations and stock deliveries. This wont be easy and it will take some time. Inzi did well to not select him in ODIs, any more failures and his confidence level will be at all time low.
 
Said this for a very long time and people just think that ournbowling is pretty good when in fact it's borderline incompetent.

2009 to early 2010 was the period where we were beginning to think that finally after the 2 W's, Akhtar etc; our bowling might be going in the right direction with Amir's induction who joined Asif in partnership.

When you've got bowlers who can't swing and seam the ball early and when you see the same ball doing just that by the opposition when we bat just leaves you in to think what exactly are they doing that ours can't.

Our players have always been mentally and physically weak more mentally though than anything else. Imran Khan was mentally strong and took that team from the 80's and even though he had some players like Miandad wuo was mentally strong too and got the team to fight out in the 92 WC and won it.

Pakistan since then have struggled to find a leader who can instill such fighting spirit and mentally make them stronger infact I considered Wasim Akram as one who was from Imran Khan's school of thoughts but was just about a decent captain eventually when he got it.

Pakistan need a psychologist who can mentally assess these players and get to know their fears and help them overcome such things which is hurting them and more importantly the team.
 
More then outdated it's incredibly overrated by most fans.
 
Thought i would bump this thread. Same issues with Pakistani bowling. We have not mastered the art of either knowing how to take wickets or how to keep things tight, dry up the runs if the wickets are not coming. Other teams have now moved on and now try different things like wide outside the off stump yorker, different slower ball yorkers i.e. back of the hand, finger spin, slower ball bouncers i.e. finger spin or back off the hand, intelligent field placings where they know the angles in the field and where they can predict the batsman's scoring range, shots and ofcourse backed up by top class, reliable fielding.

Everything about Pakistan Cricket is out dated. And what scares me is that over here we are not even talking about Batting and captaincy yet.
 
Bowlers delivered a par score just about. Had Amir been fit and a better option than Hafeez we would have had them at par.

Its the batting thats the damn problem. Dot balls and mental midgetry.
 
I thought the bowlers were very good and most of them did their job well.

Junaid for Riaz will make some difference, but not that much.

Hopefully, a better bowler is called up and the bowling can restrict teams to 315-20, which is pretty good in this modern era.

Batting line up won't chase it, but you can't expect them to bundle teams out for 250 or something (unless it is cloudy).
 
Back
Top