What's new

Pakistani PM Imran Khan says escalation of Iran conflict would be 'disastrous'

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,868
Ines Pohl: Mr. Khan, you probably have one of the most difficult jobs in the world. Your country has to balance ties with the United States and China. Beijing wants to invest in Pakistan, but that, of course, strains your relationship with Washington. Your country also shares a border with conflict-ridden countries like Afghanistan and Iran. How are you managing all that?

Imran Khan: I joined politics because I felt that Pakistan has tremendous potential. When I was growing up, Pakistan had the fastest growing economy in Asia, which served as a model for development in the 1960s. But we lost our way. My objective for coming into politics was to regain that potential.

It's true that we live in a difficult neighborhood and we have to balance our actions. For instance, Saudi Arabia is one of Pakistan's greatest friends and has always been there for us. Then we have Iran, with which we have always maintained a good relationship. Therefore, a military conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran would be disastrous for Pakistan. We are trying our best to make sure that ties between these two countries do not deteriorate. It is a region that cannot afford another conflict.

Then there is Afghanistan. Pakistan is doing its best to bring peace to Afghanistan. It is a country that has suffered so much in the past 40 years. We pray that the Taliban, the Americans and the Afghan government achieve peace.

Ines Pohl: Last year, India and Pakistan were very close to war. Ever since Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi scrapped the special status for Indian-administrated Kashmir in August 2019, we see that the situation has become worse. What is your government doing to defuse these tensions?

Imran Khan: I was the first leader to warn the world about what is happening in India. India has been taken over by an extremist ideology known as "Hindutva." It is the ideology of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). The RSS, a political organization founded in 1925, was inspired by the German Nazis, and its founding fathers believed in racial supremacy. Just as the Nazi ideology was built on hatred for minorities, the RSS ideology is also based on hatred for Muslims and other minorities, including Christians.

It is a tragedy for India — and for its neighbors — that the country has been taken over by the RSS, an organization which also assassinated the great Mahatma Gandhi. A nuclear-armed country is being run by extremists, and Kashmir has been under siege for over five months.

Ines Pohl: Are you willing to talk to PM Modi about these issues?

Imran Khan: After I became prime minister, I made an effort to talk to the Indian government and PM Modi. In my first speech as prime minister, I said that if India moved one step forward, we would take two steps toward them to resolve our differences. But I soon came to know that India did not respond well to my offer because of the RSS' ideology. It became quite clear last year when it unilaterally annexed Kashmir, which is a disputed territory between Pakistan and India according to several UN resolutions.

Ines Pohl: But Prime Minister Khan, there are many who say that the human rights situation in the Pakistani part of Kashmir is also not good. How would you respond to that?

Imran Khan: Well, it's very easy to find out. We invite anyone from anywhere in the world to visit the Pakistan side of Kashmir and then go to the Indian side. Let them decide.

Ines Pohl: But still, protests against the Pakistani Kashmir administration aren't allowed. So that's not really freedom of expression, either.

Imran Khan: Azad Kashmir holds free and fair elections and it elects its own government. Like any other administration, they have their problems. But as I said, let us invite observers from all over the world. I assure you that they can go to the Pakistan side of Kashmir but won't be allowed on the Indian side.

Ines Pohl: Let me stress once more: You advocate freedom for the Kashmiri people, as you did at the UN last year, so don't you think that the international community will pay more attention to your demands if protests in Pakistan-administered Kashmir are also allowed?

Imran Khan: Let the people of Kashmir decide what they want. Pakistan is ready for a referendum or a plebiscite. Let them decide whether they want to remain with Pakistan or to be independent.

Ines Pohl: Do you think the international community is paying too little attention to the Kashmir conflict?

Imran Khan: Sadly, yes. Consider the sort of media attention the Hong Kong protests are getting. The tragedy of Kashmir is much greater.

Ines Pohl: Why is that happening in your opinion?

Imran Khan: Unfortunately, commercial interests are more important for Western countries. India is a big market and that is the reason behind the lukewarm response to what is happening to some 8 million people in Kashmir, as well as to minorities in India. The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) is blatantly against minorities, and particularly against the 200 million Muslims in India. The silence of the world on all of this is mainly because of commercial interests.

Also, strategically, India is supposed to be a counterbalance to China, and therefore you see a completely different approach to the two conflicts.

Ines Pohl: Mr. Khan, what can Germany and the European Union do in this regard?

Imran Khan: I think Germany can play a huge role. Germany is the strongest country in Europe and plays a big part in the EU. When I spoke to Chancellor Angela Merkel, I tried to explain these issues to her; about what is happening in India. And she actually made a statement about it when she visited India.

Ines Pohl: What is the current status of the Afghan peace talks?

Imran Khan: I think they are heading towards a ceasefire. We are hoping that the US-Taliban talks succeed, as we have a new government in power in Afghanistan with President Ashraf Ghani being re-elected.

Peace in Afghanistan would open up trading opportunities in Central Asia. It [Afghanistan] would also become an economic corridor for us. If there is peace in Afghanistan, our people in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, which borders Afghanistan, will also benefit.

Ines Pohl: You surely can help out the US. How close are your ties with the Taliban right now?

Imran Khan: Pakistan has played its part in peace talks. There was a hostage situation and with Pakistan's efforts, two out of three Western hostages were released. So, we are doing our best with whatever influence we have.

Ines Pohl: You are very critical of the human rights situation in Kashmir and India, and I see that you like to present yourself as a representative of the Muslim world. But when it comes to China and the Muslim Uighur community, you are not as vocal. Why is that? Why are you not more outspoken about the Chinese suppression of the Uighur people?

Imran Khan: Well, mainly for two reasons. First, the scale of what is happening in India is not comparable to what is supposedly happening to the Uighurs in China. Second, China has been our great friend. It has helped us in our most difficult times because of the economic crisis my government inherited. Therefore, we do talk about things with China privately, not publicly, as these are sensitive issues.

Ines Pohl: And last but not least, you knew Britain's Lady Diana very well. What do you think about her youngest son, Prince Harry, and his wife Meghan Markel's decision to leave their senior roles in the royal family?

Imran Khan: You know what, I have so many issues in Pakistan to deal with. It doesn't seem to be a huge issue to me. I think, it's their life. If that's how they want to lead it, then why should people interfere?

Ines Pohl: Do you think Diana would have understood their decision?

Imran Khan: I guess so. Frankly, I haven't really looked into it deeply. I think they are a young couple who want to lead their own life, so it's up to them.

Ines Pohl: Thank you, Mr. Prime Minister.

The interview was conducted by Ines Pohl, DW's editor-in-chief, at the Prime Minister House in Islamabad, Pakistan.

https://www.dw.com/en/exclusive-pak...-iran-conflict-would-be-disastrous/a-52021938
 
Questions about Iran-Saudi Arabia conflict, US-Afghan talks, India-Pakistan war and Uighur rights followed suddenly by … what do you think about Harry and Meghan :facepalm: ? This could literally be a skit in a comedy show.
 
At least he has finally admitted that friendship with China is more important than the drama of being the representative of Muslims.

He also recognizes that other countries are not responding to his rhetoric-laden and sensationalized speeches and tweets over Kashmir because of commercial interests.

Hence, he should not blame them because he is doing the same with respect to China.

Nevertheless, those dramatic speeches and tweets are ultimately for domestic consumption only.
 
It is also important to point out that the relationship between China and Pakistan is not based on friendship or mutual respect.

It is a master-slave relationship.

The complication for Pakistan is that China is not our only master.
 
That was actually a very stupid answer on China issue. You can't claim to be the representive of Muslim community if you ignore Uighurs.
 
That was actually a very stupid answer on China issue. You can't claim to be the representive of Muslim community if you ignore Uighurs.

It is still a big improvement on sweating bullets and blundering “I don’t know about it”.

That was was his answer a few months back.
 
Remember, he is the PM of Pakistani and not the world.

Pakistan should come first and he has demonstrated that in this interview.
 
Remember, he is the PM of Pakistani and not the world.

Pakistan should come first and he has demonstrated that in this interview.

Then why is he acting like the representative of Muslims around the world on Twitter?
 
Then why is he acting like the representative of Muslims around the world on Twitter?

Where has he?

Care to show then I can comment.

Kashmir had been supported by Pakistan and will continue to be.

Deescalation between Iran and Saudis is in the interest of Pakistan.

Commenting on some issue and not commenting on other to protect Pakistan’s interest is what matter.

It isn’t that difficult to understand unless you are his critic for the sake of criticism aka Tarek Fateh :)
 
He loses whatever credibility he has whenever he talks about the Uyghur issue. One of the many reasons why he's not given much attention despite his efforts. He should accept this and stop making excuses like "India is a big market" etc etc.
 
He loses whatever credibility he has whenever he talks about the Uyghur issue. One of the many reasons why he's not given much attention despite his efforts. He should accept this and stop making excuses like "India is a big market" etc etc.

Supporter of RSS/BJP/Hindutva talking about credibility while supporting rape, murder, depriving of basic necessities in Kashmir and India? Lol

China isn’t Pakistan. Lol
 
Supporter of RSS/BJP/Hindutva talking about credibility while supporting rape, murder, depriving of basic necessities in Kashmir and India? Lol

China isn’t Pakistan. Lol

Too many lols in the comment to take you seriously.
 
Where has he?

Care to show then I can comment.

Kashmir had been supported by Pakistan and will continue to be.

Deescalation between Iran and Saudis is in the interest of Pakistan.

Commenting on some issue and not commenting on other to protect Pakistan’s interest is what matter.

It isn’t that difficult to understand unless you are his critic for the sake of criticism aka Tarek Fateh :)

"Women in the West can't wear hijab" and thousand other similar statements made by him
 
He loses whatever credibility he has whenever he talks about the Uyghur issue. One of the many reasons why he's not given much attention despite his efforts. He should accept this and stop making excuses like "India is a big market" etc etc.

maybe for indians or pro indians .... no pakistani cares how they look up to our PM.
 
Too many lols in the comment to take you seriously.

As you wish but supporters of RSS/BJP/Hindutva are taken seriously for their bigotry and racism as they continue to support their government other radicalized Organisation in killing and oppressing minorities, really unfortunate.
 
Serious enough that India has to ask China to stop raising Kashmir issue at the UN.

Lolfer. Read the entire statement. India said China must look at the global concensus and stop raising Kashmir.

4 of the 5 members of P5 called it a bilateral issue. China can do jack on this.

Imran can ask Mahathir or Erdogan to do something now.

May be Mahathir can stop exporting edible oil to India so that we cannot fry our bhajiya.
 
Lolfer. Read the entire statement. India said China must look at the global concensus and stop raising Kashmir.

4 of the 5 members of P5 called it a bilateral issue. China can do jack on this.

Imran can ask Mahathir or Erdogan to do something now.

May be Mahathir can stop exporting edible oil to India so that we cannot fry our bhajiya.

Aww.

now read my statement and highlighted part that you have typed up.

I know RSS/BJP/Hindtuva supporters have to twist the words and narrative to make themselves look less evil but can ya'll?

Put back on your khaki chaddi and go on a walk to think about what you are promoting and supporting, which is, rape, murder, occupation, and discrimination.
 
[MENTION=151173]kk1992[/MENTION]

China cant do jack at UNSC in this matter. So think where Pakistan stands.

After all the drum beating. Nothing.
 
[MENTION=151173]kk1992[/MENTION]

China cant do jack at UNSC in this matter. So think where Pakistan stands.

After all the drum beating. Nothing.

wow.

what a statement, you have open my eyes to reality.

You are a genius.
 
Good. Now please go open Imrans eyes.

LOL, you are funny character.

I do not know IK personally.

Can you tell Modi to stop killing Indians just because they are muslim and chrisitian and while you are at it can you please also ask them to stop having Indian army murder, rape, and occupied Kashmiri.
 
We don't need top hear the obvious from our narcissist PM.
 
LOL, you are funny character.

I do not know IK personally.

Can you tell Modi to stop killing Indians just because they are muslim and chrisitian and while you are at it can you please also ask them to stop having Indian army murder, rape, and occupied Kashmiri.

No one believes what you said. Thats why UNSC doesnt take what pakistan saud seriously.
 
Imran is not and should not be called the "Ambassador of the Muslim World".

What is happening at the moment in China is atrocious and a crime against humanity to say the least. Having said that, Pakistan should not play the role of the saviour of Muslims all over the world. We should care about our own people, and let the superpowers of the world decide about what is happening in China.

However, Pakistan has a big role to play when it comes to Kashmir or the current USA-Iran conflict as the former issue concerns a disputed territory between Pakistan and India, and the latter is a direct threat to Pakistan's national security and interests.
 
Back
Top