mrtaim3
Tape Ball Star
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2017
- Runs
- 977
Abdullah Shafique has all the right technical skills to be a really good batsman in all formats. I would persist with him rather than expecting something from players like Usman Khan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He should play domestic cricket so we can see exactly where he stands compared to the rest of the domestic players and not just play PSL which is designed for entertainment and same goes for players like Babar and Rizwan.No tantrums - seems some players can never win in your eyes and it's interesting to see favouritism at play.
In those 50+ matches he has scored almost 20 50+ scores.
If he doesn't score in PSL you will call him a failure. If he scores you call him a failure anyway.
What should he do? Retire from cricket? Is there no room for redemption or comebacks.
You can try Sahibzada too. I'm not against it. He should be given a fair and consistent shot.He should play domestic cricket so we can see exactly where he stands compared to the rest of the domestic players and not just play PSL which is designed for entertainment and same goes for players like Babar and Rizwan.
In the recent T20 Cup, Sahibzada averaged 121 with a strike rate of 190 over 7 games, scoring 3 centuries and 2 fifties meanwhile, your guy Abdullah Shafique averaged just 36, lol
Thats not really the batsmans fault. He can only play what's infront of him. We are already placing high expectations of scoring runs on him. It is too much to expect him to negotiate for Pat Cumins and Bumrah to play PSL so his critics can be satisfied.@DeadlyVenom
Also I want to ask are fahim ashraf and tariq usman world class international standard bowlers?
No that's not my stance at all Abdullah shafique has played more than enough international cricket facing decent bowlers and he's not cut for international cricket. Imam is also a beast in domestic and we know what happens in international cricket.Thats not really the batsmans fault. He can only play what's infront of him. We are already placing high expectations of scoring runs on him. It is too much to expect him to negotiate for Pat Cumins and Bumrah to play PSL so his critics can be satisfied.
Your stance seems to be that sometimes you want proven domestic players to play international but then when you don't like the player then you criticize the same domestic you were a fan of.
How do we find T20 players then if not PSL?N
No that's not my stance at all Abdullah shafique has played more than enough international cricket facing decent bowlers and he's not cut for international cricket. Imam is also a beast in domestic and we know what happens in international cricket.
PSL is definitely not the league where you can hype up players For international cricket Usman khan last year scored 4 centuries in PSL with so many chances he's not even able to score 1 century in international cricket
PSL is designed for entertainment purposes where the pitch is going to be flat with smaller boundries and not easy to replicate same perfomances in international cricket
Will babar bat this position ? neverAbdullah Shafique has all the ingredients to become our premier batsman moving forward in LOi.
- Good Technique
- Good Range of Strokes
- Acceleration or Accumulation depending on the situation…
Not interested in nonsense about how he failed in SAF or is too defensive… so please avoid.
Need to persist with the following team moving forward:
1. Saim Ayub
2. Mo Haris
3. Abdullah Shafique
4. Babar Azam
5. Saud Shakeel
6. Salman Agha
7. Shadab Khan
8. Naseem Shah
9. Sufiyan Muqeem
10. Ihsanullah
11. Abrar
ABD has ability to hit big and go with the flowAbdullah Shafique has all the ingredients to become our premier batsman moving forward in LOi.
- Good Technique
- Good Range of Strokes
- Acceleration or Accumulation depending on the situation…
Not interested in nonsense about how he failed in SAF or is too defensive… so please avoid.
Need to persist with the following team moving forward:
1. Saim Ayub
2. Mo Haris
3. Abdullah Shafique
4. Babar Azam
5. Saud Shakeel
6. Salman Agha
7. Shadab Khan
8. Naseem Shah
9. Sufiyan Muqeem
10. Ihsanullah
11. Abrar
How do we find T20 players then if not PSL?
All other Pak tournaments are of lower quality (Champions Cup, National T20, etc), and FC tournaments won't produce the right players for the T20 format.
By the way, I am not arguing with you or have any axe to grind in case it is being perceived that way. I am just interested in your opinion, as I can't see any alternative for the T20 selection in Pakistan apart from PSL.
Imam is a different story. He never plays quickly and isn't good enough to be selected for franchise, so I think his ceiling is a lot lower than others.
Do you remember that He had a very decent first World Cup as a Batsman and looked out second best Batsman than ?Do you know the difference between PSL and Int cricket?
Nah but good to see a Pakistani batter stepping up in a high pressure chase.So Abdullah good enough for international t20's after 1 good innings?
Form is temporary. Class is permanent.Abdullah Shafique set things up easily for Qalandars after scoring a quickfire 65 runs off just 35 deliveries. This man is just a treat to watch playing elegant shots.
Whenever he performs in mickey mouse PSLForm is temporary. Class is permanent.
This guy will win Pakistan many more games in the future in all formats.
Guy has a winning double hundred and a match winning hundred vs Sri Lanka at Galle in Test Cricket. Not many can say that. Not even Babar. Those two innings were the most crucial Pakistani batter has played in recent times for an away win.Whenever he performs in mickey mouse PSLhis fans come out saying hes class etc. Check his record. Hes extremely timid in international cricket. He won't be batting against Abbas Afridi and Hasan Ali in international cricket
No doubt hes got massive potential and scored big hundreds but hes got weaknesses which he didn't work on. International cricket is unforgiving in that regard. Also shouldn't compare to babar as babar is bang average.Guy has a winning double hundred and a match winning hundred vs Sri Lanka at Galle in Test Cricket. Not many can say that. Not even Babar. Those two innings were the most crucial Pakistani batter has played in recent times for an away win.
He's still young. Give him some time.
Massive insult to KL Rahul. His temu version would be Imam.Temu version of KL Rahul.
Imam and Fakhar opening was such a stable combination and it's a shame that's not carried on.Massive insult to KL Rahul. His temu version would be Imam.
Imam despite all his faults still has impressive stats even if it is minnow bashing.
Abdullah is somehow even worse then Imam
I dont understand this technique propaganda?They hype his technique and aesthetics a lot…
I think even that element is overrated.
I hate these types of players (coward white ball batters) in general but I can tell when a batter really does play proper satisfying shots.
For me, I love watching Shai Hope play his strokes both against pace and spin. He has class and swagger. He has confidence and guile.
This guy Shafique does nothing for me even when he stands and holds his pose after successfully nailing one.
He was going to smash you in the Asia cup but lost form at the wrong time.Who is this guy?
He was going to smash you in the Asia cup but lost form at the wrong time.
Duck Dullah, Technique Aya aur lei gya Bumrah.His technique hype is just a hoax... His technique is flawed as it has been debunked many times before... Just like Afridi being called duckridi, his name is being duckique.
Who cares?Imaam is away better than him.
I already said fakhar,Saim and farhaan as back up opener.Who cares?
Alistair Cook is way better than both Imam and Shafique
So we play a guy like Cook in ODI????
Then you don’t need to unnecessarily mention Imam. You can say what you want tbf but it’s a needless name to throw in the hat.I already said fakhar,Saim and farhaan as back up opener.
I was quoting topspin because he was saying Abdullah has better technique and bats at a faster paceThen you don’t need to unnecessarily mention Imam. You can say what you want tbf but it’s a needless name to throw in the hat.
I’m not fully up to date with you and my bro @topspin ‘s debate but I trust him to have a sound judgment on cricket. I’m sure whatever he said holds some merit and weightage. The Shafique desperate to make it into the Pakistan side for the 2023 World Cup and the Shafique now are 2 very different players.I was quoting topspin because he was saying Abdullah has better technique and bats at a faster pace
Labu will be replaced by Cameron Green soon enough.Marnus Labushagne is a better ODI batter than both Shafique and Imam
He (Marnus) is viewed as the black sheep of the team.
Get your priorities right! You don’t need Tatti approach white ball players!
I’m not fully up to date with you and my bro @topspin ‘s debate but I trust him to have a sound judgment on cricket. I’m sure whatever he said holds some merit and weightage. The Shafique desperate to make it into the Pakistan side for the 2023 World Cup and the Shafique now are 2 very different players.
I have no problem with Abdullah Shafique being dropped because he's got his issues but I do not want to see him replaced for an inferior tried and tested player like Imam.
Who cares?
Alistair Cook is way better than both Imam and Shafique
So we play a guy like Cook in ODI????
Imam actually scored good knocks against good attacks during 2017-2019 at good pace.....his appetite of runs was great...Imam and Fakhar opening was such a stable combination and it's a shame that's not carried on.