What's new

[PICTURES/VIDEOS] Imran Khan a mosaic in Pakistan's political history

EcFLO0M.png
With this tweet,Kaptaan has shut down the biggest fake news factory with facts. Well they ever talk about the biggest spreader of fake news. Thought not
 
Last edited by a moderator:
‘PTI founder says no to any relief, vows to fight legal battle’

According to PTI leader Barrister Ali Zafar, Imran Khan is determined to take on the challenges ahead and will not back down from the case against him.

Zafar stated that the treatment meted out to PTI workers and leaders is unacceptable and the party will continue to raise its voice against injustice. He mentioned that the desire for a free Pakistan is a fundamental right of all citizens, and the party will not be silenced over the injustices.

The PTI leader also mentioned the growing polarization in Pakistan, which has now extended beyond politics into homes. He termed the increase in polarization to the lack of freedom and democracy in the country.

Zafar maintained that the PTI is a movement, not just a political party, and that its goal is to fight for justice and freedom. He said that the Imran Khan has always encouraged people to speak out against injustice and that this stance will continue to guide the party’s actions.

The development came at the time when Imran Khan decided to plea his case at the International Human Rights Organisation (IHRO), announced Aleema Khanum, the sister of the incarcerated former PM.

Talking to journalists outside Adiala Jail, Aleema Khan alleged that the PTI founder is being denied the right to communicate with his children. She further claimed, “He is not allowed to meet his doctor, and this treatment amounts to torture.”

Aleema claimed that ‘no court is willing to hear their petitions.’ “The PTI founder has said we have no other option left now,” she revealed.

Earlier, Khawaja Asif said that no offer given for shifting the PTI’s founder from jail to his Bani Galla residence. “It might be the wish of the PTI people but there is no truth in it,” defence minister said.

 

PTI negotiating team expected to meet Imran Khan in two days​


A meeting between the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) negotiating team and the party's founder, Imran Khan, is expected to take place within the next two days.

According to Express News, Speaker Ayaz Sadiq reached out to senior PTI leaders Asad Qaiser and Omar Ayub following a message from Omar Ayub about the ongoing negotiations between the PTI and the government.

Sources confirmed that Ayub had sent a message to Speaker Sadiq earlier today. In response, the Speaker engaged in discussions with PTI's negotiating committee about arranging a meeting with the party's founder.

Although Sadiq clarified that it was not his responsibility to facilitate a meeting with Imran Khan, he expressed his intention to help arrange the meeting between the two sides. "It was never my responsibility to arrange a meeting with the PTI founder, and it still isn't, but I will make efforts to ensure the negotiating committee meets him," Sadiq said.

The Speaker has also been in contact with government officials, and it is now likely that the PTI negotiating team will meet with Imran Khan in the coming two days. The PTI delegation plans to present their written demands after the meeting.

This development follows two rounds of talks between the government and PTI, with the third round scheduled for Wednesday.

Source: The Express Tribune
 
Imran moves LHC for post-arrest bail in eight May 9 riots cases

Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf incarcerated founding chairman Imran Khan on Saturday approached the Lahore High Court (LHC) seeking post-arrest bail in eight cases of May 9 riots including an attack on the corps commander’s residence.

Eight separate bail petitions have been filed before the LHC in as many cases through Barrister Salman Safdar.

A two-judge bench comprising Chief Justice Aalia Neelum and Justice Asjad Javed Ghural will take up the petitions on Monday.

An anti-terrorism court had on Nov 27 denied bail to the former prime minister in these cases.

The petitions mainly argued that the prosecution failed to establish the petitioner’s association with the unfortunate occurrences narrated in the FIRs.

They said the petitioner has been implicated in the May 9 cases as a result of a well-orchestrated plan merely to harass and humiliate him for political reasons even though admittedly he was in the custody of the NAB.

The arrest of the petitioner was never required in the cases, which was evident from the fact that police remained reluctant to secure his arrest during five months and 12 days after the dismissal of his pre-arrest bail by the trial court.

The petitions alleged that the indifferent behaviour of police and lack of effort in securing the arrest of the petitioner at a time when he was detained at Adiala Jail, supplement the argument that arrest of the petitioner was not required in the cases.

The sole allegation against the petitioner in the cases is of “abetment”, which has been supplemented by the prosecution most vaguely, the pleas added.

They argued that the trial judge overlooked the fact that frivolous and baseless allegations related to the May 9 events have already been rejected due to inconsistencies in the story of the investigating agency.

Moreover, the trial judge also passed a lengthy order by ignoring the basic principle of the law of bail, laid down by the superior courts that “deeper appreciation of evidence should not be done at bail stage and only tentative assessment should be done.”

The petitions argued that Imran Khan has been facing an unprecedented political victimisation for two years. The May 9 cases are yet another effort by the state/police to implicate the petitioner in a criminal matter under the sole allegation of abetment, they added.

The petitions ask the LHC to set aside the trial court’s decision and grant bail to the former prime minister in the eight FIRs.

Denying bail to the PTI founding chairman, the ATC had declared that the charges of abetting and conspiring with the perpetrators of the May 9 riots against the petitioner were not ordinary in nature.

“The offences fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 of CrPC. Petitioner was found guilty,” ATC-I Judge Manzer Ali Gill had observed in his order.

The judge had noted that the entire case of the prosecution revolved around the stance that due to the criminal conspiracy and abetment of the petitioner (Imran Khan), the PTI workers and other senior leadership committed the occurrence.

Therefore, he said, the argument of the petitioner’s counsel that his client was behind the bar at the time of offence had no weight.

The judge had also rejected another stance by the counsel that the petitioner’s post-arrest bail in so many other cases had already been allowed by different courts.

“This court also is of the view that it is not an ordinary case of abetment, instigation or conspiracy,” the trial judge had remarked in his order.

He had observed that being the founding chairman of PTI, the petitioner’s speeches and directions were strictly followed by his workers and supporters.

Separately, ATC-III Judge Arshad Javed had on Nov 8, 2024 granted post-arrest bail to Imran Khan in four other cases, including burning the PML-N office in Model Town, a container near Kalma Chowk, police vehicles in Gulberg, and violence at Sherpao Bridge during the May 9 riots.

DAWN NEWS
 

PTI negotiating team expected to meet Imran Khan in two days​


A meeting between the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) negotiating team and the party's founder, Imran Khan, is expected to take place within the next two days.

According to Express News, Speaker Ayaz Sadiq reached out to senior PTI leaders Asad Qaiser and Omar Ayub following a message from Omar Ayub about the ongoing negotiations between the PTI and the government.

Sources confirmed that Ayub had sent a message to Speaker Sadiq earlier today. In response, the Speaker engaged in discussions with PTI's negotiating committee about arranging a meeting with the party's founder.

Although Sadiq clarified that it was not his responsibility to facilitate a meeting with Imran Khan, he expressed his intention to help arrange the meeting between the two sides. "It was never my responsibility to arrange a meeting with the PTI founder, and it still isn't, but I will make efforts to ensure the negotiating committee meets him," Sadiq said.

The Speaker has also been in contact with government officials, and it is now likely that the PTI negotiating team will meet with Imran Khan in the coming two days. The PTI delegation plans to present their written demands after the meeting.

This development follows two rounds of talks between the government and PTI, with the third round scheduled for Wednesday.

Source: The Express Tribune
The mafia have backed down and blinked 1st. They allowed IK to meet his reps and at the same time humiliated The Sharifs. The Sharifs had promised to allow the meeting but the establishment didn't allow it and made the Sharifs and their reps look like total tools. Today they allowed the meeting and at the same time showed themselves to be cowardly.
IK has shown bravery that PK needed and has changed PK forever. May Allah bless our Kaptaan with good health. To Hell with crooked mafia
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Khawaja Asif denies deal offers to PTI founder

Defense Minister Khawaja Asif assures that no deal has been offered to the founder of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) founder Imran Khan, ARY News reported.

Speaking to the media outside Parliament House, Khawaja Asif firmly stated that no deal has been offered to PTI founder Imran Khan and clarified that the government cannot strike any deals with him, emphasising that decisions will be made by the courts.

Khawaja Asif remarked that if PTI genuinely seeks fruitful dialogue, it must end its side shows. He added that the actions witnessed in the National Assembly raised serious questions about PTI’s commitment and intentions toward negotiations.

The federal minister criticised the language used during recent parliamentary sessions, calling it evident that talks are being used as a mere “smoke screen.” He stressed that serious negotiations require both sides to halt aggressive behaviour.


 
PTI founder ‘announces’ Black Day on Feb 8 across Pakistan

According to sources, the PTI MNAs and MPAs have been instructed to hold demonstrations in their respective areas as part of the protests against ‘rigged’ elections on February 8 2024.

Imran Khan has directed party leaders to prepare for protests, while also issuing instructions to refrain from making statements against JUI-F chief Fazlur Rehman.

The PTI founder has also ordered party leaders to take opposition leaders, including Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, into confidence regarding the planned protests.

The announcement comes as the PTI prepares to launch a nationwide protest campaign against the government.

It’s worth mentioning here that Pakistan held general elections on February 8, 2024 with independent candidates backed by former PTI winning most of the seats. However, PML-N and PPP formed an alliance to keep Imran Khan’s party out of power.

The opposition parties have alleged rigging in the elections – a claim rejected by the then caretaker administration, which conducted the polls.

However, in recent development, PTI is in talks with the federal government amid the prevailing uncertainty in the country.

Where PTI Chairman, Barrister Gohar said that party will submit its written demands to government in the third round of talks, scheduled to take place tomorrow (January 16).

“Tomorrow, our third session of negotiations with the government will take place, during which we will submit our demands in writing,” Barrister Gohar said.

Barrister Gohar emphasized that if the government engages in these talks with sincerity and goodwill, a resolution to all issues could be achieved.

 

Imran welcomes Gohar and Gandapur's meeting with army chief​


Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)'s founding chairman Imran Khan has welcomed the meeting between the party's incumbent Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur with Chief of Army Staff General Asim Munir.

The meeting, held in Peshawar, aimed to address key political and security concerns, Express News reported.

After his meeting with Imran Khan at Adiala Jail, Barrister Gohar spoke informally to the media, emphasising the importance of following the directives of PTI’s founder.

He explained that any future disclosures regarding meetings would only be made when Imran personally instructed him to do so.

Gohar reaffirmed that all actions taken by him are in line with Imran's guidance, describing the talks with General Munir as a positive development for the country’s stability.

Gohar also highlighted PTI’s primary demands, including the formation of a judicial commission to investigate two significant incidents. He stated, "We have always kept the door open for dialogue, while others have kept theirs closed. If this dialogue progresses, it will be beneficial for the country’s stability."

During the Peshawar meeting, both Gohar and Gandapur presented their concerns directly to General Asim Munir. Gohar confirmed that the meeting had yielded positive progress, suggesting that potential resolutions were being explored.

However, the meeting was marred by tensions between Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa's political figures. A disagreement broke out between CM Gandapur and Governor Faisal Karim Kundi over the allocation of Rs500 billion for counterterrorism efforts.

Gandapur accused Kundi of spreading misleading information, leading to a heated exchange. The conflict escalated when Awami National Party (ANP) leader Aimal Wali Khan accused the provincial government of harboring Taliban elements. Gandapur responded by defending his past involvement in the Afghan Jihad and calling for clarity on the allegations.

Amid the tensions, General Asim Munir and other political leaders worked to refocus the conversation on regional security issues.

Barrister Gohar stressed the importance of addressing security matters in Parliament, urging a national approach to the ongoing challenges.

Following the meeting,Gohar proceeded to Parliament House, where he met with PTI Negotiation Committee head Omar Ayub. Gohar conveyed Imran's special message to the committee.

Reports suggest that Ayub is expected to hold a press conference soon to discuss the next steps in the party’s negotiations.

 

‘Why delay?’ Imran Khan should be convicted tomorrow: Aleema Khan​


Former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s sister, Aleema Khan, on Thursday called for a swift verdict in the Al-Qadir Trust case, saying the judiciary’s credibility was at stake, Express News reported.

Speaking to reporters outside the Islamabad High Court, she questioned the delay in announcing a decision. "The judge heard the case at length. Now, he should deliver the verdict. Why is he not doing so?" she asked.

Aleema Khan dismissed speculation that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party was looking to US President elect Donald Trump for support. "Has the PTI pinned any hopes on Trump? Why do you keep asking such questions? Has Imran Khan been sitting in jail for 18 months waiting for him?" she said.

She insisted that her brother was in prison to prove his innocence. "Give him credit for that," she added.

Calling the Al-Qadir Trust case "foolish," Aleema Khan said PTI was merely enduring court dates. She alleged that journalists who report fairly on prison conditions are not granted access to Khan.

She reiterated her demand for an immediate ruling. "We pray that the verdict is announced tomorrow," she said, adding that Imran Khan had full confidence in the judiciary. "It is no longer his test; it is the judiciary’s test now. Some will pass, and some will fail."

Source: The Express Tribune
 

‘Why delay?’ Imran Khan should be convicted tomorrow: Aleema Khan​


Former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s sister, Aleema Khan, on Thursday called for a swift verdict in the Al-Qadir Trust case, saying the judiciary’s credibility was at stake, Express News reported.

Speaking to reporters outside the Islamabad High Court, she questioned the delay in announcing a decision. "The judge heard the case at length. Now, he should deliver the verdict. Why is he not doing so?" she asked.

Aleema Khan dismissed speculation that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party was looking to US President elect Donald Trump for support. "Has the PTI pinned any hopes on Trump? Why do you keep asking such questions? Has Imran Khan been sitting in jail for 18 months waiting for him?" she said.

She insisted that her brother was in prison to prove his innocence. "Give him credit for that," she added.

Calling the Al-Qadir Trust case "foolish," Aleema Khan said PTI was merely enduring court dates. She alleged that journalists who report fairly on prison conditions are not granted access to Khan.

She reiterated her demand for an immediate ruling. "We pray that the verdict is announced tomorrow," she said, adding that Imran Khan had full confidence in the judiciary. "It is no longer his test; it is the judiciary’s test now. Some will pass, and some will fail."

Source: The Express Tribune
They tried to convince IK to give them a deal and he refused. Those with the red pen are now begging for a way out of the mess they created to bring his govt down. The Lord works in mysterious ways.
 
A new legal team has been formed for former PM Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi, however, key party-affiliated lawyers have not been included

Notably, several key lawyers associated with the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) were excluded from the revamped lineup, Express News reported on Tuesday.

The newly appointed team includes prominent names such as Barrister Salman Akram Raja, Barrister Salman Safdar, and Usman Riaz Gul.

Other members include Chaudhry Zaheer Abbas, Arshad Tabrez, and Qausain Faisal Mufti.

Additionally, Khalid Mehmood Yousaf, Chaudhry Ishtiaq, Abu Zar Niazi, Rai Salman Amjad, Shoaib Shaheen, Sardar Qadeer, Ali Ijaz Butter, and Mishal Yousafzai have also been brought on board.

However, prominent PTI-linked lawyers such as Faisal Chaudhry, Barrister Gohar, and Sher Afzal Marwat were notably absent from the list, raising questions about the decision-making process behind the reshuffle.

The revamped legal team is tasked with defending Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi in the high-profile Toshakhana case, which centres on allegations related to gifts received during Khan’s tenure as Prime Minister.

Observers have speculated that the exclusion of seasoned PTI-affiliated lawyers indicates a potential shift in legal strategy as the case progresses.

Imran sets judicial commission fromation deadline

On Monday, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan directed his party’s negotiation team to withdraw from further talks with the government if a judicial commission is not formed within seven days, according to Barrister Gohar.

Speaking to media outside Adiala Jail, Gohar emphasised that the establishment of the judicial commission is critical for meaningful dialogue.

"If the government does not move forward on forming the commission, there is no point in continuing negotiations," he said.

Source: The Express Tribune
 
Former Prime Minister Imran Khan's conversation with lawyers and media at Adiala Jail - January 22, 2025

"To extend Yahya Khan Part 2's hold on power and to cover up the events of May 9th (2023), Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa did not hear our petitions regarding the May 9th false flag operation and the election rigging of February 8th (2024). The worst human rights violations in history were committed against PTI. From Zille Shah to Sami Wazir, there is a long tale of oppression and tyranny against us. We have not been able to get justice from any court across the country. The courts are paralyzed, but even today, the illegitimate government fears that if a judge hears our petitions on human rights violations on merit, they might actually deliver justice. But no matter what they do, it is a divine law that a reign of tyranny and oppression cannot last long.

I am deeply grateful to Saudi Crown Prince HRH Mohammed bin Salman for responding to my appeal and releasing nearly 7,200 poor and deserving Pakistani citizens from Saudi prisons. I have always tried to use my position and influence to improve the lives of ordinary Pakistanis. This was one of the reasons I entered politics, and I will continue to strive for it for as long as I live.

Neither Bushra Bibi nor I have financially benefited from the Al-Qadir Trust in any way. Malik Riaz will testify that I was the only Prime Minister who never sought anything from him for personal or financial gain. Unlike Zardari, I did not have a Bilawal House built for me, nor did I sell One Hyde Park at double its value, like the Sharif family did. The future of Pakistan's youth is important for me, and it was for this reason that Al-Qadir University was established.

They have used every tactic to cause me agony. I strongly condemn the social media campaign launched by our opponents against Bushra Bibi. The opposition has been slinging mud at Bushra Bibi for the past six years just so they can somehow malign my character. Those who claim to be our well-wishers, but become part of their propaganda are not our well-wishers, but are playing into the enemy’s hands by carrying out their mission."

 

Imran Khan to have phone call with sons and access to physician: IHC directs​


The Islamabad High Court has directed authorities to allow the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founding chairman Imran Khan to speak with his sons over the phone, Express News reported.

Chief Justice Aamer Farooq heard the case related to Imran’s requests for various facilities while in prison, including access to a personal physician, meetings with his wife, and phone calls with his children.

During the hearing, the court directed that Khan’s wife and political leaders should be allowed to visit him according to jail rules. Furthermore, a phone call with Imran's sons and medical treatment by his personal doctor were ordered.

The court also inquired about the procedure for allowing Khan's wife to visit, considering she is now a convicted individual, and asked for clarification on the process for his sons’ calls and medical treatment.

The court instructed the Assistant Superintendent of Jail to obtain clarification from the Superintendent of Adiala Jail and provide a response by Monday.

Imran’s lawyer, Faisal Chaudhry, informed the court that despite earlier orders, some of the granted facilities had been revoked. He further requested permission for immediate meetings with Imran.

The case will be revisited on January 27.

Earlier on Monday, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) had issued notices to jail authorities in response to a petition filed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founding chairman Imran Khan, seeking the restoration of newspaper and TV access, permission for telephonic conversations with his sons, and medical checkups by his personal doctor.

During a hearing on Monday, PTI chief's counsel Faisal Chaudhry had argued that the trial court had not addressed the matter of personal medical care in its January 10, 2025, order, which the petition challenged.

IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq had directed a jail representative to appear in person at the next hearing scheduled for January 23.

 
Who is he to decide that there is a wide bridge between the establishment and the public? Which public? The vele nutcases who vandalised the country on 9th May? The wastemans abroad who don’t have jobs but are happy to waste their entire day outside Avonsfield or chase after cars with visiting bureaucrats? Speak for your own delusional lot, don’t speak for the masses!
 
Who is he to decide that there is a wide bridge between the establishment and the public? Which public? The vele nutcases who vandalised the country on 9th May? The wastemans abroad who don’t have jobs but are happy to waste their entire day outside Avonsfield or chase after cars with visiting bureaucrats? Speak for your own delusional lot, don’t speak for the masses!
The same masses that voted on Feb 8, should their vote not dictate the Government formation?

On one hand you say no one can speak on behalf of the masses, on the other hand you don't respect their only say which is their "vote". My theory on your analogy is simple, if someone is deaf and lives in denial and keeps on asking the other person to speak in a louder tone so he can hear. Then the solution is not speak louder, the solution is not to have this deaf person be in a leadership position because then like yourself he won't be able to hear the masses.
 
Who is he to decide that there is a wide bridge between the establishment and the public? Which public? The vele nutcases who vandalised the country on 9th May? The wastemans abroad who don’t have jobs but are happy to waste their entire day outside Avonsfield or chase after cars with visiting bureaucrats? Speak for your own delusional lot, don’t speak for the masses!
They are called elections and when held on the 8th February, they gave the PTI a 2/3 Rd majority until the 9th February when form 47s. 🤣🤣🥰🥰
And if you feel there is no gap, then why is IK accused of fermenting problems for the army. Make up your mind what you crooks are arguing.
 
The same masses that voted on Feb 8, should their vote not dictate the Government formation?

On one hand you say no one can speak on behalf of the masses, on the other hand you don't respect their only say which is their "vote". My theory on your analogy is simple, if someone is deaf and lives in denial and keeps on asking the other person to speak in a louder tone so he can hear. Then the solution is not speak louder, the solution is not to have this deaf person be in a leadership position because then like yourself he won't be able to hear the masses.
These losers have no idea what they are arguing. The ultimate humiliation is that a banned party got a 2/3rd majority.
 
The same masses that voted on Feb 8, should their vote not dictate the Government formation?

On one hand you say no one can speak on behalf of the masses, on the other hand you don't respect their only say which is their "vote". My theory on your analogy is simple, if someone is deaf and lives in denial and keeps on asking the other person to speak in a louder tone so he can hear. Then the solution is not speak louder, the solution is not to have this deaf person be in a leadership position because then like yourself he won't be able to hear the masses.
The fact that this cretin was smoked out of his rabbit hole shows that this letter has struck home.
 
The same masses that voted on Feb 8, should their vote not dictate the Government formation?
The same masses who had no issue with the army as long as Imran Khan was in their good books.

How about you people make your mind up whether they really are evil or not? You didn’t seem to care as long as it was working for you!
 
Hopefully another 20 years to his sentence for his delusions and double standards when it comes to deciding when the army is good (for him) and when the Army is evil (for the public apparently).
 
The same masses who had no issue with the army as long as Imran Khan was in their good books.

How about you people make your mind up whether they really are evil or not? You didn’t seem to care as long as it was working for you!
The army was popular because of IK. He rescued them from hate after the Mush years and got them respectability. But they hated us and wanted to kill us, stole our mandate and today they are begging him. Why would an army that has " total control of the Judiciary" be begging for talks. Turn off your social media they keep saying and we can talk. They, like you are hated.
 
Hopefully another 20 years to his sentence for his delusions and double standards when it comes to deciding when the army is good (for him) and when the Army is evil (for the public apparently).
You make it a 1000. But once an idea takes seed, it can't be wished away. You played the 9th May card but on the 8th February a banned party Smashed your thugs. Today Rana Sanaullah tells don't ask us for more than we can deliver( reference to the talks and the PTI team asking to meet IK).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The same masses who had no issue with the army as long as Imran Khan was in their good books.

How about you people make your mind up whether they really are evil or not? You didn’t seem to care as long as it was working for you!
What a non-sense argument you have made. You are implying that people supporting Imran Khan in the past absolutely deserves whatever is coming their way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What a non-sense argument you have made. You are implying that people supporting Imran Khan in the past absolutely deserves whatever is coming their way.
Nonsense? I’m stating it as it is. It’s PTI clowns who had no issues with the Army as long as Imran Khan was ok with them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Letter to army chief a proof of Imran's despair, frustration, says PML-N's Siddiqui

Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) Senator Irfan Siddiqui has asserted that jailed PTI founder Imran Khan's letter to Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Gen Asim Munir was proof of the former's "despair and frustration".

In a statement on Wednesday, the senator termed Imran's letter to the army chief a "charge sheet," saying that the former prime minister had also sent a letter to COAS via former president Arif Alvi in 2023.

"They [PTI] did not receive a receipt or a reply to the previous letter, and will not receive this time as well," Siddiqui added.

Two days earlier, PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and lawyer Faisal Chaudhry confirmed that Imran, who is incarcerated in Adiala jail, penned a six-point letter to the army chief urging for review of policies while explaining the reasons for what he called the widening gulf between public and the army.

He clarified that writing a letter by the party founder to the army chief was not a policy shift and that the jailed party founder wrote the letter as a former prime minister.

The 71-year-old cricketer-turned-politician has been behind bars since August last year after he was booked in multiple cases ranging from corruption to terrorism since his ouster from power via opposition's no-trust motion in April 2022.

However, security sources, a day earlier, claimed that no letter from the incarcerated former premier was received by COAS Munir. Sources added that the news about Khan’s letter came to the military brass via the media.

The letter comes weeks after PTI leaders — Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan — met the army chief, with the party's chairman saying that they discussed the overall security situation.

It also holds importance as the former ruling party ended its negotiations with the PML-N-led coalition government last month, in which the PTI had demanded two things — the formation of judicial commissions on events that transpired on May 9, 2023, and November 24-27 as well as the release of "all political prisoners", including Khan.

 
I give up trying to explain this, but let me give you a last shot at it. Supporting Imran and opposing Army unlawful acts are 2 separate things. There are common grounds however they both are looked at individually and separately.

For example in 2018 a person can still support Imran whilst opposing Army's unlawful activities in Balochistan. In 2021 a person can support Imran whilst also support Army for response to India over their airstrikes or help in developing the Kartarpur border.

In 2025 a person can not be a supporter of Imran Khan but can still oppose Army's policy over Afghan migrants, strong arming Parliamentarians to sign ridiculous laws like 26 Amendment or PECA, for all human rights violations like abductions, torture, family torture (physical and mental), killing of protestors, etc, taking over acres of land from villagers with no repercussions, etc

You are confusing a simple argument that Imran supporter cannot support Army or an Army apologist cannot side with Imran. Look at things differently. Call out on what is black and what is white.
 
I give up trying to explain this, but let me give you a last shot at it
Well, after your initial poor attempt having scored that massive own goal for which I then shared the BBC article, this is a slightly better one.

I personally think your a little better than the ones who disgrace your lot with abusive, disrespectful language. The points you make are fair. But can I ask, on an individual level, did you as a Khan fan call out Khan’s support of the army over things that are questionable whilst he was in power? You only answer for yourself
 
Well, after your initial poor attempt having scored that massive own goal for which I then shared the BBC article, this is a slightly better one.

I personally think your a little better than the ones who disgrace your lot with abusive, disrespectful language. The points you make are fair. But can I ask, on an individual level, did you as a Khan fan call out Khan’s support of the army over things that are questionable whilst he was in power? You only answer for yourself
Gorms like you turn a blind eye to the murder, kidnappings and torture, but apparently if you criticse the evil thugs that do it, then you are bad people. No wonder your thugs got smashed at the elections
 
I give up trying to explain this, but let me give you a last shot at it. Supporting Imran and opposing Army unlawful acts are 2 separate things. There are common grounds however they both are looked at individually and separately.

For example in 2018 a person can still support Imran whilst opposing Army's unlawful activities in Balochistan. In 2021 a person can support Imran whilst also support Army for response to India over their airstrikes or help in developing the Kartarpur border.

In 2025 a person can not be a supporter of Imran Khan but can still oppose Army's policy over Afghan migrants, strong arming Parliamentarians to sign ridiculous laws like 26 Amendment or PECA, for all human rights violations like abductions, torture, family torture (physical and mental), killing of protestors, etc, taking over acres of land from villagers with no repercussions, etc

You are confusing a simple argument that Imran supporter cannot support Army or an Army apologist cannot side with Imran. Look at things differently. Call out on what is black and what is white.
You are trying to explain to this immoral scum that is a paid troll.
 
Letter to army chief a proof of Imran's despair, frustration, says PML-N's Siddiqui

Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) Senator Irfan Siddiqui has asserted that jailed PTI founder Imran Khan's letter to Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Gen Asim Munir was proof of the former's "despair and frustration".

In a statement on Wednesday, the senator termed Imran's letter to the army chief a "charge sheet," saying that the former prime minister had also sent a letter to COAS via former president Arif Alvi in 2023.

"They [PTI] did not receive a receipt or a reply to the previous letter, and will not receive this time as well," Siddiqui added.

Two days earlier, PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and lawyer Faisal Chaudhry confirmed that Imran, who is incarcerated in Adiala jail, penned a six-point letter to the army chief urging for review of policies while explaining the reasons for what he called the widening gulf between public and the army.

He clarified that writing a letter by the party founder to the army chief was not a policy shift and that the jailed party founder wrote the letter as a former prime minister.

The 71-year-old cricketer-turned-politician has been behind bars since August last year after he was booked in multiple cases ranging from corruption to terrorism since his ouster from power via opposition's no-trust motion in April 2022.

However, security sources, a day earlier, claimed that no letter from the incarcerated former premier was received by COAS Munir. Sources added that the news about Khan’s letter came to the military brass via the media.

The letter comes weeks after PTI leaders — Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan — met the army chief, with the party's chairman saying that they discussed the overall security situation.

It also holds importance as the former ruling party ended its negotiations with the PML-N-led coalition government last month, in which the PTI had demanded two things — the formation of judicial commissions on events that transpired on May 9, 2023, and November 24-27 as well as the release of "all political prisoners", including Khan.

Rather than using Nooras as witnesses, people that have all the respect shown. Why don't you actually debate the facts. The army chief has sworn that he isn't political, so do you believe him. Why were the results changed on the 9th February and why did he Munir tell Mansoor that IK would never be seen again. Why were the IHC judges blackmailed and attacked and the SC has been. Destroyed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, after your initial poor attempt having scored that massive own goal for which I then shared the BBC article, this is a slightly better one.

I personally think your a little better than the ones who disgrace your lot with abusive, disrespectful language. The points you make are fair. But can I ask, on an individual level, did you as a Khan fan call out Khan’s support of the army over things that are questionable whilst he was in power? You only answer for yourself
Here is my response to you. I have been a poster on here during IK era, I'm happy for you to dig out any posts from me that supported any unlawful acts of the Army during IK era. For me its simple knowledge, as humans we are best of all creations simply because we have the ability to interpret what is right from wrong. You take that ability from humans then we are no different to animals. I know what is right and what is wrong, period. IK is in the right and Army is in the wrong as of today. We can approach this statement from multiple different angles and try bending it one way or other but the bottomline will not change.

As far as IK fan is concerned I'm a big admirer of his resilience, courage, leadership and motivational skills but I do not support him in a policy making environment. For policy making abilities we need to have diplomats in place who come through the ranks like Jai Krishna in India.

The reason for ultimate support for IK is that under his leadership there is a chance Pakistan can create an environment that would be condusive for policy making. At the moment frankly speaking its a jungle where might rules. In such environments there can be no policy-making. We need Khan to turn this back from a jungle to a place where people can live. Once we have a sense of law, security and economy prospering I would prefer Khan to stand down and seasoned diplomats to take over. That is my take on it.
 
Imran's lawyer verbally abuse Adiala jail staff member

Faisal Chaudhry, the lawyer of incarcerated Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan, was engaged in a verbal altercation with the Adiala jail administration after he was barred from entering the prison on Thursday.

In the video — available with Geo News, the lawyer can be heard unleashing a flurry of abuse at jail Assistant Superintendent Imran Riaz as he visited the prison to meet Imran, who is incarcerated in Adiala jail.

"Why was I stopped...who dare not clear me," Chaudhry asked the police officer. Meanwhile, the assistant superintendent can be heard giving explanations to the lawyer.

Following the altercation, Chaudhry registered a complaint against the jail administration at Adiala Jail Chowki.

In his application, he maintained that his "power of attorney" is attached to all cases of PTI founder Imran Khan and added that the jail staff stopped him at the prison's entrance and did not allow him to enter.

The lawyer noted that an anti-terrorism court had scheduled the hearing of a case related to the attack on General Headquarters (GHQ).

Chaudhry complained that he was forced to sit in the deputy superintendent's room for two hours for protesting. He also accused the jail staff of harassing him and other petitioners, urging the police to take legal action against the staff members.

The 71-year-old cricketer-turned-politician has been behind bars since August last year after he was sentenced in Toshakhana case-I — one of the dozens cases registered against the former premier since his ouster from power in April 2022.

 

Imran's letter to army chief has 'shaken ruling' party: Barrister Saif​


Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) claims that a letter written by Imran Khan to the army chief has unsettled government officials, and drawn strong reactions from the governing coalition.

Without refering to the army chief, Barrister Dr Muhammad Ali Saif , spokesperson for the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa government, alleged that the letter had created panic within the federal government, though he did not name any specific officials.

He claimed that ministers from the "fake government" had launched propaganda even before the letter reached its intended recipients.

"The ruling party’s leaders have lost sleep over Imran Khan’s letter," Saif said in a statement, adding that senior Pakistan Muyslim League - Nawaz (PML-N) figures were "visibly disturbed."

PTI has repeatedly accused the government of using legal and administrative tactics to suppress the opposition.

Saif asserted that once Khan is released, his party will hold the governing coalition accountable for what he described as "unlawful actions and political victimisation."

The letter, reportedly addressed to senior military leadership, has yet to receive an official response.

Earlier this week, contrary to the claims made by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), security sources have revealed that no letter from former prime minister Imran Khan was received by Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Asim Munir.

Sources familiar with the matter stated that the news regarding Khan’s letter reached the military leadership through the media, not through any formal communication.

The controversy began when PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and Khan’s lawyer, Faisal Chaudhry, informed the media that Khan had written a letter to the army chief, urging him to "reevaluate policy."

Speaking outside Rawalpindi’s Adiala jail, Chaudhry elaborated that the former premier, in his capacity as PTI supremo and ex-prime minister, had sent a six-point letter to General Munir.

Contrary to the claims made by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), security sources have revealed that no letter from former prime minister Imran Khan was received by Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Asim Munir.

Sources familiar with the matter stated that the news regarding Khan’s letter reached the military leadership through the media, not through any formal communication.

The controversy began when PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and Khan’s lawyer, Faisal Chaudhry, informed the media that Khan had written a letter to the army chief, urging him to "reevaluate policy."

Speaking outside Rawalpindi’s Adiala jail, Chaudhry elaborated that the former premier, in his capacity as PTI supremo and ex-prime minister, had sent a six-point letter to General Munir.

 
Imran's lawyer verbally abuse Adiala jail staff member

Faisal Chaudhry, the lawyer of incarcerated Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan, was engaged in a verbal altercation with the Adiala jail administration after he was barred from entering the prison on Thursday.

In the video — available with Geo News, the lawyer can be heard unleashing a flurry of abuse at jail Assistant Superintendent Imran Riaz as he visited the prison to meet Imran, who is incarcerated in Adiala jail.

"Why was I stopped...who dare not clear me," Chaudhry asked the police officer. Meanwhile, the assistant superintendent can be heard giving explanations to the lawyer.

Following the altercation, Chaudhry registered a complaint against the jail administration at Adiala Jail Chowki.

In his application, he maintained that his "power of attorney" is attached to all cases of PTI founder Imran Khan and added that the jail staff stopped him at the prison's entrance and did not allow him to enter.

The lawyer noted that an anti-terrorism court had scheduled the hearing of a case related to the attack on General Headquarters (GHQ).

Chaudhry complained that he was forced to sit in the deputy superintendent's room for two hours for protesting. He also accused the jail staff of harassing him and other petitioners, urging the police to take legal action against the staff members.

The 71-year-old cricketer-turned-politician has been behind bars since August last year after he was sentenced in Toshakhana case-I — one of the dozens cases registered against the former premier since his ouster from power in April 2022.

So the media report this but can't utter a word on the 100s of missing workers, murdered journalists and not to mention the tortured prisoners. May Allah give sabre to the families against this evil regime and it's evil supporters. Both will rot in hell
 
PTI concerned over Imran’s health, seeks ‘urgent’ medical care

The PTI has expressed concern over reports of Imran Khan’s rising sugar levels and irregular heartbeat, urging the government to provide him with access to medical facilities and allow doctors of his choice to examine him.

In a statement released on Thursday, the party’s information secretary, Sheikh Waqas Akram, criticised the government for denying the PTI chief his “constitutionally mandated rights and facilities”, as outlined in jail manuals.

“The PTI founder is being denied all facilities as part of a scheme to break him, both physically and mentally. Imran Khan’s health and well-being are of utmost importance to us and any negligence in providing medical care could have serious consequences,” Mr Akram observed.

He called upon the government to ensure Imran Khan’s regular medical checkup by “physicians of his choice”.

Mr Khan should be allowed to communicate with his sons as it is his “fundamental, legal and constitutional right”.

He called for the immediate release of Mr Khan, his wife, former foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi and other PTI leaders.

“Imran Khan is being persecuted for an unrelenting dedication to reshaping Pakistan into a welfare state, where the government truly represents the people, rather than serving the interests of power-hungry elite.”

He criticised Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif for extending an olive branch to India despite its policy of genocide and ethnic cleansing in held Kashmir.

“Pakistan should not engage in talks with India until the latter softens its stance and reinstates Kashmir’s special status — before the unilateral constitutional amendment of Aug 5, 2019,” the PTI leader said.

DAWN NEWS
 
Imran alleges mistreatment in 2nd ‘open letter’ to army chief

PTI founder Imran Khan wrote a second “open letter” to Chief of Army Staff General Asim Munir on Saturday, complaining about alleged mistreatment in prison among other things.

Previously on February 3, Imran wrote to the army chief over what he claimed was a growing distance between the military and the public. As per his letter, the army needed to reevaluate its policy to win over the public with reasons and suggestions proposed by Imran to remedy the situation.

However, security sources said the letter had not been received by the military and dismissed reports in the media about the existence of such a letter. They claimed that the military establishment was not interested in receiving such a letter.

In the letter posted on Imran’s X account today, he said: “The prison administration … has done every injustice to me to increase pressure on me while violating basic human rights. I have been kept in a death cell. I was kept in complete lock-up for 20 days where even sunlight did not reach me.

“For five days, the electricity in my cell was turned off and I was in complete darkness. My exercise equipment and TV were taken away and I was not even allowed to have newspapers. They even withhold books whenever they want. Apart from these 20 days, I was again kept in lock-up for 40 hours. My sons have been made to talk to me only three times in the last six months.”

He said he had written the previous with “good intentions for the betterment of the country and the nation, so that the growing gap between the army and the people could be reduced day by day, but the response was given with extreme frivolity and irresponsibility”.

Imran claimed that 90 per cent of the people would support his previous letter’s points if public opinion was taken on them.

The PTI founder talked at length about his criticism of recent legal and political developments in the country and the issues being faced by his party and workers.

“All this is against our traditions and due to this, hatred against the army has increased a lot among the people, which if corrected in time, is better for both the army and the country, otherwise irreparable losses may have to be borne from all this,” he reiterated in line with his first letter.

Concluding his letter, Imran said: “It is essential for the stability and security of the country that the gap between the army and the people be reduced, and there is only one way to reduce this growing gap, and that is for the army to return to its constitutional boundaries, separate itself from politics and fulfil its assigned responsibilities, and this task will have to be done by the army itself, otherwise this growing gap will become fault lines in the term of national security.”

Source: Dawn News
 
𝐅𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐫 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐈𝐦𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐊𝐡𝐚𝐧’𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐋𝐚𝐰𝐲𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐌𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐚𝐭 𝐀𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐚 𝐉𝐚𝐢𝐥; 𝐌𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧:
- 𝟏𝟎 𝐅𝐞𝐛𝐫𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓

“I applaud the public for their participation in the nationwide protests on February 8th, including in Punjab, Sindh, and Swabi. Despite this era of blatant fascism, people continue to respond to my call, breaking the shackles of fear, proving that the nation is now determined to attain genuine sovereignty at any cost. The fraudulent, subservient government is fearful. Raids were conducted across the country, and individuals were subjected to violence. Under the pretext of cricket, we were denied permission to hold a rally at Minar-e-Pakistan, which clearly indicates the panic and desperation of this worthless government.

My letter to the Army Chief was written with the sincere intentions for the betterment of the country. This is my nation, and I am deeply concerned about its future. I would like to address the DG ISPR and state that the reputation of the military is being completely ruined. While you claim to be uninvolved in politics, every citizen is aware that the country's affairs are being controlled by the Army Chief. Individuals like Mohsin Naqvi, who have never even contested a councilor’s election, have been imposed upon the nation, wielding authority over everything from cricket to internal and external affairs.

Repression and fascism are rampant in the country. The 26th Constitutional Amendment has effectively dismantled the Supreme Court’s independence. Justice Qazi Faez Isa was the most biased and shameless Chief Justice in history, surpassing even Justice Munir in his misdeeds. During his tenure, democracy was trampled upon and human rights were grossly violated, yet instead of taking action against this injustice, he facilitated every illegal move. Rule of law and human rights have been severely compromised. Sham elections were carried out and the people were deprived of their mandate. The Chief Election Commissioner and Qazi Faez Isa served as facilitators of the establishment, and in the process, betrayed their offices and the nation. As a result, a forged parliament, a fraudulent prime minister, and a phony president have been installed.

What Qazi Faez Isa was being used for is now being done by the Constitutional Bench. The country has been reduced to a banana republic. Judges are supposed to hear both sides of an argument, but, one-sided decisions are being handed down here.

I would like to send a special message to Justice Yahya Afridi: Given the state of law and human rights in the country, you should take a stand against this injustice and become an honorable part of history, rather than playing a disgraceful role like Qazi Faez Isa.

Voices of media and social media have been silenced through the draconian amendments to the PECA law. State of the internet in the country is evident to all. The economy has suffered a loss of $1.7 billion. The country is experiencing a rapid brain drain, with 1.7 million people having moved abroad. Economic devastation and unemployment have left the entire nation distressed.

We demanded commissions be formed to investigate May 9th (2023) and November 26th (2024) because we knew that negotiations were a mere facade. Forming a commission on the events of February 8th (2024) was way out of their league. Had their intentions been sincere, they would have established commissions on May 9th and November 26th to uncover the truth, as these were matters related to human rights violations that required immediate action. However, nothing was done. The establishment murdered unarmed civilians on November 26th when they ordered opening fire on them.

The country’s most notorious money launderers have been imposed as rulers upon the nation. Intelligence agencies kept informing us for 30 years about how these two families looted the country. They themselves showed us files on the Surrey Palace and Mayfair flats. NAB was set to recover Rs 1,100 billion, and during our tenure, we successfully recovered Rs 480 billion because we were serious about accountability. In contrast, in the previous 17 years, only Rs 80–90 billion had been recovered. However, amendments were made to NAB laws to dismiss all corruption cases against these two families. Cases involving Maqsood Chaprasi, Mayfair properties, One Hyde Park bribery, and the Omni Group were all closed. At first, we were informed about their corruption, yet now, through rigging, they have been imposed on us simply because their expertise lies in appeasing the establishment. The military has destroyed its own credibility by installing faces that the public has rejected, creating resentment among the masses. This fraudulent system can only survive through crushing Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and keeping our people unjustly incarcerated, ensuring that the puppet government remains in place and the electoral fraud is not revealed. Any survey will reveal the growing chasm between the public and the military.

Where democracy flourishes, progress follows. The examples of East and West Germany are before us. East Germany suffered under dictatorship, while West Germany thrived under democracy. After 50 years, the world witnessed how democracy propelled West Germany’s development. The Soviet Union is another example—it was progressing rapidly in the 1970s, but within 15 to 20 years, authoritarianism and policies akin to abducting voices of dissent led to its downfall, while the United States surged ahead.”

#حق_کی_جیت_ہو_گی
 

'Haven't received any letter from any one': COAS​


Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff General Asim Munir on Thursday has denied 'receiving any letter from any one,' stating that 'even if any such letter was received, he would forward it to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.'

Speaking informally to journalists during a luncheon hosted for Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the Prime Minister's House, General Munir said, “I have not received any letter from anyone, and even if I do, I will not read it. I will send it to the Prime Minister.”

The army chief highlighted that Pakistan is progressing well and reiterated his commitment to the country’s development and stability.

The statement comes a day after PTI lawyer Faisal Chaudhry claimed outside Adiala Jail that Imran Khan had sent a third letter to the army chief, raising concerns about alleged electoral fraud that he said favoured a minority over the majority.

Chaudhry stated that Imran Khan has shared the contents of the letter with PTI leadership, and the letter will cover six main points. He confirmed that the letter would address issues such as the need for deep structural reforms, the damage caused to democracy by the government's policies, and other critical matters.

Chaudhry also revealed that Khan and other party leaders had appeared in the GHQ case, and that PTI has decided to appoint Aamir Dogar as a member of the opposition’s negotiation committee. He added that new members would also be included in the political committee, with a formal notification set to be issued today.

Former Prime Minister Imran Khan had earlier written a second open letter to Army Chief General Asim Munir, following up on a previous letter that aimed to address the widening gap between the military and the public. The letter was shared on Imran Khan's official Twitter account. In it, he expressed disappointment, stating, "I wrote the first open letter to you with the intention of improving the country’s situation, but the response was given with extreme irresponsibility and lack of seriousness."

 

Imran Khan will get no response of any letter: Siddiqui​


Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) Senator Irfan Siddiqui said on Thursday that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan will get no response of any letter.

Expressing his thoughts on Samaa TV, Siddiqui said, "The army chief has said that he had received no letter. He [COAS] said that if he receives any letter, it will be sent to the prime minister."

"There is no idea that where he [PTI] founder dispatches a letter," said Siddiqui.

He maintained: "He [PTI founder] wants to create a divide between the army and the masses."

Earlier on Wednesday, the PML-N decided against initiating the dialogues with the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).

Expressing his thoughts on Samaa TV, PML-N Senator Irfan Siddiqui, while emphasizing the government's policy, said, "The PTI has denounced the invitation of the prime minister and National Assembly speaker for holding the talks."

"This party is not formed for holding talks and embracing the democratic attitude. We will see afterward whether they are serious to hold talks or not," Siddiqui said.

"But we are not giving an offer to hold the talks. Now it is up to the PTI that when the party needs to hold serious talks," said the PML-N senator.

 

PTI founder should write letter to prime minister, not army chief: Ahsan Iqbal​


Federal Minister for Planning and Development Ahsan Iqbal said on Saturday the Prime Minister’s Office was the central place for addressing political matters and if the PTI founder is serious, he should write to the prime minister instead of involving the military.

Speaking at an event, he said that repeatedly writing to the army chief was an attempt to drag the military into politics.

He stated that the PTI built its anti-corruption narrative but it was an attempt to drag the military into political experiment again.

Expressing surprise over lawyers Ali Zafar and Salman Akram Raja defending the case of 190 million pounds, Iqbal accused them of misleading the nation.

The minister highlighted that in countries like the US, the UK or Germany, politicians involved in such corruption would be permanently disqualified, but efforts are being made here to protect them.

 

Imran Khan urges establishment to consider facts in his open letters​


Former Prime Minister Imran Khan has instructed his party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), to launch a strong political movement after Ramadan and assigned two senior leaders to engage with the opposition.

His lawyer, Faisal Chaudhry, shared these details with the media outside Adiala Jail after meeting Imran Khan.

According to Faisal Chaudhry, Imran Khan has directed Asad Qaiser and Umar Ayub to take charge of political coordination and establish communication with opposition parties. Imran Khan also reiterated that his open letters highlight facts that the establishment must consider.

Faisal Chaudhry claimed that PTI leaders facing legal action are subjected to controlled trials inside Adiala Jail, while those who left the party after 9 May have been spared legal consequences.

He revealed that PTI has filed a petition in Islamabad High Court demanding an open trial. "Lawyers and journalists are selectively allowed inside the courtroom. The judiciary is being crushed, and basic rights are being violated," he said.

Imran Khan’s lawyer reiterated PTI’s stance that 9 May events were a false flag operation, demanding an independent judicial commission to investigate the incidents.

"We seek justice under the Constitution and law. We disagree with the Supreme Court bench’s remarks on military courts," Faisal Chaudhry added. Imran Khan, through his lawyer, also highlighted Pakistan’s economic crisis and human rights violations.

"The sanctity of homes was violated in crackdowns against PTI. Basic human rights are being trampled. With media censorship and internet restrictions, who will invest in Pakistan?" Khan was quoted as saying.

He further claimed that after PTI’s removal, Pakistan suffered a $45 billion economic loss, and the current government was formed "on the shoulders of Form 47"—a reference to alleged electoral rigging.

 
Imran Khan’s lawyer reiterated PTI’s stance that 9 May events were a false flag operation, demanding an independent judicial commission to investigate the incidents.
That's PTI supporters openly claim the 9th may terrorist activities and they openly spout hate against the country's establishment
 
Last edited by a moderator:
560 days in Jail , with no live coverage yet he is the most popular and stronger voice in the country having unparalleled popularity.

The opponents are only delaying the inevitable, IK will reign supreme at the end
 

After months in isolation, Imran Khan gets to talk to his sons​

RAWALPINDI: The Adiala jail authorities have arranged a telephonic conversation between Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan and his sons in light of the court orders, ex-premier's lawyer Faisal Chaudhry said on Saturday.

Chaudhry informed journalists about the development outside the Adiala jail.

An arrangement to the above effect was made after the PTI politicians, earlier this month, alleged that their party founder, who has been behind bars since August 2023, was languishing in isolation and denied visitors.

The former ruling party leaders also accused the jail authorities of withholding most of the rightful amenities, which they said the PTI founder deserved as a former premier of the country.

On January 28, Senior Special Judge Central-I Shahrukh Arjumand accepted, on humanitarian grounds, Khan's plea seeking the aforementioned facilities.

Meanwhile, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) had also directed the jail authorities to arrange the WhatsApp call, besides ordering the PTI founder's medical check-up by his physician, The News reported.

It must be noted that IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq heard the petition seeking the above facilities on January 23 and directed the authorities to allow Khan to meet his wife, Bushra Bibi, and political leaders as per jail rules.

During that hearing, Khan's counsel argued that the facilities were withdrawn despite court orders. However, a TV and additional newspapers were restored after the court took notice.

The IHC CJ inquired about the procedure for WhatsApp calls, to which the jail authorities responded that they had arranged a meeting under the directives of trial courts on humanitarian grounds.

Before adjourning the hearing, the IHC CJ directed the jail authorities to obtain directives from the Adiala jail superintendent and report back to the court.

Source: GEO
 
Aleema Khan: Imran Khan remains firm on rejecting any deal

PTI founder is healthy and in good spirits, no ear infection, she tells media outside Adiala Jail

Aleema Khan has reaffirmed that PTI founder Imran Khan is not considering any deal.

“What could they possibly demand from him in a deal?” she asked while addressing the media outside Adiala Jail.

She assured everyone that Imran Khan was in good health and high spirits, dismissing rumours about his medical condition.

“We met him today after a week. All his court hearings have been postponed. We also met Bushra Bibi, and I can confirm that Imran Khan looked completely fine and happy,” she said.


 
Back
Top