- Joined
- Nov 25, 2023
- Runs
- 12,723
Few quality teams is better than having multitudes but a monoply over this format would be inimical too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Remember, when Australia's power was reduced in the ICC, it is natural to dislike BCCI. Who cares about how Bangladesh was treated.That’s why i’m asking what’s your reason? There needs to be a reason to dislike BCCI..only Pakistanis actually have a genuine reason.
Given the general tenor of cricket today and given the singular focus on money in the symposium arranged by the MCC, I find the above quote mildly amusing."In cricket, money is seen as a dirty word but it shouldn't be because it is the only way to sustain the game." [Mark Nicholas]
Fans don't care because their team is not good in Tesrs. Not the other way around. Indian fans are diverse. Not everyone is pure IPL fan. Recent England series was an example. Teams don't have enough bench strength to form a good Test team. SA to some extent NZ can still field a God Test unit. WI batting needs fixing..Their fans love Test cricket. Remaining teams can relegate themselves.I would support a no test format or let aus-ind-eng enjoy it within themselves. It's quite evident many teams and 99% of the fans gives no crap about test matches. Take a look at the lower ranked teams like SriLankan, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, etc - do you think they care much about test?
Are you sure about England? Cricket is losing popularity in England among native Brits. That's why they came up with The Hundred.
Test cricket has been crying out for reform for a long time.
There needs to be more context to the matches and a reason for why they are played.
The test championship does help but it seems weird to have a one off final after a two year build up.
A test championship with the winner crowned at the end of the cycle and promotion/relegation could work...but it will be heavily subsided by T20 cricket because there is no chance in hell that. Sri Lanka v West Indies div 2 test championship match will be a revenue generator.
I like the idea. But unfortunately, only good on paper. Not practical. For league B.• Test League A: India, Australia, England, South Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan.
• Test League B: Sri Lanka, West Indies, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Zimbabwe, Ireland.
One automatic promotion (B1) and relegation (A6) at the end of each two year cycle.
B2 also contests A5 in a promotion/relegation playoff at this point. A5 keeps its position if it wins, draws, or ties the game; if B2 wins, it is promoted and A5 is relegated.
A1 and B1 both receive silverware. No playoff system for A1 - they are the Test League champions.
Could expand from 6 to 7 teams in each League if full membership is granted to (eg) Nepal or Scotland.
I like your idea in principle but what incentive will be League B team have to climb up to League A?• Test League A: India, Australia, England, South Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan.
• Test League B: Sri Lanka, West Indies, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Zimbabwe, Ireland.
One automatic promotion (B1) and relegation (A6) at the end of each two year cycle.
B2 also contests A5 in a promotion/relegation playoff at this point. A5 keeps its position if it wins, draws, or ties the game; if B2 wins, it is promoted and A5 is relegated.
A1 and B1 both receive silverware. No playoff system for A1 - they are the Test League champions.
Could expand from 6 to 7 teams in each League if full membership is granted to (eg) Nepal or Scotland.
What we can do for now is to cut down test cricket to 4 days, Max 80 overs a day, and have day/night matches. This will naturally attract more TV viewership & more crowd in the grounds who can come after work.
What we can do for now is to cut down test cricket to 4 days, Max 80 overs a day, and have day/night matches. This will naturally attract more TV viewership & more crowd in the grounds who can come after work.
• Test League A: India, Australia, England, South Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan.
• Test League B: Sri Lanka, West Indies, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Zimbabwe, Ireland.
One automatic promotion (B1) and relegation (A6) at the end of each two year cycle.
B2 also contests A5 in a promotion/relegation playoff at this point. A5 keeps its position if it wins, draws, or ties the game; if B2 wins, it is promoted and A5 is relegated.
A1 and B1 both receive silverware. No playoff system for A1 - they are the Test League champions.
Could expand from 6 to 7 teams in each League if full membership is granted to (eg) Nepal or Scotland.
Test cricket will inevitably die anyway. The more you tweak things, the faster will be the death.
Only 5 teams should play test cricket - Ind, Eng, Aus, SA, Pak
Where is NZ? They are a former WTC winner and also whitewashed India at home.
6 teams should play minimum.
Actually fans caring or not matters very little. MONEY does not care. Test cricket = 40h blocked on tv time. Tv channels cares more about money. If fans are not sitting in front of tv for that amount of time where they can sell that time for other sports for shorter time and more money, what do you think will happen. England's last test against WI had Jimmy retiring so that's an anomaly. In 2024 a sport like a ODI is already too long, nvm test cricket. More and more cricketers will quit test to play t20 and ODI only.Fans don't care because their team is not good in Tesrs. Not the other way around. Indian fans are diverse. Not everyone is pure IPL fan. Recent England series was an example. Teams don't have enough bench strength to form a good Test team. SA to some extent NZ can still field a God Test unit. WI batting needs fixing..Their fans love Test cricket. Remaining teams can relegate themselves.
It will probably end as it started. England and Australia just playing each other on biannual rotating tours, with some matches involving a 3rd team (in that case South Africa).
Test cricket could end up as a “legends/classics” sort of event, i.e. a 3 way tri-series every couple of years between England, Australia and India, with the two best performing sides contesting a final.
This will pretty much kill off WI, SL and BD. Perhaps even PCB. Could throw in NZ and SA in this mix too. These three rely heavily on T20I to generate revenue. Besides the handouts from ICC.How to make cricket great again? Ban T20 at international level.
Maybe franchise leagues can have T20 but international T20s should be scrapped.