What's new

Ravindra Jadeja vs Shahid Afridi - Who is a better ODI all-rounder?

Ted123

Tape Ball Star
Joined
Sep 26, 2017
Runs
693
Two different kinds of all-rounders but for a good period of their career fell in the bits-and-pieces league.

While Ravindra Jadeja is economical with ball as his economy suggests over his career, Afridi was a wicket taking bowler in the second half of his career.

With bat, Afridi's peak is better as he averaged 23@114 but Jadeja is handy also averaging 31@85 SR. Jadeja is a better fielder but Afridi was very good also in field.

Both average close to 35 with the bowl although Afridi has done his share of minnow bashing.

Who is the better all-rounder between the two. Discuss!
 
In ODIs no contest really. Afridi had impact, Jadeja scores soft runs and picks soft wickets. Although inconsistent Afridi was an out and out matchwinner on his day, made opponents nervous. Jadeja has been playing ODIs and T20s for a decade now with maybe 1/2 match winning efforts. In tests Jadeja is genuinely brilliant, in other two formats he should play only as 12th man.

Afridi is like Marat Safin, a world beater on his day but indiscipline, laziness, lack of intelligence made him an underachiever. Jadeja is that steady 40th ranked ATP player who makes it to 3rd round in all grand slams for many years without anyone noticing or caring about him.
 
I would gladly take an Afridi in the current Indian ODI team, it would do wonders for our balance.
 
In ODIs no contest really. Afridi had impact, Jadeja scores soft runs and picks soft wickets. Although inconsistent Afridi was an out and out matchwinner on his day, made opponents nervous. Jadeja has been playing ODIs and T20s for a decade now with maybe 1/2 match winning efforts. In tests Jadeja is genuinely brilliant, in other two formats he should play only as 12th man.

Afridi is like Marat Safin, a world beater on his day but indiscipline, laziness, lack of intelligence made him an underachiever. Jadeja is that steady 40th ranked ATP player who makes it to 3rd round in all grand slams for many years without anyone noticing or caring about him.

Well put.
 
Interesting comparison. Afridi is an underachiever by all standards. The bloke was very talented but didn't wanted to change, work hard and achieve greatness. But he had that sheer presence on field. No moment in life is boring with Afridi on your side.

Jadeja,on other hand, has been a good ODI player for India as well. He won India CT 2013 with all-round performance. <B>But he is not someone who can run through side with the bowl or can win the game single-handedly with the bat which Afridi could</B>. But he had his share of big moments.

The reason in bold is why I will take Afridi but this is still a close comparison in ODIs. Afridi well ahead in T20s though and Jaddu in tests.
 
Last edited:
Afridi was as much as match winner as a match loser lol He has let Pakistan down many times at crucial juncture with reckless shot. Having said Jaddu has rarely won matches for us in ODI.
 
Shahid Afridi is one of the best LOI all rounder and the best spin bowling all rounder by a good margin.

It's incredible to have a player like him in the team: bowl 10 overs as a very good spinner, is a brilliant fielder and ad to that the number of game he has impacted with the bat.

This thread is a shame for the forum. The batting equivalents of such a comparaison will be Nichols Vs Hayden and the bowling equivalent will be Southee Vs Bret Lee.
 
Afridi is a better spinner against SENA countries than Jadeja. He could pick up key wickets with his fastish leg breaks.
 
Afridi’s peak was much better, but the guy played for 20 years in different role - from specialist bowler, batsman to motivational leader.... hence his legacy got tarnished lot. If Jadeja can drag his career till 2027 WC, I am sure he won’t end like what he is now. Jadeja is a better Test all-rounder, but in LO, even Afridi’s worst wasn’t that low because guy always was a threat with his spin, and his peak was frightening - his batting stats of 23+/120+ between 1996-2015 is exceptionally good for that era, probably equivalent to 30/150 in last 5 years ODI cricket.
 
Afridi offers more with the ball . With the bat, Jadeja can play support knocks . If Afridi comes off , he will probably win the game.

Afridi takes this 1 for me.
 
Afridi by far. Please don't embarrass us Indians by opening such ****** threads.

Afridi was a match winner. Sure he turned up like once in 20 matches but he at least got the job done everytime he fired unlike Jadeja who chokes at the end always
 
Jadeja has 12 fifties out of which 11 have been in a losing cause.
You heard that right.
If ever stats were meaningless.
He is a non entity really.
 
Batting at 7 with an average of 23 and very high strike rate is actually very good for most teams. The problem for Pakistan was that they got into precarious situations more often than others so it made him seem worse than he actually was, but in most teams with a strong batting line up that would have been fantastic. Add to that he was a pretty threatening bowler on his day and very economical as well as part of one of the best ODI bowling line-ups there was. Therefore Afridi easily
 
Oh lol then whats the point .
Even then i cant remember when jadaje single handedly won India any game except his 2014

Jadeja was player of the series in CT 2013 which was won by his own country.

Anyways, I have given my explanation on my first post. I will pick Afridi.
 
jadeja should not play another ODI for India.
It is over in CT 2017. Just like it was over for Ashwin.

Scoring runs which are in losing causes, not his main job actually, is of no use for the team.
It is his bowling, which is mainly important for the team, is of little use for the team in ODIs.

In tests, however, he is more than decent.

Afridi played some very good innings in ODIs and even in tests he has a decent record in the 27 tests he played. Even though afridi is by no means an ATG allrounder, comparing him to jadeja is injustice to afridi.
 
in LOI? afridi easily despite what the numbers say. jadeja scores a lot of soft runs.

in tests? jadeja easily. especially these days he is turning out to be a great bowler everywhere. Battinf is handy too.
 
Afridi had an ex-factor about him and opponents used to fear him. Same can't be said about Jadeja. Jadeja is more like a containing bowler in ODI who can bat a bit.

Jadeja is a better Test player though.
 
Afridi by miles.

Afridi could've won games on his own.

Could've doesnt mean did that frequently though. Luke bronchi can win games on his own better than kohli. So like ronchi by miles?
 
Could've doesnt mean did that frequently though. Luke bronchi can win games on his own better than kohli. So like ronchi by miles?

Ronchi didn't really have a long career. He was a nobody.

Afridi has around 400 ODI wickets and over 8,000 ODI runs. He was a legend in ODI.

As some Indian posters have mentioned, Jadeja had many soft runs. He is a fine Test player but quite ordinary in ODI. It is why India went for Chahal and Kuldeep.
 
Sanjay Manjrekar is a huge Afridi fan. We all know how he feels about Jadeja
 
Every time Jadeja bats he loses the game.

I've never seen Jadeja single handedly win a game e.g. a 7-12.
 
I don't like afridi at all but I will take him over jadeja anyway over him in limited overs. Afridi was miles better then him.
 
Jadeja is nothing special in LOI. Afridi was very inconsistent, but he was a much bigger match winner than Jadeja.
 
The only reason he has had a long ODI/T20 career is because our selectors, coaches, captains can't differentiate between formats. Jadeja never does well in IPL either. Ashwin was a gun white ball (especially T20) bowler in the first half of his career, not the case with Sir. I am not basing this just on stats, I have had the misfortune of watching this misfit ply his trade without accountability for 12 years. More than a decade after making a fool out of himself in consecutive WT20s with both bat and ball, he will do the same in this year's T20 WC. Still won't be dropped, idiots will cite 2023 WC, Indian conditions, balance, anything to keep their golden boy in the scheme of things. I won't mind if he is specialist 12th man though, best in the world at that.
 
Jadeja is nothing special in LOI. Afridi was very inconsistent, but he was a much bigger match winner than Jadeja.

Accurate statement. On his day Afridi is a genuine match winner. An unstoppable phenomenon. Jaddu cannot do even 10% of what Afridi could do.
 
Well, Jaddu won CT 2013, what Afridi won?

A whole frieken t20 World Cup and took us to another final in a t20 World Cup as well. I wasn’t even gonna reply to this thread cause it’s just an insult to Boom Boom. Afridis has won uncountable matches with the bat and ball for Pakistan. Where else Jadeja brings out his cringeworthy sword celebration after scoring a 50 and than his team always goes on to lose the match. No Indian even agrees Jadeja comes anywhere close to Afridi. Stats is another thing afridis presence alone on the field made a much bigger impact than all of jadejas whole career combined
 
Afridi hands down. Except that CT in 2013, Jadeja has done literally nothing in odi or T20 cricket.

He's a better test cricketer though.
 
Both pathetic. Although Jadeja is even worse (ODI cricket).
 
T20 it is but this is about ODIs?

he had an amazing peak in LOIs from 2006-2012. If he was playing for any decent batting he could have been the one lifting the 2011 wc trophy as well. He led his side really well from 2010-2012. Imagine being given captaincy of the team in the news for spot fixing and other scandals with on-going tour of Eng and yet lead that team to a 2-3 loss was amazing. Yes we did lost that series but Afridi did restore Pak's pride and his efforts to revive Pak cricket after spot fixing are underrated and this credit is given to Misbah when in fact it was Afridi who restore Pak's better image after that scanadal.
 
Afridi’s peak was much better, but the guy played for 20 years in different role - from specialist bowler, batsman to motivational leader.... hence his legacy got tarnished lot. If Jadeja can drag his career till 2027 WC, I am sure he won’t end like what he is now. Jadeja is a better Test all-rounder, but in LO, even Afridi’s worst wasn’t that low because guy always was a threat with his spin, and his peak was frightening - his batting stats of 23+/120+ between 1996-2015 is exceptionally good for that era, probably equivalent to 30/150 in last 5 years ODI cricket.
very well put. Indeed pre 2006 Afridi produced some gem of innings esp remember his knocks against Ind on our India tour where he destroyed India with his pure batting. Post 2006 he worked hard on his bowling and was a very very good spinner for some years to come. He dragged his career which is why he has some haters but he always had his place in the team. He alwayd produced some match winning performances.
 
Lala all the way. Although inconsistent with the bat, but Lala is probably the best spin all rounder we have ever seen. A LOI ATG All rounder.
 
You can hate Afridi for his terrible lows between the soaring highs. But this thread would have been better created when Jadeja actually won a LOI/T20 with bat or ball. Afridi has done this lots of times. He arguably even won his country a T20 WC to take them out of the depression of losing the previous one to their bitter rivals :rabada2

Jadeja flatters to deceive. So close, yet always so far.

In test cricket, Jadedja has been the superior bowler. But Afridi has produced some stunning batting displays there too. You could use Jadeja's test bowling to maybe prop Jadeja up, but am sure Afridi fans who are better educated on his test bowling record could perhaps find a counter there as well.
 
Afridi’s peak was much better, but the guy played for 20 years in different role - from specialist bowler, batsman to motivational leader.... hence his legacy got tarnished lot. If Jadeja can drag his career till 2027 WC, I am sure he won’t end like what he is now. Jadeja is a better Test all-rounder, but in LO, even Afridi’s worst wasn’t that low because guy always was a threat with his spin, and his peak was frightening - his batting stats of 23+/120+ between 1996-2015 is exceptionally good for that era, probably equivalent to 30/150 in last 5 years ODI cricket.


I agree that peak Afridi was better in ODIs than Jadeja, but I have to disagree with the adjustment of his batting stats.

With the way Afridi batted, his batting stats would have remained identical in every era unless you go back 50-60 years when fielding standards were horribly low.

There is no way Afridi would have averaged 30 in ODI cricket today. Simply too risky and brainless to average anything beyond 25.

His dismissals had nothing to do with the pitch or the boundary size or even the quality of bowling. It was his shot selection and complete absence of temperament.
 
he had an amazing peak in LOIs from 2006-2012. If he was playing for any decent batting he could have been the one lifting the 2011 wc trophy as well. He led his side really well from 2010-2012. Imagine being given captaincy of the team in the news for spot fixing and other scandals with on-going tour of Eng and yet lead that team to a 2-3 loss was amazing. Yes we did lost that series but Afridi did restore Pak's pride and his efforts to revive Pak cricket after spot fixing are underrated and this credit is given to Misbah when in fact it was Afridi who restore Pak's better image after that scanadal.

He is a brilliant T20 player(ATG player in that) but in ODIs, he is a bit overrated. No doubt one of the most entertaining player the game has seen but if someone like Hardik Pandya continues the way he has played and doesn't improve, he would reach Afridi's level in ODI format.

His career best moment came in the 2009 T20 world cup semis and finals.
 
[/b]

I agree that peak Afridi was better in ODIs than Jadeja, but I have to disagree with the adjustment of his batting stats.

With the way Afridi batted, his batting stats would have remained identical in every era unless you go back 50-60 years when fielding standards were horribly low.

There is no way Afridi would have averaged 30 in ODI cricket today. Simply too risky and brainless to average anything beyond 25.

His dismissals had nothing to do with the pitch or the boundary size or even the quality of bowling. It was his shot selection and complete absence of temperament.

Yup my thoughts too.

Tho he would have striked at a better rate.

Maybe 25-28 at 130 fo sure (his career SR is 117).

---

On topic, every kid was an Afridi fan during his pomp.

A complete entertainer and a match winner on his day.

If he had worked on his bowling, he could have been so much more.

I still rememeber his 7fer against WI.

WHAT THE HELL WAS THAT.

That drift and turn.....if he had produced that type of bowling against others, very very few would have played him well.

Afridi (in form version) would EASILY walk into the Indian ODI and T20 team right now.

This is the era for him.
 
Last edited:
Jadeja has been underutilized as hell, and as a utility player, he indeed is a total package today. He has the power game, up there with greatest fielders of all time, and is a good spin bowler.

Having said that, Shahid Afridi's mediocre career trumps Jadeja the ODI player. Just the iconic knocks Afridi played (fluke or not) are enough to put him ahead of Jadeja's below average ODI career.
 
Last edited:
Jadeja has been underutilized as hell, and as a utility player, he indeed is a total package today. He has the power game, up there with greatest fielders of all time, and is a good spin bowler.

Having said that, Shahid Afridi's mediocre career trumps Jadeja the ODI player. Just the iconic knocks Afridi played (fluke or not) are enough to put him ahead of Jadeja's below average ODI career.

Having said all that, I have never seen an individual grow like I have seen Jadeja. Since the beginning of his career, he has taken his skills, fitness and personality upwards every season. Looked like a total lallu when he first came, and now he has the swagger of a cheetah and skills to go along.

Hats off to Sir. :salute:
 
Different kinds of players.Afridi will win or lose you the game while Jaddu would have lesser impact either way

Depends on what you want

In T20s,Afridi easily,In tests Jadeja has done better
 
[/b]

I agree that peak Afridi was better in ODIs than Jadeja, but I have to disagree with the adjustment of his batting stats.

With the way Afridi batted, his batting stats would have remained identical in every era unless you go back 50-60 years when fielding standards were horribly low.

There is no way Afridi would have averaged 30 in ODI cricket today. Simply too risky and brainless to average anything beyond 25.

His dismissals had nothing to do with the pitch or the boundary size or even the quality of bowling. It was his shot selection and complete absence of temperament.

He would have averaged 20-25% more than his career average simply because average scores of game has increased by more than that. His brainless batting is what kept it at 23/120 level, otherwise even in that career he would have averaged much more.

I understand where you are coming from, but your logic is flawed - even on the flattest of tracks, against soft attack on a small ground, he’ll throw his wicket many times, which he had done many times, but difference is the days he stood there, he scored like 71 of 52 ..... now that figure will covert to 110 of 60. Its simple law of average - ODI per scores have gone to 325+ from ~250, and % of soft opponents have increased significantly...... outcome is Tendulkar’s stats of 44/85, Kohli’s 60/90, Babar’s 55/85 ..... and hacks like Josh Butler maintaining unreal stats of 45/120.... in 90s & 2000s, this guy won’t have survived average 35 balls per innings. If Josh Butler & Johnny Bairstowe can maintain that sort of stats for a significant number of innings, I am sure Afridi won’t have been much inferior to them in modern era.
 
Jadeja has played 160 ODIs and has only one match winning 50!!! One match winning fifty score in 160 ODIs. He has scored 12 50s, and we only won once!!


Comparing Afridi to Jadeja is a crime. This is when Afridi himself was mediocre. Sad part is, Indians made so much fun of Afridi through out his career, yet they gladly defend the useless Jadeja
 
Jadeja has played 160 ODIs and has only one match winning 50!!! One match winning fifty score in 160 ODIs. He has scored 12 50s, and we only won once!!


Comparing Afridi to Jadeja is a crime. This is when Afridi himself was mediocre. Sad part is, Indians made so much fun of Afridi through out his career, yet they gladly defend the useless Jadeja

Not one it's two. England 2011 and England 2013. There was a tied match in NZ as well which actually was a quality inning.

http://www.howstat.com/cricket/Statistics/Matches/MatchScorecard_ODI.asp?MatchCode=3461

http://www.howstat.com/cricket/Statistics/Matches/MatchScorecard_ODI.asp?MatchCode=3325

Overall, Jadeja has total 11 man of match awards in 160 odis, one includes CT'13 final.

http://www.howstat.com/cricket/Statistics/Players/ManOfMatch2_ODI.asp?PlayerID=3644
 
If my team needs 80 off 80 balls with 6 down I’d back Jadeja to win it with that being said Afridi was a much better bowler than him
 
He would have averaged 20-25% more than his career average simply because average scores of game has increased by more than that. His brainless batting is what kept it at 23/120 level, otherwise even in that career he would have averaged much more.

I understand where you are coming from, but your logic is flawed - even on the flattest of tracks, against soft attack on a small ground, he’ll throw his wicket many times, which he had done many times, but difference is the days he stood there, he scored like 71 of 52 ..... now that figure will covert to 110 of 60. Its simple law of average - ODI per scores have gone to 325+ from ~250, and % of soft opponents have increased significantly...... outcome is Tendulkar’s stats of 44/85, Kohli’s 60/90, Babar’s 55/85 ..... and hacks like Josh Butler maintaining unreal stats of 45/120.... in 90s & 2000s, this guy won’t have survived average 35 balls per innings. If Josh Butler & Johnny Bairstowe can maintain that sort of stats for a significant number of innings, I am sure Afridi won’t have been much inferior to them in modern era.

Lol. Excellent post. I was about to write something similar along the lines it's ridiculous that hacks like butler have better stats then the greats of the game such as Tendulkar, Lara etc.
 
jadeja absolutely is far superior to shahid in tests. in odi afridi is ahead but jadeja has had his fair share of brilliance.
 
jadeja absolutely is far superior to shahid in tests. in odi afridi is ahead but jadeja has had his fair share of brilliance.

Jadeja is not very useful in ODI. He has had spells of being an economic bowler(but not wicket-taking) which can be useful, but a strike rate below 90 batting in the lower order is pretty useless honestly. India has a lack of useful lower-order all rounders otherwise he wouldn't play ODIs
 
Jadeja is not very useful in ODI. He has had spells of being an economic bowler(but not wicket-taking) which can be useful, but a strike rate below 90 batting in the lower order is pretty useless honestly. India has a lack of useful lower-order all rounders otherwise he wouldn't play ODIs

His batting is useless. But he is a handy spin bowling option to have. Very economical in this era where KulCha are getting smashed these days for more runs.
 
Oh god, Afridi >>>>>>>>>>>> Jadeja. I don't even remember any performance of Jadeja except his last knock in the WC. Afridi has over a dozen memorable innings which were unimaginable back in the days. Also Afridi was the top wicket taking bowler in 2011 WC. Not even gonna talk about the fastest century. Jadeja...what has he done?
 
Oh god, Afridi >>>>>>>>>>>> Jadeja. I don't even remember any performance of Jadeja except his last knock in the WC. Afridi has over a dozen memorable innings which were unimaginable back in the days. Also Afridi was the top wicket taking bowler in 2011 WC. Not even gonna talk about the fastest century. Jadeja...what has he done?

Jaddu- CT'13
 
He would have averaged 20-25% more than his career average simply because average scores of game has increased by more than that. His brainless batting is what kept it at 23/120 level, otherwise even in that career he would have averaged much more.

I understand where you are coming from, but your logic is flawed - even on the flattest of tracks, against soft attack on a small ground, he’ll throw his wicket many times, which he had done many times, but difference is the days he stood there, he scored like 71 of 52 ..... now that figure will covert to 110 of 60. Its simple law of average - ODI per scores have gone to 325+ from ~250, and % of soft opponents have increased significantly...... outcome is Tendulkar’s stats of 44/85, Kohli’s 60/90, Babar’s 55/85 ..... and hacks like Josh Butler maintaining unreal stats of 45/120.... in 90s & 2000s, this guy won’t have survived average 35 balls per innings. If Josh Butler & Johnny Bairstowe can maintain that sort of stats for a significant number of innings, I am sure Afridi won’t have been much inferior to them in modern era.

Very well put.

Afridi is massively underrated on this forum. A bowler who would bowl 10 economical overs with a wicket or two and those occasional breathtaking spells like the 6/38 against Australia, the 5-fer out of nowhere against Sri Lanka in 2011 or even the 7/12 against the WI, with an average of 25 runs coming in 12-15 balls at number 7-8, sometimes a 50 coming at a strike rate of 200+, and a more than decent fielder would walk in any team of the current era.

The problem was that in the last few years of his career, Pakistan's batting order was full of legends (Akmal, Shehzad, Hafeez, Maqsood,...) and he often used to come at a 150-6 like situation. He used to score those 25 runs from 10 balls and leave the team at 190-7, making the scorecard look even worse than before. Had he played against a team surrounded by capable and consistent anchoring batsmen, those 25 runs from 10 balls would have catapulted Pakistan's total to 300+ instead of 190-7.

His bowling was never a problem and it actually improved a lot in the late 2000s. The way he used to bat, his runs would have been more valuable to the current Pakistan team instead of that 2010-2015 team where they used to feel happy after crossing 200.
 
Ok, Manjrekar was roasted for his comments on jadeja but he was not far off the mark. Ok, jadeja might have improved his batting. But neither his batting not bowling won India any matches of note. And comparing him with Afridi is a joke.
 
Shahid Afridi is one of the best LOI all rounder and the best spin bowling all rounder by a good margin.

It's incredible to have a player like him in the team: bowl 10 overs as a very good spinner, is a brilliant fielder and ad to that the number of game he has impacted with the bat.

This thread is a shame for the forum. The batting equivalents of such a comparaison will be Nichols Vs Hayden and the bowling equivalent will be Southee Vs Bret Lee.

Jadeja is definitely a Greater Cricketer than Afridi if we consider Tests.
 
Jadeja is definitely a Greater Cricketer than Afridi if we consider Tests.

Is Afridi really as great a cricketer as this comparison looks similar to Southee Vs Lee assuming Southee is Jadeja and Lee is Afridi?
 
Jadeja has a strike rate of 44.7 in 2010s which is same as Afridi's strike rate of 44.7 between 90s-10s. How exactly is Afridi a wicket taker and Jadeja not?

Afridi has economy of 4.62 in previous era while Jadeja is 4.89 in this era. Again, who is more economical?

I think Jadeja is overall better spinner than Afridi but the peak version of Afridi was better.

As a batsmen, Afridi is better but non reliable.

As a fielder, Jadeja is better.

Rest too much hyperbole in this thread.
 
Last edited:
I see two extremes of PAK supporters here in PP these days.

One group is overenthusiastic and they are still in denial mode - equates everything based on the PAK cricket team 15-20 years back or earlier. And, these bunch regularly get a reality check these days. But, there is a small group as well in the other end - they try to change past based on the current state of PAK cricket.

This thread is one such case - SHAHID AFRIDI wasn't Shadab Khan FGS. Afrdi wasted his God gifted ability for cheap cricket and never bothered to develop his game, instead of being the corner stone of PAK cricket, guy made his way through the shallow route - occasional brilliance, lots of media mockery and a loyal base of deluded fans (most of whom teen agers, at least mentally). He had the ability to finish career with ~150 Tests, ~500 Test wickets @ <35 and close to 8K Test runs @ ~35 average, but a SR over 75 and some 150+ catches - may be 15+ 5fors and 15+ Test hundreds to add to that. That's may not be ATG state, but definitely one that would have taken him to the status of PAK/Asian greats.

BUT still, the guy was an outstanding LO player, and an ATG T20 player. He played in an era when bowlers had a remotely fair game hence his loose cannon efforts often ended in premature death - countless times, he got out (we called - threw his wicket) to a harmless ball when he was in full command. That was his second nature, something won't have changed regardless of playing conditions. But, what would have changed in this "modern" era of cricket is his countless innings of 20s & 30s - ending to a difficult ball or hold out to boundary. These are the innings that would have made difference in current playing conditions - with modern compressed bats, just bring the boundary rope 5 metres inside, even in 1990s & 2000s, Shahid Afridi would have been a different proposition with bat.

As a bowler, he was mean and economical - and he played most of his games when there was some art of spin play still left; so the guy ended as a decent leg-spinner. The way these days leg-spinners like Rashid, Shadab, Chahal, Shodhi, Adil, Tahir ..... are running through batting line-ups, I just wonder what Afridi could have done today. Yes, his economy would have suffered, but I am sure every other bowling parameters - SR, average, 4/5fors would have been much better. Honestly, I don't think this Afghan guy Rashid is a better leggi than Afridi at his pomp and Rashid is running riots even in IPL, which tells lot about the quality of spin play these days.

Like most PAK cricketers, Shahid Afridi ruined his own career himself, then dragged it to tarnish his legacy; otherwise guy could have been a living legend for the right reasons. I always say - education helps, more so in a game like cricket .... can't be more true for five PAK players of past years - Shoaib, A Razzak, Mo Yousuf and the one & only Shahid Khan Afridi - fifth one was Misbah ul Haq, at the opposite end.
 
My question is - If SENA countries have to pick one of them (for all 3 formats) who they will choose?
 
This is a silly thread,
Afridi the bowler was day in day out an accurate ODI bowler capable of containment as well as Jadeja but with the skill and capability to occasionally shape or break open a game with a bunch of wkts which Jadeja never will have

Batting wise, both are essentially no.7/8 players. Afridi being far and away the better striker and with vastly greater attacking skillsets. It is not even a comparison in terms of impact creation ability
 
Don't know whether Afridi was a better all rounder than Jadeja but the latter is a very overrated LoI cricketer for sure. Not good enough to play LoIs. But he'll still play on.
 
Though I'm a big fan of Jadeja, i must say Afridi is better in limited overs cricket..
Jadeja's bowling is not convincing in the shorter format and even with average of just 23, Afridi is better matchwinner.
 
This thread is the equivalent of my Ahmad Shahzad vs Kohli thread which didn’t last for long.

Afridi could take us from a position where we’d be facing a defeat to a position where we could actually win the game. He did it with both bat and ball. Unfortunately, our top order was **** so we were heavily reliant on Afridi to perform every game.

When the chips are down for India, Jadeja would not be the player I’d want to bring our team back into the game, it would be Afridi.
 
Back
Top