[Report] BCCI accused of switching pitches in ICC World Cup 2023

Sycamore

Tape Ball Star
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Runs
785
As per reports, ICC consultant is not happy as the agreement has been ignored for the semi final in a last minute switch up.

The Cricket World Cup has been plunged into an astonishing row amid claims the Indian board have switched the pitch for their team's semi-final on Wednesday against New Zealand in Mumbai without the ICC's permission.

And they could do the same if India reach Sunday's final in Ahmedabad, where three of the four group games have been played on different surfaces from those on the schedule.

Pitches at ICC events are prepared under the supervision of the governing body's consultant, Andy Atkinson, who agrees in advance with the home board which of the numbered strips on the square will be used for each game.


But Mail Sport has learned that the agreement has been ignored as the tournament reaches its climax, with the semi-final set to take place on a pitch that has already been used twice - potentially assisting India's world-class spinners as they seek to reach their first 50-over World Cup final since 2011.

The pitch for Wednesday's game at Mumbai's Wankhede Stadium was supposed to be No 7, an entirely fresh surface unused for any of the venue's four group matches.

But a WhatsApp message circulated on Tuesday to a group of more than 50 BCCI and ICC officials confirmed that the first semi-final had been moved to pitch No 6, which has already staged games between England and South Africa, plus India and Sri Lanka.

Atkinson is understood to have been told there is an unspecified problem with pitch No 7 - an opinion he is thought not to share.

It follows concerns that plans for the final at Narendra Modi Stadium on Sunday, where India or New Zealand will meet Australia or South Africa, who play in Kolkata on Thursday, may also be changed unilaterally.

Atkinson is understood to have grown frustrated at the lack of a straight answer about preparations for the final, which prompted him to fly to Ahmedabad last Friday.

And it has transpired that while the tournament's opening game, between England and New Zealand, had taken place on the pre-agreed pitch No 6, none of the next three matches conformed to the schedule, with Atkinson claiming in an email to his bosses that the changes had been made 'without proper notice or forewarning'.

The matter was complicated by the fact that he was told by the ICC's senior events manager at the venue that the India v Pakistan game there on October 14 took place on pitch No 7, as per the schedule, when it actually took place on pitch No 5.

Atkinson's recommendation is that the final, too, should be played on pitch No 5, which has been used only once, though he learned last week that pitch No 6 - which has been used twice - could get the nod, again bringing India's spinners into play.

When he asked who authorised the various changes, the BCCI said it was the Gujarat Cricket Association, while the GCA claimed they had been acting under instructions from the BCCI, with the requests made directly by the Indian team management.


In his email, Atkinson warns: 'As a result of these actions, one must speculate if this will be the first ever ICC CWC [cricket World Cup] final to have a pitch which has been specifically chosen and prepared to their stipulation at the request of the team management and/or the hierarchy of the home nation board.'

He added: 'Or will it be selected or prepared without favouritism for either of the sides competing in the match in the usual manner, and unquestionably because it is the usual pitch for the occasion?'

A spokesperson for the BCCI said: 'The ICC independent pitch consultant works with the host and venues on their proposed pitch allocations and this process is ongoing throughout an event of this length and nature.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/c...inst-New-Zealand-Mumbai.html#article-12749525
 
In his email, Atkinson warns: 'As a result of these actions, one must speculate if this will be the first ever ICC CWC [cricket World Cup] final to have a pitch which has been specifically chosen and prepared to their stipulation at the request of the team management and/or the hierarchy of the home nation board.'

These mails should have had been confidential. How media got hold of it I wonder.
 
Thoughts on this ? Makes a mockery of the pinnacle tournament of cricket. How can this be called a world event?
"Atkinson is understood to have been told there is an unspecified problem with pitch No 7 - an opinion he is thought not to share."

Why not share? That exactly is the main crux of he issue.
 
"Atkinson is understood to have been told there is an unspecified problem with pitch No 7 - an opinion he is thought not to share."

Why not share? That exactly is the main crux of he issue.
There is dodgy stuff all around.

Have a read of this

"The matter was complicated by the fact that he was told by the ICC's senior events manager at the venue that the India v Pakistan game there on October 14 took place on pitch No 7, as per the schedule, when it actually took place on pitch No 5."
 
"Atkinson is understood to have been told there is an unspecified problem with pitch No 7 - an opinion he is thought not to share."

Why not share? That exactly is the main crux of he issue.
This is someone from the ICC saying this.

This is messed up and should be sorted out before the game is played.

We don't want to be screwed over because of India playing underhanded games.
 
There is dodgy stuff all around.

Have a read of this

"The matter was complicated by the fact that he was told by the ICC's senior events manager at the venue that the India v Pakistan game there on October 14 took place on pitch No 7, as per the schedule, when it actually took place on pitch No 5."
My question was a bit different actually.

There seems to be an issue with pitch no. 7 as he was told.

He may agree with it or he may not.

Since he seems like in disagreement to the extent of his mails getting leaked/shared; he should have had directly address the issue.

HE chose not to share it. The VERY REASON around which this whole speculations are revolving.

Shold have mentioned atleast in the mail itself if not publicly told to the media. no?
 
This is someone from the ICC saying this.

This is messed up and should be sorted out before the game is played.

We don't want to be screwed over because of India playing underhanded games.
So who thought not to share the reason?

Atkinson or the ICC official who was the messenger?

The "He" in the statement could be represented by both.
 
I won't lie that sounds super shady.

If it's a one-off, you can suggest there might be a legitimate issue with the scheduled pitch. Definitely requires a detailed investigation or the fairness of the match conditions becomes a farce.
 
I won't lie that sounds super shady.

If it's a one-off, you can suggest there might be a legitimate issue with the scheduled pitch. Definitely requires a detailed investigation or the fairness of the match conditions becomes a farce.
It's not a one off ...since the Pak vs India pitch has been lied about as well...
 
I won't lie that sounds super shady.

If it's a one-off, you can suggest there might be a legitimate issue with the scheduled pitch. Definitely requires a detailed investigation or the fairness of the match conditions becomes a farce.
If true India should be dqed.

I know it won't happen and Pakistan would be worse opponents for us but better that than a team that rigs pitches in the tournament progresses.
 
Nothing dodgy about this at all. That's why every non Indian is up in arms about the BCCI rigging pitches in an international tournament.
Australia created the same drama in test series. Turned it was nothing. All the pitches are belters at the Wankhede. India domianted batting first, fieding first, on turning wicket, on seaming wicket. Pretty much everywhere they have dominated. Can they explain what is the difference between 2 pitches?
 
Atkinson’s email warns: “As a result of these actions, one must speculate if this will be the first ever ICC CWC [cricket World Cup] final to have a pitch which has been specifically chosen and prepared to their stipulation at the request of the team management and/or the hierarchy of the home nation board.


Cheats. Hope they fail miserably. If not in the Semi, in the Final against whoever.
 
Australia created the same drama in test series. Turned it was nothing. All the pitches are belters at the Wankhede. India domianted batting first, fieding first, on turning wicket, on seaming wicket. Pretty much everywhere they have dominated. Can they explain what is the difference between 2 pitches?
Brother, you're cheating, you know it. You know it's wrong. Stop defending this crap.
 
This story has gone global.

ICC should respond and punish India if true.

Blatant cheating from an international body to try tilt the game in their favour.
If "true" of what?

What's the "true" version here?
 
Brother, you're cheating, you know it. You know it's wrong. Stop defending this crap.
So.... The ICC official/Atkinson refused to state the reason for pitch change yet "cheating" allegation is running in fantasy?
 
I'm giving benefit of doubt. But when the officials themselves didn't reveal the reason, there's hardly anything here to speculate "cheating"

I think everyone goes full monty with this to dilute India's performance. I guess that is how India topped the table in 2019/2015 :)
 
As Jadeja said after the BGT series this year, white people start seeing pitches in India from their flights. What a bunch of cowards lol.
Glad that India never whines about playing conditions in SENA. Not even when they were served those ridiculous boundary dimensions against England last WC, only way they could have countered Kuldeep.
 
As Jadeja said after the BGT series this year, white people start seeing pitches in India from their flights. What a bunch of cowards lol.
Glad that India never whines about playing conditions in SENA. Not even when they were served those ridiculous boundary dimensions against England last WC, only way they could have countered Kuldeep.
I kinda expected this tabloid news before hand. They do this every time. All that is left in the fray are SENA teams. THey do it religiously.
 
Is there any proof or just speculation? I mean, it is the dailymail. Why would India use a 2 day old pitch. This does not make any sense.
 
How hard is it for Indians to understand, its not about the fact you are no 1 or no 9. If you break the rules you need to be punished. The rules are in place for a reason. Just because you have the best team, doesn't give you authority to mess about your opponents.

Yes they would've won regardless, but breaking playing conditions is not on. And if you do, then get ready to be ridiculed.
 
How hard is it for Indians to understand, its not about the fact you are no 1 or no 9. If you break the rules you need to be punished. The rules are in place for a reason. Just because you have the best team, doesn't give you authority to mess about your opponents.

Yes they would've won regardless, but breaking playing conditions is not on. And if you do, then get ready to be ridiculed.
So far news is whatsapp news about a "consultant". Why don't ICC do something about it if they break the law. It conveniently appears on tabloids, whatsapp.
 
So far news is whatsapp news about a "consultant". Why don't ICC do something about it if they break the law. It conveniently appears on tabloids, whatsapp.
Let's see which pitch is used, if it's slow and nothing like a normal Wakhede pitch it will give this story credence.
 
How hard is it for Indians to understand, its not about the fact you are no 1 or no 9. If you break the rules you need to be punished. The rules are in place for a reason. Just because you have the best team, doesn't give you authority to mess about your opponents.

Yes they would've won regardless, but breaking playing conditions is not on. And if you do, then get ready to be ridiculed.
Was England punished in 2019 WC? Sky commentators played it off like a small thing and ICT didn't lodge any complaint.
 
Let's see which pitch is used, if it's slow and nothing like a normal Wakhede pitch it will give this story credence.
Sure we will see. Typically it is going to be a good batting wicket. There will be a bit of everything. Anyone who has seen IPL can tell. Even the oldie Chawla did very well under lights at wankhede. Same way some seamers also did. If it is a turning wicket NZ will be the beneficiary as they have 3 spinners.
 
how do you know BCCI is rigging pitches?
Your name suggests you are a Chennai fan and the first wc match between India and Aus in Chennai shud give you the answer. The slow pitch was made specifically to favor India, it wasn't a ODI pitch by any measure. Every pitch for Indian games was bespoke made to order pitch.
 
This thread will be a proper laughter gold mine once Shami, Bumrah, Siraj do their thing. Some posters here would believe the earth is flat before admitting Indian bowling attack is tilted towards its quicks. Insecurity stems from this.
 
Australia created the same drama in test series. Turned it was nothing. All the pitches are belters at the Wankhede. India domianted batting first, fieding first, on turning wicket, on seaming wicket. Pretty much everywhere they have dominated. Can they explain what is the difference between 2 pitches?
You are preaching to the choir, Naveen!
 
Sure we will see. Typically it is going to be a good batting wicket. There will be a bit of everything. Anyone who has seen IPL can tell. Even the oldie Chawla did very well under lights at wankhede. Same way some seamers also did. If it is a turning wicket NZ will be the beneficiary as they have 3 spinners.
No, Indians have a fixed formula for pitch, which isn't exactly huge turning pitch but very slow pitch. Like the one against Australia or against SA or Pakistan, even the dharamshala one against Kiwis was tried to be made similar. Now some BCCI apologists will say the pitch is same for both teams, of course it is but pitches are specifically made based upon one team's strength.
 


its been rolling on all sites, sshameful looks like Hasan Raza will have the last laugh
 
No, Indians have a fixed formula for pitch, which isn't exactly huge turning pitch but very slow pitch. Like the one against Australia or against SA or Pakistan, even the dharamshala one against Kiwis was tried to be made similar. Now some BCCI apologists will say the pitch is same for both teams, of course it is but pitches are specifically made based upon one team's strength.
If they are very slow pitches, how come Shami and Bumrah are unplayable? Are they both better than Malcolm Marshall?
 


its been rolling on all sites, sshameful looks like Hasan Raza will have the last laugh
What are these sites lol .nz, nybreaking lol
 
Let's see which pitch is used, if it's slow and nothing like a normal Wakhede pitch it will give this story credence.
Brother.... You already brought allegation of cheating.... Even pak ppers didn't go that far as of yet lol.
 
No, Indians have a fixed formula for pitch, which isn't exactly huge turning pitch but very slow pitch. Like the one against Australia or against SA or Pakistan, even the dharamshala one against Kiwis was tried to be made similar. Now some BCCI apologists will say the pitch is same for both teams, of course it is but pitches are specifically made based upon one team's strength.
That is nonsense when NZ batted very well for 40 overs and they imploded. Chennai pitch is always like that. That is something everyone knows.
 


its been rolling on all sites, sshameful looks like Hasan Raza will have the last laugh
same copy/paste article.
 
NZH - it's the leading story, stuff and fox sports aus are reporting it.
Obviously Newzealand will copy and paste the same news since NZ is playing. They will keep pushing the narrative hoping it will stick. Guess what. Nothing will stick.
 
Your name suggests you are a Chennai fan and the first wc match between India and Aus in Chennai shud give you the answer. The slow pitch was made specifically to favor India, it wasn't a ODI pitch by any measure. Every pitch for Indian games was bespoke made to order pitch.
We know how Chennai pitches behave. Among the few available at this ground, the difference between those pitches are not that much. They all are slow and low. In ODIs, the weather conditions play bigger role than the differences in these pitches because they are not that different. In the particular match you quoted, Australia won the toss and chose to bat. They had the better conditions, but poor batting let them down. In other words, India was a better equipped team than Australia on that day.
 
If they are very slow pitches, how come Shami and Bumrah are unplayable? Are they both better than Malcolm Marshall?
Bcoz Shami and Bumrah know how to bowl hard lengths on slow pitches, while others aren't as good at it. It's not about a pitch favouring fast or slow bowlers in general, it's about giving advantage to a bowling line up in particular which bowls exceedingly well on slow pitches compared to the rest of the teams. I would say all that is fine if it's a bilateral series, but in an ICC wc tournament I would assume that it's not upon the home board to decide on the pitches.
 
Lets assume this news is true. What do the Indians think about this ? Fair play ?
 
Lets assume this news is true. What do the Indians think about this ? Fair play ?
Nope it is not. It's blatant pitch fixing. And it hasn't started now, for every match India was getting made to order pitches. While I am wearing a blue tshirt to today's match in the stadium but in my heart I would not mind getting ousted by kiwis and showing our players the mirror.
 
Where did he give a statement?
In his email, Atkinson warns: 'As a result of these actions, one must speculate if this will be the first ever ICC CWC [cricket World Cup] final to have a pitch which has been specifically chosen and prepared to their stipulation at the request of the team management and/or the hierarchy of the home nation board.'

He added: 'Or will it be selected or prepared without favouritism for either of the sides competing in the match in the usual manner, and unquestionably because it is the usual pitch for the occasion?'
 
News story is spreading like wildfire globally. Never really bought into the BCCI influence conspiracies before but this is pretty clearly grounds for disqualification. The fact that this accusation is being made by the ICC independent pitch consultant is a massive deal. ICC would not have let this story get out if it there was not evidence behind the accusations.

A few lines in particular caught my attention:

“In his email, Atkinson warns: 'As a result of these actions, one must speculate if this will be the first ever ICC CWC [cricket World Cup] final to have a pitch which has been specifically chosen and prepared to their stipulation at the request of the team management and/or the hierarchy of the home nation board.'”

Also the finger pointing is unbelievable. The BCCI is blaming the Gujarat Cricket Association while the GCA is saying it was acting under direct guidance of the BCCI:

“When he asked who authorised the various changes, the BCCI said it was the Gujarat Cricket Association, while the GCA claimed they had been acting under instructions from the BCCI, with the requests made directly by the Indian team management.“

This finger pointing is as close to an admission as you can get.. whichever party is responsible it seems clear that this happened.

Be prepared to be gaslit by Indian nationalists about why this is not a big deal or why this is all fake. The Indian team is good and probably would win regardless, but it is absolutely wrong and disqualifying to exert influence over independent decision making like this during an ICC tournament.
 
In his email, Atkinson warns: 'As a result of these actions, one must speculate if this will be the first ever ICC CWC [cricket World Cup] final to have a pitch which has been specifically chosen and prepared to their stipulation at the request of the team management and/or the hierarchy of the home nation board.'

He added: 'Or will it be selected or prepared without favouritism for either of the sides competing in the match in the usual manner, and unquestionably because it is the usual pitch for the occasion?'
Where is his statement to the press?
 
In his email, Atkinson warns: 'As a result of these actions, one must speculate if this will be the first ever ICC CWC [cricket World Cup] final to have a pitch which has been specifically chosen and prepared to their stipulation at the request of the team management and/or the hierarchy of the home nation board.'

He added: 'Or will it be selected or prepared without favouritism for either of the sides competing in the match in the usual manner, and unquestionably because it is the usual pitch for the occasion?'
That's not a statement. That's a mail.
 
This will be the order of gaslighting we will receive:

1) It did not happen.
2) It happened, but by mistake.
3) Okay, we did it on purpose, but why are you complaining? You must just be upset because you lost.
4) It’s actually a good thing that it happened.
 
Everyone knows about this, it's not a secret. I don't want to put anyone in trouble here but I went to an ICC spinsor event earlier this month, invited by one of the sponsors for the wc, and a genuine great/legend of the game from Africa, told me similar story about another Indian match, while having dinner next to me. He was of course laughing about it bcoz he thought it's a given thing with bcci.
 
Where is his statement to the press?
Meri jaan he sent this email to his boss, and this email is in the press and is being reported on


That's not a statement. That's a mail.
Oh well that's all well and good, we can disregard his expertise and experience because he failed to get up on a podium in front of a press conference. Who even uses email in 2023 anymore right?
 
lol "spreading like wild fire" if you cut and paste the same "whatsapp story" in multiple news that is not spreading like wild fire. That is merely repeating the conspiracy theory
 
Have you ever worked as a professional consultant?

You don't make statements to the press. You report back to the organisation that hired you. He has emailed the ICC about his reservations. Those emails were leaked.
Leaked emails are not authenticated unless verified/admitted by both sender and receiver.
 
Didn't England do the same against India last WC, they switched to a pitch on the extreme edge resulting in 50 m boundaries one side to counter Kuldeep. That was when they were about to be knocked out.
No one's going to pay attention to you. India should probably lose, so people who've been addicted to crying struggle to find something else to cry about :rp

So this Atkinson guy is someone appointed by the ICC to oversee pitches. He first asked for batting pitches so we could have a joke of a tournament. Luckily some of the curators made their own mind up and we got to see some good games eventually.

India have proved themselves across all types of pitches. Unlike England in 2019 who needed flat batting wickets to win a WC and failed wherever anything outside the script was provided. Where were the tears then?

The only thing India needs to prove is that they can handle knockout game pressure and perform. Nothing else needs any proving this time.

You can cry and whine all you want. This won't be the first time I've seen those tears. 2011 saw similar tears. And even after the WC was over, the next round of tears were reserved for how India didn't get the actual trophy or something like that :vk2
 
Back
Top