[Report] ICC approves the hybrid model for the Champions Trophy 2025 following an agreement between the PCB and BCCI [Post Updated #4739]

I hope the tournament is not moved out of Pakistan or played without Pakistan’s participation. If that happens, the PCB will be shooting itself in the foot, and we will become a laughingstock on the global stage.

This isn’t going to happen, and if it does, the ICC will have a lot to answer for and could lose a lot of credibility, especially if it’s being run by an Indian. If it was going to happen, it would’ve by now. Plus, it’s India refusing to travel to Pakistan, not the other way around. Pakistan also have offered a middle path which India refused again. So it's all on indias head. ICC will not make a silly move like that.



The best option would be to accept a hybrid model: play India in the UAE and host the finals and semifinals in Pakistan, provided India doesn’t reach the knockout stage. While Pakistan could also avoid traveling to India, the PCB’s financial constraints make it difficult for them to dictate terms to the ICC or BCCI
 
Why can't Pakistan not play the annual India games organized by the BCCI in the disguise of an Asia Cup or other ICC tournament? If they do it even once, this story will move to its next chapter.
why cant India refuse those games? Pakistan never said they had issues with India playing. Its India and Indian people that want to desperately boycott Pakistan and refusing to travel. This post of yours makes zero sense
 
Some Sr sport journalists are very confident that the PCB has a strong case this time. In case the BCCI says they are unsatisfied with the security in Pakistan, the PCB will highlight the fact all ICC members including the BCCI signed off on the security assessment and reports of the third parties in Pakistan. The PCB will highlight the likes of England, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh have all toured Pakistan without any issues and even many PSL seasons have been held in Pakistan without issues.

If India highlights the ongoing political situation in Pakistan, the terror attacks against Chinese, the situation in Baluchistan and KPK, the PCB will highlight the fact that all visiting teams get Presidential level security and after 2009, all teams visiting Pakistan have been provided Presidential Level security and there have been no security issues for visiting teams again.

The PCB will also highlight in court and bring it in writing that they have official Govt of Pakistan approval to respond to the BCCI *** for Tat now with no compromises i.e. if India refuses to come to Pakistan then the Pakistani Govt will refuse permission to the PCB to go to India therefore a Hybrid model is the only solution to satisfy both countries in ICC events.

They were confident last time PCB took BCCI to court. What happened?

Courts in UAE or British Virgin Islands have no jurisdiction over BCCI or GoI. GoI cannot be forced by anyone to disclose its security intelligence.

ICC will simply demonstrate that without India CT is not financially viable as broadcaster and sponsors will not pay much. Hence the need to shift the CT.


ICC will simply say that they will go ahead without Pakistan if Pakistan government refuses to allow them to play in India.
 
They were confident last time PCB took BCCI to court. What happened?

Courts in UAE or British Virgin Islands have no jurisdiction over BCCI or GoI. GoI cannot be forced by anyone to disclose its security intelligence.

ICC will simply demonstrate that without India CT is not financially viable as broadcaster and sponsors will not pay much. Hence the need to shift the CT.


ICC will simply say that they will go ahead without Pakistan if Pakistan government refuses to allow them to play in India.
how can BCCI say that India is safe for Pak to reject Fusion model? Pakistan Government might have different intelligence. So basically BCCI just has to inform and PCB has to prove? what sick joke is that?
 
why cant India refuse those games? Pakistan never said they had issues with India playing. Its India and Indian people that want to desperately boycott Pakistan and refusing to travel. This post of yours makes zero sense

Because the BCCI are greedy for money. The PCB have the opportunity to refuse said money.
 
Because the BCCI are greedy for money. The PCB have the opportunity to refuse said money.
PCB has no reason to refuse Games unless this one way treatment by ICC pushes them to Brink

BCCi stance is hypocritical. They could nt even bring solution to change groups because its unacceptable to Broadcasters but at same time Indian Media is saying Pak vs Ind game only effects 10% of CT revenue. Big and bold claim so why group change is not offered to pcb? Im sure they will happily take it . Why only PCB has to come with solution to the problem which they did not create at all?
 
how can BCCI say that India is safe for Pak to reject Fusion model? Pakistan Government might have different intelligence. So basically BCCI just has to inform and PCB has to prove? what sick joke is that?

India has UN sanctioned terrorists roaming around? No.

ICC cannot play CT 2025 without India. Financially unviable.

ICC can play any ICC event in India without Pakistan and ask BCCI to make up the losses.

If PCB can make up the losses for CT 2025 without India, they should tell ICC that.


When one country brings 90 per cent of the revenue, they can dictate terms.
 
India has UN sanctioned terrorists roaming around? No.

ICC cannot play CT 2025 without India. Financially unviable.

ICC can play any ICC event in India without Pakistan and ask BCCI to make up the losses.

If PCB can make up the losses for CT 2025 without India, they should tell ICC that.


When one country brings 90 per cent of the revenue, they can dictate terms.
these are your views about UN sanctioned Terrorists , Did BCCI officially take this position? they only say Pak has security problem and they can definitely share specific threat from Govt to Govt. it happens all over the world and intelligence compromise issue is only coming from you in your posts. you are making this up in your head while no such narrative is brought forward officially by BCCI. If BCCi had shared the threat our Govt might have agreed to not bring you in Lahore . Apparently from what i hear , Security plan was signed off by BCCi in October without sharing any issues. A general and sweeping statement on basis of past events that Pak has security problem does nt work. There are always threats thats why security is provided at highest level. Im sure BCCI put extra effort to ensure Pak safety in India last year.

we know that already but BCCI did nt say in board meeting we bring in 90% , we will do whatever we want. talk about official positions
 
Last edited by a moderator:
these are your views about UN sanctioned Terrorists , Did BCCI officially take this position? they only say Pak has security problem and they can definitely share specific threat from Govt to Govt. it happens all over the world and intelligence compromise issue is only coming from you in your posts. you are making this up in your head while no such narrative is brought forward officially by BCCI. If BCCi had shared the threat our Govt might have agreed to not bring you in Lahore . Apparently from what i hear , Security plan was signed off by BCCi in October without sharing any issues. A general and sweeping statement on basis of past events that Pak has security problem does nt work. There are always threats thats why security is provided at highest level. Im sure BCCI put extra effort to ensure Pak safety in India last year.

we know that already but BCCI did nt say in board meeting we bring in 90% , we will do whatever we want. talk about official positions

BCCI has said that the government didn't give security clearance.

Why will GoI share intelligence with a hostile nation?

GoI has told BCCI not to travel. BCCI is bound to follow that directive. This has been upheld by the Court in the previous BCCI vs PCB case.


BCCI doesn't need to say what is already known.
 
I hope the deadlock remains and the CT is scrapped
apparently Indian Media is reporting CT broadcasts Rights are worth whooping 750 Million US $
90% is from India which means 3 Indian games that are guaranteed are worth 675/3= 225 Million $ 😂😂😂😂
 
hahahahahahahaha

2024-2031 deal is 3.2 Billion which includes
2 Men OdI world cup
4 T20 Men Wc
1 more CT
and WTC finals along with Women Tournaments

You are telling me Disney star is is paying 675 Million $ out of 3.2 Billion just one CT that has only 5 Potential Indian Games? LMAO

You know little.

JioStar previously known as Disney Star paid $3bn for India territory rights from 2024 to 2027.

A little googling will help you.
 
BCCI has said that the government didn't give security clearance.

Why will GoI share intelligence with a hostile nation?

GoI has told BCCI not to travel. BCCI is bound to follow that directive. This has been upheld by the Court in the previous BCCI vs PCB case.


BCCI doesn't need to say what is already known.
Lol again
there is no evidence that GOI said this ti BCCI.. right now its just your words against Mine
 
Auction/ bids are blown out above their intrinsic value to create brand equity same is the case with broadcast rights
 
Auction/ bids are blown out above their intrinsic value to create brand equity same is the case with broadcast rights
its just proving the point of Pakistan
675 Million $ by Jio star for 3 guranteed games
surely they are nt making 225 Million $ each game by selling Ads during Ind vs Nz or Bang

Ind vs Pak is worth twice Ind vs Bang
 
hahahahahahahaha

2024-2031 deal is 3.2 Billion which includes
2 Men OdI world cup
4 T20 Men Wc
1 more CT
and WTC finals along with Women Tournaments

You are telling me Disney star is is paying 675 Million $ out of 3.2 Billion just one CT that has only 5 Potential Indian Games? LMAO
I said already and saying again if you dont know about something than don't poke your nose in that discussion.

That deals( 3.2b) only include for indian territory qnd this is show how big are Indian matches values regardless of apposition team's.

Lol :kp
 
so Jio Star is paying 225 Million $ for each CT game of India

CT 2025 750 M $ according to TOi
90% from India
675 Million$
only 3 games are guaranteed for India
675/3= 225 Million $

so Jio Star is paying 225 Million $ for each CT game of India

CT 2025 750 M $ according to TOi
90% from India
675 Million$
only 3 games are guaranteed for India
675/3= 225 Million $

Yes. But they paid far lesser for T20WC rights match wise. Because India played 9 matches. So it equalizes over the 4 years.
 
I said already and saying again if you dont know about something than don't poke your nose in that discussion.

That deals( 3.2b) only include for indian territory qnd this is show how big are Indian matches values regardless of apposition team's.

Lol :kp
can you read boy?

your numbers dnt add up

there 2 odi wc yet to be played . 20 Guaranteed Indian matches
4 t20 wc also minimum 20 games

how is CT 2025 is worth 675$ M out of 3.2 Billion $ that has only 3 Indian Games that are guranteed?
 
Yes. But they paid far lesser for T20WC rights match wise. Because India played 9 matches. So it equalizes over the 4 years.
why would they pay less for T20 matches? does nt matter if its 9 matches. Each game has its value and Broadcasters run ads to make it back

and Im sure Ind vs Bang is not worth 225 Million $ compared to Ind Vs Pak.. in your famous words it is KNOWN 😂
 
ICC Board meeting at 5 pm IST and hybrid model set to be accepted. Pakistan asks for a tri series involving India but it is being rejected

Rejection pe rejection .lol


Why can't we play a tri series involving Pak in UAE if we are willing to play them in CT in the same venue?

Is the BCCIs stance as following:

1. We will play Pakistan in ICC & ACC events anywhere in the world including India but not in Pakistan. (Reason - security situation in Pakistan)

2. We will not play Pakistan outside of ICC and ACC events anywhere in the world. (Reason - they kill our soldiers).

Looks fair to me

:rabada2
 
I think ICC/ BCCI can give little bit face saving for pakistan if they can add UAE as officially Co- host of champions trophy along with Pakistan .
 
Why can't we play a tri series involving Pak in UAE if we are willing to play them in CT in the same venue?

Is the BCCIs stance as following:

1. We will play Pakistan in ICC & ACC events anywhere in the world including India but not in Pakistan. (Reason - security situation in Pakistan)

2. We will not play Pakistan outside of ICC and ACC events anywhere in the world. (Reason - they kill our soldiers).

Looks fair to me

:rabada2
After all the drama created by PCB , I don't think BCCI can now agree to Play a tri series involving pakistan.

This is where PCB is incompetent boards .they dont know how to negotiates with BCCi or ICC . They should have keep quiet infront of media and should have talked with BCCI behind the close door.
:kp
 

"Should India Pull Out...": Broadcaster Note To ICC Makes Startling Champions Trophy Revelation​


The wait continues for any decision regarding the Champions Trophy 2025 following India's refusal to travel to Pakistan due to security reasons. Several media reports suggested that the tournament will be held in a 'hybrid' manner with India playing their matches in Dubai. However, nothing official has been announced by any organisation. Meanwhile, a note that was written by the broadcaster to the International Cricket Council (ICC) revealed how the tournament will be impacted if either India or Pakistan decides to opt out. According to Times Of India, Star India had written to the ICC when the row over the competition started with numbers showing what is at stake with respect to revenue.

While selling their media rights for the period of four years, the ICC decided to sell the India market separately. As a result, the deal with Star India amounted to 90% of their global revenue share.

According to the note, if India decides to opt out of the Champions Trophy, the ICC members will have to forego 90 per cent of the $750 million (total value of the media rights). On the other hand, if Pakistan decides to opt out, the ICC members will have to forego less than 10 per cent of the total amount.

In the report, industry sources said - "The ICC is well within its rights to shift the tournament to any country as long as it is in the best interests of the property (read: Champions Trophy). The decision is not so complicated as it is being made to look".

"There is no question of the tournament getting cancelled. As for the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) saying they will do a quid-pro with India when the Asia Cup arrives, let's be clear that the current topic is an ICC matter. The Asia Cup is for the Asian Cricket Council to decide. Neither is the federation the same, nor the broadcaster and it's a completely separate issue for PCB to think about," sources added.

 
why would they pay less for T20 matches? does nt matter if its 9 matches. Each game has its value and Broadcasters run ads to make it back

and Im sure Ind vs Bang is not worth 225 Million $ compared to Ind Vs Pak.. in your famous words it is KNOWN 😂

But ICC doesn't sell per match rights or per event rights.

So the broadcaster pays for X number of years having Y number of events. In this case 4 years and 4 events for $3bn.

The broadcaster will count his profit or losses at the end of 4 years when all matches are done and dusted.

Just now you said that Star is supposedly paying 225mn for each match for India rights. You simply divided total value of the rights by matches. Doing the same for T20WC gives a figure of $75mn.

It will go even lower for a odi WC.
 
If this is true than PCB would have already Told to ICC/ BCCI that we are accepting all the ICC/ BCCI demands so no need for any meeting.

PCB is already know that if there will be any meeting and Talk are goes to voting, its will be more humiliation for them as no one will support PCB.

But I don't trust Pakistan media so looking for indian source to confirm this news

:kp


Board Meeting is cancelled again as per GEO news right now 😂😂😂
 
But ICC doesn't sell per match rights or per event rights.

So the broadcaster pays for X number of years having Y number of events. In this case 4 years and 4 events for $3bn.

The broadcaster will count his profit or losses at the end of 4 years when all matches are done and dusted.

Just now you said that Star is supposedly paying 225mn for each match for India rights. You simply divided total value of the rights by matches. Doing the same for T20WC gives a figure of $75mn.

It will go even lower for a odi WC.
there is another way to do it

Divide each game by total value.. thats how IPl match is worth more than ICC game figure comes from.

Surely they pay for a cycle with multiple tournaments. The amount cannot be divided by tournament since its not guaranteed that future event will happen as proposed.

It will be extremely risky from Financial management to count your chickens at end of Cycle and thats not now Deal value is arrived at. its like shooting an arrow in Dark hoping it will hit the target

make it make sense
 

CT meeting: All set for the hybrid model; No takers for PCB demand of tri-series​


The much-awaited meeting to resolve the vexing issue of Champions Trophy will be held on Thursday evening with the widely-debated hybrid model all set to be accepted by the International Cricket Council (ICC). The majority of the board members - 15 in all - seem to be in favour of the two-nation formula for the 15-game championship. The meeting will be held at 3.30 PM UAE time (5 PM IST) with Jay Shah, the newly elected Chair of the ICC, presiding over it.

It is reliably understood that the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), which has been opposing the formula, is believed to have agreed for the hybrid model with the UAE most likely emerging as the second venue where five of the 15 games, including all three league matches of India and two knockout games - one semifinal and final - will be held. It could be formally announced after the meeting.

The PCB is understood to have made four-five demands in return for accepting the model but it is unlikely they will be accepted by the ICC. The key PCB demand, of course, is for a similar formula for India and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) when they host ICC events, but it remains to be seen whether that will be approved. As of now that remains the most contentious point. The PCB also seems to be asking for compensation for relocating the five games and it is unlikely there will be any opposition to this demand.

What is, however, certain is that the ICC and the Indian board will decline a key demand. PCB has insisted that India should play a tri-series involving a third country at a neutral venue, most probably in the UAE, but there is no consensus on this. In fact, both the ICC and the BCCI are opposed to the idea and it is all set to be rejected. India have not played Pakistan in a match that is not part of either a global or continental competition since 2012 and that will not change despite thr strong PCB demand.

Another demand of the PCB was to not have India and Pakistan in the same group so that Pakistan could play all their league games at home. But this was not acceptable to the ICC. An India-Pakistan game is the biggest cash cow in world cricket and even the broadcasters are believed to be opposed to the idea, as previously reported by Cricbuzz. The blockbuster game is scheduled for March 1, and will most likely be played at the Dubai International Stadium.

 

CT meeting: All set for the hybrid model; No takers for PCB demand of tri-series​


The much-awaited meeting to resolve the vexing issue of Champions Trophy will be held on Thursday evening with the widely-debated hybrid model all set to be accepted by the International Cricket Council (ICC). The majority of the board members - 15 in all - seem to be in favour of the two-nation formula for the 15-game championship. The meeting will be held at 3.30 PM UAE time (5 PM IST) with Jay Shah, the newly elected Chair of the ICC, presiding over it.

It is reliably understood that the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), which has been opposing the formula, is believed to have agreed for the hybrid model with the UAE most likely emerging as the second venue where five of the 15 games, including all three league matches of India and two knockout games - one semifinal and final - will be held. It could be formally announced after the meeting.

The PCB is understood to have made four-five demands in return for accepting the model but it is unlikely they will be accepted by the ICC. The key PCB demand, of course, is for a similar formula for India and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) when they host ICC events, but it remains to be seen whether that will be approved. As of now that remains the most contentious point. The PCB also seems to be asking for compensation for relocating the five games and it is unlikely there will be any opposition to this demand.

What is, however, certain is that the ICC and the Indian board will decline a key demand. PCB has insisted that India should play a tri-series involving a third country at a neutral venue, most probably in the UAE, but there is no consensus on this. In fact, both the ICC and the BCCI are opposed to the idea and it is all set to be rejected. India have not played Pakistan in a match that is not part of either a global or continental competition since 2012 and that will not change despite thr strong PCB demand.

Another demand of the PCB was to not have India and Pakistan in the same group so that Pakistan could play all their league games at home. But this was not acceptable to the ICC. An India-Pakistan game is the biggest cash cow in world cricket and even the broadcasters are believed to be opposed to the idea, as previously reported by Cricbuzz. The blockbuster game is scheduled for March 1, and will most likely be played at the Dubai International Stadium.


So its official now.

Hard luck @Slim @emranabbas
 
I trust brother @Devadwal s news more than any Indian media.

:kp
are your CT 2025 is worth whooping 750 Million$ ? only three Indian Games are guaranteed.

the whole cycle 2024-2031 is worth 3.2 Billion $ from Indian Broadcasters. and we are yet to see 80% of the matches after CT 2025

these Numbers dnt add up. im not contesting that India brings in 90% or whatever but whole deal of 750 Million $ for 15 match tournament seems to me blown out of proportion
 
Why would India not accept the demand for Pakistan and India to be placed in different groups? Money actually is more important than dead soldiers i guess. Shameless people if that is true.
 
If this is true than PCB would have already Told to ICC/ BCCI that we are accepting all the ICC/ BCCI demands so no need for any meeting.

PCB is already know that if there will be any meeting and Talk are goes to voting, its will be more humiliation for them as no one will support PCB.

But I don't trust Pakistan media so looking for indian source to confirm this news

:kp
if pcb already told Icc that we accept everything , can we expect schedule announcement today? 🤔
 
After all the drama created by PCB , I don't think BCCI can now agree to Play a tri series involving pakistan.

This is where PCB is incompetent boards .they dont know how to negotiates with BCCi or ICC . They should have keep quiet infront of media and should have talked with BCCI behind the close door.
:kp
All this drama created by PCB? how ?

Explain it to me or enlighten us 😂

Naqvi only said we want equal terms. what did pcb say on media to rile up BCCi? please enlighten us
 
Where the heck did Tri Series Idea came from out of the blue? Has Naqvi no shame.. ? He is going to take insult and injury both now.
 

"Should India Pull Out...": Broadcaster Note To ICC Makes Startling Champions Trophy Revelation​


The wait continues for any decision regarding the Champions Trophy 2025 following India's refusal to travel to Pakistan due to security reasons. Several media reports suggested that the tournament will be held in a 'hybrid' manner with India playing their matches in Dubai. However, nothing official has been announced by any organisation. Meanwhile, a note that was written by the broadcaster to the International Cricket Council (ICC) revealed how the tournament will be impacted if either India or Pakistan decides to opt out. According to Times Of India, Star India had written to the ICC when the row over the competition started with numbers showing what is at stake with respect to revenue.

While selling their media rights for the period of four years, the ICC decided to sell the India market separately. As a result, the deal with Star India amounted to 90% of their global revenue share.

According to the note, if India decides to opt out of the Champions Trophy, the ICC members will have to forego 90 per cent of the $750 million (total value of the media rights). On the other hand, if Pakistan decides to opt out, the ICC members will have to forego less than 10 per cent of the total amount.

In the report, industry sources said - "The ICC is well within its rights to shift the tournament to any country as long as it is in the best interests of the property (read: Champions Trophy). The decision is not so complicated as it is being made to look".

"There is no question of the tournament getting cancelled. As for the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) saying they will do a quid-pro with India when the Asia Cup arrives, let's be clear that the current topic is an ICC matter. The Asia Cup is for the Asian Cricket Council to decide. Neither is the federation the same, nor the broadcaster and it's a completely separate issue for PCB to think about," sources added.

I wonder what @sweep_shot will choose?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lol
3.2 Billion $ for 2024-2031 by JioStar
total 8 Mens Tournaments

according to Cricketjoshilla here , amount is divided by tournament

3.2/8 = 400 Million $

How is champions trophy worth 675 million$ ? Article says total value is 750 M and 90 percent is from India = 675 Million
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tri series with India lol.. What a joke.. This is absolute pathetic from loud mouth Naqvi. So the main intention at the end is to make money from India and Indian market. Shame Shame..
 
tri series with India lol.. What a joke.. This is absolute pathetic from loud mouth Naqvi. So the main intention at the end is to make money from India and Indian market. Shame Shame..
is nt it main intention of ICC to make money and by extension BCCI since according to you in last post ICC= BCCI.. shame shame
 
While selling their media rights for the period of four years, the ICC decided to sell the India market separately. As a result, the deal with Star India amounted to 90% of their global revenue share.

According to the note, if India decides to opt out of the Champions Trophy, the ICC members will have to forego 90 per cent of the $750 million (total value of the media rights). On the other hand, if Pakistan decides to opt out, the ICC members will have to forego less than 10 per cent of the total amount.

In the report, industry sources said - "The ICC is well within its rights to shift the tournament to any country as long as it is in the best interests of the property (read: Champions Trophy). The decision is not so complicated as it is being made to look".
But but what about its all about India vs Pakistan as some are claiming?
 
There will be lots of talk before like how they will share the money with UAE. Who take the gate money generating from Indian matches etc .

This is not a gully mohalla tournaments.

Now wait for more information about what was the reason of cancellation of that meeting .

The PCB chief arrived in Dubai this morning so obviously he is not coming just for the cancellation of metting when meeting itself was a virtual .


if pcb already told Icc that we accept everything , can we expect schedule announcement today? 🤔
 
There will be lots of talk before like how they will share the money with UAE. Who take the gate money generating from Indian matches etc .

This is not a gully mohalla tournaments.

Now wait for more information about what was the reason of cancellation of that meeting .

The PCB chief arrived in Dubai this morning so obviously he is not coming just for the cancellation of metting when meeting itself was a virtual .
dude why meeting was cancelled?

do you even read your posts. you have been saying lot of things here
 
is nt it main intention of ICC to make money and by extension BCCI since according to you in last post ICC= BCCI.. shame shame
It is PCB's demand to have a tri-series with India... Which is rejected. Ask Naqvi now why is he running after Indian money ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nah Idea was great but PCB don't know how to negotiated.
just keep on repeating same thing and it does nt mean it will become truth

Negotiation happens between two agreeable parties. BCCi is not even table , how will PCB negotiate? learn to know between a suggestion and demand
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is PCB's demand to have a tri-series with India... Which is rejected. Ask Naqvi now why is he running after Indian money ?
you need to stop believing everything media says and then you make it part of arguments here

PCB has not demanded anything from Nov 10- Dec 5… they were asked to come up with solution after Indian refusal. they have presented solutions. its your Jingoistic behavior , you call everything DEMAND
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dude why meeting was cancelled?

do you even read your posts. you have been saying lot of things here
I know very well but you'll not understand because you're living in delusion world

I said I'm wait for more information about what was the actual reason behind the cancellation of the meeting .​


Nothing's are confirmed as of now .

More the delay,more the chance of cancellation of the champions trophy because broadcasters and their partners needs enough time for marketing. ( Even PCB/ ICC/ BCCI agree to each other's)

They have rights as ICC is already passed the official deadlines to announced the schedule.

:kp
 
just keep on repeating same thing and it does nt mean it will become truth

Negotiation happens between two agreeable parties. BCCi is not even table , how will PCB negotiate? learn to know between a suggestion and demand

your posts on this thread are most senseless among all Indian posters here.
People's who are well aware of reality definitely understand what was/ is I'm saying.

:kp
 
so far PCB has nt shown any arrogance on Media. Naqvi appeared twice on media to talk about the issue and both times he said one sided arrangement of hybrid model is not acceptable to PCB.. and rightfully since it was BCCI that refused to travel at last moment. which part of this is arrogance to you?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
whats the wait on schedule announcement?
Why should india/ BCCI care about schedule .

Its neither india tournament nor we are hosting it.

PCB/ ICC will gets most of profit from this tournaments.

If tournaments is cancelled than it will be humiliation for PCB becouse afte 30 year's they gets one ICC tournament and they can't even host it. Lol

Now forget about Hosting any future ICC events for atleast 20 years as long as BCCI is powerful.

:kp
 
Back
Top