You're embarrassing yourself now.
So this is another tactical retreat?...
Why is it you never answer the questions? Why is it that you never respond with sources? Why is it you always claim victory using the same parameters for one side and not the other?
I'll give you some examples of the ridiculous claims by you and junaids.
'Russia will lose around Kherson because the bridges have been destroyed'
- The bridges are still standing and usable even if damaged, remember MLRS ammunition is hitting them not 1 ton bombs
'Ukraine have captured huge territory in the kherson counter offensive'
- Every single independent source and map shows no gains. I recall a week ago that I asked for the names of settlements captured or some recognised sources and you gave none.
'Russia is running out of x/y/z and the Ukrainians are hitting depos'
- the Russians are not running out of any weapons or ammunition anytime soon. I even provided an article written by the British Royal Institute for war studies that explained that the Russians started military industrial production a long time ago. You and junaids deliberately ignored it, maybe because you didn't like the content
- you never mentioned once the number of depos destroyed by the Russians. 1 depo destroyed by Ukraine according to you guys is a major victory but 5 destroyed by Russians is not even mentioned
'Russia have been unable to gain territory in the Donbas since x/y date, they are struggling/losing'
- I find this one perhaps the most laughable because you and junaids never mention the manpower mismatch of the defensive fortifications built by NATO trained units since 2014 in the area
- with just 200k the Russians have less than a third of the men Ukraine have in this conflict but they are fighting a front line over 1000km, this means that they can't perform big sweeping moves like we saw during battles in WW1/2
- these fortifications are in the forms of steel and concrete bunkers, tower buildings and underground basements, it takes time with limited forces to sweep these territories
'Russia were humiliated in Kyiv, they failed to take Kyiv in the first few days'
- I asked many times for sources that said the Russians explicitly claimed kyiv would be taken in a few days, you gave none
- I asked how many times in history army of 40k was enough to take a city of 3 million, you gave none
- I said that if you guys are confident that Russians are behind schedule or failing with their plans, why not share them with us. In fact if you have the Russian plans and timetables please share with the rest of us so we can assess as well.
I could go on and on because you guys have no idea about any aspect of the conflict.