Saudi crown prince MbS arrives in Pakistan amid fanfare, received by PM Imran Khan on red carpet

[slipcatch]

Thats your opinion you can have it. Dont why anyone in India should listen to it.

Quite a few Indian on this forum who agree with my opinion.

Frankly if one does not see him as radicalized extremists then one should get help and it become particularly important in a country which was divided on religious grounds.

It would be counter productive to an elect someone who would again incite religious violence.

And if anyone has issue anyone calling elected radicalized extremists as extremists then just see his affiliation with radicalized extremists religious groups who openly promote violence against minority.

 

[Hitman]

Lets start with the Shimla Agreement.

Their own Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto signed it back in 1972 after being taught a lesson. And then they shamelessly violated it in 1999 during the Kargil War.

 

[cricketjoshila]

Quite a few Indian on this forum who agree with my opinion.

Frankly if one does not see him as radicalized extremists then one should get help and it become particularly important in a country which was divided on religious grounds.

It would be counter productive to an elect someone who would again incite religious violence.

And if anyone has issue anyone calling elected radicalized extremists as extremists then just see his affiliation with radicalized extremists religious groups who openly promote violence against minority.

1.Again its a Pakistani opinion on what should be important in India. Again you can have it. Not sure why it should matter to Indians.

2.Whats productive and whats counter productive, lndians are fully capable of deciding it. Indians elected Modi and will elect or reject him based on their own thinking again in 2019.

3.You may keep calling anyone or any group radicalized or extremist or anything. Your personal and you are free to have it. If you expect Indians to decide their PM based on opinions of foreigners then you need a reality check.

If any Indian has issues with Modi he may not vote him. But if you think Indians are going to be swayed or care for any foreigners opinion on who should or shouldnot be India's PM then thats not going to happen.

 

[cricketjoshila]

Their own Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto signed it back in 1972 after being taught a lesson. And then they shamelessly violated it in 1999 during the Kargil War.

Before 1999 Kargil War they signed the Lahore Declaration as well.

 

[slipcatch]

1.Again its a Pakistani opinion on what should be important in India. Again you can have it. Not sure why it should matter to Indians.

2.Whats productive and whats counter productive, lndians are fully capable of deciding it. Indians elected Modi and will elect or reject him based on their own thinking again in 2019.

3.You may keep calling anyone or any group radicalized or extremist or anything. Your personal and you are free to have it. If you expect Indians to decide their PM based on opinions of foreigners then you need a reality check.

If any Indian has issues with Modi he may not vote him. But if you think Indians are going to be swayed or care for any foreigners opinion on who should or shouldnot be India's PM then thats not going to happen.

LOL.

Man, why are you wasting data, everyone with a small size brain knows it.

Again, LOL LOL LOL, it is a forum, where people discuss, talk, debate, give their personal opinion, and insult radicalized extremists for having extremists view.

When will you understand that simple concept.

LOL LOL

But again, many Indian agree that Modi is bad for the great India.

 

[Hitman]

Before 1999 Kargil War they signed the Lahore Declaration as well.

And they want India to keep their word regarding the referendum in Kashmir after violating every possible agreement they signed.

 

[cricketjoshila]

LOL.

Man, why are you wasting data, everyone with a small size brain knows it.

Again, LOL LOL LOL, it is a forum, where people discuss, talk, debate, give their personal opinion, and insult radicalized extremists for having extremists view.

When will you understand that simple concept.

LOL LOL

But again, many Indian agree that Modi is bad for the great India.

Again its your opinion you are free to have it. Dont understand why you think anyone should take it seriously, if they dont want too. Why should anyone consider anyone bad good or extremist based on your opinion?

If any or many Indians think Modi is bad.They have the right to not vote for him.

 

[cricketjoshila]

And they want India to keep their word regarding the referendum in Kashmir after violating every possible agreement they signed.

The referendum was conditional. Pakistan never fulfilled those conditions.

 

[slipcatch]

Again its your opinion you are free to have it. Dont understand why you think anyone should take it seriously, if they dont want too. Why should anyone consider anyone bad good or extremist based on your opinion?

If any or many Indians think Modi is bad.They have the right to not vote for him.

Boo boo, you have a choice lol.

I am not an Indian soldier in Kashmir who are threatening to you to accept my opinion or get killed.

Why is it so difficult for you to comprehend? lol

 

[cricketjoshila]

Boo boo, you have a choice lol.

I am not an Indian soldier in Kashmir who are threatening to you to accept my opinion or get killed.

Why is it so difficult for you to comprehend? lol

Good.So you understand that your opinion doesnot make anyone good bad or extremist or anything.

 

[slipcatch]

Good.So you understand that your opinion doesnot make anyone good bad or extremist or anything.

No!

If you are trying to suggest Modi isn't an extremists, lol

Now this isn't an opinion, it is a fact, Ant-Muslim sentiment has been normalized under Modi's tenure.

I wonder if Kashmiri has choice to be freed, not get raped, or killed.

They do if they become subservient to radicalized extremists version of hinusim. What do you have to say about that?

 

[sshakir411]

Lets start with the Shimla Agreement.

So India wants to go back to 1972 because it benefits them. Pretty dumb ask and lots have changed since then. India can keep dreaming.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Good.So you understand that your opinion doesnot make anyone good bad or extremist or anything.

This is a discussion forum, most people understand that no one's opinion is binding in a court of law. I don't know why you keep bringing up the blindingly obvious, are you afraid that someone is going to get prosecuted on the basis of what they post here?

 

[cricketjoshila]

No!

If you are trying to suggest Modi isn't an extremists, lol

Now this isn't an opinion, it is a fact, Ant-Muslim sentiment has been normalized under Modi's tenure.

I wonder if Kashmiri has choice to be freed, not get raped, or killed.

They do if they become subservient to radicalized extremists version of hinusim. What do you have to say about that?

Your opinion doesnot become a fact because you say so. But you are free to say so.

 

[cricketjoshila]

So India wants to go back to 1972 because it benefits them. Pretty dumb ask and lots have changed since then. India can keep dreaming.

Both sides signed that agreement. Agreed to abide by that. Did it have a time bound factor that Pakistan will be free to violate it when they wish to?

What about the 1999 Lahore Declaration? Again signed by both PMs and ratified by both parliaments.

Will you be ok if India abandon the Indus Water Treaty signed in 1960?

Your post reflects the mentality which is why no agreement or treaty with Pakistan holds any value.Hence its useless to have any talks.

 

[sshakir411]

Both sides signed that agreement. Agreed to abide by that. Did it have a time bound factor that Pakistan will be free to violate it when they wish to?

What about the 1999 Lahore Declaration? Again signed by both PMs and ratified by both parliaments.

Will you be ok if India abandon the Indus Water Treaty signed in 1960?

Your post reflects the mentality which is why no agreement or treaty with Pakistan holds any value.Hence its useless to have any talks.

I seriously hope you don’t deal with things in your daily life with such attitude where things are either black or white. You know the history well of the dispute and all the things that have made these agreements acceptable in their context but not as a general blanket.

 

[cricketjoshila]

I seriously hope you don’t deal with things in your daily life with such attitude where things are either black or white. You know the history well of the dispute and all the things that have made these agreements acceptable in their context but not as a general blanket.

Pakistan signed to treaties with India. Both were ratified. Why is Pakistan not following them?

If they are not following them, then why should India follow the IWT?

What is the guarantee that Pakistan will follow any agreement thats made in future?

Btw what i do in my real life isnt a matter of concern here.
[MENTION=133315]Hitman[/MENTION]

 

[slipcatch]

Pakistan signed to treaties with India. Both were ratified. Why is Pakistan not following them?

If they are not following them, then why should India follow the IWT?

What is the guarantee that Pakistan will follow any agreement thats made in future?

Btw what i do in my real life isnt a matter of concern here.

[MENTION=133315]Hitman[/MENTION]

Real life?
So are you living a fake life on pp?

 

[SportsWarrior]

And they want India to keep their word regarding the referendum in Kashmir after violating every possible agreement they signed.

Referendum in kashmir means Pak will have the first handover POK to India. Do these guys really know that. Do that first and then ask India to hold Referendum

 

[Hitman]

So India wants to go back to 1972 because it benefits them. Pretty dumb ask and lots have changed since then. India can keep dreaming.

So the Shimla agreement should not be spoken of because it was signed in 1972?