Shoaib Malik Support & Performance Watch

Should Malik be in the plans for the 2019 WC?


  • Total voters
    421
  • Poll closed .
deal...what's on table?

I don't understand...what you just said.


Ok, let me write it out.


If Malik doesn't score 2 centuries: I want you to never post in this thread again.


If Malik does score 2 centuries: You want me to.....................................................


Fill in the blanks, and we may have a deal :)
 
I don't understand...what you just said.


Ok, let me write it out.


If Malik doesn't score 2 centuries: I want you to never post in this thread again.


If Malik does score 2 centuries: You want me to.....................................................


Fill in the blanks, and we may have a deal :)

a public apology by SS, WL, Sultan and TGK.
 
The deal is between you and me.


I can't get anyone else to do anything :P

You can try to convince them...as the reward is huge...and risk is low (from their perspective)...

this is a public thread not private chat...so many parties involved.
so it's fair...
 
You can try to convince them...as the reward is huge...and risk is low (from their perspective)...

this is a public thread not private chat...so many parties involved.
so it's fair...
Again....its a deal between you and me, why do I have to get others involved, who didn't even make the bet.


I accepted the deal...now he has to do his part to make it official

No you didn't.


You made an absurd counter offer.


Its like me saying I'll accept to change my nationality to Indian.....if you get the Queen to call me and convince me.



Thats not accepting a bet.....
 
I don't know about other 10...but he would score 2 100s...

point is ..if he does...will you recant your statements?

so seem very confident stating this

Show us all that u stand by ur claim and accept the unconditional bet
I mean Malik is gonna score 2 Centuries rite? What have u got to loose?
 
Again....its a deal between you and me, why do I have to get others involved, who didn't even make the bet.




No you didn't.


You made an absurd counter offer.


Its like me saying I'll accept to change my nationality to Indian.....if you get the Queen to call me and convince me.



Thats not accepting a bet.....

I replied to TGK and you "jumped" in...

do you part...convince them for public apology as they have been bugging me for years now...

If you interested in bet then do some work...maybe it's easier than you think...as basically you all are deniers...
 
so seem very confident stating this

Show us all that u stand by ur claim and accept the unconditional bet
I mean Malik is gonna score 2 Centuries rite? What have u got to loose?

My statement is unconditional...(I have no doubt about Malik's performance) so if you want to make it conditional...bring something on table...simple.

Thats true that I have nothing to lose..but i want haters to lose!
 
Last edited:
I replied to TGK and you "jumped" in...

do you part...convince them for public apology as they have been bugging me for years now...

If you interested in bet then do some work...maybe it's easier than you think...as basically you all are deniers...

You are very good. You find a way out of things quite well.

I guess arguing with W63 all the time really sharpens your skills.




For the last time, its a personal bet. When you have a condition that only concerns me, we'll talk.



Until then, you are everything W63 has ever called you. All talk, but no action.
 
You are very good. You find a way out of things quite well.

I guess arguing with W63 all the time really sharpens your skills.




For the last time, its a personal bet. When you have a condition that only concerns me, we'll talk.



Until then, you are everything W63 has ever called you. All talk, but no action.

How it's personal bet as it involves public thread?
You are not even trying...i think it would be super easy to WL and TGK on board.

Now it all depends how serious you are!
 
LOL shartein lagne shuroo hogayi hain :)))

stakes are too high, botal botal only :fawad
 
How it's personal bet as it involves public thread?
You are not even trying...i think it would be super easy to WL and TGK on board.

Guy A wants to make bet with Guy B

Instead of accepting the bet Guy B brings in Guy X Y and Z
 
Yes, he would definitely perform!

if plays all test matches, you can expect 2 centuries from him...(big thing from a #6/7 batsman as most of the time you play with tail).

lol..ok and are you so sure? Personally Ill be very happy if he scores two centuries and we go on and win..I have no problems admitting that..I dont really do monetary bets so will not make a bet with money but Im happy to be brave and agree to change my sig for a short period to reflect me being wrong about Malik for etc..

however I believe you should also agree to Blitz terms and conditions. And remember it has to be two centuries not two fifities or one hundred etc ..has to be two centuries..that is your claim!!
 
If Shoaib Malik doesn't score 2 centuries can BZ stop posting altogether?
 
lol this bet will never work. BZ has promised 2 centuries only if he plays all three tests. Chances of him playing one test isn't certain let alone three tests. Plus it's a stupid bet. In a three test series I wouldn't even bet on Tendulkar scoring two centuries. You just can never really know that. And if Malik suddenly scores two centuries in the space of three tests, does that make him a great player? Course not, because he hasn't performed to a high standard throughout his test career. If he does well here, he needs to back it up by a couple more centuries in following test series.

Anyway, like I said, don't think Malik will play all three tests anyway. What will happen in my opinion is asad will play the first test. If he fails, Malik will come in and be given the next two remaining tests.

If Malik does play in front of Asad, and fails in two tests, he'll likely be dropped for Asad. Only if Malik does sort of decent, he'll be kept. And anyway even if he loses the bet, Black Zero will maintain that Malik still had a good series. Which might be true.

Much better to have a bet on whether Malik will have a good series or not. If Malik will average over 40 (or perhaps 50) in the series with a minimum of two tests played. Think that's fairer for all parties involved.
 
Well , I ask WL will he apologize to BZ publicly if Malik scores 2 centuries in 3 tests?
Why?
Malik (or any player) is selected to perform.... he is suppose to perform.... he is paid a lot of money to perform. Apologies should come when you don't perform.... and don't do what you are supposed to do!
Plus.....
Did Malik apologize for his last pathetic 32 innings or Zimbabwe tour?
Did BZ apologize for Malik's last pathetic 32 innings or Zimbabwe tour?
If you want apology for performance.... then did ever apologize when Afridi was performing in the WC taking wickets left and right?

When you get an "A" in your exam, do you ask your parents to apologize to you if .... they were not expecting you to get an "A"? I am sure, you do apologize if you get an "F".... to your parents!


Here is my offer that I have repeated so many times... and if BZ if so confident in Malik's abilities (will score 2 100s) then why does he run away from the offer below???

No ... I don't want him to stop posting.... he is our only entertainment on PakPassion besides whining Indians.

I offered BZ a simpler bet before Zimbabwe tour. He said .... he was sure of beating me in Fantasy competition with Malik being the captain of his team. My reply was.... that if he beats me, I'll donate $100 to PakPassion.... if I beat him, he has to donate only $50 to PakPassion. He ran away and did not take the bet!

That bet still stand.... and if he is afraid of losing money then I lower the bet to $50/$20 bet! He wins... I donate $50 ... if I win, he donates $20.

But... as you know, he has never put his money where his mouth is! :) He just says he Malik is best ... but does not prove it with his actions! ;-)
 
Last edited:
LOL shartein lagne shuroo hogayi hain :)))

stakes are too high, botal botal only :fawad

You can see ...no one is really confident that Malik would not be able to hit 2 100...

told you..."abhi tou achay din aayay hein"
 
lol..ok and are you so sure? Personally Ill be very happy if he scores two centuries and we go on and win..I have no problems admitting that..I dont really do monetary bets so will not make a bet with money but Im happy to be brave and agree to change my sig for a short period to reflect me being wrong about Malik for etc..

however I believe you should also agree to Blitz terms and conditions. And remember it has to be two centuries not two fifities or one hundred etc ..has to be two centuries..that is your claim!!

i have 820 posts in this thread...while you got 55 only...
Blitz got 13...

even if we add you and blitz ...total is: 68...
so 68 vs 820 is not a fair deal...but if we include WL (392) and SS(207)
so for you four total is: 667...

brings some balance...

so basically Blitz to bring SS and WL on board...


and I am very clear about 2 centuries in 3 tests...
 
I wouldn't even bet on Tendulkar scoring two centuries. You just can never really know that. And if Malik suddenly scores two centuries in the space of three tests, does that make him a great player? Course not, because he hasn't performed to a high standard throughout his test career. If he does well here, he needs to back it up by a couple more centuries in following test series.

Anyway, like I said, don't think Malik will play all three tests anyway. What will happen in my opinion is asad will play the first test. If he fails, Malik will come in and be given the next two remaining tests.

If Malik does play in front of Asad, and fails in two tests, he'll likely be dropped for Asad. Only if Malik does sort of decent, he'll be kept. And anyway even if he loses the bet, Black Zero will maintain that Malik still had a good series. Which might be true.

Much better to have a bet on whether Malik will have a good series or not. If Malik will average over 40 (or perhaps 50) in the series with a minimum of two tests played. Think that's fairer for all parties involved.

you are confused...
 
i have 820 posts in this thread...while you got 55 only...
Blitz got 13...

even if we add you and blitz ...total is: 68...
so 68 vs 820 is not a fair deal...but if we include WL (392) and SS(207)
so for you four total is: 667...

brings some balance...

so basically Blitz to bring SS and WL on board...


and I am very clear about 2 centuries in 3 tests...

That made 0 sense.


Because someone has 13 posts in a 'malik support thread'', he can't make a bet with you?


I been reading this thread. Your support for him is commendable, but pointless. Accept his bet, and stop posting in this thread :D
 
Last edited:
Why?


why not?

Malik (or any player) is selected to perform.... he is suppose to perform....
and he will perform...

he is paid a lot of money to perform.
Players are not got money even for WI tour
Apologies should come when you don't perform.... and don't do what you are supposed to do!

Malik always performed!
Plus.....
Did Malik apologize for his last pathetic 32 innings or Zimbabwe tour?
58 runs in test against Aus is pathetic?

Did BZ apologize for Malik's last pathetic 32 innings or Zimbabwe tour?
I don't share your sentiments regarding "pathetic" 32 innings

If you want apology for performance.... then did ever apologize when Afridi was performing in the WC taking wickets left and right?

Afridi who? you mean who got sachin's pic in his bedroom?

When you get an "A" in your exam, do you ask your parents to apologize to you if .... they were not expecting you to get an "A"? I am sure, you do apologize if you get an "F".... to your parents!

what is "A"?


Here is my offer that I have repeated so many times... and if BZ if so confident in Malik's abilities (will score 2 100s) then why does he run away from the offer below???

maybe I was waiting for a good deal...
 
Apologies should come when you don't perform.... and don't do what you are supposed to do!

Malik always performed!

You and Me r not watching the same cricket i believe

Malik made 2 14 7 11
"Malik always Performs" :facepalm:

Did Malik apologize for his last pathetic 32 innings or Zimbabwe tour?
58 runs in test against Aus is pathetic?

1 Score of 58 gives a free ticket to score meaningless 20s and 30s for 32 Innings

Gotcha :akhtar
 
Why?
Malik (or any player) is selected to perform.... he is suppose to perform.... he is paid a lot of money to perform. Apologies should come when you don't perform.... and don't do what you are supposed to do!
Plus.....
Did Malik apologize for his last pathetic 32 innings or Zimbabwe tour?
Did BZ apologize for Malik's last pathetic 32 innings or Zimbabwe tour?
If you want apology for performance.... then did ever apologize when Afridi was performing in the WC taking wickets left and right?

When you get an "A" in your exam, do you ask your parents to apologize to you if .... they were not expecting you to get an "A"? I am sure, you do apologize if you get an "F".... to your parents!


Here is my offer that I have repeated so many times... and if BZ if so confident in Malik's abilities (will score 2 100s) then why does he run away from the offer below???

You and Me r not watching the same cricket i believe

Malik made 2 14 7 11
"Malik always Performs" :facepalm:



1 Score of 58 gives a free ticket to score meaningless 20s and 30s for 32 Innings

Gotcha :akhtar

http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/showpost.php?p=4215277&postcount=3526
 
He is scared and understand the risk involved...
No. You kNOW I am not scared.... I'll happy if he does good the PAKISTANI team and the team wins. I am not a player fan... I am team fan unlike some idiots (specially Sachin fans) who put player ahead of the team!

Malik is so determined at the moment
Why he not determined in Zimababwe? Was he match fixing there?

and WL know what Malik can do...
Again you are putting words in my mouth..... (read: lying). I do not know what anybody can do... but I certainly know what Malik has done in last 32 innings... and it is there for everybody to see!
 
maybe I was waiting for a good deal...

So you admit to the bet I offered????

Your Fantasy team (with Malik captain) vs My Fantasy Team (without Malik captain)? You win I donate $50 to PP ... I win you donate $20 to PP? Both test and ODI series vs Sri Lanka?
 
Why?
why not?

Because have YOU apologized for Malik's Zimabawe poor performance?


Malik (or any player) is selected to perform.... he is suppose to perform....
and he will perform...
You know "Ghaib ka Ilm"?

he is paid a lot of money to perform.
Players are not got money even for WI tour
Where did those 90K pounds come from?

Apologies should come when you don't perform.... and don't do what you are supposed to do!

Malik always performed!
:))) Liar!! Did he perform in Zimbabawe? :)))

When you get an "A" in your exam, do you ask your parents to apologize to you if .... they were not expecting you to get an "A"? I am sure, you do apologize if you get an "F".... to your parents!

what is "A"?
You wouldn't know. It is something to do with education, being educated and being rational!

So when are you saying yes to my bet offer?
 
So you admit to the bet I offered????

Your Fantasy team (with Malik captain) vs My Fantasy Team (without Malik captain)? You win I donate $50 to PP ... I win you donate $20 to PP? Both test and ODI series vs Sri Lanka?

fantasy team got 11 players...

and this thread is about Malik only...
 

u really have trouble keeping up with a debate dont u?
This link shows his last 32 TEST Innings

Those Test Innings date back to 2007 when Malik was actually good with the Bat

Point of the argument here is
Malik failed for 32 Consecutive Innings
Malik Performance post 2008 went down hill to absolute Crap

2009 Onwards
Test Average : 29.44
ODI Average : 24.5 S/R 72.44

2009 Onwards
1 Century and 1 50 in ODI after Batting in 23 Innings

Can u plz answer why he made scores of 50+ only 2 Times in 23 Innings
And why he has a CRAP Batting Average ?
 
fantasy team got 11 players...

and this thread is about Malik only...

:))

ndkx4.jpg



fantasy team got 11 players...
So... you have no clue who will perform in Pak-SL series? You are admitting you can NOT pick better 11 players than me? :))

Logically ... if you know Malik will score two 100s, then you should ALSO know who else will scores 100s and take wicket... :P



and this thread is about Malik only...
wrong again..... this thread was about Malik..... ever since I started posting, it is about you & me!
 
fantasy team got 11 players...

and this thread is about Malik only...

Quite the hypocrite, arn't you.


In 'this thread', you are right, since it only concerns Malik, so W63 bringing other players in it, seems unfair.


In 'our bet', it only concerned us, you and me, yet you kept bringing other people in, which you thought was ok :facepalm:



Make up your mind. I'm starting to question your intelligence. Oh wait.....you're a Malik fan. Scratch that.
 
Quite the hypocrite, arn't you.


In 'this thread', you are right, since it only concerns Malik, so W63 bringing other players in it, seems unfair.


In 'our bet', it only concerned us, you and me, yet you kept bringing other people in, which you thought was ok :facepalm:



Make up your mind. I'm starting to question your intelligence. Oh wait.....you're a Malik fan. Scratch that.
Mate don't let him get to you.

:nonstop: :runaway: :nonstop: :runaway: :nonstop: :runaway: :nonstop: :runaway: :nonstop:

Remind you of anyone?
 
:))






So... you have no clue who will perform in Pak-SL series? You are admitting you can NOT pick better 11 players than me? :))

I have fair idea about some players' performances...but I am not confident about them that they will surely perform...for other players it's a fluke but in malik's case it's sure shot.

Logically ... if you know Malik will score two 100s, then you should ALSO know who else will scores 100s and take wicket... :P

Your logic fails as every player is different...


wrong again..... this thread was about Malik..... ever since I started posting, it is about you & me!

Even before you joined the thread, there was Taveez, SS, Sultan, TGK and others...and we presented our case for supporting Malik...
To me it's a impersonal thing.
 
Malik probably will get a chance against bangladesh and can make two centuries in two tests. BD are real bad :(
 
Quite the hypocrite, arn't you.


In 'this thread', you are right, since it only concerns Malik, so W63 bringing other players in it, seems unfair.


In 'our bet', it only concerned us, you and me, yet you kept bringing other people in, which you thought was ok :facepalm:



Make up your mind. I'm starting to question your intelligence. Oh wait.....you're a Malik fan. Scratch that.

the bet was about "this thread"...
as I explained earlier...it would like betting $800 vs $50 ...you think it's a fair deal?
 
I love it when plays for :ss but he is way too mediocre for pakistan.. lol @ his averages 26 against aus , 18 against eng , 22 against india ,11 against newzealand :)) Its hardwork beinga malik fan , congrats ;)

few countries missing..and i have no idea..if you presented T20, ODIs, or test stats...

or pulled some numbers from air.
 
few countries missing..and i have no idea..if you presented T20, ODIs, or test stats...

or pulled some numbers from air.

test stats , the format he is sinfully selected for. He has failed against 6 out of 8 teams he has played against in tests.Your darling only averages 21 outside asia , brilliant ;)
 
test stats , the format he is sinfully selected for. He has failed against 6 out of 8 teams he has played against in tests.Your darling only averages 21 outside asia , brilliant ;)

He is selected against SL..

Please let us know his average against SL so we understand if his selection is really sinful?
 
He is selected against SL..

Please let us know his average against SL so we understand if his selection is really sinful?

so a player is selected based upon the opposition only? Then malik probably should only play in asia and against srilanka and south africa only. After the srilanka tour malik should be dropped against the BD as he has 0 average against bangladesh and should not be selected against england either as he averages only 18 against them :))
 
so a player is selected based upon the opposition only? Then malik probably should only play in asia and against srilanka and south africa only. After the srilanka tour malik should be dropped against the BD as he has 0 average against bangladesh and should not be selected against england either as he averages only 18 against them :))

Malik played 32 tests...and SL is the country he played against most of the time...

other countries..he played 2/3/4 so we don't have a good sample to conclude anything...

View attachment 18643
 
Malik played 32 tests...and SL is the country he played against most of the time...

other countries..he played 2/3/4 so we don't have a good sample to conclude anything...

View attachment 18643

how will he play against them if he fails consistently and you don't play against srilanka all the time. He is a failure at test level alongwith farhat.
 
how will he play against them if he fails consistently and you don't play against srilanka all the time. He is a failure at test level alongwith farhat.

FACT: He got a huge success against SL.

Regarding other countries, as i have shown..he hasn't played much...
so one can't say anything about them...

three countries he played 4 or more...and aside Eng..he has performed well against them.

Satisfied?
 
FACT: He got a huge success against SL.

Regarding other countries, as i have shown..he hasn't played much...
so one can't say anything about them...

three countries he played 4 or more...and aside Eng..he has performed well against them.

Satisfied?

averaging 31 against the west indian attack is satisfactory? Has played complete 6 innings against australia failed played 9 innings against england and failed miserably and failed against the mighty indian attack on flat tracks :D. But performance against srilanka keeps you happy. If it was huge then has a HUGE failure against 6 of the nations he has played against.
 
Last edited:
What do u want BZ? Malik should be given 10 Matches Per Nation?

10 Matches vs England
10 Matches vs Australia
10 Matches vs South Africa?

By this logic he would have played 60 Test Matches and they u will have a sample to judge :facepalm:

Simple Logic is :
Malik has played 25 Test Innings since 2007 and has averaged 29 with only 1 Century to his name

There is absolutely no way u can convince anyone that Malik deserves a spot in the Test Team ahead of Umar Akmal / Asad Shafiq
 
What do u want BZ? Malik should be given 10 Matches Per Nation?

10 Matches vs England
10 Matches vs Australia
10 Matches vs South Africa?

By this logic he would have played 60 Test Matches and they u will have a sample to judge :facepalm:

Simple Logic is :
Malik has played 25 Test Innings since 2007 and has averaged 29 with only 1 Century to his name

There is absolutely no way u can convince anyone that Malik deserves a spot in the Test Team ahead of Umar Akmal / Asad Shafiq

my point was that sample of 3/4 matches isn't enuf...
we have good sample set for sl..and he excelled in this case.
 
Lucky to be selected after a poor tour of Zim. The SL series is massive for him, if he fails Umar Akmla will come in. He'll probably bat at 6 in Tests.
 
my point was that sample of 3/4 matches isn't enuf...
we have good sample set for sl..and he excelled in this case.

10 Test Matches is enough Sample

It doesnt matter if he played
2 Test vs ENG
2 vs Aussies
3 vs SA

Total 10 Test Matches against non Minnows is enough to judge a player
 
He is selected against SL..

Please let us know his average against SL so we understand if his selection is really sinful?

:))

So, how Malik would/should have been selected to make his debut having played against no team?
 
Last edited:
Malik played 32 tests...and SL is the country he played against most of the time...

other countries..he played 2/3/4 so we don't have a good sample to conclude anything...

344a0k1.jpg

:))

Hiding his averages? Let me do the honors!!

5 fifties in 23 test matches vs all teams except Sri Lanka!! I guess 23 tests is not a good/big sample! ;-)

Calling this performance (?) pathetic would be insulting to pathetic people!
 
Last edited:
:))

Hiding his averages? Let me do the honors!!

5 fifties in 23 test matches vs all teams except Sri Lanka!! I guess 23 tests is not a good/big sample! ;-)

Calling this performance (?) pathetic would be insulting to pathetic people!

What's wrong in 42 against SA?
 
attachment.php


Incase u dont know BZ a Test Match has 2 Innings

Care to explain why Malik made ONLY 163 Runs in 9 Innings vs Eng?

Batted 6 Times and made only 160 Runs vs Aussies how CRAP is that

In 23 Test Matches he failed to make a SINGLE DAMN Century :facepalm:
 
What's wrong in 42 against SA?

There is nothing wrong with 42 against SA aslong as u consider average of 25 in Test Matches to be good

Do u consider 25 to be a good average in Tests?
 
BZ avoiding the question

in 39 Innings (He batted 39 Times)

he failed to make a Century
he made Only 5 Fifties

Just for the sake of comparison Azhar Ali made 9 Test Fifties in only 13 Innings

3 of his 5 Fifties came on home pitches

Highest score of 73 in Karachi and he was Stumped :facepalm:
The greatest player of SPIN got Stumped when he was all set to make a Ton
 
@VTEC
- actually I have discussed in detail about what should be a par score for a test match in this thread...you can refer to it...and as per that...42 is much more than par score.
- against ENG, he was the second best pakistani top order player after farhat...check your stats..
- This series is being played against SL, why are you not mentioning his average of 60 against them?
- about Aus, even Ponting expressed his surprise when Malik was not played for first two tests, and when he made 58 in 3rd test...he was not included in next match against same opposition.
 
BZ avoiding the question

in 39 Innings (He batted 39 Times)

he failed to make a Century
he made Only 5 Fifties

Just for the sake of comparison Azhar Ali made 9 Test Fifties in only 13 Innings


3 of his 5 Fifties came on home pitches

Highest score of 73 in Karachi and he was Stumped :facepalm:
The greatest player of SPIN got Stumped when he was all set to make a Ton

Forget Azhar Ali..... even Imran Farhat has done much better than Malik! :))
 
BZ avoiding the question

in 39 Innings (He batted 39 Times)

he failed to make a Century
he made Only 5 Fifties

Just for the sake of comparison Azhar Ali made 9 Test Fifties in only 13 Innings

3 of his 5 Fifties came on home pitches

Highest score of 73 in Karachi and he was Stumped :facepalm:
The greatest player of SPIN got Stumped when he was all set to make a Ton

When azhar played the same matches where Malik appeared Azhar laid EGGS. (average less than 10 )
14
0
0
19


and overall 19:

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...er_involve=8270;template=results;type=batting
 
@VTEC
- actually I have discussed in detail about what should be a par score for a test match in this thread...you can refer to it...and as per that...42 is much more than par score.
:))
OK.. Vtec.... when was the last time we got a straight answer for our BZ saab!

- about Aus, even Ponting expressed his surprise when Malik was not played for first two tests, and when he made 58 in 3rd test...he was not included in next match against same opposition.
why would rickey want pakistan to play an easier-than-tailender player?? :))

- against ENG, he was the second best pakistani top order player after farhat...check your stats..
here ... matches vs England involving Malik..... since matches against England not-involving were just listed as club matches by ICC! ;-)
 
BZ avoiding the question

in 39 Innings (He batted 39 Times)

he failed to make a Century
he made Only 5 Fifties

Just for the sake of comparison Azhar Ali made 9 Test Fifties in only 13 Innings

3 of his 5 Fifties came on home pitches

Highest score of 73 in Karachi and he was Stumped :facepalm:
The greatest player of SPIN got Stumped when he was all set to make a Ton

he was playing with Butt (with 6 down) and then Butt got out..and Gul came...so he had to hit out on 5th ball of the over...

It;s Malik's greatness that so many times he scored runs while playing with tail...
 
...and when Malik does not play..... the test matches are ranked as "club" or "List-A" matches by ICC???

I am just showing Vtech the better way to compare players...
and there is no reason for anyone to weep on this...

and to add, Umer Amin got avg of 10 :(

and to add further, Malik's batting position was changed by force...and after that match he was dropped ...while on merit/performance there were 5 others who could be dropped ahead of him.

and then he was dropped from ODIs/T20 too...

so with same philosophy he was picked for test on T20 performance...
avg of 100 in T20 isn't bad.
 
Back
Top