hafeezrocks
Local Club Star
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2011
- Runs
- 2,163
Anything less than 20 overs would make a mockery of the Sport.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hasn't cricket already changed/modified/evolved/tweaked/chopped/miscegenated MASSIVELY?
I mean in Pakistan domestic atmosphere, Tape ball T1 is one of the popular formats.
T5 is already playable and totally acceptable format in the international scenes. (We might see one today against WI),
So why not T10 or T5 in the Olympics?
Because Purists are afraid that Cricket in Olympics will further trivialize their long, outdated and boring format called Test Cricket.
Imagine if tomorrow Cricket in Olympics brings in new fans no matter how few , they all will be T20 fans only. None of the new audience is going to develop a taste for a boring 5 day contest ever.
If cricket ever becomes olympic sport regularly we will have China emerge as one of the cricketing power in future
So cricket wont be in 2028 olympics?
I feel like replacing the t20 World Cup with the olympics and keeping the original 50 over World Cup seems like the best way forward. Both formats keep their relevance as players will care just as much about an Olympic gold medal as a World Cup. In the current system we’re about to have three straight years with world cups (21 t20wc, 22 t20wc, 23 odiwc) which is overkill. The olympics can be a gateway for new countries into the sport and the World Cup can remain more exclusive thereby retaining quality of competition. Not sure how others feel?
Agreed, having the T20 WC as just the Olympics would be a good idea.