Sakss
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2009
- Runs
- 14,207
Sindh Knights vs Balochistan Warriors
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is hamza swinging it? Pcb text commentary seems to think so
Where can we find the live score? Has anyone got any link pls.
Maqsood is a must. He can play big shots when required.
According to the commies Sohaib has made it to the WC squad.![]()
Nobody doubts his ability to play the big shots when required, it's his ability to refrain from playing aerial shots when they're not required that's in question.
umar akmal and sohaib too similar for my liking for a misfiring batting order. in any case on current form: in a squad of maqsood, harris, and akmal: junior will miss out in the play eleven.
maqsood doing an umar akmal as i type this
Tue but having both akmal and Maqsood in the 11 gives you more chance of winning than having lots of tuk tuk
The only bat in pakistan who has shown any real potential in pacing an innings is Haris and its early days for him
Tue but having both akmal and Maqsood in the 11 gives you more chance of winning than having lots of tuk tuk
The only bat in pakistan who has shown any real potential in pacing an innings is Haris and its early days for him
2 quickfire 30's are going to get us a win? ok
2 quickfire 30's are going to get us a win? ok
umar akmal and sohaib too similar for my liking for a misfiring batting order. in any case on current form: in a squad of maqsood, harris, and akmal: junior will miss out in the play eleven.
maqsood doing an umar akmal as i type this
No they aren't
But they won't do as much damage as 45 ball 20s and both have won games for us in the past, something the the other tuk tuks bar Shezhad cannot claim to have dine
2 quickfire 30's are going to get us a win? ok
2 snail paced 20s arent going to do it either.
With quick fire 30s we have more chance.
Whats azhars score?
no mathematically the two cancel each other out.
I can completely see retrospection to the affect of: "of course when you play hit or miss players like afridi, sohaib, and akmal in the same line up you have to accept that you can be dismissed for 150 odd"
Azhar is a really disgrace to watch
And I'm more than comfortable to live with that when are current line has done crap and our 80/ strategy has been doing crap for years
sounds like a "cut my nose to spite my face" strategy.
The problem with tuk tuks is they fire less often than the so called reckless players , even when the tuk galore fires we wont be able to score 250. With the socalled reckless player fire we have a good chance to score 280 300.
The problem with tuk tuks is they fire less often than the so called reckless players , even when the tuk galore fires we wont be able to score 250. With the socalled reckless player fire we have a good chance to score 280 300.
sounds like gambling.
Pakistani has a hopefully temporary problem of batting quality.
The so called talented players dont last more than 5 overs.
the slow ones score too slowly despite consuming plenty of overs.
a mix of players is acceptable but you cannot replace every with a 30 ball superstar. I am really against YK's selection: but when I think that our playing eleven could conceivably have: hafeez, afridi, akmal, sohaib even I feel the need to seek refuge in the boring batting of yk, and misbah.
Why ?
Misbah the anchor is only ever useful if we are chasing under 220, yk is never useful
One can easily accomodate both akmal and Maqsood
This is all whisful thinking but post WC a top 6 like this isn't out if the question
1. Shezhad
2. Babar Azam
3. Sohail
4. Akmal
5. Sarfraz
6. Maqsood
This leggie is quality
conceivable. all depends on if they can figure out how to prolong their stay on the crease. its a non-negotiable in the game, always has been,.
Only in Pakistan do we hear "we should select xyz player becaue either he will sccore quickly or get out without scoring and not eat up a lot of deliveries"
most of these guys need to learn to play longer innings. In Sohaib and Haris's case they are young and will learn. Junoirs been around for a 100 odi's.
This leggie is quality
Honestly there is zero point in playing a long innings if your output is going at a strike rate of 60 most of the time
Plus all the people who we claim can play a long innings are the ones who barely last 5 overs with the exception of shezhad and Misbah
if you are playing out a maiden to anwar ali in the power play: i think your pedigree as a batsman is quite clear
have yet to see the opposite to be true: that a team comes in and everyone score 50 off 30 and the team wins
You are just generalising
Maqsood and akmal have won us more games than the tuk tuk champions
sounds like gambling.
Pakistani has a hopefully temporary problem of batting quality.
The so called talented players dont last more than 5 overs.
the slow ones score too slowly despite consuming plenty of overs.
a mix of players is acceptable but you cannot replace every with a 30 ball superstar. I am really against YK's selection: but when I think that our playing eleven could conceivably have: hafeez, afridi, akmal, sohaib even I feel the need to seek refuge in the boring batting of yk, and misbah.
We have shehzad and misbah for the stability purpose , any more than this means we are puposely attempting a suicide.
Haris is a good batsman with all gears , fawad can accelerate when we require. Sarfraz is probably the most versatile of them all. So yes we have a room for sohaib and akmal in our team. We dont need the guys who will consume all the strike and score so low that the late middle order has no choice but to go for infinity per over.