good to know that buddy..
Looks like it's turning and dusting up...but slowly as of yet . S.A can still put on 250 plus here , which will set up the game for a win in my opinion .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
good to know that buddy..
Blitzkrieg said:well why dont just give yuvraj a break!! he had just two bad test matches....and he was coming from a good innings againt pak (169) when india where like 70/4 down....
Perth93 said:So why drop RP Singh on the same basis? Because he doesn't drink Pepsi?
Fact is, Yuvraj has played ONLY that one innings of any merit.
The faster he goes from the scene, the better of the team will be.
Blitzkrieg said:well why dont just give yuvraj a break!! he had just two bad test matches....and he was coming from a good innings againt pak (169) when india where like 70/4 down....
Milroastnescafe said:Pak pitches are generally too flat to give advantage/disadvantage to either home or away team. I guess the low bounce is the only real distinct factor there.
Smith in very good form lately - makes a big difference to the Saffers if he is batting well.
Random Aussie said:He was hopeless against australia and did not look at all like a Test quality batsman, fielded terribly when he was supposed to be the best fieldsman in the team, then failed in the 2020 which he is supposed to be a gun at, then failed in every single ODI (except for one against Sri Lanka of course) in the CB series. How can you bring him back to the Test team?
Kaif has been making mountains of runs and I am sure there are others who have been making runs in the Indian domestic - what sort of message does picking Yuvi send to those guys? (Unless Yuvi has been making domestic runs but I doubt he has played a game cso he is SupaStar!)
So that's why I don't give him a break
Well, considering the start, the Saffies would be pretty unhappy if they got anything less than 350.saffer said:What's a good first innings score on this type of wicket ?
Well, considering the start, the Saffies would be pretty unhappy if they got anything less than 350.
Sheikh said:The spinners have bowled 26 of the 38 overs so far. That's 68% on the first day of a test match. Ridiculous.
Blitzkrieg said:well.....read my post above...thatz why he needs abreak from you and not from test cricket!
Random Aussie said:Because he bowls tame harmless offspin? And is not in any sort of form with the bat?
And no I will not give him a break
It's pretty obvious and I don't feel the need to elaborate.Blitzkrieg said:what i so ridiculous bout it????
Blitzkrieg said:there are some examples of the tame and harmless spin!
Yuvraj Singh to Amla, no run, edged but it doesn't carry! Yuvraj drifted the ball into the right-hander from round the wicket and spun it away from him, Amla tried to defend on the front foot but got an outside edge which fell short of Dravid at first slip
33.1 Yuvraj Singh to Smith, no run, loud appeal for lbw first up, Smith moves a long way across his stump and tries to play across the line, Smith misses and gets hit in line of off stump, the ball was turning into middle and leg, that looked rather out but Doctrove didn't think so
Sheikh said:It's pretty obvious and I don't feel the need to elaborate.
Sigh, if you don't see a problem in having 2 part time spinners bowling in tandem in the 40th over of a test match (on the first day), then I don't know what to say.Blitzkrieg said:well i would go ahead and elborate it then!!
cause i guess u r too used seing matches in england or Sa or any other part where u got pacers bowling more then 75%!! so whatz the problem if spinners are boowling 68% here???
Blitzkrieg said:well i would go ahead and elborate it then!!
cause i guess u r too used seing matches in england or Sa or any other part where u got pacers bowling more then 75%!! so whatz the problem if spinners are boowling 68% here???
Random Aussie said:No wickets
Will India petition for Doctrove to be removed too?
Watching on the net, god almighty the Indian commentator is having a whinge about that LBW.
Blitzkrieg said:well hes got more creditability then god almighty random aussie whose quite random and silly and pissed why indians kicked sum aussie a$$ in there own backyard and to his worst nightmare is supporting saffies these days(one of australias main cricketing rivals )
Random Aussie said:Smith gone after taking 10 of that Yuvi over.
Yuvi the sheik of tweak!
Random Aussie said:Eh? Grow up mate
Sheikh said:Important wicket there for the Indians. They need to consistently make breakthroughs to get a hold of this game. S.A, on the other hand, will look to fashion a few more meaningful partnerships on their way to a significant 1st innings score. Kallis the key once again; a big score by him will take S.A to relative safety.
Blitzkrieg said:Awww that hurts right? 'how the hell this yuvraj guy the tame harmless spinner got the sa captain' some random guy in aus SULKIING....
well hes got more creditability then god almighty random aussie whose quite random and silly and pissed why indians kicked sum aussie a$$ in there own backyard and to his worst nightmare is supporting saffies these days(one of australias main cricketing rivals )
Blitzkrieg said:well hes got more creditability then god almighty random aussie whose quite random and silly and pissed why indians kicked sum aussie a$$ in there own backyard and to his worst nightmare is supporting saffies these days(one of australias main cricketing rivals )
Random Aussie said:Why would I be sulking? And no it doesn't "hurt". I am just watching a cricket match and commenting on it like everyone else.
Well done to Yuvi for getting a wicket but I still think they should have picked a batsman who was actually making runs.
saffer said:India kicked Aussies @ss in their own backyard ?
Comments like this force to do something i hate....support Australia....which series where you watching exactly ?
some series which u ddnt see!!
saffer said:Obviously....the one I saw was 2-1 to australia...and closer to 3-1 than 2 all .
saffer said:Obviously....the one I saw was 2-1 to australia...and closer to 3-1 than 2 all .
saffer said:Oh no..kallis and prince new to the crease batting together . Expect all scoring to stop and pressure to come right on top of south africa . Come on boys...250 is the magic number...!!
ttime to go offline...u just lost kallis!
Blitzkrieg said:well it is some random in aus whose sulking!!
on a serious note...kaif hasnt played int cricket for some time....and on this pitch they needed someone wo could bowl and bat...and yuvraj offers both!
P.S-kaif hasnt been scoring mountain of runs!! his average is in high 40's which lower then katich's which is in 70's(which u said dun deserve a place)
saffer said:I'm not going anywhere . This is great cricket (for the wrong reasons mind you).
jusarrived said:no it was closer to 2-1 to indians favour .
Random Aussie said:I was given the impression by Indian posters here that he had been scorily very heavily in the domestic comp. But he was just an example, what about Gambhir, Roshit Sharma, Tiwary? I am sure there are others out there.
Don't understand how you can be remotely fair to your batsmen to pick someone who averaged about 5 for the entire 2 month tour of Australia - is that the 7th best Test batsman in India at the moment?
Katich actually does deserve a place but he is roundly hated by the Aussie posters (including me but OZGOD hates him more) so will never get the credit for his average.
India might be able to roll South Africa for 250ish here, game on!
Blitzkrieg said:there are many u are right!! but on this given day the choice was between kaif and yuvraj cause others are not even in the squad!! he played only 2 tests any one can have bad days......neither ponting nor gilchrist had good series witht he bat againt india....ponting saved his skin with last match century in adelaide.....u cant judge a plyer just because of one series...and especially the guys who have been around for like 5 to 6 years and performing consistently!
Big session this for India. 1 more wicket and I'd have to say that they're on top. Pretty even at the moment.
saffer said:Nope . S.A still just on top even if they lost another wicket . 200 would be a par score on this track . And it's not going to get any easier to bat on .
It's not that bad to bat on. I didn't see the smith and kallis dismissals so I can't comment, but Mckenzie threw his wicket away, and Amla pretty much missed a straight one. No devils in those dismissals.saffer said:Nope . S.A still just on top even if they lost another wicket . 200 would be a par score on this track . And it's not going to get any easier to bat on .
Sheikh said:It's not that bad to bat on. I didn't see the smith and kallis dismissals so I can't comment, but Mckenzie threw his wicket away, and Amla pretty much missed a straight one. No devils in those dismissals.
for once u are right....batting last would not be easy here.....
Really? I just saw it and while the ball did bounce a bit, it pretty much went straight on. Smith made the mistake of pushing at the ball with hard hands; that's why it popped up to the man close in.Blitzkrieg said:kaliis was a touch unlucky...but the ball that dismissed smith really bounced n turned sharply!
Prince is due a score and A.B is full of confidence; 350 is still on.saffer said:The S.A tail wont last here . It's down to the next two partnerships for south africa to try and get that score up to around 250 if possible .
Prince is due a score and A.B is full of confidence; 350 is still on.
It's simple; these two have to put on another 60-70 odd taking them to about 260-5. Boucher walks in and puts on 40 for the next wicket: 300-6...and the last 4 wickets add 50 to the total= 350!saffer said:350 ???!!!!
i hope you are right . Can't see it though .
saffer said:350 ???!!!!
i hope you are right . Can't see it though .