How come IND-PAK play in one SF if they are both Group winners? Only explanation is that BD actually won their respective Group by virtue of H2H over PAK as IND is clearly other Group winner with 3 wins.
That actually tells how clueless PAK management is, being host they had no idea of the order of precedence & how the ranks in group will be decided. I do understand that PAK rested few players against BD, considering they had advanced already (It wasn't that case though mathematically, but I give the BoD here), but surely they didn't know that if BD advances beating PAK, they'll be group winners and face a weaker opponent (at least on papers) in SF!!!!
Still PAK should win the SF & subsequently the Final, because I don't see other teams loaded with so many regular players, while IND A is also touring NZ, therefore this is basically their 3rd team, with only one player over 24; but posters here should realize how cricket administration is run under PCB - you need one sip to taste the broth!!!!
That actually tells how clueless PAK management is, being host they had no idea of the order of precedence & how the ranks in group will be decided. I do understand that PAK rested few players against BD, considering they had advanced already (It wasn't that case though mathematically, but I give the BoD here), but surely they didn't know that if BD advances beating PAK, they'll be group winners and face a weaker opponent (at least on papers) in SF!!!!
Still PAK should win the SF & subsequently the Final, because I don't see other teams loaded with so many regular players, while IND A is also touring NZ, therefore this is basically their 3rd team, with only one player over 24; but posters here should realize how cricket administration is run under PCB - you need one sip to taste the broth!!!!