Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, thereby hangs a tale.
Gatt took a long time to get established at test level. He was dropped every time England lost, like his team mate Ramprakash later on.
Then when he got his mind right, for about three years he was England’s best batsman, piling on big centuries. He missed that ‘86 Windies series through injury. He came back to win the Ashes and two ODI tournaments on one tour. He scored two centuries against Imran, Wasim and Qadir in 1987. Then he fell foul of politics and a tabloid honey-trap and was sacked as skipper during the 1988 Windies series, and dropped himself, and then got banned for going to SA and that was his test career, by-and-large. He had one more test hundred in the tank, in Australia, commenting humbly that he owed skipper Atherton a few runs.
I believe RObin smith took his spot. Had a decent series vs Austrlalia. Gooch/Gatting/Robin smith all looked hopeless against Kumble in 1993. Indians were so much angry with Azharuddin's captaincy after his series losses in Australia/SA, world cup loss, some Indians were rooting for England. Graeme Hick was considered to be next Bradman at that time. Sadly he didn't live up to the expectation. He was the only one that looked somewhat assured during that tour. Made a 178 at Chennai.
England desperately missed Gower on that tour.
Gooch was going through a divorce and should not really have been playing cricket. His mind was not right.
I believe RObin smith took his spot. Had a decent series vs Austrlalia. Gooch/Gatting/Robin smith all looked hopeless against Kumble in 1993. Indians were so much angry with Azharuddin's captaincy after his series losses in Australia/SA, world cup loss, some Indians were rooting for England. Graeme Hick was considered to be next Bradman at that time. Sadly he didn't live up to the expectation. He was the only one that looked somewhat assured during that tour. Made a 178 at Chennai.
Hick was considered bradman until his test debut in 1991. From the moment he debuted first ambrose and co, then Wasim and Waqar exposed him as just a county basher. By the time they played india in 92/93 he was already considered a bit of a joke.
I guess the easier and less physically threatening bowling of Indian gentle medium pacers and non turning spinners like kumble gave him a bit of confidence
A fantastic exhibition of test match batting today from India in tough spinning conditions. The lads are digging in and spending valuable time on the crease.
Despite it being a tough ground to score singles they have rotated the strike well.
Beat Australia in Australia and were dominating England in England in the same calendar year - whereas some other teams were struggling to win against minnows West Indies .
Beat Australia in Australia and were dominating England in England in the same calendar year - whereas some other teams were struggling to win against minnows West Indies .
The only cricket that matters. As a test purist as some liked to quote me for that, I wait for the South Africa tour.
These are meaningless matches going around.
Still you are losing your sleep over these matches.![]()
The only cricket that matters. As a test purist as some liked to quote me for that, I wait for the South Africa tour.
These are meaningless matches going around.
You wouldn't have said that before the tournament as your team were favourites and you certainly wouldn't be saying this if your team was to lift the cup.
You wouldn't have said that before the tournament as your team were favourites and you certainly wouldn't be saying this if your team was to lift the cup.
He is frustrated, confused and certainly can't take the pressure of his own big statements. He supports IPL but has a problem with International T20s. He said before the world cup that Pandya will be the hero of T20 World Cup and is now calling this World Cup meaningless.![]()
The only cricket that matters. As a test purist as some liked to quote me for that, I wait for the South Africa tour.
These are meaningless matches going around.
It is not even a debate. You have to be utterly deluded or in complete denial to argue that any other Asian side has a stronger claim and can list greater achievements.
Kohli’s India, or 2015-present Indian team is undoubtedly the greatest Asian Test side that has ever been assembled.
Lets just agree to disagree with all of this:
1. No way Cummins is better than Waqar. 10 years from now, everyone would forget Cummins but Waqar woould still be remembered.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">India in the last 12 months in Test cricket:<br><br>Beat Australia at Melbourne<br>Beat Australia at Brisbane<br>Beat England at Lord's<br>Beat England at The Oval<br>Beat South Africa at Centurion<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@SajSadiqCricket) <a href="https://twitter.com/SajSadiqCricket/status/1476512037710749699?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
South African conditions are very similar to Australian.
Of course India will win there.
The issue is their endless losses in New Zealand.
I've always been amazed by this thread. It's as if becoming the GOAT asian side is a very difficult achievement. I think I've said this before but the benchmark for asian sides isn't really great. Asian sides historically have been lions at home and lambs abroad.
The only two sides worth considering in the debate are Imran's (& Miandad) side during the 80s and the Indian side of the 2000s. I've compared the current Indian side to both of those sides and the Indian side of 2000s and Pakistan of 80s compare very similarly with each other. But both fall short in stats at home and away from home compared to the current Indian side both in terms of win loss ratios and achievements outside asia.
The series won outside asia by Imran and Miandad's Pakistan were:
Two series wins in England and a series win in New Zealand - 3.
They drew two series one in Windies and one in NZ - 2.
The series won by the Indian side of 2000s were
Two series wins in the Caribbean, one in England and one in NZ - 4.
They also drew a series in Aus and SA - 2.
This current Indian side under Kohli and Rahane have already won two series in Australia, two series in the Caribbean and are leading this series 2-1 in England. So that's 5 series won or being led outside asia. And they aren't yet finished as a side. They tour South Africa next where they have a decent chance of winning too.
The biggest difference between the current Indian side and the Pakistani side of 80s and Indian side of 2000s is that the current side is very attacking and rarely draws series - it either wins or loses which is partly responsible for its more series wins outside asia and it also has a higher win loss ratio outside asia compared to the other two. Imran's side was a great side but it was defensive and played in a manner to not lose rather than to win which is why they have a high amount of draws, the Indian side of noughties were great but while they brought their best against the great Australian side, they weren't as dominant overall and were at best the third best side during that era after Aus and SA.
The current Indian side is far more attacking than the former two which points to its higher win loss ratio and their home record is unmatched by any other side in test cricket history. They're easily better than any other Asian side to have played the game and are currently competing with the Saffer side of the late 2000s and early 2010s from a legacy pov. They can better their legacy if they tick the box in South Africa too by winning there later this year. Of course the GOAT teams are the Windies and the Australian sides.
There has never been an Asian side that has consistently won overseas, so I'm amused at this thread continuing as if there's any serious competition in history.
South African conditions are very similar to Australian.
Of course India will win there.
The issue is their endless losses in New Zealand.
Well on the way to conquering the final frontier South Africa..
I believe they got this, if they win the next match, this will be the greatest Asian test side ever and also the 3rd best side of all time after the 80's WI and Aus of the early 2000s..
Given the extended run of success , fair to say it’s better than the Australian side . It’s slightly inferior to the great West Indian side as the batting quality is slightly inferior to that side but bowling wise , it’s better than either of the three attacks .
Nah, Great Aus and WI sides were superior. What do you mean by extended run? They both had extended runs and had better batting. This Indian team does not have gun batting.
Always said that good pacers and capable batters are the difference between being a decent Test team and a very good Test team.
At the moment India has a good array of pacers who can trouble any opposition batting line-up and they have a capable batting group who has the skills to put up decent totals around the world.
Don’t forget the spinners too.
Well on the way to conquering the final frontier South Africa..
I believe they got this, if they win the next match, this will be the greatest Asian test side ever and also the 3rd best side of all time after the 80's WI and Aus of the early 2000s..
The "3rd best side" lost to NZ in the final) Delusional.
Don’t forget the spinners too.
The "3rd best side" lost to NZ in the final) Delusional.
Do India still justify that label?
No! They have a superior bowling attack to Sachin-Dravid's side thoughDo India still justify that label?
Great teams do not lose a series after leading 1-0 in a 3 match series vs. the weakest SA team in history.
Other honourary mentions:
Losing CT17 final
Losing WTC final
Losing 152-0
As far as Kohli the captain
All of the above plus:
Never won a WT20
Never won a WC
Never won an IPL tournament
Fluke win vs Australia first time round vs. weak Oz team
Absent in second series win vs Australia.
Winning at home isn't an achievement; it the expectation anyway.
Not as bonkers as Ashwin being better then Imran Khan.As I said before, the debate ended after India’s win in Australia last year. Whatever this Indian team achieved or did not achieve after that point changed nothing with respect to their legacy compared to other Asian teams.
They have already surpassed all Asian Test teams of the past, let’s see if any Asian team (basically any Indian team of the future since others aren’t capable) can catch up.
- Longest reign as a number 1 ranked team for an Asian side
- Longest reign as a number 1 ranked team in the 2010-20 decade
- two Test series wins in Australia, all other Asian sides have zero
- unbeaten in a home series
You have to be absolute bonkers to believe or argue that any Asian side of the past can list a greater list of achievements.
This Indian team was never anytime close to a great WI/Aus team due to weak batting. The great Aus/WI team remains the stand-out team in world cricket.
There is no comparison between Wesindies and Australian team.
West Indies did not lose a Test series for 15 long years 1980-95, while that great Australian team did lose away test series in Sri lanka 1999, India 2001 and notably Ashes of 2005. Yes that team did win 11 straight Tests under Waugh but lost in India. Similarly 2005 Ashes.
West indies did not lose single series for 15 years.
WI team lost in NZ on their first attempt and couldn't win on the second attempt in 80s.
WI team also drew many away series in India, Pakistan, Aus etc in 80s.
I will prefer a record of higher W/L than not losing kind of record. You play cricket to win, go ahead and win a lot even if you end up losing some in process of winning. Not much to do with WI team because they won plenty, just a general point.
Drew but not lost. There is one key stat they did not lose a Test series for 15 years. 1980-1995
Drew but not lost. There is one key stat they did not lose a Test series for 15 years. 1980-1995
That great Australian team lost 3 key test
1999 sri lanka 2005 eng 2001 india
3 series they lost in 6 years cycle.
India is bot even in league. Lost to South Africa twice 2018,2022, lost to England 4-1 in 2018 as well and lost to nzl 2-0 as well. India is not even in ATG discussion in my books.
Not correct.
WI played 3 tests series in 1980. 1st test was won by NZ and the other two tests were drawn. NZ won the series by 1-0.
1st Test, Dunedin, Feb 8 - 13 1980 - Won by NZ
2nd Test, Christchurch, Feb 22 - 27 1980 - Draw
3rd Test, Auckland, Feb 29 - Mar 5 1980 - Draw
Now can we stop calling WI GOAT team? Since you prefer that only teams not losing any series can be called that. I don't have any issue with WI losing to NZ because when all dais and done, WI won a whole lot more than what they lost and remained rank 1 team for a very long time.
India was never in a discussion of being clubbed with a great Aus/WI team. Those two teams were truly outstanding and ATG teams.
I think in my other post i mentioned it very clearly that ATG west indian cricket period started after losing to Nzl. After that they dud not lose any series for 15 years home/away and also beat nzl in 1994 away from home.
Once a team will remain unbeaten in 30 TEST series or 16 years unbeaten in tests then yes you can bring a case.
Ok but Aussies were unbeaten in 16 Test series and lost 3 Test series between their peak 6 year cycle 1999-2005.
Kohli's team had ended that debate a long time back for anyone caring about actual results.
He did not have serious competition, to begin with. IK team won like 1-2 tests outside of Asia and at home drastically less domination than Kohli's team. The gap is very large there. The Indian team of the late 00s won a bit more than IK's team, but still not as much Kohli's team. No Asian team dominated the way Kohli's team has dominated at home.
----------------------------------------------------
W/L of all teams Since 2016, when playing Away
Ind: 1.2
...
...
...
Aus : 0.6
Pak : 0.6
Eng : 0.5
SA: 0.5
NZ : 0.4
One stand-out team which made world cricket interesting because they could go and play well in all conditions. Everyone else has been hovering around 0.5. Hope is that some other teams take over to keep cricket interesting for away tours.
----------------------
Home record since 2016,
Ind : 11.5
..
...
..
...
...
NZ 4.5
Aus 3.3
SA 2.3
Eng 1.7
SL 1.1
The gap here is multiple times than away record.
-----------------------
What a phenomenal run by the Indian team under Kohli.
So you compare this side to the Indian side of the 00's how is that fair? Do we not take into account the quality of opposition? Is it plausible that the 00's Indian side would comfortably be the best side in the world atm (even with a weak bowling attack)? I get that you can only beat what is in front of you. But surely common sense has to prevail. Unless we're purely comparing results, then I'd agree.