What's new

The imminent death of Pakistan Cricket: Mohsin Naqvi – The biggest culprit

I don't like his politics but feel he is our only hope.

He is the only one with the power and authority to clean up and put processes place and the only one who can push back on the ex player cabal that has ruined us.

But he will need to be bold and in it for the long haul.

His decision to sack Kirsten and Gillespie was the wrong one and will be difficult to recover from, but if he is clever he will realise that it was due to ex player mafia that he was led down that path.
Maybe he took that decision because he didn't know anything about cricket. Prior to CT, it seemed like Aqib had become his newest trusted guy.
 
No it all started with ramiz raja no political party has right to meddle with cricket affairs and make ramiz raja chairman based on friendship if pti can do then all other parties can do it too
Before Ramiz, Sethi and Zaka had already played their musical chair from 2011-14. Take a few steps back, and there was Nasim Ashraf, who also allegedly enjoyed the same relations with Musharaf that Naqvi is enjoying from munir.
Take a few more steps back. Tauqir Zia was also made PCB head by Mushi. It's been like this for decades.
 
I don't blame you or anyone living in Pakistan for not speaking up against the butcher of Pakistan cricket, its hard, people are scared of saying anything against him, you never know what can happen.
So the players he named were performing great and winning tournaments before Naqvi, right? And Naqvi came and dragged the multiple trophy winners down?
 
Our system rewards the boot polishers with positions for services rendered. I laugh when idiots compare Ramiz Raja with the mafia henchmen like Sethi, The money laundering guy from Sindh (name escaped me) and this disgraceful scum.
They are comparing the actions of Ramiz as head of PCB as this is a discussion about PCB and Pakistan cricket.

Ramiz did exactly the same and he is responsible for rise of power of Babar and Rizwan.

You cannot condemn the one(Naqvi) without the other(Ramiz) for doing the exact same thing.
 
Does it matter? Do you have a counter to the fact I have quoted?
My age has nothing to do with the fact that Pakistan cricket team is literally run like a family business with addition of close friends here and there.

yes, as you post the most unique things. And why should I counter to something I don't have an objection?
 
They are comparing the actions of Ramiz as head of PCB as this is a discussion about PCB and Pakistan cricket.

Ramiz did exactly the same and he is responsible for rise of power of Babar and Rizwan.

You cannot condemn the one(Naqvi) without the other(Ramiz) for doing the exact same thing.
Stop this nonsense.They rose because they are our best cricketers. I dare you or anyone else to name players that are better than them in PK.
 
Before Ramiz, Sethi and Zaka had already played their musical chair from 2011-14. Take a few steps back, and there was Nasim Ashraf, who also allegedly enjoyed the same relations with Musharaf that Naqvi is enjoying from munir.
Take a few more steps back. Tauqir Zia was also made PCB head by Mushi. It's been like this for decades.

Basically this. The PCB honcho is almost always handpicked by the dictator who is running Pak from behind the curtain or otherwise. Pak cricket team is used as a PR tool for the army, when it does well, the credit is always taken by the dictator & they use it to spread their political ambitions.

I followed the stadium renovation project in detail & it was obvious that all of it was done to just build up a certain someone. They also have a stadium in Peshawar & so many others but they will not work at them as they do not bring good PR. For GSL, the entire state was standing behind PCB to get the job done, I am happy that the stadium is built & on time but this hypocrisy is what I am against.
 
The biggest culprit for Pakistan is Mohammad Rizwan

You can try your best to shift the blame on others. I saw it from the day when they tried to push this guy as something he clearly isn’t.

He is your biggest problem. He is the biggest stumbling block.
 
Ahmed Shehzad said while speaking at the show on local media outlet:

“People say that the team doesn’t have a system where players are selected through favouritism, but they do. We’ve seen it. We know everything. We’ll tell the truth to the whole world unless we feel that you’re going towards the right direction. There was only one sport left in Pakistan. That was cricket. Today, that has also finished.”
 
Stop this nonsense.They rose because they are our best cricketers. I dare you or anyone else to name players that are better than them in PK.
Means they can play with 70 SR batting till 30-35 overs chasing 321 and you would be okay with it?
 
They are comparing the actions of Ramiz as head of PCB as this is a discussion about PCB and Pakistan cricket.

Ramiz did exactly the same and he is responsible for rise of power of Babar and Rizwan.

You cannot condemn the one(Naqvi) without the other(Ramiz) for doing the exact same thing.

I wouldn't take these lot seriously they are just sore losers who are still crying because their arrogant leader couldn't form a government.
These are brain washed lot by imran khan who go out on streets to burn buses, demolish buildings and carry weapons to peaceful protests also taliban sympathiser and were caught hiding bin Laden in KPK, and if government takes actions they act like victims I wouldn't expect any sense coming out of them lot
 
Lol, its always the chairmans. Starting from Najam, Zaka to Mohsin (who is a very capable chairman).

Never Babar, Rizwan, Shaheen saya mafia group or the seeds of Misbah Azhar Ali, Asad Shafiq. The real leeches in the system.

Pakistani fans just suck so hard, they cannot help but politicise everything

Agree. Najim Sethi, Mohsin Naqvi, Zaka Ashraf....I am tired of hearing these names. Doesn't matter who you put in an admin position, they can't turn water into wine. The players are crap. All you can do is give them a shot and when they fail, try someone else. Or just pick your best 11 and let them do their best without added pressure of expectation.
 
He is not going anywhere as he is the 2nd most powerful person in Pakistan
Is this a good thing or a bad thing? I just don’t understand. If he is the 2nd most powerful person in Pak then surely he can streamline and execute a lot of the changes for the betterment of the team and administration. This then means that despite having power either he doesn’t know what to do or he does know and understand but as yet there is some master plan than we are not privy to.

Now the things he has done look ok. The grounds are nice. Tournament arranged. PSL looks lie a big draw. But all these things were in the pipeline anyway.

I just don’t see what he has significantly achieved in his few months at the helm. If anything appointments of coaches looks to be a short term sticking plaster.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is this a good thing or a bad thing? I just don’t understand. If he is the 2nd most powerful person in Pak then surely he can streamline and execute a lot of the changes for the betterment of the team and administration. This then means that despite having power either he doesn’t know what to do or he does know and understand but as yet there is some master plan than we are not privy to.

Now the things he has done look ok. The grounds are nice. Tournament arranged. PSL looks lie a big draw. But all these things were in the pipeline anyway.

I just don’t see what he has significantly achieved in his few months at the helm. If anything appointments of coaches looks to be a short term sticking plaster.

Yes lets bring back Ramiz who thought using concrete pitches for tests and making Babar captain and chief selector was a good idea. Or should we go back to Zaka Ashraf who appointed Shan Masood/Shaheen as captain? :ROFLMAO:
 
Is this a good thing or a bad thing? I just don’t understand. If he is the 2nd most powerful person in Pak then surely he can streamline and execute a lot of the changes for the betterment of the team and administration. This then means that despite having power either he doesn’t know what to do or he does know and understand but as yet there is some master plan than we are not privy to.

Now the things he has done look ok. The grounds are nice. Tournament arranged. PSL looks lie a big draw. But all these things were in the pipeline anyway.

I just don’t see what he has significantly achieved in his few months at the helm. If anything appointments of coaches looks to be a short term sticking plaster.

I don’t know the answer to whether that is a good thing or bad thing…

But what motivation would anyone have to change anything if they the 2nd most powerful person in the country?
 
Stop this nonsense.They rose because they are our best cricketers. I dare you or anyone else to name players that are better than them in PK.
Early on, I thought they were our best cricketers too but then you soon realise that they are risk averse hence the low S/R. The high averages is due to hardly taking any risks and playing against weak bowling line-ups in bilateral tournaments. As soon as they are thrust into ICC tournaments against the best, they falter like a butterfly flying against hurricane winds!
 
Sarfaraz Nawaz, in conversation with a sports media outlet:

"Yeah, I watch closely, and on and off, I write to the PCB chairman because he doesn't know much about cricket. I suggested things to him, but it's up to him what he does. Pakistan cricket is gone now. I think it's because of all the PCB officials running the board. They are non-cricketers; they are bureaucrats. That's why I think they don't know how to go about things like that. They've picked people who previously destroyed Pakistan cricket. And then there are frequent changes in the PCB. Within a year and a half, there were three chairmen and four captains. What else do you expect?"
 
Early on, I thought they were our best cricketers too but then you soon realise that they are risk averse hence the low S/R. The high averages is due to hardly taking any risks and playing against weak bowling line-ups in bilateral tournaments. As soon as they are thrust into ICC tournaments against the best, they falter like a butterfly flying against hurricane winds!
But the issue is that a domestic scene that is organised by total imbeciles isn't producing talent to keep anyone of the guys on their toes. These guys that played in CT are our best players. Just a plain fact. Lots of anger from the fans but no alternatives.
 
Means they can play with 70 SR batting till 30-35 overs chasing 321 and you would be okay with it?
No. It's means that we need better players to push them and kick them out. Look at the 100s of posts but no alternative bar some get that once scored 42 and some obese guy that also fixes matches..
 
They are comparing the actions of Ramiz as head of PCB as this is a discussion about PCB and Pakistan cricket.

Ramiz did exactly the same and he is responsible for rise of power of Babar and Rizwan.

You cannot condemn the one(Naqvi) without the other(Ramiz) for doing the exact same thing.
RR was sincere and had the qualifications. Look at his tenure and the disastrous reign of the mafia. Under RR we reached a SF and final, we can't win a game in our home tournament.
 
Lack of talent, ability, skill set, know-how, courage, fear factor, you name it, we have it.
 
No. It's means that we need better players to push them and kick them out. Look at the 100s of posts but no alternative bar some get that once scored 42 and some obese guy that also fixes matches..
Saim Ayub and Mohammad Haris can replace them
 
RR was sincere and had the qualifications. Look at his tenure and the disastrous reign of the mafia. Under RR we reached a SF and final, we can't win a game in our home tournament.
the only reason you like RR is because he was selected by Imran khan don't try to fool people and he's the one who engineered the destruction of Pakistan cricket by given Babar full authority and no accountability
 
“whOoo caN reeEplaCe baAbaR aNd RiiZwaaN” 🤡


-Saim can replace them


“buT saIm waaS alReaDy iN thE teeeAm” 🤡🤡🤡🤡
 
“hAaaRis IzzZ baRleeY fC” 🤡

So Ian Bishop is mentally deranged sitting on Sky Sports stating Muhammad Harris is a player who he has seen and can play the modern required game for Pakistan?

These 6 team Australian system chamchey and their cricketing understanding is beyond ridiculous!
 
Mohammad Hafeez took a jibe at PCB while speaking on a show on a local sports media outlet:

"For the solution, we have talked about the management, the players. We always say that we need foreign coaches. We think foreign coaches perform the best. Why not have a foreign chairman?"
 
Rumman Raees, while speaking on a show on a local media outlet, said:

"There is absolutely no need for change when your results are good. If you are going to Australia or South Africa, you can add a fast bowler or increase the number of batsmen. But if you are playing at home, where you know the match is in Karachi, and Dubai is considered our second home, then why didn’t you include a second specialist spinner in the team? This is just common sense."

"Nowadays, if you ask anyone, even a regular person, they will say the mistake was in selection. You are the ones selecting the team, you are the ones making the plans, and yet selection errors keep happening. This talk about 'intent'—it's not something we are hearing for the first time in this tournament. We have been discussing it in all formats. If the world is playing Test cricket at a run rate of four, ODIs at five or six, and T20s at seven or eight, then we are clearly lacking in this area."

"And the main core players in our batting lineup are the ones lacking in this aspect. Either they are not improving their game, or they are not listening to the plans—something is wrong that is not getting sorted out. If I say we struggle against spin in the middle overs, our rotation of strike is poor, and we are not taking risks to show intent, then who will take responsibility for that?"
 

Waqar Younis Offers PCB Chairman's Role To Ex-India Star, Gets Epic Response​


Another round of musical chairs is expected to unfold in the Pakistan cricketing spectrum, with sackings and signings likely, in the wake of the national team's disastrous performance in the ICC Champions Trophy. Pakistan were eliminated from the tournament without a single win to their name. Defeats against New Zealand and India were followed by a washed-out contest against Bangladesh, meaning Mohammad Rizwan's side just had one point on the board.

Changes in the selection committee, coaching staff, personnel in the team are highly likely but epic scenes unfolded in the DP World Dressing Room after a fan suggested a foreign face to take up the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chairman's role.

"It's the sort of position which invites a lot of attention. Press Conferences everyday, I doubt the board would be open to getting a foreign name onboard for the chairman's role," Wasim Akram said as the question was posed by a fan on the platform," Wasim Akram said in response to the question, highlighting why a foreign face is unlikely to take up the role.

Waqar Younis then signalled at Ajay Jadeja for such a position, hinting that he is a foreign person. The former India cricketer then gave an epic reply.

"Wasim bhai ke bacche hain, mere bhi hain (Wasim Akram has kids, I do to...)," Jadeja said before breaking into laughter. Akram had earlier said that he can't take up such a role in the Pakistan team as he wants to remain closer to his family.

"The job has two aspects to it, the administrative aspect and the sporting aspect. They can be separated. Fans and the public aren't interested in how much profit the board made, the stadiums developed. Fans and future players want to see how their cricket will develop," Jadeja further said.

Jadeja has been in Pakistan, spending time with Pakistan's cricket's big names over the last few weeks as a pundit for the Champions Trophy. While the Pakistan team has already been eliminated from the tournament, India have already qualified for the semi-final.

 
Ground Reality of Pakistan and Mohsin Naqvi:

  1. Mohsin Naqvi is the Interior Minister of Pakistan
  2. Mohsin Naqvi is the Narcotics Minister of Pakistan
  3. Mohsin Naqvi is the Chairman of PCB

State of Terrorism & Cricket
  1. Pakistan is now 2nd on the Global Terrorism Index
  2. Pakistan has climbed 7 positions in Synthetic Narcotics rankings
  3. Pakistan is 7th in Test rankings in Cricket
  4. Pakistan is 7th in T20 rankings in Cricket
  5. Pakistan is 3rd in ODI rankings
I won't make any comments on issues outside of cricket since I am here to talk about cricket. But tell me how someone can hold Naqvi accountable for the disappointing performance of the cricket team, which is composed of largely the same players who have been part of the squad for quite some time?
 
Naqvi's vilification is really getting over the top. Your system is out and out needs revamp. He has done a decent job as PCB chairman. We never hear people asking Cricket board chairman to resign for the team's failure like in Pakistan. Guys, ignore your domestic political allegiances and actually focus on the cricket system thats rotten with Nepotism.
 
I won't make any comments on issues outside of cricket since I am here to talk about cricket. But tell me how someone can hold Naqvi accountable for the disappointing performance of the cricket team, which is composed of largely the same players who have been part of the squad for quite some time?
Naqvi's vilification is really getting over the top. Your system is out and out needs revamp. He has done a decent job as PCB chairman. We never hear people asking Cricket board chairman to resign for the team's failure like in Pakistan. Guys, ignore your domestic political allegiances and actually focus on the cricket system thats rotten with Nepotism.
The argument about having largely the same set of players actually works against Naqvi because, when analyzed systematically, the decline of this "same set of players" is a structural issue rather than an individual one. The very argument being made highlights a drastic downward spiral in performance, which is a collective failure. While individual players are responsible for their own performances, the overall decline is demonstrable, severe, and systemic—and ultimate accountability lies with management, not individuals.

It's convenient to avoid discussing non-cricketing issues, but the reality is that this single individual is overseeing multiple critical policy areas, all of which are deteriorating. The fundamental point I’m making is that no single person can effectively manage so many responsibilities at once—this "responsibility overload" is directly contributing to the decline across all areas under their purview.

If we’re discussing cricket, then let’s stick to cricket. The fact remains that this individual cannot continue running cricket alongside managing multiple other policy areas, especially amid a surge in terrorism, with increasingly frequent and deadly attacks affecting nearly half of Pakistan.

From a purely human perspective, they need to either focus solely on cricket or step back from cricket to handle other responsibilities. Anyone who disagrees is either biased or deliberately ignoring the obvious.
 
The argument about having largely the same set of players actually works against Naqvi because, when analyzed systematically, the decline of this "same set of players" is a structural issue rather than an individual one. The very argument being made highlights a drastic downward spiral in performance, which is a collective failure. While individual players are responsible for their own performances, the overall decline is demonstrable, severe, and systemic—and ultimate accountability lies with management, not individuals.

It's convenient to avoid discussing non-cricketing issues, but the reality is that this single individual is overseeing multiple critical policy areas, all of which are deteriorating. The fundamental point I’m making is that no single person can effectively manage so many responsibilities at once—this "responsibility overload" is directly contributing to the decline across all areas under their purview.

If we’re discussing cricket, then let’s stick to cricket. The fact remains that this individual cannot continue running cricket alongside managing multiple other policy areas, especially amid a surge in terrorism, with increasingly frequent and deadly attacks affecting nearly half of Pakistan.

From a purely human perspective, they need to either focus solely on cricket or step back from cricket to handle other responsibilities. Anyone who disagrees is either biased or deliberately ignoring the obvious.
Most of your points are fair and make sense. But what i have noticed is the political bias of many pakistani posters here. Pakistan cricket has been a mess for decades, pcb Chairman has always been some politician with multiple hats. Naqvi has actually improved the finances of PCB and tried some changes in stagnant Pakistan cricket.
The kind of stand mohsin naqvi took against bcci for champions trophy should be commended. Had he belonged to Imran khan's party, pp would have been flooded with praises of the mighty leadership of IK and his lieutenant Naqvi.

Blaming Naqvi, babar, Rizwan, Aaquib is too simplistic and ignores the core issues of Pakistan cricket as a whole. Naqvi has been one your better PCB chairman for the last 20 years. Not like some idiots in the past who ended up paying legal fees to BCCI.
 
Most of your points are fair and make sense. But what i have noticed is the political bias of many pakistani posters here. Pakistan cricket has been a mess for decades, pcb Chairman has always been some politician with multiple hats. Naqvi has actually improved the finances of PCB and tried some changes in stagnant Pakistan cricket.
The kind of stand mohsin naqvi took against bcci for champions trophy should be commended. Had he belonged to Imran khan's party, pp would have been flooded with praises of the mighty leadership of IK and his lieutenant Naqvi.

Blaming Naqvi, babar, Rizwan, Aaquib is too simplistic and ignores the core issues of Pakistan cricket as a whole. Naqvi has been one your better PCB chairman for the last 20 years. Not like some idiots in the past who ended up paying legal fees to BCCI.
This point is not directed towards you, personally.

It is a habit of people in Pakistan to start quoting the past or start drawing comparisons when there is no solid argument to their point.
  1. PCB has been a mess for decades.
  2. The previous Chairpersons of PCB have been incompetent.
  3. There has been a lot of political interference in the PCB for decades.
But quoting the past doesn’t take away from the fact that Mohsin Naqvi cannot hold “key” political positions in the Government along with Chairman of PCB and everything that he is in charge of has been degraded.

There has not been any independent financial Audit (for decades) so there is no solid evidence that Mohsin Naqvi has improved anything financially.

However, there is solid evidence that all the stadium repairs which he oversaw (for Champions Trophy) are now leaking and in disarray.

For me, India is not the shinning example of anything, a population over a billion people and until a few years ago Pakistan was able to compete with India in almost all fields (Sports or otherwise) with significantly less population and resources. India's competition is China and the sooner Pakistanees stop comparing themselves to India, the better. Pakistan doesn't need comparisons with India and fully capable to chart its own course. India is a huge population which is Cricket mad and Bollywood (is a copy/paste machine) and together are some of the reasons behind IPL (and financial windfall).

Good luck to India and Indians and my best wishes but Pakistan is capable of standing on its own.

Mohsin Naqvi is an abject failure in facets of Administration (Cricket or otherwise) and it is dead clear to everyone apart from those with political bias. Even a broken clock is right twice a day so Mohsin Naqvi being right on X or Y is merely coincidental.
 
The argument about having largely the same set of players actually works against Naqvi because, when analyzed systematically, the decline of this "same set of players" is a structural issue rather than an individual one. The very argument being made highlights a drastic downward spiral in performance, which is a collective failure. While individual players are responsible for their own performances, the overall decline is demonstrable, severe, and systemic—and ultimate accountability lies with management, not individuals.

It's convenient to avoid discussing non-cricketing issues, but the reality is that this single individual is overseeing multiple critical policy areas, all of which are deteriorating. The fundamental point I’m making is that no single person can effectively manage so many responsibilities at once—this "responsibility overload" is directly contributing to the decline across all areas under their purview.

If we’re discussing cricket, then let’s stick to cricket. The fact remains that this individual cannot continue running cricket alongside managing multiple other policy areas, especially amid a surge in terrorism, with increasingly frequent and deadly attacks affecting nearly half of Pakistan.

From a purely human perspective, they need to either focus solely on cricket or step back from cricket to handle other responsibilities. Anyone who disagrees is either biased or deliberately ignoring the obvious.
There hasn't been any decline. The group of cricketers were always mediocre with moments of brilliance here and there. Ramiz gave Babar excessive power and created unjustified hype around him and his boys. Pakistan was fortunate to have faced depleted teams during his tenure and also benefited from rain interruptions in the 2022 T20 World Cup, which allowed them to advance past the group stage. But even then, they didn't win anything, not even an Asia Cup. When Ramiz took over, the team with the same group of players, started losing test matches at home. Naqvi has shown the courage in taking on the Nexus which is controlling Pakistan cricket team and has been excessively hyped despite getting below par results consistently.
 
This point is not directed towards you, personally.

It is a habit of people in Pakistan to start quoting the past or start drawing comparisons when there is no solid argument to their point.
  1. PCB has been a mess for decades.
  2. The previous Chairpersons of PCB have been incompetent.
  3. There has been a lot of political interference in the PCB for decades.
But quoting the past doesn’t take away from the fact that Mohsin Naqvi cannot hold “key” political positions in the Government along with Chairman of PCB and everything that he is in charge of has been degraded.

There has not been any independent financial Audit (for decades) so there is no solid evidence that Mohsin Naqvi has improved anything financially.

However, there is solid evidence that all the stadium repairs which he oversaw (for Champions Trophy) are now leaking and in disarray.

For me, India is not the shinning example of anything, a population over a billion people and until a few years ago Pakistan was able to compete with India in almost all fields (Sports or otherwise) with significantly less population and resources. India's competition is China and the sooner Pakistanees stop comparing themselves to India, the better. Pakistan doesn't need comparisons with India and fully capable to chart its own course. India is a huge population which is Cricket mad and Bollywood (is a copy/paste machine) and together are some of the reasons behind IPL (and financial windfall).

Good luck to India and Indians and my best wishes but Pakistan is capable of standing on its own.

Mohsin Naqvi is an abject failure in facets of Administration (Cricket or otherwise) and it is dead clear to everyone apart from those with political bias. Even a broken clock is right twice a day so Mohsin Naqvi being right on X or Y is merely coincidental.
Factually incorrect. Pakistan have never competed with India in most fields.

Cricket and hockey have been the only sports where Pak used to compete vs India (and not even anymore tbh)

Badminton, Tennis, Wrestling, Boxing, Chess, Shooting, Compound Archery - Sports where India have won world championships, Olympic medals, Grand Slams where Pakistan have never won anything.

Space research - Another thing where Pakistan has never been a player in its' history while India has had moon missions and is now planning human spaceflight

Railways - Pak simply not a competitor in any form

Tech/Pharma - Huge fields where India are a global player and Pak never have been.

It's cricket and hockey which have created the false delusion of Ind and Pak being "sem2sem"
 
So the murderous thug spent 14bn on a stadium without a roof and after one bout of rain everything is leaking. I wonder how much he picked up in commissions from the contractors? And then people ask what's going wrong with our cricket.
 
This point is not directed towards you, personally.

It is a habit of people in Pakistan to start quoting the past or start drawing comparisons when there is no solid argument to their point.
  1. PCB has been a mess for decades.
  2. The previous Chairpersons of PCB have been incompetent.
  3. There has been a lot of political interference in the PCB for decades.
But quoting the past doesn’t take away from the fact that Mohsin Naqvi cannot hold “key” political positions in the Government along with Chairman of PCB and everything that he is in charge of has been degraded.

There has not been any independent financial Audit (for decades) so there is no solid evidence that Mohsin Naqvi has improved anything financially.
All the audited PCB financial reports are available on the website. Please dont make random claims.
The data is solid enough!

 
Only a stone rain can stop PCb , they are shameless
Oh put a sock in it…

What did you say to me? “Rizwan is on the brink of creating history”

You were certain Pakistan will win the tournament, now you want to blame the PCB?
 
So you win a tournament and the first thing that comes in to your mind is not to celebrate but to remember Pakistan.

I like it,
Every child should remember their parents on a big occasion.
 
But when India loses to any team you come out drooling and barking?
When India loses. Meaning when India plays a game.

Pakistan is not even playing...

So you get the point or what?

For a guy who claims to have read only 1 book that too of Rushdies and claims it to be good and than have comprehension issues is really weird.
 
It's ridiculous that a man with 3-4 full time jobs is being given the responsibility to run the PCB and even the PM can't get rid of him because Naqvi is GHQs boy.

Naqvi was busy travelling and lobbying in the US with Congressmen, Senators and Trump Administration officials during the inauguration week.

The PCB chairman role is a full time job.
 
Back
Top