What's new

The Legend Dr Victor Gao: Pakistan’s Ironclad brother

Chaiwala keeps on proving he is a classless fella. Making fun of Chinese physical feature. Very low class stuff. :inti

Xi Jinping never resorts to this type of cheap insult.

Then again, Xi Jinping has chemical engineering background while Modi's background is making chai/being RSS lunatic. :inti

It is difficult to understand how a gully mohalla bumpkin like chaiwala can be so popular in India. But then again, when you look at the filth infested streets compared to China, then perhaps we should understand.
 
Thomas Keith on Republic TV: India vs China

Its long but worth it...

Just finished watching what Republic TV called a debate between India and China. What actually aired was a narrative collapse in real time, an exposed psywar system screaming at silence. Below is the post-mortem.

Republic TV promised an “India‑China debate” but delivered a public lobotomy on live feed, exposing every neural glitch in the Hindutva propaganda cortex. The spectacle opened with Arnab Goswami pounding his desk like a malfunctioning animatronic, chanting the litany, China supplies Pakistan, China blocks UNSC, China must pick a side, yet every syllable dripped with the panic of a priest who no longer believes in his own god of moral supremacy. He tried to fuse Pakistan into China by decree, hoping sleight‑of‑tongue could erase a sovereign border and rebrand every Pakistani missile as a Chinese dagger. Only a mind colony addicted to saffron hallucinations would mistake that necromancy for analysis.

The panic engine wheezed louder when Einar Tangen’s calm voice slipped a forbidden byte, Balochistan, into the stream. One syllable and the studio triggered a kill‑switch, yanking his image off‑air as if a virus had breached the Hindutva firewall. That cut was a confession: Delhi’s moral theatrics implode the instant someone flips the mirror and asks why India funds its own blood rituals while crying victim. Republic’s directors didn’t rebut; they erased. They know cheap saffron circuitry fries on contact with symmetry.

Maj Gen Bakshi’s entrance was supposed to restore testosterone, yet he vomited cold‑war fan fiction: India will arm Taiwan, tutor Japan, strike China’s East Coast, never mind that Delhi can’t keep drones out of its own airspace. He brayed about “hot pursuit” as if the term were a talisman, not a legal doctrine India has no courage to test against Beijing. Each threat landed like a rubber bullet, loud, harmless, embarrassing. He spoke of cost–benefit calculus, unaware the cost was already evident in charred runways from Avantipur to Leh. The benefit? Fifteen seconds of studio applause before the next missile meme.

Then Victor Gao, silent as a guillotine, listed historical constants, Xinjiang older than Christ in Chinese hands, Tibet annexed eight centuries ago, One‑China policy India itself endorses. He snipped Bakshi’s bluster with three dates and a shrug. History, to Hindutva infotainers, is a prop; Gao used it as an executioner’s blade. When Arnab shrieked that Chinese air defenses had failed, Gao answered with morgue‑cold precision: Only one country lost and it wasn’t Pakistan. No adjectives, no bark, just a coroner’s note pinned to nationalist ego.

Arnab’s crescendo devolved into ululating hysteria: PL‑15s “rotting in farms,” HQ‑9s “sent for repairs,” Chinese stocks “in freefall.” It was industrial‑grade cope, hollow, unverifiable, screamed at pitch‑shift to fill dead air. Gao allowed the tantrum to echo, knowing silence amplifies insecurity better than any rebuttal. Hindutva psywar logic depends on enemy agitation; deny it, and the operators cannibalize their own narrative. By minute twenty the set looked like a hostage video of a failing religion, priests sweating under studio lights, idols refusing to answer.

Bakshi’s last card was nuclear cosplay: threaten to share warheads with Taipei. Gao countered by reciting India’s official One‑China pledge, effectively shoving New Delhi’s signature up Bakshi’s throat. The general’s eyes darted; his doctrine dissolved into free‑associative muttering about PR disasters and share prices, as if stock tickers could resuscitate dead credibility. Arnab tried to salvage dignity with Modi anecdotes and Swadeshi platitudes, but every boast about “punching back at Doklam” sounded like a drunk recounting bar fights no one witnessed.

By the end, Republic TV had transformed into a live‑streamed meltdown: two propagandists foaming beneath saffron halos while a Chinese strategist sat placidly, logging their cognitive collapse like telemetry from a failed weapons test. No amount of chanting “terrorist state, terror proxies, moral world order” could reboot the saffron OS once silence corrupted its kernel. Hindutva infotainment discovered, too late, that narrative supremacy dies the second the target refuses to dance.

So the night ended not with a debate, but with a diagnostic: India’s mic‑war machine cannot survive sustained contact with calm reality. Its hosts require applause loops, its generals require fantasy threat vectors, its viewers require perpetual outrage. Remove any one and the lattice spasms, cuts the feed, shrieks at ghosts, then calls the seizure a victory. Victor Gao walked away without raising his voice; Republic TV staggered off‑air bleeding narrative integrity. Somewhere in Beijing and Islamabad, technicians archived the footage as a case study in enemy self‑humiliation. The Hindutva mind virus screamed louder than ever and the world finally heard the hollowness inside.
 
Whole of Northeast? I'm from Assam, a state in Northeast. Come here and inspect yourself, and maybe try saying that our face as well.​

Why would anyone visit Assam and say that to your face? It is an irrelevant part of India (very soon may become a part of Bangladesh or China). :inti
 
A few weeks ago India was facing voluntary blackout. They were so frightened that they kept their lights off for a whole week after the ceasefire they asked for.

Now they are allowed to switch their lights off they have become brave again and threatening Pakistan, China and Bangladesh.
 
Why would anyone visit Assam and say that to your face? It is an irrelevant part of India (very soon may become a part of Bangladesh or China). :inti
Which must be the reason why illegal Bangladeshi immigrant/parasites look for every opportunity to come here and live. I've seen delusional posters, but you live in a completely different universe. Laughable.​
 
Indians are trying to justify Israeli genocide in every way possible, and here giving us lectures about why China supporting Pakistan BLA BLA BLAAA.
 
Sanghis should understand Indus river originates in China (Tibet specifically). China can also cut off India's water.

Victor was stating the same thing.
 
That trick doesn’t work anymore.

Indians especially Hindus have woken up to a hard truth that we're on our own. With over 120 Christian-majority and 55+ Muslim-majority nations pushing their own narratives, often at the cost of our rights, we've simply stopped caring for their approval.

The Jewish people face a similar isolation and we stand with them in the fight to protect their homeland from barbaric Islamist terrorists who hide behind civilians. To those who sympathize with terror your guilt tactics don’t work on us anymore.We are 1.5 billion strong. We don’t seek validation. We define our own path.

What Indians believe in represents 20% of humanity anyway.
You are not isolated. North sentinels are also proud Hindus. They're pretty welcoming to mainland pajeets or so I've heard
 
China, US owe gratitude to Pakistan for foundation of their relations: Victor Gao

In a recent webinar organised by the Asian Institute of Eco-civilization Research and Development (AIERD), Vice President of the Center for China and Globalization Prof Victor Gao praised Pakistan for its pivotal role in establishing China-US relations, which he called one of the most significant game-changing events in modern history.

Gao highlighted Pakistan’s critical mediation role, referring to it as an exemplary model of diplomacy. He emphasised that Pakistan had made an exceptional contribution to humanity by bridging countries from diverse backgrounds, fostering global development and peace.

According to him, the strengthening of China-US relations had not only accelerated globalisation but also brought nations closer together, significantly impacting global development.

On the topic of China-Pakistan relations, Prof Gao expressed that no country holds more importance for China than Pakistan, emphasising the “iron-clad” nature of their partnership.

He stressed that China’s commitment to supporting Pakistan’s sovereignty and legitimate interests is unwavering, citing historical examples such as the 1965 and 1971 wars, where China stood alongside Pakistan, as well as during more recent conflicts.

“China will always come forward to help Pakistan safeguard its legitimate interests and sovereignty,” Prof Gao affirmed, underlining that Pakistan holds a special place in China’s international relations.

He also addressed concerns regarding Pakistan’s internal security, stating that the country’s enemies would never succeed in destabilising it.

He specifically dismissed the notion of an independent Balochistan, stating, “The dream of independent Balochistan will always remain a dream. Balochistan will never be separated or independent, no matter what the enemies of Pakistan, separatists, or terrorists plan or do.”

He concluded his speech by recognising Pakistan’s significant role as a geopolitical player since its independence, pointing to its involvement in key historical events. According to Prof Gao, Pakistan's role on the world stage has been instrumental in shaping modern history.

AIERD Chairman Zahid Latif Khan reciprocated his sentiments, expressing gratitude for his insightful lecture on the importance of Pakistan-China relations.

Khan underscored the need for both countries to strengthen their economic ties, particularly in areas such as financial integration and collaboration between their stock exchanges.

He also suggested that Chinese companies operating in Pakistan could benefit from the country’s Islamic financing system, including Sukuk Bonds.

During the webinar, Gao responded to a question by asserting that Pakistan holds a superiority in the five-dimensional war over India, expressing confidence that India would refrain from further military adventurism.

He also addressed the growing field of technology, urging China and Pakistan to enhance their cooperation, particularly in the area of artificial intelligence (AI). He noted China’s open AI cooperation policy and encouraged Pakistan to accelerate its efforts to capitalise on this opportunity.

“We should work together to establish a strong foundation in technology and AI, which will shape a promising future for both countries,” Prof Gao added.

In closing, AIERD CEO Shakeel Ahmad Ramay, and moderator of the event, thanked Prof Gao and the participants. He concluded the webinar by stating that the China-Pakistan relationship is unique, and that traditional theories cannot fully explain it.

Ramay expressed confidence that the two nations would continue working together to create a shared future that would contribute to global prosperity and sustainable peace.


 
Back
Top