What's new

Umar Akmal handed three-year ban from all forms of cricket

It’s Misbahs fault from dropping him from the test team . It had a really detrimental affect on him . I feel for him .

No one is entitled to be on the team. Being dropped is part and parcel of cricket, and cricketers all over the world have to learn to cope with this even if they think it is “unfair”. There’s only one person responsible for Umar Akmal’s career and if I were to give Akmal one hint, I’d say his name starts with a “you”.
 
Something isn’t right.

He and Amir both debuted around the same time and are only a couple of years apart in terms of age. This guy saw the consequences of everything first hand at a very young age. That should be enough to send a shiver down his spine at the thought of doing anything corrupt.

Clearly, PCB has been caught out once again investing times in undereducated illiterates and it is costing them dearly with very little outcome.

I would rather have a decade of being a Zimbabwe/Ireland level team but start a fresh with an injection of cricketers who have at least attained an education at University level or A levels. Let talent take a back seat and let’s bring back maturity.
 
Taffazul Rizvi discusses legal aspects of Umar Akmal case

"A 3 year ban for non-reporting is considered stiff, it's not a relaxed ban. PCB was also thinking that sentences for such offenses should start increasing because it's clear that perhaps players aren't learning their lessons"

Agreed.
 
Cut the family some slack man. They’ve just been tarnished hard know they can’t fight against a machine. People say things that are senseless at times

How long are we going to cut them some slack man? Id say part of the reason umar is in this mess is because of kamran and the family making excuses for him all the time and running to his defence

They shouldve knocked some sense into him and made him take ownership instead of making him out to be a victim all the time maybe then it wouldnt have come to this
 
A shame such a talent was wasted. He could’ve been a great if he had a good work ethic and discipline
 
a great news indeed
a person who had never learned from his mistakes
he deserved this
i still remember his pics with mazhar majeed in 2010
i always had doubts on him
 
No or little impact to the Pakistan national team. He was not contributing anyway. But, a bigger impact to all the other teams that play against Pakistan. They had an almost free wicket all these years.
Also, big loss for those fans who compare Umar Akmal vs. [Any One]. :ua
 
I suppose people generally dislike him and therefore nobody wants to highlight the irregularity of the PCB justice department when it comes to sentencing crimes.

Regardless of the person and how much we dislike him, there has to be level of consistency when punishing. Salman Butt denied his crime until a couple of years ago but he is playing FC cricket and has bagged 2 PSL contracts since.

I would like Justice for Umar Akmal not because I have a personal opinion about him as a player but more so that our justice system isn’t flawed. This would be totally in line with the vast level of injustices carried out by courts in Pakistan, and quite literally, enough is enough. He should not have been banned for more than a year.

You can see that in this thread too.

"Poor batsman"

"Mentally weak"

"Lost talent"

So, that's why he deserves 3 year ban... I mean, WTH? Is that even logic?

He hasn't even fixed.

Most recently, others have gotten away with a few months ban for not reporting. Nawaz and Irfan.

Amir fixed. Butt fixed. Both are playing cricket today.

And Umar is being compared to the fixers, lol.
 
You can see that in this thread too.

"Poor batsman"

"Mentally weak"

"Lost talent"

So, that's why he deserves 3 year ban... I mean, WTH? Is that even logic?

He hasn't even fixed.

Most recently, others have gotten away with a few months ban for not reporting. Nawaz and Irfan.

Amir fixed. Butt fixed. Both are playing cricket today.

And Umar is being compared to the fixers, lol.

He didn't report multiple approaches and only admitted to them after being confronted about them. Nawaz and Irfan reported the approaches themselves, though they did it late. As per the PCB lawyer.
 
Lol, Umar Akmal probably over confidently thought by not contesting the charges and just blindly admitting, not going in without a lawyer he would get the bare minimum which is 6 months. The PCB gave him many chances and let off's in the past, he can't really complain right now.
 
He didn't report multiple approaches and only admitted to them after being confronted about them. Nawaz and Irfan reported the approaches themselves, though they did it late. As per the PCB lawyer.

And these approaches are the ones PCB found out about. Who’s to say there weren’t other instances?
 
End of Umar Akmal s career but I think there is more to here than what meets the eye...
 
Three years seems like a very harsh punishment. The PCB appear to have washed their hands of Akmal.
 
We may have just seen Umar Akmal's final game. It doesn't seem like he will play international cricket again.
 
For all those rejoicing - unfortunately this is not the last we hear of either Akmal brother and their selection in the Pakistan team.

It takes a lot more than a 3 year ban or being 39 and unfit to keep an Akmal out of the team.
 
The PCB lawyer makes it very clear (without saying too much) why Umar Akmal received a 'harsh' 3 year ban and not a lesser punishment.

I know it's Pakistan but judges do not have discretion to do as they please - they follow the law.

If Akmal had a proper lawyer and sought reliable representation i'm sure we'd be looking at a 6 month ban instead.

This further evidences that something isn't right in Umar's head and he desperately needs support for his mental wellbeing.
 
Umar Akmal chose to represent himself. :danish

Not a great call and if he was honest, then it would have been reduced.
 
What I am surprised about is that he has all of a sudden become a better talent because of his ban and apparently the tribunal states he kept on justifying his reasons for not reporting the approach, he was asked time and time again to just admit he should have reported it and made a mistake just like M Irfan, M Nawaz did but no Akmal had to justify his reasons for not approaching it after several attempts of them trying to make him say otherwise hence they decided as this is a regular occurrence and clearly the previous punishments to other players for similar offences were not a deterrent they decided to throw the book at him and I can’t say I blame them. Anyway all the people here saying what a waste put it this way he was not coming back to the team any time soon so let’s just forget about it and he had a handful of good performances in so many years, he won’t be missed internationally
 
Something isn’t right here.

How can you be banned for 3 years for not reporting an advance made by a bookie whilst ICC banned Shakib for 12 months?

True.

However, two verdicts are given by two organisations - this only tells how corrupt & incompetent ICC is while PCB has their own high standards for such corruptions. They added two more years to a standard protocol of 1 year ban and one more year deferred punishment for a similar offence.
 
If it was PCB of yesterday years, I don’t think Umar had to be worried much - this punishment would have been over turned to 6 months..... next in last 3-4 months not much cricket and in next 3-4 not expected much either - net, net not much loss. But, this time I think it’ll hurt him badly.

His international career was almost over, what was left is PSL, BPL, CPL, T10 and domestics - that’s also gone by this. Must have irritated PCB brasses to the bleating point.
 
Shoaib Akhtar was banned for 5 years in 2008, through the courts the ban was removed and eventually 7 years later Najam Sethi reimbursed him the fine.

Umar Akmal will definitely be appealing this and will perhaps try his luck in the corrupt Punjab High Courts where the corrupt PML-N politicians have had a field day against the NAB
 
3 years is way too much. Considering umar, Amir got very lucky. Poor umar didn't even "technically" got involved.
 
I am worried that the PCB had set a precedent here that could come back to bite it.
3 years is harsh unless they have taken all previous disciplinary history into account.

You don't want a babar or a Shaheen getting into this kind of thing now. Wow that would be the end ��
 
Oh and what a typical stani. Making a blunder and trying to justify it ��
 
I am worried that the PCB had set a precedent here that could come back to bite it.
3 years is harsh unless they have taken all previous disciplinary history into account.

You don't want a babar or a Shaheen getting into this kind of thing now. Wow that would be the end ��

If there's talent, the punishment gets smaller and smaller as it has been seen in previous cases.
 
Response to Umar Akmal's apologists

For those saying he hasn't even fixed (@Hawkeye) it's the lack of remorse that's done him. If he had quietly accepted all charges I wouldn't have been surprised to see a 2 year ban, with one of those years suspended, like Shakib got.

However, the guy admitted to the charges AND effectively pleaded not guilty by trying to justify his actions. People have taken that as his naivete, as he is not a professional lawyer himself. I see it differently. It smacks of the arrogance and entitlement of a guy who has been let off easy by the establishment numerous times. So, when the establishment got serious, Umar Akmal's disregard for rules and discipline caught up with him.

Previously every time he messed up, there was some form of leniency from the establishment because we (and they) all held out hope of the prodigy coming good. However that leniency has fed his lack of remorse and self reflection on his part for the various infractions he's had.

He's also surrounded by a family (and culture) who enable his repeated indiscretions with a victim mentality.

You only need to see it with the various posters here decrying this judgement as harsh.

Lastly, the use of previous cases (I.e. Amir, Sharjeel, Butt) is a non sequiter. Judge Umar's ban length on his actions, arguments and PCB's line in the sand moment to stop more players from continuing with these shenanigans

So, in closing, it's not the PCB stitching up Umar [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION]. It's all on Umar. It had to be. You can only play fate for so long.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For those saying he hasn't even fixed (@Hawkeye) it's the lack of remorse that's done him. If he had quietly accepted all charges I wouldn't have been surprised to see a 2 year ban, with one of those years suspended, like Shakib got.

However, the guy admitted to the charges AND effectively pleaded not guilty by trying to justify his actions. People have taken that as his naivete, as he is not a professional lawyer himself. I see it differently. It smacks of the arrogance and entitlement of a guy who has been let off easy by the establishment numerous times. So, when the establishment got serious, Umar Akmal's disregard for rules and discipline caught up with him.

Previously every time he messed up, there was some form of leniency from the establishment because we (and they) all held out hope of the prodigy coming good. However that leniency has fed his lack of remorse and self reflection on his part for the various infractions he's had.

He's also surrounded by a family (and culture) who enable his repeated indiscretions with a victim mentality.

You only need to see it with the various posters here decrying this judgement as harsh.

Lastly, the use of previous cases (I.e. Amir, Sharjeel, Butt) is a non sequiter. Judge Umar's ban length on his actions, arguments and PCB's line in the sand moment to stop more players from continuing with these shenanigans

So, in closing, it's not the PCB stitching up Umar [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION]. It's all on Umar. It had to be. You can only play fate for so long.


Thats a very good point. Both these brothers have a sense of self entitlement, and it can be seen here as well. For instance, Kamran Akmal still maintains that fitness culture is wrong. The problematic part is that they have been given enough leeway in the past. I mean its been a decade since Umar Akmal made his debut.

This corruption related charges are not going to be the last episode though, as with the reintegration of Sharjeel and Saleem Malik, Pakistan seems to be quite lenient when it comes to giving a free ride to corrupt people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For those saying he hasn't even fixed (@Hawkeye) it's the lack of remorse that's done him. If he had quietly accepted all charges I wouldn't have been surprised to see a 2 year ban, with one of those years suspended, like Shakib got.

However, the guy admitted to the charges AND effectively pleaded not guilty by trying to justify his actions. People have taken that as his naivete, as he is not a professional lawyer himself. I see it differently. It smacks of the arrogance and entitlement of a guy who has been let off easy by the establishment numerous times. So, when the establishment got serious, Umar Akmal's disregard for rules and discipline caught up with him.

Previously every time he messed up, there was some form of leniency from the establishment because we (and they) all held out hope of the prodigy coming good. However that leniency has fed his lack of remorse and self reflection on his part for the various infractions he's had.

He's also surrounded by a family (and culture) who enable his repeated indiscretions with a victim mentality.

You only need to see it with the various posters here decrying this judgement as harsh.

Lastly, the use of previous cases (I.e. Amir, Sharjeel, Butt) is a non sequiter. Judge Umar's ban length on his actions, arguments and PCB's line in the sand moment to stop more players from continuing with these shenanigans

So, in closing, it's not the PCB stitching up Umar [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION]. It's all on Umar. It had to be. You can only play fate for so long.
Have you read my posts since the punishment was handed down?

I have:

1. Accepted that there is no excuse for failing to report corrupt approaches.
2. Agreed that significant punishment is required.
3. Acknowledged that failing to engage a proper lawyer was stupid.

My issue is that the punishment for the crime must fit the crime, not be increased if the offender is uneducated or stupid or both.

His offence is exactly the same as Mohammad Irfan’s. His guilt is exactly the same as Mohammad Irfan’s.

Yet his punishment is a 3 year ban whereas Irfan got a 6 month ban.

Same crime, plus an early guilty plea, but six times as long a suspension?

That is outrageous, it’s a blatant and flagrant miscarriage of justice, and it brings the PCB and the judge into disrepute.
 
One thing that really surprised me is how despite having a very good support system around him, he never put his head in the right place. As a matter of fact, i think they have ingrained this victim mindset in him and told him that how "talented" he is and how unfair the management is when they have to toe the line for him.
 
It’s rather ironic, isn’t it?

We have the Qayyum and Beloff (Amir, Asif, Butt) reports which are paragons of clarity, justice and legal argument.

Then we had the absurd comedy of the PCB publishing the Sharjeel report, which showed the calibre of legal expertise and knowledge of a seven year old with a learning disability. Which was unsurprising as 2 of the 3 judges had zero legal experience or training.

Now we have this ludicrously disproportionate punishment, six times as severe as Mohammad Irfan got for exactly the same offence.

And the PCB hasn’t even bothered to publish the report.
 
Something isn’t right.

He and Amir both debuted around the same time and are only a couple of years apart in terms of age. This guy saw the consequences of everything first hand at a very young age. That should be enough to send a shiver down his spine at the thought of doing anything corrupt.

Clearly, PCB has been caught out once again investing times in undereducated illiterates and it is costing them dearly with very little outcome.

I would rather have a decade of being a Zimbabwe/Ireland level team but start a fresh with an injection of cricketers who have at least attained an education at University level or A levels. Let talent take a back seat and let’s bring back maturity.

This whole 2008 2009 young batch turned out to be disappointing
Amir nasjr jamshed umar akmal shazaib ahmed and ahmed shehzad.
These guys never realised their potential
 
This whole 2008 2009 young batch turned out to be disappointing
Amir nasjr jamshed umar akmal shazaib ahmed and ahmed shehzad.
These guys never realised their potential

Something that baffles me that how much potential there is and how little it translated into. One thing that is common here is that they never got a good captain, it started with inept home board i.e Ijaz Butt era. I really hope that Misbah is able to bring about this transformation and at least negative headlines are not there. From 2010 to 2020 it was relatively stable for Pakistan.
 
In 2009-10, Umar Akmal was a bigger talent and super star in cricket than Virat Kohli, Steve Smith, Joe Root and Kane Williamson all combined.

Let that sink in.

What a gigantic waste of talent.

I remember in 2009, I looked at Kohli with disgust while feeling envious that Pakistan has finally found their own Tendulkar.
 
Something that baffles me that how much potential there is and how little it translated into. One thing that is common here is that they never got a good captain, it started with inept home board i.e Ijaz Butt era. I really hope that Misbah is able to bring about this transformation and at least negative headlines are not there. From 2010 to 2020 it was relatively stable for Pakistan.

Its not only about the captain
These guys were too arrogant
I hope the new guys follow the babar azam route IA
 
In 2009-10, Umar Akmal was a bigger talent and super star in cricket than Virat Kohli, Steve Smith, Joe Root and Kane Williamson all combined.

Let that sink in.

What a gigantic waste of talent.

I remember in 2009, I looked at Kohli with disgust while feeling envious that Pakistan has finally found their own Tendulkar.

Correction, he was made into a superstar, he never had the game or the temperament. It all went downhill after 2014, as he was still a decent batsmen till then.
 
3 years for failing to report an approach ?That is way too harsh. It's pretty obvious now that people at the PCB don't like UA much and he has got only himself to blame for.

Pretty much the end for his int'l career.
 
3 years for failing to report an approach ?That is way too harsh. It's pretty obvious now that people at the PCB don't like UA much and he has got only himself to blame for.

Pretty much the end for his int'l career.

Way too lenient, he should have been banned about a decade ago when he faked an injury.
 
In 2009-10, Umar Akmal was a bigger talent and super star in cricket than Virat Kohli, Steve Smith, Joe Root and Kane Williamson all combined.

Let that sink in.

What a gigantic waste of talent.

I remember in 2009, I looked at Kohli with disgust while feeling envious that Pakistan has finally found their own Tendulkar.

I didn't know what you had seen on Umar Akmal. He is an upgrade version of Shahid Afridi but his batting technique were no where near Tendulqar or Kohli.
 
Have you read my posts since the punishment was handed down?

I have:

1. Accepted that there is no excuse for failing to report corrupt approaches.
2. Agreed that significant punishment is required.
3. Acknowledged that failing to engage a proper lawyer was stupid.

My issue is that the punishment for the crime must fit the crime, not be increased if the offender is uneducated or stupid or both.

His offence is exactly the same as Mohammad Irfan’s. His guilt is exactly the same as Mohammad Irfan’s.

Yet his punishment is a 3 year ban whereas Irfan got a 6 month ban.

Same crime, plus an early guilty plea, but six times as long a suspension?

That is outrageous, it’s a blatant and flagrant miscarriage of justice, and it brings the PCB and the judge into disrepute.

[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION]

So this is the charge placed on him:

Article 2.4.4 of the PCB Anti-Corruption Code reads as: “Failing to disclose to the PCB Vigilance and Security Department (without unnecessary delay) full details of any approaches or invitations received by the Participant to engage in Corrupt Conduct under this Anti-Corruption Code”.

· According to Article 6.2, the range of permissible period of ineligibility for those charged and found guilty under Article 2.4.4 is a minimum of six (6) months and a maximum of a lifetime.


Yes, his charge is the same as Mohammed Irfan's. However, in any justice setting, the plea you enter and the contrition you show, affects the length of the sentence. Plus, as per Article 6.2, the length of the ban is correct.

So whilst he did accept his charge, he:

a) Essentially demonstrated a not guilty plea by justifying his actions
b) Showed little remorse for doing what he did

So your point about him is that being stupid in not having legal representation shouldn't count against him. That's misguided, because, in any court of law, contrition can be a difference maker. It's what helped Amir get a 5 year ban, as opposed to a 10 year ban for Butt (suspended element of the respective bans aside)

Secondly, it's high time that the PCB drew a line in the sand against this behaviour. We have now seen this thing happen thrice in a decade.
A precedent needed to be set.

That could only happen with a stiff punishment, such that, even with contrition and legal representation, Akmal would still get, atleast 18 months.

So whilst it is a strict punishment relative to previous cases, it is absolutely not a flagrant abuse of justice.
 
We need a full disclosure of events.

The crooks who approached him and their nefarious activity has gone into anonymity. Whilst a professional sportsman has lost his career and dignity. This is not fair as other cricketers need to know who those crooks are, and what is the Pakistani establishment doing about arresting and convicting them?
 
You can see that in this thread too.

"Poor batsman"

"Mentally weak"

"Lost talent"

So, that's why he deserves 3 year ban... I mean, WTH? Is that even logic?

Amir fixed. Butt fixed. Both are playing cricket today.

And Umar is being compared to the fixers, lol.

Both PCB and fans seem to take talent/future worth into account. Umar honestly I don't think he would ever come back and be a success at international long term. He wasn't in favour with fans or board, poor fitness, and most fans are labelling him a TTF at this point. Umar is not a repeat offender, he's never been charged with failure to report before. And his discipline issues really shouldn't be lumped in with this, it's not right.

Hence are happy to see him banned for a long time. Again with Kaneria, no one honestly gave a damn. If Amir wasn't part of the trio, who knows maybe Butt and Asif would have gotten life bans instead. PCB were already trying to make an example of them more to cover for how they were pushing Amir back into the fold. There are rumours that were lenient when Salim Malik got banned, the more talented/with a bigger future at the time were showed leniency. I'm still utterly confused how Sharjeel got such a short sentence when he was convicted of all those things listed, but I guess he's lucky PCB handled it and not ICC or pressure from a foreign board.
 
For those saying he hasn't even fixed (@Hawkeye) it's the lack of remorse that's done him. If he had quietly accepted all charges I wouldn't have been surprised to see a 2 year ban, with one of those years suspended, like Shakib got.

However, the guy admitted to the charges AND effectively pleaded not guilty by trying to justify his actions. People have taken that as his naivete, as he is not a professional lawyer himself. I see it differently. It smacks of the arrogance and entitlement of a guy who has been let off easy by the establishment numerous times. So, when the establishment got serious, Umar Akmal's disregard for rules and discipline caught up with him.

Previously every time he messed up, there was some form of leniency from the establishment because we (and they) all held out hope of the prodigy coming good. However that leniency has fed his lack of remorse and self reflection on his part for the various infractions he's had.

He's also surrounded by a family (and culture) who enable his repeated indiscretions with a victim mentality.

You only need to see it with the various posters here decrying this judgement as harsh.

Lastly, the use of previous cases (I.e. Amir, Sharjeel, Butt) is a non sequiter. Judge Umar's ban length on his actions, arguments and PCB's line in the sand moment to stop more players from continuing with these shenanigans

So, in closing, it's not the PCB stitching up Umar [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION]. It's all on Umar. It had to be. You can only play fate for so long.

POTW. Umar Akmal hasn't just had a second chance, but 14-15 chances.

How can you expect leniency with that disciplinary record, and when you don't contest the charges but plead your innocence anyway in front of a judge ?

Previous PCB administrations would either brush these matters under the carpet or hand out tap on the wrist punishments, or go through a drama of handing out severe sentences only to overturn them on appeal.

Akmal however should expect no such leniency from this new administration.
 
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION]

So this is the charge placed on him:

Article 2.4.4 of the PCB Anti-Corruption Code reads as: “Failing to disclose to the PCB Vigilance and Security Department (without unnecessary delay) full details of any approaches or invitations received by the Participant to engage in Corrupt Conduct under this Anti-Corruption Code”.

· According to Article 6.2, the range of permissible period of ineligibility for those charged and found guilty under Article 2.4.4 is a minimum of six (6) months and a maximum of a lifetime.


Yes, his charge is the same as Mohammed Irfan's. However, in any justice setting, the plea you enter and the contrition you show, affects the length of the sentence. Plus, as per Article 6.2, the length of the ban is correct.

So whilst he did accept his charge, he:

a) Essentially demonstrated a not guilty plea by justifying his actions
b) Showed little remorse for doing what he did

So your point about him is that being stupid in not having legal representation shouldn't count against him. That's misguided, because, in any court of law, contrition can be a difference maker. It's what helped Amir get a 5 year ban, as opposed to a 10 year ban for Butt (suspended element of the respective bans aside)

Secondly, it's high time that the PCB drew a line in the sand against this behaviour. We have now seen this thing happen thrice in a decade.
A precedent needed to be set.

That could only happen with a stiff punishment, such that, even with contrition and legal representation, Akmal would still get, atleast 18 months.

So whilst it is a strict punishment relative to previous cases, it is absolutely not a flagrant abuse of justice.
Absolutely wrong.

Akmal declined the opportunity of a hearing and elected to plead guilty and accept his punishment.

That’s it. The judge had zero right to then cross-examine him: his guilty plea was complete.

He clearly turned up at the session unrepresented by a lawyer because he thought that he was going merely to hear what his sentence was. The judge had zero right to stage the hearing that the guilty-pleading accused had waived his right to undergo.

If he had had a lawyer - or an education and IQ like me - he would have remained silent when the Judge unlawfully attempted to cross-examine him. And his lawyer would have told the judge that he (the judge) seemed to have misunderstood that the early guilty plea and polite rejection of a hearing meant that the judge was obliged to desist from holding the forbidden hearing and needed to get on with the sentencing, rather than subjecting Akmal to a Kangaroo Court.
 
Umar Akmal deserves his three-year ban, reckons Zaheer Abbas

Former Pakistan greats have little sympathy for Umar Akmal following the latter’s three-year ban from all forms of cricket on corruption charges. Pakistan legend Zaheer Abbas tore into Akmal for his tendency to “misbehave” and his failure to report corrupt approaches despite being a senior cricketer.

“How can you say he is a great talent when he isn’t following the rules? If you aren’t following the rules, then you aren’t a great player. Great players always follow the rules. Sachin Tendulkar, for example. If you aren’t following rules, you are doubtful about your career,” Abbas told The Indian Express.

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) on Monday banned Akmal for not reporting spot-fixing offers ahead of this year’s Pakistan Super League (PSL). “Umar Akmal handed three-year ban from all cricket by Chairman of the Disciplinary Panel Mr Justice (retired) Fazal-e-Miran Chauhan,” PCB said in a tweet. He was provisionally suspended on February 20.

The former Pakistan captain also opined that in all likelihood Akmal wouldn’t be playing for Pakistan again. “ I think his international career is all but over. He deserved the punishment,” he said.

“He (Akmal) wasn’t a junior player. He was playing for Pakistan for a long time. He must have been told by the PCB about the ICC Anti-Corruption rules many times – what to do when a corrupt approach is made. But he was ignoring it. PCB got to know that somebody (a corruptor) was trying to get hold of Umar. Later on he confessed, but it was too late,” Abbas said.

The PCB formally charged Akmal with two breaches of its Anti-Corruption Code for two unrelated incidents on March 20. The charges come under Article 2.4.4 of the Board’s Anti-Corruption Code, which deals with the failure to disclose (without delay) “full details of any approaches or invitations received by the Participant to engage in Corrupt Conduct” to the PCB’s Vigilance and Security Department.

At a hearing at the National Cricket Academy, he represented himself, while the PCB was represented by lawyer Taffazul Rizvi.

Akmal’s career has been littered with disciplinary issues – including public criticism of former Pakistan head coach Mickey Arthur – for which he received fines and suspensions. But this is for the first time that the middle-order batsman has been sanctioned for breaching the Anti-Corruption Code. In 2018, however, Akmal told Samaa TV that he had been offered $200,000 by bookmakers to leave alone two deliveries during Pakistan’s 2015 World Cup opener against India. “…every match I play against India, they offer me money to make some excuse and opt out of the game,” he had said.

Akmal is a case of a talent gone awry. “From the very beginning, he used to misbehave. But when I was the Pakistan team’s chief batting consultant during a tour to Dhaka some years ago, he didn’t show any misbehaviour in front of me,” Abbas said.

Somehow, corruption code breaches keep surfacing in Pakistan cricket. From Saleem Malik to Umar Akmal, it’s a long list; Pakistani cricketers banned for corruption. “The PCB does have a robust anti-corruption programme. Akmal was caught because PCB was keeping an eye on him. But if Pakistan would were stricter on those players who started match-fixing, I think this (corruption) would have gone a long time ago,” he remarked, without taking names.

https://indianexpress.com/article/s...-ban-corruption-charges-zaheer-abbas-6381987/
 
Procedurally, fair enough on your point about cross examination not being permissible. He could appeal the process, although I don't know if he has the legal avenues to pursue that course.



However, I reiterate that the ends justify the means here, given his attitude and lack of remorse.


I will concede, that the legal process needs sharpening up in the future and my whole 'ends justify the means' statement sets a dangerous precedent
 
Absolutely wrong.

Akmal declined the opportunity of a hearing and elected to plead guilty and accept his punishment.

That’s it. The judge had zero right to then cross-examine him: his guilty plea was complete.

He clearly turned up at the session unrepresented by a lawyer because he thought that he was going merely to hear what his sentence was. The judge had zero right to stage the hearing that the guilty-pleading accused had waived his right to undergo.

If he had had a lawyer - or an education and IQ like me - he would have remained silent when the Judge unlawfully attempted to cross-examine him. And his lawyer would have told the judge that he (the judge) seemed to have misunderstood that the early guilty plea and polite rejection of a hearing meant that the judge was obliged to desist from holding the forbidden hearing and needed to get on with the sentencing, rather than subjecting Akmal to a Kangaroo Court.
Procedurally, fair enough on your point about cross examination not being permissible. He could appeal the process, although I don't know if he has the legal avenues to pursue that course.



However, I reiterate that the ends justify the means here, given his attitude and lack of remorse.


I will concede, that the legal process needs sharpening up in the future and my whole 'ends justify the means' statement sets a dangerous precedent
 
Procedurally, fair enough on your point about cross examination not being permissible. He could appeal the process, although I don't know if he has the legal avenues to pursue that course.



However, I reiterate that the ends justify the means here, given his attitude and lack of remorse.


I will concede, that the legal process needs sharpening up in the future and my whole 'ends justify the means' statement sets a dangerous precedent
Believe me, he frustrates me even more than you! :)

What a waste of talent!
 
If there's talent, the punishment gets smaller and smaller as it has been seen in previous cases.

Which cases are you referring too? I dont think Irfan, Nawaz got lesser punishment because they were extreme talents, they just handled their issue a bit better.

Or are you referring to other countries? Where some are never banned and the ones banned are random cricketers with not much future to show how well they handle such cases.
 
It’s rather ironic, isn’t it?

We have the Qayyum and Beloff (Amir, Asif, Butt) reports which are paragons of clarity, justice and legal argument.

Then we had the absurd comedy of the PCB publishing the Sharjeel report, which showed the calibre of legal expertise and knowledge of a seven year old with a learning disability. Which was unsurprising as 2 of the 3 judges had zero legal experience or training.

Now we have this ludicrously disproportionate punishment, six times as severe as Mohammad Irfan got for exactly the same offence.

And the PCB hasn’t even bothered to publish the report.

Both PCB and fans seem to take talent/future worth into account. Umar honestly I don't think he would ever come back and be a success at international long term. He wasn't in favour with fans or board, poor fitness, and most fans are labelling him a TTF at this point. Umar is not a repeat offender, he's never been charged with failure to report before. And his discipline issues really shouldn't be lumped in with this, it's not right.

Hence are happy to see him banned for a long time. Again with Kaneria, no one honestly gave a damn. If Amir wasn't part of the trio, who knows maybe Butt and Asif would have gotten life bans instead. PCB were already trying to make an example of them more to cover for how they were pushing Amir back into the fold. There are rumours that were lenient when Salim Malik got banned, the more talented/with a bigger future at the time were showed leniency. I'm still utterly confused how Sharjeel got such a short sentence when he was convicted of all those things listed, but I guess he's lucky PCB handled it and not ICC or pressure from a foreign board.

Yes, agreed.

This one is terrible in the sense, totally disproportionate.

And fans trying to group 'disciplinary' issues with this don't seem to have any shame.
 
He might have gone to report them once getting the hint from someone inside that this is about to explode. That’s pretty bad tbf, but still not 3 years. You get 5 years for actually bagging a pay day and carrying out a no ball!

dont know why u r comparing two very different scenarios .
Amir Was 18/19 his Captain persuaded him to do the no ball as well as his fellow senior fast bowler
he admitted his charges didn't Offer any excuses
And Got 5 years For what foe not being mature enough which he couldn't have been at the age of 19.

Umar on the other hand is on the seen for more then 10 years he knows in and out of every Bad aspect that he shouldn't do and then He also Gives excuses for not reporting.i don't know u need to judge scenarios better that what judges see and make decisions
 
Umar Akmal Will Definitely Challenge 'Harsh' Three-year Ban, Says Brother Kamran

Akmal was referring to Mohammad Irfan and Mohammad Nawaz who were banned for short periods after not reporting approaches made to them.

PTI |April 28, 2020, 2:17 PM IST

The three-year ban handed to Umar Akmal for not reporting corrupt approaches is "very harsh" and he will "definitely challenge" it, his elder brother Kamran said on Monday after the Pakistan Cricket Board's announcement.

Kamran, expressed surprise over the outcome of the PCB hearing, held in Lahore on Monday.

"I am definitely surprised at the harsh punishment given to Umar. A three- year ban is very harsh. He will definitely approach every available forum to appeal against this ban," Kamran said.

The veteran of 57 Tests, 153 ODIs and 58 T20 internationals pointed out that other players have been given much lighter punishments for similar charges.

"Definitely it is hard to understand because other players in the past have got short bans for similar offences. Yet Umar has got such a harsh punishment."

Akmal was referring to Mohammad Irfan and Mohammad Nawaz who were banned for short periods after not reporting approaches made to them.

Kamran said Umar would definitely consider hiring a legal counsel to file his appeal on the available forums. Umar presented his own case in Monday's hearing while the PCB was represented by their legal counsel Tafazzul Rizvi.

Umar, who last played for Pakistan in last October against Sri Lanka in a home T20 series has been charged on two counts of not reporting offers made to him to spot-fix in the Pakistan Super League (PSL).

Justice (retd) Justice (retd) Fazal-e-Miran Chauhan, in a short order after a one-hour hearing imposed a three-year ban on Umar. A detailed order will be released later.

Rizvi argued that Umar's case was unrelated to those of the other two players, who left themselves at the discretion of the court.

He also said that the other players had one charge against them while Umar had two different charges against him.

"Umar admitted to the charges but tried to justify himself and the judge also gave him a chance several times to review his position which he didn't," Rizvi said.

Kamran and Umar's other brother, Adnan Akmal has also played for Pakistan in 21 Tests and 5 ODIs as a wicketkeeper-batsman.

Link: https://www.news18.com/cricketnext/...ree-year-ban-says-brother-kamran-2595893.html
 
Shoaib Akhtar speaking on his YouTube:

"PCB said to UA that had you told us about the approach we would have been lenient on you - he says that I never fixed a match - all I did was not report the approach so you cannot put a ban of 3 yrs on me"

"Some history about UA - After every six months or so, UA does something that he is pulled up on and caught out, all sorts of things seem to happen to him"

"If in 10 years or so, Virat Kohli has hit 70 hundreds whilst UA has just 3 so the fault lies squarely with him and no one else - that is just a fact"

"They went after UA as he failed to report approach but the company that was given rights for online streaming of games, and in that contract it said that whilst streaming there can be online betting also - Why didnt PCB's legal department spot that? This is what this incompetent department allowed - the fact that the contract allowed for subletting for online gaming"

"Why not make a law in Pakistan, like there is in Sri Lanka, that anyone caught match-fixing goes to jail for 10 years so that no one darent do this"

"What started in 1995 continues today in 2020 with people not stopping from doing match-fixing"

"Why did we bring Mohammad Amir back? You have one law for Salman Butt, one for Mohammad Asif and another for Amir"

"Then you tried to make Amir into a star; You slapped the system on its face and brought Amir back"

"Amir then slapped you (the system), saying go away - I dont want to play Test cricket - I dont want to pay back Pakistan"

"Now we have people who were CEOs in their time, now talking big about this asking for people to be put in jails - why didnt they ban such people in their time?"

"People were given a cover by the PCB after match fixing - the PCB brought match fixers back in and they played for Pakistan"

"They think - "lets match fix, we will get banned for six months or 2 years and then come back like Sharjeel"

"Think they will put pressure on UA during appeal to accept his mistake and then reduce his ban to six months"
 
dont know why u r comparing two very different scenarios .
Amir Was 18/19 his Captain persuaded him to do the no ball as well as his fellow senior fast bowler
he admitted his charges didn't Offer any excuses
And Got 5 years For what foe not being mature enough which he couldn't have been at the age of 19.

Umar on the other hand is on the seen for more then 10 years he knows in and out of every Bad aspect that he shouldn't do and then He also Gives excuses for not reporting.i don't know u need to judge scenarios better that what judges see and make decisions

I am sure he has gloated in the past about reporting x number of approaches etc, so he fully knew the processes and procedures. Glad they threw the book at him.
 
dont know why u r comparing two very different scenarios .
Amir Was 18/19 his Captain persuaded him to do the no ball as well as his fellow senior fast bowler
he admitted his charges didn't Offer any excuses
And Got 5 years For what foe not being mature enough which he couldn't have been at the age of 19.

Umar on the other hand is on the seen for more then 10 years he knows in and out of every Bad aspect that he shouldn't do and then He also Gives excuses for not reporting.i don't know u need to judge scenarios better that what judges see and make decisions

Amir initially denied the charges. He's blamed his involvement on seniors pressuring him to fix. If you hear his interview, Amir says he didn't do it for money, he gave Butt his bank details randomly, and then bowled the no-balls in order for him not to be investigated for fixing.

His words were from the interview were "I have done nothing wrong. I was manipulated."

Sounds like excuses to me, which quite frankly are pretty hard to believe. Umar at least might have had some believable ones.
 
As I’ve said previously about Imran Nazir and the same with Umar Akmal, he was a good four-hitter off bad balls , that’s about it — I don’t consider anyone a batsman because he’s smacked a cute four, if he does not know the basics of constructing innings, judging and adjusting to conditions and bowling types, having what it takes to play proper innings — we just get excited and say someone’s got talent because he’s whacked a four off a juicy ball here and there.

A mediocre and pretty useless batsman,
with the maturity of a 10 year old kid — I’m sure there’s better prospects if given a fair run.
 
Which cases are you referring too? I dont think Irfan, Nawaz got lesser punishment because they were extreme talents, they just handled their issue a bit better.

Or are you referring to other countries? Where some are never banned and the ones banned are random cricketers with not much future to show how well they handle such cases.

If we compare the offense of umar and amir, one can easily see that discrimination based upon severity of crime does exist. For bigger offense, Amir received small punishment while for smaller offense, umar has received harsher one.
 
Something isn’t right here.

How can you be banned for 3 years for not reporting an advance made by a bookie whilst ICC banned Shakib for 12 months?

Its very weird...it seems the PCB just wanted to get rid of him what with all the recent controversy he has gotten himself into. Just looks at Sharjeel, he had worse offences but half of his ban was suspended. Very very odd and probably unfair/unjust.
 
If we compare the offense of umar and amir, one can easily see that discrimination based upon severity of crime does exist. For bigger offense, Amir received small punishment while for smaller offense, umar has received harsher one.

Amir was sent to jail in a foreign country mate..............
 
dont know why u r comparing two very different scenarios .
Amir Was 18/19 his Captain persuaded him to do the no ball as well as his fellow senior fast bowler
he admitted his charges didn't Offer any excuses
And Got 5 years For what foe not being mature enough which he couldn't have been at the age of 19.

Umar on the other hand is on the seen for more then 10 years he knows in and out of every Bad aspect that he shouldn't do and then He also Gives excuses for not reporting.i don't know u need to judge scenarios better that what judges see and make decisions

i think.... this 18 year old excuse should be put in to rest by now. Otherwise, every 18/19 year old guy should be given guilt free pass even if they murder someone.
 
Amir was sent to jail in a foreign country mate..............

PCB didn't push for that at all if PCB had control of that, I'm sure he would have been spared that. It was because it happened in england and other parties pushed for that.

If fixing were done in Pakistan, I'm sure they would have pushed for a reduced sentence. Just like what Sharjeel got.
 
PCB didn't push for that at all if PCB had control of that, I'm sure he would have been spared that. It was because it happened in england and other parties pushed for that.

If fixing were done in Pakistan, I'm sure they would have pushed for a reduced sentence. Just like what Sharjeel got.


Thats not what the point is, the issue is that how players are not learning their lessons. And the fans in this forum are the prime reason. They are still defending that the sentencing is harsh. Makes me wonder how his family must be making him feel at the moment. :uakmal
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Jail time could be a useful deterrent Pommie, possibly the last resort!! It’s like fighting covid 19, all will have to pitch in to save the cricket world: Fans, Boards, stake holders,law enforcement agencies, You & I. <a href="https://t.co/vuCHiDoWux">https://t.co/vuCHiDoWux</a></p>— Ramiz Raja (@iramizraja) <a href="https://twitter.com/iramizraja/status/1254895045855117313?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 27, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
The only injustice was that he wasn’t banned ten years ago.
The biggest waste of space along with Shezad and a few others.

The name Akmal should be obliterated in the cricketing record books
 
PCB didn't push for that at all if PCB had control of that, I'm sure he would have been spared that. It was because it happened in england and other parties pushed for that.

If fixing were done in Pakistan, I'm sure they would have pushed for a reduced sentence. Just like what Sharjeel got.

Amir had a 5 year ban fully backed by the PCB.

I agree about the Sharjeel situation.
 
Amir had a 5 year ban fully backed by the PCB.

I agree about the Sharjeel situation.

They had no choice. PCB tried to appeal to get the ban reduced but failed.

Ijaz Butt officially requested a review on Amir's (he didn't mention the other two). However he ultimately claimed, "There is one in a million chance as the final decision would rest with ICC". Later on Najam Sethi when he was interim pcb chief said "Amir is our talented cricketer and I will request the ICC that (as) he has spent two and a half years of his ban, was also jailed, so for God's sake reduce his ban,"

So yeah PCB tried on the behalf of Amir. They just couldn't do anything, ICC wouldn't budge. PCB never wanted it that long and I'm sure if it were left up to them it would have been far shorter.
 
They had no choice. PCB tried to appeal to get the ban reduced but failed.

Ijaz Butt officially requested a review on Amir's (he didn't mention the other two). However he ultimately claimed, "There is one in a million chance as the final decision would rest with ICC". Later on Najam Sethi when he was interim pcb chief said "Amir is our talented cricketer and I will request the ICC that (as) he has spent two and a half years of his ban, was also jailed, so for God's sake reduce his ban,"

So yeah PCB tried on the behalf of Amir. They just couldn't do anything, ICC wouldn't budge. PCB never wanted it that long and I'm sure if it were left up to them it would have been far shorter.

Exactly my point, remember that doofus Ijaz But instead blamed English Cricket team of fixing matches. We were lucky were not thrown out of England. Amir should not have been forgotten, anyone advocating him should have looked at the ODI series afterwards and the misfortune it brought to Pakistan.

As a matter of fact, the PCB was not even suspending them and they were supposed to play One Day series, it was not until ICC stepped in that they took the charges seriously.
 
Curiouser and curioser!

The so-called judge was actually elevated to his position on the bench by the Musharraf state of emergency.

He then sought early retirement less than two years later when he was served with a Contempt Notice for having taken his Oath in defiance of a restraining order.

Source: https://www.dawn.com/news/495280

Well, does the PCB even bother with due diligence? They have passed off this individual as a retired judge, when it turns out that he was appointed in defiance of a restraining order and took early retirement when the long arm of the law was about to catch up with him.

Aside from the fact that he appears not to have currency of practice, the circumstances of his elevation to the bench and sudden retirement from it are extraordinary.
 
You said Amir got a lighter punishment. I assume you think being locked up is a lesser punishment than being banned from cricket?

locked up for how many days....?

Give the same option to umar about serving either 3 months in jail or 3 years of banning. Anyone will gladly accept the former. Time is the biggest currency in a sportsman's life.
 
Back
Top