[VIDEO] BJP leader threatens to ‘slaughter 200,000 Muslims’ over cow incident

[HalBass9]

Corrected for accuracy .... any progress on the homework assignment ?

PS: time for you to tuck your tail firmly between legs and run as fast as you can ? Or wait and see if your usual wannabe Pakistani minnion shows up to provide air-cover ?

Absolute truth has been spoken many times.

The cows must live and the humans must die.

 

[uppercut]

Absolute truth has been spoken many times.

The cows must live and the humans must die.

is that the full story ? Hint: see your Homework assignment

 

[HalBass9]

is that the full story ? Hint: see your Homework assignment

The Raphayal must drop out of the sky but the cow must love.

Only Indian cows.

American cows are not so much.

 

[uppercut]

The Raphayal must drop out of the sky but the cow must love.

Only Indian cows.

American cows are not so much.

here is the full story .... Indian Muslims have the absolute full right upon Hindu sacred beliefs in India .... anyone even so much as objecting to this "fundamental right" of an Indian Muslim is a bigot because afterall the momins are the "chosen" ones from no less an authority than God himself.

This is the extent of processing capabilities of your brain.

 

[sweep_shot]

Absolute truth has been spoken many times.

The cows must live and the humans must die.

 

[uppercut]

right ... the Indian constitution doesn't prove anything( People just randomly made up cow protection article for shitz and giggles I suppose ?? ) , the Indian Penal code doesn't prove anything, but your personal experience proves that 1 billion Hindus do not consider Cows as sacred. This is the depth of your logic ?

If so you are not debating ....

@finalfantasy7 no response ?

 

[HalBass9]

here is the full story .... Indian Muslims have the absolute full right upon Hindu sacred beliefs in India .... anyone even so much as objecting to this "fundamental right" of an Indian Muslim is a bigot because afterall the momins are the "chosen" ones from no less an authority than God himself.

This is the extent of processing capabilities of your brain.

My brain doesn’t allow me to slaughter humans.

 

[BouncerGuy]

Not sure why there is so much fuss about COWS??

Any Hindu wants to explain??

Why not the same about Buffalo?? GOAT, Camel??

 

[Bhaag Viru Bhaag]

@finalfantasy7 no response ?

Are you still looking for responses?

 

[uppercut]

You are a extremist bigot because you deliberately demand rights to indulge in desecrating sacred Hindu beliefs in India and you see absolutely nothing wrong in that stance.

No, I don’t.

What do you mean you don't ... explain.

I’m asking you,why is it okay for you to support slaughtering humans Animals over a steak?

I’m not Indian. I can’t demand anything from Indians, I can only criticize.

You need reading glasses, or is selective comprehension part of the package?

But this thread is not about beef cuts. Pick another one, I'll be there

Because they are not humans. Reasons have been explained literally dozens of times. Here it is again:

If someone does not get the simple fact that Cows are sacred for Hindus in India and insist on deliberately harming them then you lose the right to be treated as per civilized norm( which BTW have been tried over and over across many many centuries ).

Now go ahead and tell me why the vermin that you doggedly support do not understand that concept of respecting others beliefs. And most importantly why are you fighting for the rights of such

 

[LordJames]

What do you mean you don't ... explain.




Because they are not humans. Reasons have been explained literally dozens of times. Here it is again:

If someone does not get the simple fact that Cows are sacred for Hindus in India and insist on deliberately harming them then you lose the right to be treated as per civilized norm( which BTW have been tried over and over across many many centuries ).

Now go ahead and tell me why the vermin that you doggedly support do not understand that concept of respecting others beliefs. And most importantly why are you fighting for the rights of such vermin ?

I’ll answer that directly.

India proudly claims to be a constitutionally secular state — no state religion, no religious bias, and supposedly no law based on religious sentiment. Yet somehow, that secularism vanishes when it comes to cow slaughter. The hypocrisy is glaring: in a country that claims neutrality, there should be no law regulating what animal — be it cow, pig, or potato — can or cannot be slaughtered for consumption.

And let’s be honest: slaughtering a cow for food is not the same as harming it out of cruelty. Ironically, India remains one of the largest beef exporters in the world. So, spare us the sanctimony.

By all means act on "harming" anyone be it cow or humans which is not the same as slaughter (for human consumption).

As for constantly dragging in Pakistan’s constitution or someone’s personal belief system — it’s a tired and transparent red herring. It’s your go-to tactic whenever your argument crumbles: derail the discussion, deflect blame, and hope no one notices the sleight of hand.

We're not fooled.

 

[Bhaag Viru Bhaag]

What do you mean you don't ... explain.




Because they are not humans. Reasons have been explained literally dozens of times. Here it is again:

If someone does not get the simple fact that Cows are sacred for Hindus in India and insist on deliberately harming them then you lose the right to be treated as per civilized norm( which BTW have been tried over and over across many many centuries ).

Now go ahead and tell me why the vermin that you doggedly support do not understand that concept of respecting others beliefs. And most importantly why are you fighting for the rights of such vermin ?

I find it amusing how you keep begging for answers to your questions, but the moment you are asked something serious, you run away and start trolling instead.

Also, a request to @HalBass9, please don't engage with this guy until he shares his opinion on post #430.

 

[sweep_shot]

I find it amusing how you keep begging for answers to your questions, but the moment you are asked something serious, you run away and start trolling instead.

Also, a request to @HalBass9, please don't engage with this guy until he shares his opinion on post #430.

He accuses others to run away but he himself runs away when going gets tough.

It seems like he wants everyone to agree with him and clap for him.

 

[BouncerGuy]

GUYS, PLEASE MAKE NO PERSONAL REMARKS.

 

[uppercut]

I’ll answer that directly.

India proudly claims to be a constitutionally secular state — no state religion, no religious bias, and supposedly no law based on religious sentiment. Yet somehow, that secularism vanishes when it comes to cow slaughter. The hypocrisy is glaring: in a country that claims neutrality, there should be no law regulating what animal — be it cow, pig, or potato — can or cannot be slaughtered for consumption.

Using that logic the USA is not a secular country then as their anti-abortion laws are based on Christian belief ? In any case Indian secularism is very different from the typical western secularism because in India the govt also subsidizes Hajj pilgrimage whereas there is no such benefit for Hindus. Also Mosques, Churches and Gurdwara's are exempt from taxes and are managed privately by the respective communities. Hindu temples do not have the same privilege.

And let’s be honest: slaughtering a cow for food is not the same as harming it out of cruelty. Ironically, India remains one of the largest beef exporters in the world. So, spare us the sanctimony.

Except it is worse .... unless in your bizarro world there is no harm involved when cows are killed. And BTW what India exports is Buffalo meat.

By all means act on "harming" anyone be it cow or humans which is not the same as slaughter (for human consumption).

As for constantly dragging in Pakistan’s constitution or someone’s personal belief system — it’s a tired and transparent red herring. It’s your go-to tactic whenever your argument crumbles: derail the discussion, deflect blame, and hope no one notices the sleight of hand.

We're not fooled.

When did I drag Pakistani constitution ? can you point me to those posts.

 

[LordJames]

Using that logic the USA is not a secular country then as their anti-abortion laws are based on Christian belief ? In any case Indian secularism is very different from the typical western secularism because in India the govt also subsidizes Hajj pilgrimage whereas there is no such benefit for Hindus. Also Mosques, Churches and Gurdwara's are exempt from taxes and are managed privately by the respective communities. Hindu temples do not have the same privilege.





Except it is worse .... unless in your bizarro world there is no harm involved when cows are killed. And BTW what India exports is Buffalo meat.



When did I drag Pakistani constitution ? can you point me to those posts.

Dear cut,

You are making dumb arguments which are contradictory and cancelling each other out :

1. Buffalo (instead of cow): Your argument about "preventing harm" to animals fall flat here because even if India is exporting buffalo meat, it still requires slaughtering the animal!
2. Animal Slaughter for Human Consumption: The normal cycle of rearing animals (humanely) and then slaughtering them for human consumption is beneficial and less harmful to the animal (and economy) compared to the animal reaching old age developing diseases and then being put down, India is already slaughtering (see argument 1)

Lets watch you run away and change your forever dumb and contradictory arguments.

 

[topspin]

They deep down cherish dead Muslims. It is their political philosophy. Hitman joshilaa etc. thread to thread it's their fantasy

As evident by the nature of their posts in the Iran-Israel and Palestine related threads.

 

[HalBass9]

Dear Dumbercut,

You are making dumb arguments which are contradictory and cancelling each other out :

1. Buffalo (instead of cow): Your argument about "preventing harm" to animals fall flat here because even if India is exporting buffalo meat, it still requires slaughtering the animal!
2. Animal Slaughter for Human Consumption: The normal cycle of rearing animals (humanely) and then slaughtering them for human consumption is beneficial and less harmful to the animal (and economy) compared to the animal reaching old age developing diseases and then being put down, India is already slaughtering (see argument 1)

Lets watch you run away and change your forever dumb and contradictory arguments.

You are wasting your time, you can’t debate with someone who believe in slaughtering human over his political driven religious beliefs.

Insult them and move on and they’ll seek your attention again to get insulted.

 

[Bhaag Viru Bhaag]

You are wasting your time, you can’t debate with someone who believe in slaughtering human over his political driven religious beliefs.

Insult them and move on and they’ll seek your attention again to get insulted.

There is no point debating with these '2 kodi ke andhbhakhts'. Their minds are filled with nothing but pigs, sewage, and cow d*ng.

 

[uppercut]

You are wasting your time, you can’t debate with someone who believe in slaughtering human over his political driven religious beliefs.

Insult them and move on and they’ll seek your attention again to get insulted.

awww .... throwing in the towel already ?

 

[HalBass9]

awww .... throwing in the towel already ?

 

[Suleiman]

They deep down cherish dead Muslims. It is their political philosophy. Hitman joshilaa etc. thread to thread it's their fantasy

100%

They are ready to bring Muslims into question any time even a fly is swatted by a Muslim, but you will see their mental gymnastics when shoe is on the other foot.

Let’s look at how many of the Indians with an agenda showed condolences to the Muslim toddler who was physically assaulted by a Jewish man, but are always ready to condemn Muslims for everything under the sun:

Thread '[VIDEO] Tourist throws toddler to ground at Russian Airport, leaves him in Coma'

Jun 26, 2025

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

Caught On Cam: Tourist Throws Toddler To Ground At Russian Airport, Leaves Him In Coma

A one-and-a-half-year-old boy was left in a coma after a tourist at a Russian airport picked him up and slammed him to the floor in a shocking act of violence.

According to the Sun, who first reported the news, the child suffered skull fractures and spinal injuries in the unprovoked assault, which took place moments after he and his mother arrived in Russia.

The horrific incident, caught on surveillance footage that has not been publicly released, took place at the...

• BouncerGuy
• Replies: 15
• Forum: Time Pass and Sports

But are here fighting over cows… incredible. Thread above has a grand total of 12 replies… 2 Indians who generally have opposing debates were man enough to condemn it. Respect to @Vikram1989 and @Bhaijaan for being genuine and calling a spade a spade in there.

 

[sweep_shot]

They deep down cherish dead Muslims. It is their political philosophy. Hitman joshilaa etc. thread to thread it's their fantasy

Agree.

This is why I wouldn't feel bad if India get into a war and many sanghis die in the war. They want to see dead Muslims. Why should I show compassion toward them? That would be naivety.

 

[DeadlyVenom]

Agree.

This is why I wouldn't feel bad if India get into a war and many sanghis die in the war. They want to see dead Muslims. Why should I show compassion toward them? That would be naivety.

Let's not stoop to their level. All human life should be cherished brother.

 

[Rajdeep]

100%

They are ready to bring Muslims into question any time even a fly is swatted by a Muslim, but you will see their mental gymnastics when shoe is on the other foot.

Let’s look at how many of the Indians with an agenda showed condolences to the Muslim toddler who was physically assaulted by a Jewish man, but are always ready to condemn Muslims for everything under the sun:

Thread '[VIDEO] Tourist throws toddler to ground at Russian Airport, leaves him in Coma'

Jun 26, 2025

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

Caught On Cam: Tourist Throws Toddler To Ground At Russian Airport, Leaves Him In Coma

A one-and-a-half-year-old boy was left in a coma after a tourist at a Russian airport picked him up and slammed him to the floor in a shocking act of violence.

According to the Sun, who first reported the news, the child suffered skull fractures and spinal injuries in the unprovoked assault, which took place moments after he and his mother arrived in Russia.

The horrific incident, caught on surveillance footage that has not been publicly released, took place at the...

• BouncerGuy
• Replies: 15
• Forum: Time Pass and Sports

But are here fighting over cows… incredible. Thread above has a grand total of 12 replies… 2 Indians who generally have opposing debates were man enough to condemn it. Respect to @Vikram1989 and @Bhaijaan for being genuine and calling a spade a spade in there.

Here is a counter-question: Why do you think that is the case? Meaning, why do you think Indian Hindus hate Muslims? Why only Muslims, and not so much Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Parsees, Jains, etc.? I've been asking this question on PakPassion for many years, but no one seems to genuinely answer it.

Hatred doesn’t come out of thin air, and no one is born out of their mother’s womb with hatred in their heart. So something must happen in the world that leads to this hatred. This forum must introspect and try to find that answer rather than playing the victim card and blaming Hindus.

Let me give you one (of many) examples — just a few days ago, your COAS Asim Munir openly said that Hindus are not their equals, and the following week, terrorists came to Pahalgam, specifically asked for people's religion, and butchered them. So should we still love Muslims just to remain politically correct?

In India, you have problems with Hindus. In Israel, you have problems with Jews. In the Western world, you have problems with Christians. Have you ever wondered — why?

Why do you think the term Islamophobia was coined, but not Hinduphobia, Sikhophobia, Jainophobia, or Buddhophobia?

Let me be very open and candid — most non-Muslims around the world hate you because you are constantly in a state of conflict and anger. They may not say it openly for fear of backlash, but that is the truth. That is why the term Islamophobia exists. Just close your eyes and imagine a world without Muslims — how peaceful would it be?

So, while it's okay to go after brother @uppercut on a Muslim-majority forum like this, the reality outside is very different. We must not be completely ostrich to it.

Radjeep.

 

[Suleiman]

Just close your eyes and imagine a world without Muslims — how peaceful would it be?



Radjeep.

case in point. This is the extent to which these people are brainwashed.

Defend cows being slaughtered, but then say things like this.

I’m glad you stopped hiding and made your intentions clear though.

Yet millions of you flock to Muslim countries in search of a better life.

 

[The Bald Eagle]

Here is a counter-question: Why do you think that is the case? Meaning, why do you think Indian Hindus hate Muslims? Why only Muslims, and not so much Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Parsees, Jains, etc.? I've been asking this question on PakPassion for many years, but no one seems to genuinely answer it.

Hatred doesn’t come out of thin air, and no one is born out of their mother’s womb with hatred in their heart. So something must happen in the world that leads to this hatred. This forum must introspect and try to find that answer rather than playing the victim card and blaming Hindus.

Let me give you one (of many) examples — just a few days ago, your COAS Asim Munir openly said that Hindus are not their equals, and the following week, terrorists came to Pahalgam, specifically asked for people's religion, and butchered them. So should we still love Muslims just to remain politically correct?

In India, you have problems with Hindus. In Israel, you have problems with Jews. In the Western world, you have problems with Christians. Have you ever wondered — why?

Why do you think the term Islamophobia was coined, but not Hinduphobia, Sikhophobia, Jainophobia, or Buddhophobia?

Let me be very open and candid — most non-Muslims around the world hate you because you are constantly in a state of conflict and anger. They may not say it openly for fear of backlash, but that is the truth. That is why the term Islamophobia exists. Just close your eyes and imagine a world without Muslims — how peaceful would it be?

So, while it's okay to go after brother @uppercut on a Muslim-majority forum like this, the reality outside is very different. We must not be completely ostrich to it.

Radjeep.

Correction, not necessarily Indian Hindus but Hindutva inspired Indians....as not every one fall for textbook propaganda

 

[Rajdeep]

As expected, no one has the gall to answer my question. Sahi sawal pooch liya to try to deviate the topic

Nevertheless, as far as this thread is concerned, not sure why this old news got bumped. No one has the right to kill anyone due to what they eat or wear. If anyone does that, law must come medieval on their rear ends.

Few misconceptions must be busted -

1. Not sure why some posters here get the notion that we support killing of innocent kids in Gaza? LOL. I have myself condemned it multiple times in every possible way. Absolutely hate Israel for doing it. No sane person should or will support it.

2. Who told Indians were against Iran in this war due to them being muslims? If anything, even right wing Indians and journalists this time was supporting Iran due to their recent issues with Donald Trump. It was Pakistan that nominated paw for nobel peace award...same pawpaw who considers Netanyahu as his closest partner and supply him with arms that kills Iranians/ Gazans.

So these misconceptions need to be eradicated. However, as far as broader and more general muslim hatred/Islamophobia in India or outside world is concerned, Muslim's are 100% responsible for it. There are no two ways about it.

 

[uppercut]

Dear Cut,

You are making dumb arguments which are contradictory and cancelling each other out :

1. Buffalo (instead of cow): Your argument about "preventing harm" to animals fall flat here because even if India is exporting buffalo meat, it still requires slaughtering the animal!
2. Animal Slaughter for Human Consumption: The normal cycle of rearing animals (humanely) and then slaughtering them for human consumption is beneficial and less harmful to the animal (and economy) compared to the animal reaching old age developing diseases and then being put down, India is already slaughtering (see argument 1)

Lets watch you run away and change your forever dumb and contradictory arguments.

Dear James ( see its so easy to throw insults on a anonymous online forum )

1. I never talked about preventing harm to all animals. Only the Cow which is sacred in Hinduism *AND* protected by law because of that. What part of that do you not understand ?

2. There are shelters to take care of them. Ludicrous to think that killing them in a brutal manner is more humane. In any case killing cows is simply not allowed in India. Non-negotiable. Again what part it do you not understand ?

 

[topspin]

Why do you think the term Islamophobia was coined, but not Hinduphobia, Sikhophobia, Jainophobia, or Buddhophobia?

Dumb argument.

This is like saying antisemitism was coined because Jews brought it upon themselves, when the reality is they were victims of the holocaust and faced severe persecution in Europe during the medieval times.

You cannot tar a tiny fraction of people, who proclaim to follow a religion, that is observed by 2 billion people - all with the same brush.

 

[Suleiman]

Dumb argument.

This is like saying antisemitism was coined because Jews brought it upon themselves, when the reality is they were victims of the holocaust and faced severe persecution in Europe during the medieval times.

You cannot tar a tiny fraction of people, who proclaim to follow a religion, that is observed by 2 billion people - all with the same brush.

Will write long essays to demonstrate Olympic level mental gymnastics to make his weird and twisted take on the world seem normal, but hasn’t worked so far.

He sounds like a white supremacist but is an Indian, whose people flock to Muslim nations by a dozen to escape the filth in their own country, and injustice in their own Hindu rashtra to go live amongst the people he very much hates himself.

No surprise though. Takes special venom in the heart to go and constantly argue and hate on a “Muslim majority” online space to feel better himself and fool himself into thinking “yeah I sure showed them ”

The whitesupremacist rant he posted can be applied to any race or group in history that saw animosity and still be wrong

You can say it for black folk, and that rant would still be wrong.

You can say it for Jews. And that rant would still be wrong.

Both groups having been told the exact same thing he’s parroting.

Heck, even Indians for the most part are looked at the same lens. How many negative stereotypes exist about them again?

Like I said, he thinks he’s a Nazi, but throw him amongst them and he’ll be roughed up for the way he looks

 

[Suleiman]

Will write long essays to demonstrate Olympic level mental gymnastics to make his weird and twisted take on the world seem normal, but hasn’t worked so far.

He sounds like a white supremacist but is an Indian, whose people flock to Muslim nations by a dozen to escape the filth in their own country, and injustice in their own Hindu rashtra to go live amongst the people he very much hates himself.

No surprise though. Takes special venom in the heart to go and constantly argue and hate on a “Muslim majority” online space to feel better himself and fool himself into thinking “yeah I sure showed them ”

The whitesupremacist rant he posted can be applied to any race or group in history that saw animosity and still be wrong

You can say it for black folk, and that rant would still be wrong.

You can say it for Jews. And that rant would still be wrong.

Both groups having been told the exact same thing he’s parroting.

Heck, even Indians for the most part are looked at the same lens. How many negative stereotypes exist about them again?

Like I said, he thinks he’s a Nazi, but throw him amongst them and he’ll be roughed up for the way he looks

Mods edited last part for me, thanks, was gonna edit it myself but ran out of time, I don’t want to make it personal despite his repulsive remarks toward Muslims and when I say the way he looks, I mean how supremacists who carry his views see people with brown skin color or physical features or culture or whatever different to their own in general, not him in particular.

Just look at the footage of how Indians who got stuck in Israel got treated in those shelters- should we use Zionist Jewish scope of the world regarding them and other non Jews to conclude what our neighbor here said above about his culture and people?

 

[LordJames]

Dear James ( see its so easy to throw insults on a anonymous online forum )

1. I never talked about preventing harm to all animals. Only the Cow which is sacred in Hinduism *AND* protected by law because of that. What part of that do you not understand ?

2. There are shelters to take care of them. Ludicrous to think that killing them in a brutal manner is more humane. In any case killing cows is simply not allowed in India. Non-negotiable. Again what part it do you not understand ?

Dear cut,

OK so we are dealing with hypocrisy here on two fronts:

1. All other animals can be harmed and slaughtered except for cow because it is sacred to "Hindus"
2. which then means constitutionally India is no longer Secular.

Fair enough, two face hypocrisy in full view.

No problems.

 

[uppercut]

Dear cut,

OK so we are dealing with hypocrisy here on two fronts:

1. All other animals can be harmed and slaughtered except for cow because it is sacred to "Hindus"
2. which then means constitutionally India is no longer Secular.

Fair enough, two face hypocrisy in full view.

No problems.

Soo James ... now here comes the most important question that I have been asking Muslim posters here on PP for months .....

The question is : Why are Muslims in India still deliberately harming cows In INDIA despite being very well aware of how sacred it is to Hindus ( and also against laws ) ?

Not one single Muslim poster answers that question.

 

[sweep_shot]

Will write long essays to demonstrate Olympic level mental gymnastics to make his weird and twisted take on the world seem normal, but hasn’t worked so far.

He sounds like a white supremacist but is an Indian, whose people flock to Muslim nations by a dozen to escape the filth in their own country, and injustice in their own Hindu rashtra to go live amongst the people he very much hates himself.

No surprise though. Takes special venom in the heart to go and constantly argue and hate on a “Muslim majority” online space to feel better himself and fool himself into thinking “yeah I sure showed them ”

The whitesupremacist rant he posted can be applied to any race or group in history that saw animosity and still be wrong

You can say it for black folk, and that rant would still be wrong.

You can say it for Jews. And that rant would still be wrong.

Both groups having been told the exact same thing he’s parroting.

Heck, even Indians for the most part are looked at the same lens. How many negative stereotypes exist about them again?

Like I said, he thinks he’s a Nazi, but throw him amongst them and he’ll be roughed up for the way he looks

Dear cut,

OK so we are dealing with hypocrisy here on two fronts:

1. All other animals can be harmed and slaughtered except for cow because it is sacred to "Hindus"
2. which then means constitutionally India is no longer Secular.

Fair enough, two face hypocrisy in full view.

No problems.

This is like saying antisemitism was coined because Jews brought it upon themselves, when the reality is they were victims of the holocaust and faced severe persecution in Europe during the medieval times.

You cannot tar a tiny fraction of people, who proclaim to follow a religion, that is observed by 2 billion people - all with the same brush.

They are not worth responding to.

They cheer when Muslim civilians die while lecturing others about morality.

 

[BouncerGuy]

GUYS, PLEASE WATCH YOUR POSTS.

NO NAME CALLING HERE, NO PERSONAL REMARKS

 

[LordJames]

Soo James ... now here comes the most important question that I have been asking Muslim posters here on PP for months .....

The question is : Why are Muslims in India still deliberately harming cows In INDIA despite being very well aware of how sacred it is to Hindus ( and also against laws ) ?

Not one single Muslim poster answers that question.

Dear uppercut,

This is a pretty easy question to answer.

1. There is no unified position in Hinduism on cow slaughter at all! In fact, even now many Hindus continue to consume beef so this isn't an agreed upon issue in Hinduism.
2. For decades, there were no legal restrictions on cow slaughter so since it was legal there were no problems with whoever slaughtered it so now due to legal issues it is a crime so should be reported and probably handled (legally).
3. Consumption of pork is impermissible in Islam but Muslims don't get triggered when "Non-Muslims" slaughter and consume pigs but if Hindus are so insensitive or rather beset by inferiority complex about their religion it can't be helped

 

[uppercut]

Dear uppercut,

This is a pretty easy question to answer.

1. There is no unified position in Hinduism on cow slaughter at all! In fact, even now many Hindus continue to consume beef so this isn't an agreed upon issue in Hinduism.
2. For decades, there were no legal restrictions on cow slaughter so since it was legal there were no problems with whoever slaughtered it so now due to legal issues it is a crime so should be reported and probably handled (legally).
3. Consumption of pork is impermissible in Islam but Muslims don't get triggered when "Non-Muslims" slaughter and consume pigs but if Hindus are so insensitive or rather beset by inferiority complex about their religion it can't be helped

1. This is just categorically not true at all because cow protection laws are built into the Indian Constitution itself. Also you think people are stupid to issue such grave threats ( as in the OP ) for no reason at all ? Thats like saying there are many Muslims who drink alcohol so therefore it must be ok. In the past there have been many riots started because of this and every single Muslim living in India perfectly knows that the cows are sacred to Hindus.
2. Again wrong. The Cow protection laws have been part of the Indian constitution since 1950s. More-over there is no doubt whatsoever that every single Muslim living in India perfectly knows that the cows are sacred to Hindus but it never stops them from indulging in bigotry/religious intolerance.
3. That Pig vs Cow is not a valid comparison. The pig is reviled whereas the cows are sacred. The only remotely close comparison for Muslims is Quran burning or drawing the prophet which instantly triggers the muslims.

So lets see the answer that question from my previous post

The question is : Why are Muslims in India still deliberately harming cows In INDIA despite being very well aware of how sacred it is to Hindus ( and also against laws ) ?​

 

[HalBass9]

I thought human life was more sacred to Hindus?

But Hindutva clowns are going clown so hard that they’ll even ridicule Hinduism.

 

[uppercut]

I thought human life was more sacred to Hindus?

Keyword being "Human" ... Jihadi scum and their online supporters who like to deliberately indulge in desecrating Hindu beliefs in India qualify as animals.

BTW Any progress on your homework assignment yet ?

But Hindutva clowns are going clown so hard that they’ll even ridicule Hinduism.

Spoken like a true Jihadi ... not surprising at all.

 

[LordJames]

1. This is just categorically not true at all because cow protection laws are built into the Indian Constitution itself. Also you think people are stupid to issue such grave threats ( as in the OP ) for no reason at all ? Thats like saying there are many Muslims who drink alcohol so therefore it must be ok. In the past there have been many riots started because of this and every single Muslim living in India perfectly knows that the cows are sacred to Hindus.
2. Again wrong. The Cow protection laws have been part of the Indian constitution since 1950s. More-over there is no doubt whatsoever that every single Muslim living in India perfectly knows that the cows are sacred to Hindus but it never stops them from indulging in bigotry/religious intolerance.
3. That Pig vs Cow is not a valid comparison. The pig is reviled whereas the cows are sacred. The only remotely close comparison for Muslims is Quran burning or drawing the prophet which instantly triggers the muslims.

So lets see the answer that question from my previous post

The question is : Why are Muslims in India still deliberately harming cows In INDIA despite being very well aware of how sacred it is to Hindus ( and also against laws ) ?​

Lies of Dumbercut exposed again:

Cow Slaughter & Hinduism

Ref: The Myth of the Holy Cow

1. Dozens of passages about cow slaughter, beef consumption throughout history and even recent times
2. Many Hindus in South India have no issues with consuming beef to this day!

Cow Slaughter & Indian Constitution

1. By your own BS, it is clear that it wasn't part of the constitution until article 48 (amendment) in 1950 which contained a "directive" but slaughter regulation was left to states
2. Many across India continued to slaughter cows and consume beef throughout 1940's, 1950s, 1960s and 1970s
3. Skipping a lot of history and milestones for brevity.... Major milestone is 1994 State of West Bengal v. Ashutosh Lahiri ruling which upheld "limited ban"
4. 2025: States where Beef consumption is still allowed
   1. Nagaland
   2. Mizoram
   3. Kerala
   4. Nagaland

Might be others but enough to expose liar @uppercut that there is no national beef ban in India to this day! Therefore Muslims, Sikhs, Christians and others will continue to slaughter cow and consume it where it is constitutionally legal.

As I have said, where it is illegal by all means people should be prosecuted (not lynched)

Pass a national ban and people will follow the law.

 

[LordJames]

The Myth of Holy Cow

Read online

 

[uppercut]

Lies of Dumbercut exposed again:

Cow Slaughter & Hinduism

Ref: The Myth of the Holy Cow

1. Dozens of passages about cow slaughter, beef consumption throughout history and even recent times
2. Many Hindus in South India have no issues with consuming beef to this day!

Cow Slaughter & Indian Constitution

1. By your own BS, it is clear that it wasn't part of the constitution until article 48 (amendment) in 1950 which contained a "directive" but slaughter regulation was left to states
2. Many across India continued to slaughter cows and consume beef throughout 1940's, 1950s, 1960s and 1970s
3. Skipping a lot of history and milestones for brevity.... Major milestone is 1994 State of West Bengal v. Ashutosh Lahiri ruling which upheld "limited ban"
4. 2025: States where Beef consumption is still allowed
   1. Nagaland
   2. Mizoram
   3. Kerala
   4. Nagaland

Might be others but enough to expose liar @uppercut that there is no national beef ban in India to this day! Therefore Muslims, Sikhs, Christians and others will continue to slaughter cow and consume it where it is constitutionally legal.

As I have said, where it is illegal by all means people should be prosecuted (not lynched)

Pass a national ban and people will follow the law.

LordJames ( Again see very easy to hurl insults )

You think the people who included Cow protection articles right into the constitution of India did not know anything about Hinduism ? Use some braincells if you have any left. Yes the Law enforcement hasn't been strictly followed but don't try to act like a village idiot trying to pretend that Cows are not holy in Hinduism.

 

[LordJames]

LordJames ( Again see very easy to hurl insults )

You think the people who included Cow protection articles right into the constitution of India did not know anything about Hinduism ? Use some braincells if you have any left. Yes the Law enforcement hasn't been strictly followed but don't try to act like a village idiot trying to pretend that Cows are not holy in Hinduism.

Dear Uppercut,

2025: States (of India) where Beef consumption is still allowed

1. Nagaland
2. Mizoram
3. Kerala
4. Nagaland

The Myth of Holy Cow

Read online

 

[uppercut]

Dear Uppercut,

2025: States (of India) where Beef consumption is still allowed

1. Nagaland
2. Mizoram
3. Kerala
4. Nagaland

As I said Law enforcement is not upto the mark. The Articles in Indian constitution supersede any idiotic local laws and D.N Jha is not an authority on Hinduism. There are very good reasons why large riots have started because of standard Muslim intolerance that leads to despicable acts like one documented in the OP.

So now without any further attempts to deflections and what aboutery answer that question I asked:

The question is : Why are Muslims in India still deliberately harming cows In INDIA despite being very well aware of how sacred it is to Hindus ( and also against laws ) ?

 

[LordJames]

Muslims and Pork Consumption:

@The Bald Eagle @Suleiman @Greenstorm @HalBass9 @sweep_shot @Justcrazy

I have a close friend in England who, along with his wife, has been a dedicated foster carer for nearly two decades. Despite having children of their own, they’ve consistently provided a safe and nurturing temporary home for some of the most vulnerable and troubled children under the care of local authorities. Their long-standing record is well known to the local councils, who trust them with complex placements.

They have a designated space in their home — including a private room with a small kitchenette — for the children in their care. One issue that often arises during child protection interviews is dietary restrictions, particularly regarding pork. Their household policy is that they do not personally consume or purchase pork. However, they are very clear and accommodating: if the council deems it necessary to provide pork for the child, the child is welcome to store, cook, and eat it within their designated space. The couple also supports the children’s religious practices, offering transportation to places of worship such as churches or gurdwaras, depending on the child’s background.

Additionally, I personally know Muslim women who have accepted Islam while raising adult non-Muslim children who still consume pork, drink alcohol, and continue their previous lifestyle within the same home. I also know Muslim men married to Christian women — and there are many such couples — who maintain a shared halal diet, while the wife may still consume pork independently.

Dozens of workplaces where Muslims work and the person on the next desk is eating BLT and I don't know any Muslim who gets triggered!
​

As I said Law enforcement is not upto the mark. The Articles in Indian constitution supersede any idiotic local laws and D.N Jha is not an authority on Hinduism. There are very good reasons why large riots have started because of standard Muslim intolerance that leads to despicable acts like one documented in the OP.

So now without any further attempts to deflections and what aboutery answer that question I asked:

The question is : Why are Muslims in India still deliberately harming cows In INDIA despite being very well aware of how sacred it is to Hindus ( and also against laws ) ?

2025: States (of India) where Beef consumption is still allowed

1. Nagaland
2. Mizoram
3. Kerala
4. Nagaland

It is legal so there is nothing to enforce!

 

[uppercut]

Muslims and Pork Consumption:

@The Bald Eagle @Suleiman @Greenstorm @HalBass9 @sweep_shot @Justcrazy

I have a close friend in England who, along with his wife, has been a dedicated foster carer for nearly two decades. Despite having children of their own, they’ve consistently provided a safe and nurturing temporary home for some of the most vulnerable and troubled children under the care of local authorities. Their long-standing record is well known to the local councils, who trust them with complex placements.

They have a designated space in their home — including a private room with a small kitchenette — for the children in their care. One issue that often arises during child protection interviews is dietary restrictions, particularly regarding pork. Their household policy is that they do not personally consume or purchase pork. However, they are very clear and accommodating: if the council deems it necessary to provide pork for the child, the child is welcome to store, cook, and eat it within their designated space. The couple also supports the children’s religious practices, offering transportation to places of worship such as churches or gurdwaras, depending on the child’s background.

Additionally, I personally know Muslim women who have accepted Islam while raising adult non-Muslim children who still consume pork, drink alcohol, and continue their previous lifestyle within the same home. I also know Muslim men married to Christian women — and there are many such couples — who maintain a shared halal diet, while the wife may still consume pork independently.

Dozens of workplaces where Muslims work and the person on the next desk is eating BLT and I don't know any Muslim who gets triggered!
​

2025: States (of India) where Beef consumption is still allowed

1. Nagaland
2. Mizoram
3. Kerala
4. Nagaland

It is legal Dumbercut so there is nothing to enforce!

the Indian Constitution is the highest authority. The states are supposed to follow that which vast majority of them do. In any case the incident mentioned in the OP happened in a state where Cows are officially protected.

So now without any further ado .... lets see the answer to my question:

and the question is : Why are Muslims in India still deliberately harming cows In INDIA despite being very well aware of how sacred it is to Hindus ( and also against laws ) ?

 

[LordJames]

the Indian Constitution is the highest authority. The states are supposed to follow that which vast majority of them do. In any case the incident mentioned in the OP happened in a state where Cows are officially protected.

So now without any further ado .... lets see the answer to my question:

and the question is : Why are Muslims in India still deliberately harming cows In INDIA despite being very well aware of how sacred it is to Hindus ( and also against laws ) ?

Dear Uppercut,

3rd time!

2025: States (of India) where Beef consumption is still allowed

1. Nagaland
2. Mizoram
3. Kerala
4. Nagaland

It is legal Dumbercut in many parts of India so even in India it is not nationwide accepted to a Hindu value otherwise it would have a law nationwide with no exemptions.

Since it is not a Nationwide law it is not binding on any Indian (Hindu or XYZ) to slaughter cows and consume beef where it is legal.

Where it is illegal, people should respect the law and anyone who is found guilty should be punished according to the law.

Even Indians cannot accept the nationwide sacred nature of the cows throughout their own country

Your "supposed sentiments" are not respected by Hindus from South India let alone people of other religions.

 

[LordJames]

Why do Muslim slaughter cows and eat Beef when they know that it hurts "Hindu Sentiments"?

Reason 1: Hindus scriptures and history shows that cows were slaughtered and eaten by Hindus

The Myth of Holy Cow

Read online

Reason 2: Hindus in South of India to this day consume beef!

Reason 3: Indian constitution does not nationwide ban on beef consumption and cow slaughter and beef consumption is perfectly legal in the following states. In other words, even the constitution of India has exemptions on the matter!

Dear Dumbercut,

2025: States (of India) where Beef consumption is still allowed

1. Nagaland
2. Mizoram
3. Kerala
4. Nagaland

Where the slaughter of cows are consumption of beef is illegal, the law should be obeyed and anyone who is found to be guilty of illegal activities should be punished according to the law not lynched.

Fix the Constitution of India to align with and define aspects of Hinduism!

 

[sweep_shot]

Why do Muslim slaughter cows and eat Beef when they know that it hurts "Hindu Sentiments"?

Reason 1: Hindus scriptures and history shows that cows were slaughtered and eaten by Hindus


Reason 2: Hindus in South of India to this day consume beef!

Reason 3: Indian constitution does not nationwide ban on beef consumption and cow slaughter and beef consumption is perfectly legal in the following states. In other words, even the constitution of India has exemptions on the matter!



Where the slaughter of cows are consumption of beef is illegal, the law should be obeyed and anyone who is found to be guilty of illegal activities should be punished according to the law not lynched.

Fix the Constitution of India to align with and define aspects of Hinduism!

He once asked me not to post beef photos. LMAO!

I obviously didn't listen to him and I always post beef photos whenever I get an opportunity.

His entitlement truly astonishes me considering I don't live in India and I am not posting on an Indian platform.

 

[uppercut]

Dear Uppercut,

3rd time!

2025: States (of India) where Beef consumption is still allowed

1. Nagaland
2. Mizoram
3. Kerala
4. Nagaland

It is legal Dumbercut in many parts of India so even in India it is not nationwide accepted to a Hindu value otherwise it would have a law nationwide with no exemptions.

Since it is not a Nationwide law it is not binding on any Indian (Hindu or XYZ) to slaughter cows and consume beef where it is legal.

Where it is illegal, people should respect the law and anyone who is found guilty should be punished according to the law.

Even Indians cannot accept the nationwide sacred nature of the cows throughout their own country

Your "supposed sentiments" are not respected by Hindus from South India let alone people of other religions.

I have already told you that what a tiny minority of people do does not count as the norm. Just like how there are many Muslims who drink and eat Pork doesnt mean that those are banned in your religion.

So can keep repeating that nonsense till you go beet-red in your cheek but it doesnt alter the fact that Cows are very sacred in Hinduism and Muslims know that very well.

So this is why those who have no regards for religious beliefs of others will get treated like vermin because they are just that - Despicable vermin.

Go cry me a river .... see if anyone cares.

 

[Cricket Warrior]

no more trolling now or i will ban u from this thread..

 

[LordJames]

I have already told you that what a tiny minority of people do does not count as the norm. Just like how there are many Muslims who drink and eat Pork doesnt mean that those are banned in your religion.

So can keep repeating that nonsense till you go beet-red in your cheek but it doesnt alter the fact that Cows are very sacred in Hinduism and Muslims know that very well.

So this is why those who have no regards for religious beliefs of others will get treated like vermin because they are just that - Despicable vermin.

Go cry me a river .... see if anyone cares.

Read and respond

The Myth of Holy Cow

Read online

 

[uppercut]

Read and respond

I don't have to because D.N Jha is not an authority on Hinduism whatsoever. End of story.

So now lets see the answer to my question which is:

"Why are Muslims in India still deliberately harming cows In INDIA despite being very well aware of how sacred it is to Hindus ( and also against laws ) ?"

 

[HalBass9]

Isn’t human life sacred to Hindus?

 

[LordJames]

I don't have to because D.N Jha is not an authority on Hinduism whatsoever. End of story.

So now lets see the answer to my question which is:

"Why are Muslims in India still deliberately harming cows In INDIA despite being very well aware of how sacred it is to Hindus ( and also against laws ) ?"

4th response on the same topic!

1. Reason 1 (Not unanimous in Hinduism): Because Hinduism is not united on the issue of cow slaughter, for example Hindus from South India consume beef
2. Reason 2 (Not unanimous in Indian Law):Indian constitution doesn't unanimously ban slaughter of the cows and consumption of beef across India. It is legal in the Indian states of Nagaland, Mizoram, Kerala and Nagaland to consume beef

For Reason 1, do Research on Hindu Religion and contradiction on the issue of cow slaughter. The Myth of Holy Cow

Read online

For Reason 2, read the Indian constitution.

In addition, not just Muslims but also Hindus (from South India), Christians and Sikhs will continue to consume beef where it is legal.

 

[uppercut]

4th response on the same topic!

You might as well be on the 4 millionth response .... the response would be the same. i.e.: You have absolutely no leg to stand on in the matter of how Hinduism considers cows to be sacred. Whether Hinduism is united or not in enforcing that belief is a matter of Human fallibility.

Now as to the matter of you using D.N Jha .... I can categorically assure you that he is not a authority on Hinduism at all. Period !!! If you dont agree then produce evidence to back your point.

Now why do Muslims in India deliberately disregard majority Hindu beliefs ?
​

Isn’t human life sacred to Hindus?

The key operative word in that sentence is "Human"

Last time I checked ... Humans do not deliberately go desecrating beliefs of other religions ( and continue doing that for many centuries !! ). That falls squarely in the vermin domain.

And now you will just pretend that this point was not answered and rinse repeat the nonsense in less than a day or so. Pathetic Shameless much ?

 

[HalBass9]

You might as well be on the 4 millionth response .... the response would be the same. i.e.: You have absolutely no leg to stand on in the matter of how Hinduism considers cows to be sacred. Whether Hinduism is united or not in enforcing that belief is a matter of Human fallibility.

Now as to the matter of you using D.N Jha .... I can categorically assure you that he is not a authority on Hinduism at all. Period !!! If you dont agree then produce evidence to back your point.

Now why do Muslims in India deliberately disregard majority Hindu beliefs ?
​

The key operative word in that sentence is "Human"

Last time I checked ... Humans do not deliberately go desecrating beliefs of other religions ( and continue doing that for many centuries !! ). That falls squarely in the vermin domain.

And now you will just pretend that this point was not answered and rinse repeat the nonsense in less than a day or so. Pathetic Shameless deadbeat much ?

 

[uppercut]

Exactly!!! That was fast !!!

 

[LordJames]

You might as well be on the 4 millionth response .... the response would be the same. i.e.: You have absolutely no leg to stand on in the matter of how Hinduism considers cows to be sacred. Whether Hinduism is united or not in enforcing that belief is a matter of Human fallibility.

Now as to the matter of you using D.N Jha .... I can categorically assure you that he is not a authority on Hinduism at all. Period !!! If you dont agree then produce evidence to back your point.

Now why do Muslims in India deliberately disregard majority Hindu beliefs ?
​

The key operative word in that sentence is "Human"

Last time I checked ... Humans do not deliberately go desecrating beliefs of other religions ( and continue doing that for many centuries !! ). That falls squarely in the vermin domain.

And now you will just pretend that this point was not answered and rinse repeat the nonsense in less than a day or so. Pathetic Shameless deadbeat much ?

Neither are you!

The belief that cows are sacred is not a unanimous Hindu belief.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Will write long essays to demonstrate Olympic level mental gymnastics to make his weird and twisted take on the world seem normal, but hasn’t worked so far.

He sounds like a white supremacist but is an Indian, whose people flock to Muslim nations by a dozen to escape the filth in their own country, and injustice in their own Hindu rashtra to go live amongst the people he very much hates himself.

No surprise though. Takes special venom in the heart to go and constantly argue and hate on a “Muslim majority” online space to feel better himself and fool himself into thinking “yeah I sure showed them ”

The whitesupremacist rant he posted can be applied to any race or group in history that saw animosity and still be wrong

You can say it for black folk, and that rant would still be wrong.

You can say it for Jews. And that rant would still be wrong.

Both groups having been told the exact same thing he’s parroting.

Heck, even Indians for the most part are looked at the same lens. How many negative stereotypes exist about them again?

Like I said, he thinks he’s a Nazi, but throw him amongst them and he’ll be roughed up for the way he looks

@Rajdeep constantly comes out with these Suella Braverman type posts and then for some reason gets annoyed when Indians get called bootlickers.

What sort of argument is he presenting in that 1000 word essay? Why is it Muslims have problems with Jews? Why is it Muslims have problems with Christians in the western world?

Newsflash Einstein: It's those countries that are invading and bombing Muslim nations, not the other way round.

 

[Bhaag Viru Bhaag]

This @uppercut guy is clearly arguing just for the sake of it now. He has no solid ground to stand on and keeps exposing his hypocrisy, yet somehow believes he is asking hard-hitting questions. His whole cow protection drama is laughable at this point.

@LordJames already dismantled his arguments. Even fellow Indians have stopped backing him because they can see he is fighting a lost cause. A Hindu man rapes a cow, yet his religious beliefs remain unshaken. India is among the top exporters of buffalo meat, still no offense taken. But when innocent people are lynched over baseless accusations, that's apparently fine for him and he calls all of them jihadis. The hypocrisy is staggering.

 

[LordJames]

This @uppercut guy is clearly arguing just for the sake of it now. He has no solid ground to stand on and keeps exposing his hypocrisy, yet somehow believes he is asking hard-hitting questions. His whole cow protection drama is laughable at this point.

@LordJames already dismantled his arguments. Even fellow Indians have stopped backing him because they can see he is fighting a lost cause. A Hindu man rapes a cow, yet his religious beliefs remain unshaken. India is among the top exporters of buffalo meat, still no offense taken. But when innocent people are lynched over baseless accusations, that's apparently fine for him and he calls all of them jihadis. The hypocrisy is staggering.

As Muslims—and as decent human beings—we're obligated to respect others' religious beliefs, ideologies, and differences of opinion. That’s what makes a society civilized.

People of all backgrounds—Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Jews, Atheists—should be able to sit at the same table and share:

• Halal beef steak
• Pork chops
• Fried chicken with fries
• Paneer butter masala

…alongside mineral water, Coke, white wine, or pineapple juice, and have a respectful debate on something as trivial as the IPL—without anyone feeling offended by others’ dietary or religious choices.

That’s what maturity and coexistence look like.

@uppercut is simply irrational—demanding respect only from Muslims while ignoring similar expectations from Christians or Sikhs. His arguments lack both religious foundation and logic.

I've had tough but respectful conversations with white supremacists about Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)—face to face and online—without it devolving into abuse.

Hinduism, as an ancient philosophy, deserves respect—but “cow being sacred to the extent of its slaughter and consumption being prohibited” is not a core tenet.

Islam, followed by over a billion people, deserves the same respect.

We don’t need to agree to show respect.

Sadly, many of these Hindutva types are neither civil nor informed—quick to shout abuse, but slow to offer substance. I have plenty of exposure to "Hindutva" debates and there is nothing but "rape, sticks, mother and sister" in their arsenal.

 

[HalBass9]

As Muslims—and as decent human beings—we're obligated to respect others' religious beliefs, ideologies, and differences of opinion. That’s what makes a society civilized.

People of all backgrounds—Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Jews, Atheists—should be able to sit at the same table and share:

• Halal beef steak
• Pork chops
• Fried chicken with fries
• Paneer butter masala

…alongside mineral water, Coke, white wine, or pineapple juice, and have a respectful debate on something as trivial as the IPL—without anyone feeling offended by others’ dietary or religious choices.

That’s what maturity and coexistence look like.

@uppercut is simply irrational—demanding respect only from Muslims while ignoring similar expectations from Christians or Sikhs. His arguments lack both religious foundation and logic.

I've had tough but respectful conversations with white supremacists about Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)—face to face and online—without it devolving into abuse.

Hinduism, as an ancient philosophy, deserves respect—but “cow being sacred to the extent of its slaughter and consumption being prohibited” is not a core tenet.

Islam, followed by over a billion people, deserves the same respect.

We don’t need to agree to show respect.

Sadly, many of these Hindutva types are neither civil nor informed—quick to shout abuse, but slow to offer substance. I have plenty of exposure to "Hindutva" debates and there is nothing but "rape, sticks, mother and sister" in their arsenal.

Forgot to mention, IMF and GDP.

 

[sweep_shot]

@uppercut is simply irrational—demanding respect only from Muslims while ignoring similar expectations from Christians or Sikhs. His arguments lack both religious foundation and logic.

I've had tough but respectful conversations with white supremacists about Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)—face to face and online—without it devolving into abuse.

This is true.

During my college days, I once did a project with a white supremacist (I deduced he was one after conversing with him). We discussed about many topics including Islam. Our discussions were very respectful in nature.

I have never seen sanghis have such respectful discussions. They always give haha emojis or resort to petty insults. Their logics are stupid and it is a waste of time to engage with them.

 

[Rajdeep]

@Rajdeep constantly comes out with these Suella Braverman type posts and then for some reason gets annoyed when Indians get called bootlickers.

What sort of argument is he presenting in that 1000 word essay? Why is it Muslims have problems with Jews? Why is it Muslims have problems with Christians in the western world?

Newsflash Einstein: It's those countries that are invading and bombing Muslim nations, not the other way round.

Thanks for the laugh captain. No one is born yesterday.

If Muslim's really had a problem with western world because they are bombing Muslim countries, thousands of Muslims like yourself will not be staying there and paying taxes to the same govt.

Also, my post was in response to someone claiming Hindus hates Muslim's in India. Last time I checked, Hindus are not bombing any Muslim country no? So why do you think Hindus only hate muslims and not Christian, Jews, Sikhs, Budhhists, Parsis etc etc.

Btw, ever wondered why western world is only bombing muslim countries and not others?

Dont stress....we are not mature enough to ponder or discuss on such topics. So lets stick to what we know best - blame everyone else, call Indians bootlickers, bring in some random names like Suella Braverman, throw in some Hindutva this...Hindutva that in between and we are all good.

Atleast it makes interesting reading.

Reality is very different though.

 

[uppercut]

Neither are you!

The belief that cows are sacred is not a unanimous Hindu belief.

So let me get this straight .... you think the People who included cow protection articles in the Indian Constitution were not aware that cows are NOT exactly sacred in Hinduism ... right ?

 

[BouncerGuy]

So let me get this straight .... you think the People who included cow protection articles in the Indian Constitution were not aware that cows are NOT exactly sacred in Hinduism ... right ?

Why is COW sacred and not buffalo or a camel or goat???

Genuine question... WHat does your scripture says??

 

[uppercut]

Why is COW sacred and not buffalo or a camel or goat???

Genuine question... WHat does your scripture says??

The Cow is considered as the abode of all Hindu Gods. Therefore extremely sacred. Also Lord Krishna is considered as the protector of Cows. There are also plenty of verses in multiple holy texts about the stature of cow.

 

[guard]

Is it a specific cow or all cows?

All breeds or just one specific type..

And do they only reside in ind or worldwide…

 

[Bhaag Viru Bhaag]

Is it a specific cow or all cows?

All breeds or just one specific type..

And do they only reside in ind or worldwide…

Good luck getting an answer to a genuine question.

 

[Bhaag Viru Bhaag]

The Cow is considered as the abode of all Hindu Gods. Therefore extremely sacred. Also Lord Krishna is considered as the protector of Cows. There are also plenty of verses in multiple holy texts about the stature of cow.

So, in the grand hierarchy of holiness, do Pakistani cows outrank Indian buffaloes now, at least in the eyes of devout Hindus?

 

[guard]

Good luck getting an answer to a genuine question.

The questions were asked in good faith (no pun)

If anyone feels offended, then sorry they feel that way. Im not going to pursue it nor hound anyone..

Enjoy your day..

 

[Bhaag Viru Bhaag]

The questions were asked in good faith (no pun)

If anyone feels offended, then sorry they feel that way. Im not going to pursue it nor hound anyone..

Enjoy your day..

Don't worry. Your question is a genuine one.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Thanks for the laugh captain. No one is born yesterday.

If Muslim's really had a problem with western world because they are bombing Muslim countries, thousands of Muslims like yourself will not be staying there and paying taxes to the same govt.

Also, my post was in response to someone claiming Hindus hates Muslim's in India. Last time I checked, Hindus are not bombing any Muslim country no? So why do you think Hindus only hate muslims and not Christian, Jews, Sikhs, Budhhists, Parsis etc etc.

Btw, ever wondered why western world is only bombing muslim countries and not others?

Dont stress....we are not mature enough to ponder or discuss on such topics. So lets stick to what we know best - blame everyone else, call Indians bootlickers, bring in some random names like Suella Braverman, throw in some Hindutva this...Hindutva that in between and we are all good.

Atleast it makes interesting reading.

Reality is very different though.

The Muslims in the west aren't the ones who have a problem with the western world bombing Muslim countries. It's the Muslim countries getting bombed with the problem Eintsein. Not sure what your point is here. Do you think everyone who disapproves of their govt action should up and leave even if they were born there? How does that work in India?

Why aren't Hindu countries getting bombed you asked? Two reasons come to mind.

Firstly, India already got looted centuries back, now it's a third world country which doesn't really hold natural resources which can't be found elsewhere.

Secondly, India is a nuclear power. Not that easy to bomb even if the west wanted to bomb them. But why would they? India is fairly compliant and has no conflicts with the west.

 

[Rajdeep]

The Muslims in the west aren't the ones who have a problem with the western world bombing Muslim countries. It's the Muslim countries getting bombed with the problem Eintsein. Not sure what your point is here. Do you think everyone who disapproves of their govt action should up and leave even if they were born there? How does that work in India?

Why aren't Hindu countries getting bombed you asked? Two reasons come to mind.

Firstly, India already got looted centuries back, now it's a third world country which doesn't really hold natural resources which can't be found elsewhere.

Secondly, India is a nuclear power. Not that easy to bomb even if the west wanted to bomb them. But why would they? India is fairly compliant and has no conflicts with the west.

Thanks

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Thanks

You are welcome.

 

[Rajdeep]

Just look at this specific story, for example. A muslim group reportedly slaughtered a cow and threw its head near a temple to instigate communal tension. However, the thread portrayed the incident as if a BJP leader randomly decided to threaten innocent Muslims without any provocation.

This is exactly what I’m trying to highlight. Whether it is all okay and good to blame others like BJP/Hindutvas hates muslims, jews invades our lands, western Christians bombs our lands etc etc....we rarely pause to reflect on why such tensions frequently involve the Muslim community. Unfortunately, this aspect often goes undiscussed.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Just look at this specific story, for example. A muslim group reportedly slaughtered a cow and threw its head near a temple to instigate communal tension. However, the thread portrayed the incident as if a BJP leader randomly decided to threaten innocent Muslims without any provocation.

This is exactly what I’m trying to highlight. Whether it is all okay and good to blame others like BJP/Hindutvas hates muslims, jews invades our lands, western Christians bombs our lands etc etc....we rarely pause to reflect on why such tensions frequently involve the Muslim community. Unfortunately, this aspect often goes undiscussed.

Let's discuss this story then. You claim this was instigated by a Muslim group who slaughtered a cow and threw it's head near a temple to instigate communal tension. What was their purpose in doing so?

 

[LordJames]

So let me get this straight .... you think the People who included cow protection articles in the Indian Constitution were not aware that cows are NOT exactly sacred in Hinduism ... right ?

The people who included articles of cow protection in the Indian constitution knew that it is not a core part of Hinduism and that's why there are exemptions within India.

IF this was a core component of Hinduism it would have been banned across India without exemptions or exceptions.

Why is COW sacred and not buffalo or a camel or goat???

Genuine question... WHat does your scripture says??

In the Hindu scriptures, there are dozens upon dozens of examples of meat consumption upon feasts so abstinence meat consumption is not a core part of Hinduism.

If you take away the "meat consumption" part then animal sacrifice has been inherent part of Hinduism for centuries. In Nepal (until very recently) thousands of animals were ritually sacrificed for Hindu goddess Gadhimai

Hindu sacrifice of 250,000 animals begins​

Cheers and protests as thousands of buffalo are decapitated at start of festival in Nepal honouring Hindu goddess Gadhimai

The answer to the sacrifice to honor Gadhimai from "Hindutva" is that we don't do it anymore OR it has been scaled back etc but the fact remains that this was part of Hindu rituals for a long time so you can't erase it from history.

Just look at this specific story, for example. A muslim group reportedly slaughtered a cow and threw its head near a temple to instigate communal tension. However, the thread portrayed the incident as if a BJP leader randomly decided to threaten innocent Muslims without any provocation.

This is exactly what I’m trying to highlight. Whether it is all okay and good to blame others like BJP/Hindutvas hates muslims, jews invades our lands, western Christians bombs our lands etc etc....we rarely pause to reflect on why such tensions frequently involve the Muslim community. Unfortunately, this aspect often goes undiscussed.

In every society there are laws to stop communal practices. In the west, there are white supremacists who throw pig heads at the Mosque, the police charges them and they are taken to account.

In India, the mob takes reports from WhatsApp university and starts a lynching campaign across India.

How many times do I have to repeat?!! In states where cow slaughter is illegal anyone who slaughters a cow is doing something illegal and should be arrested and punished (not lynched), nothing to do with Hinduism! Even if a Hindu does it he is breaking the law.

If your police is unable to enforce the law then blame the law and order in your country.