[VIDEO] India replies to PM Imran Khan's speech at the UNGA

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,710
[utube]96B5JtS63YY[/utube]

Exercising its right to reply, India on Saturday responded to Pakistan PM Imran Khan's maiden UNGA speech. In his speech that went on for about 50 minutes, far exceeding the 15-minute limit for UN speeches during the General Debate, Khan devoted half of his address to the Kashmir issue, warning that if there's face-off between two nuclear-armed neighbours, the consequences would be far beyond their borders.

Here is the full text of India's reply:

Mr. President,

I take the floor to exercise India’s right of reply to the statement made by the Prime Minister of Pakistan.

Every word spoken from the podium of this august Assembly, it is believed, carries the weight of history. Unfortunately, what we heard today from Prime Minister Imran Khan of Pakistan was a callous portrayal of the world in binary terms. Us vs Them; Rich vs Poor; North vs South; Developed Vs Developing; Muslims vs Others. A script that fosters divisiveness at the United Nations. Attempts to sharpen differences and stir up hatred, are simply put - “hate speech”.

Rarely has the General Assembly witnessed such misuse, rather abuse, of an opportunity to reflect. Words matter in diplomacy. Invocation of phrases such as “pogrom”, “bloodbath”, “racial superiority”, “pick up the gun” and “fight to the end” reflect a medieval mindset and not a 21st century vision.

Prime Minister Khan’s threat of unleashing nuclear devastation qualifies as brinksmanship, not statesmanship.

Even coming from the leader of a country that has monopolized the entire value chain of the industry of terrorism, Prime Minister Khan’s justification of terrorism was brazen and incendiary.

For someone who was once a cricketer and believed in the gentleman’s game, today’s speech bordered on crudeness of the variety that is reminiscent of the guns of Darra Adam Khel.

Now that Prime Minister Imran Khan has invited UN Observers to Pakistan to verify that there are no militant organisations in Pakistan, the world will hold him to that promise.

Here are a few questions that Pakistan can respond to as a precursor to the proposed verification.
Can Pakistan confirm the fact that it is home to 130 UN designated terrorists and 25 terrorist entities listed by the UN, as of today?

Will Pakistan acknowledge that it is the only Government in the world that provides pension to an individual listed by the UN in the Al Qaeda and Da’esh Sanctions list!

Can Pakistan explain why here in New York, its premier bank, the Habib Bank had to shut shop after it was fined millions of dollars over terror financing?

Will Pakistan deny that the Financial Action Task Force has put the country on notice for its violations of more than 20 of the 27 key parameters?

And would Prime Minister Khan deny to the city of New York that he was an open defender of Osama bin Laden?

Mr. President,

Having mainstreamed terrorism and hate speech, Pakistan is trying to play its wild card as the newfound champion of human rights.

This a country that has shrunk the size of its minority community from 23% in 1947 to 3% today and has subjected Christians, Sikhs, Ahmadiyas, Hindus, Shias, Pashtuns, Sindhis and Balochis to draconian blasphemy laws, systemic persecution, blatant abuse and forced conversions.

Their newfound fascination for preaching human rights is akin to trophy hunting of the endangered mountain goat - markhor.

Pogroms, Prime Minister Imran Khan Niazi, are not a phenomenon of today’s vibrant democracies. We would request you to refresh your rather sketchy understanding of history. Do not forget the gruesome genocide perpetrated by Pakistan against its own people in 1971 and the role played by Lt. Gen A A K Niazi. A sordid fact that the Hon’ble Prime Minister of Bangladesh reminded this Assembly about earlier this afternoon.

Mr. President,

Pakistan’s virulent reaction to the removal of an outdated and temporary provision that was hindering development and integration of the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir stems from the fact that those who thrive on conflict never welcome the ray of peace.

While Pakistan has ventured to upstream terrorism and downstream hate speech there, India is going ahead with mainstreaming development in Jammu and Kashmir.

The mainstreaming of Jammu & Kashmir, as well as Ladakh, in India’s thriving and vibrant democracy with a millennia-old heritage of diversity, pluralism and tolerance is well and truly underway. Irreversibly so.

Citizens of India do not need anyone else to speak on their behalf, least of all those who have built an industry of terrorism from the ideology of hate.

I thank you, Mr. President.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...ch-at-unga-full-text/articleshow/71345007.cms
 
Last edited:
They seem to be primarily using diversion tactics and did not actually respond to what he said.

And again, they are using the 23% to 3% minority lie, this time at UNGA? LOL. How many times has that myth has been busted, but now they are speaking that lie at UNGA.
 
Also interesting to see that they send a UN diplomat to reply to the PM of Pakistan - loses its intensity by 50% to begin with.
 
Brilliant reply, showing Imran a high quality mirror. Alice Wells, the top U.S. official for South Asia has also giving him a fitting response.

Pakistan’s new found love for humanity and morality is not fooling anyone except our emotional, gullible public. We don’t have a shred of credibility considering our dark history and also our dark present.

It was also important that our hypocrisy regarding the detention of Chinese Muslims gets highlighted at the UN level, and Alice Wells has done well to point it out.

The Indian response lacked one point though - they should have mentioned that the UN Resolution 1947 has not been implemented because of Pakistan. It is a step-by-step proposal - to get to point 2 and you have to fulfill point 1, and that is Pakistan’s job.

If we really care for the freedom of Kashmiris and their right to a plebiscite, why don’t we perform our duty and fulfill point 1?

Why not put diplomatic pressure on India by demanding them to do their part according to the resolution after doing ours?
 
I also think equating Pakistan with terrorism at every nook and corner is losing its appeal. It might have worked 10 years ago and around when OBL died, but with the on-set of ISIS and vast majority of terrorist incidents in the west (even those incidents done by Muslims) having nothing to do with Pakistan, I am sure this is sounding more and more hollow to world leaders. And it speaks in how little they care about this now.
 
And before someone inadvertently corrects her that the minority population dropped to 3% because of East Pakistan independence, ask yourself why that happened in the first place.

We discriminated against them because we considered them inferior to us. We considered their language inferior and we didn’t given them their due economic and political rights. They were also underrepresented in the military because we perceived them to be too short and skinny for combat.

When they resisted we butchered them and didn’t spare the civilians including the women and children. So again - what credibility do we have when we lecture India on human rights? What we did in East Bengal is far worse than what India is doing in J&K.
 
And before someone inadvertently corrects her that the minority population dropped to 3% because of East Pakistan independence, ask yourself why that happened in the first place.

We discriminated against them because we considered them inferior to us. We considered their language inferior and we didn’t given them their due economic and political rights. They were also underrepresented in the military because we perceived them to be too short and skinny for combat.

When they resisted we butchered them and didn’t spare the civilians including the women and children. So again - what credibility do we have when we lecture India on human rights? What we did in East Bengal is far worse than what India is doing in J&K.

Can you answer the simple question - what percent of West Pakistan's population was non-muslim minority at the time of partition, and what is it today?

The way they present their claims suggests there was some institutionalized massacre of minorities that alone explains the entire drop from 23% to 3%, when the vast majority is explained by Bangladesh separating from Pakistan and because it always had a significantly higher percent of non-Muslim population.
 
Can you answer the simple question - what percent of West Pakistan's population was non-muslim minority at the time of partition, and what is it today?

The way they present their claims suggests there was some institutionalized massacre of minorities that alone explains the entire drop from 23% to 3%, when the vast majority is explained by Bangladesh separating from Pakistan and because it always had a significantly higher percent of non-Muslim population.

It is propaganda against Pakistan. India excels at lying, we all learnt this over the years.
 
It is propaganda against Pakistan. India excels at lying, we all learnt this over the years.

Their lying appears to have gone through the roof in the last 2-3 years. 300+ terrorists killed, terrorist hide out destroyed, 2016 surgical strikes, F-16 shot down, and now this.
 
And before someone inadvertently corrects her that the minority population dropped to 3% because of East Pakistan independence, ask yourself why that happened in the first place.

We discriminated against them because we considered them inferior to us. We considered their language inferior and we didn’t given them their due economic and political rights. They were also underrepresented in the military because we perceived them to be too short and skinny for combat.

When they resisted we butchered them and didn’t spare the civilians including the women and children. So again - what credibility do we have when we lecture India on human rights? What we did in East Bengal is far worse than what India is doing in J&K.

The moment you started comparing two oppression events in timeline, one in past and other going on for decades, you lost your credibility as a neutral observer.
 
Brilliant reply, showing Imran a high quality mirror. Alice Wells, the top U.S. official for South Asia has also giving him a fitting response.

Pakistan’s new found love for humanity and morality is not fooling anyone except our emotional, gullible public. We don’t have a shred of credibility considering our dark history and also our dark present.

It was also important that our hypocrisy regarding the detention of Chinese Muslims gets highlighted at the UN level, and Alice Wells has done well to point it out.

The Indian response lacked one point though - they should have mentioned that the UN Resolution 1947 has not been implemented because of Pakistan. It is a step-by-step proposal - to get to point 2 and you have to fulfill point 1, and that is Pakistan’s job.

If we really care for the freedom of Kashmiris and their right to a plebiscite, why don’t we perform our duty and fulfill point 1?

Why not put diplomatic pressure on India by demanding them to do their part according to the resolution after doing ours?

There is one enlightening difference between the two speeches. India's reply concentrated from history and historic facts/opinions. Pakistan's speech originated from current state of affairs.

I would say this is the most glaring difference and it was mentioned right at the start of Indian reply too that this would be a history driven reply which immediately set the tone that there is going to be no forward thinking aspects from this reply.
 
There is one enlightening difference between the two speeches. India's reply concentrated from history and historic facts/opinions. Pakistan's speech originated from current state of affairs.

I would say this is the most glaring difference and it was mentioned right at the start of Indian reply too that this would be a history driven reply which immediately set the tone that there is going to be no forward thinking aspects from this reply.

100% agreed - this is one thing I wanted to mention in my first post but lost my thought. I am not going to argue that they are being accurate on historical "facts", because on a lot of them they are inaccurate. However, living in the past and living in the present is the major difference here. And on-top of that, the entire speech appears to be diversionary as it does not address the current situation in kashmir.
 
There is one enlightening difference between the two speeches. India's reply concentrated from history and historic facts/opinions. Pakistan's speech originated from current state of affairs.

I would say this is the most glaring difference and it was mentioned right at the start of Indian reply too that this would be a history driven reply which immediately set the tone that there is going to be no forward thinking aspects from this reply.

Exactly. If we keep going back to history then neither British, American, China, India and each and every nation in this entire world should not talk about oppression as all have have been oppressive at certain timeline.
 
Brilliant reply, showing Imran a high quality mirror. Alice Wells, the top U.S. official for South Asia has also giving him a fitting response.

Pakistan’s new found love for humanity and morality is not fooling anyone except our emotional, gullible public. We don’t have a shred of credibility considering our dark history and also our dark present.

It was also important that our hypocrisy regarding the detention of Chinese Muslims gets highlighted at the UN level, and Alice Wells has done well to point it out.

The Indian response lacked one point though - they should have mentioned that the UN Resolution 1947 has not been implemented because of Pakistan. It is a step-by-step proposal - to get to point 2 and you have to fulfill point 1, and that is Pakistan’s job.

If we really care for the freedom of Kashmiris and their right to a plebiscite, why don’t we perform our duty and fulfill point 1?

Why not put diplomatic pressure on India by demanding them to do their part according to the resolution after doing ours?

lolz khan phobia is evident inmost of your posts.
 
who cares.Khasn has stolen the show and has done his job.keep on crying these nobodies can keep on sptiing lies.
 
They seem to be primarily using diversion tactics and did not actually respond to what he said.

And again, they are using the 23% to 3% minority lie, this time at UNGA? LOL. How many times has that myth has been busted, but now they are speaking that lie at UNGA.

I am not sure about the numbers, I think in Pakistan (earlier West Pakistan) the minority % has been more or less stable. But in East Pakistan there was a huge decline, Pakistan army and leaders must be condemned for that because from 1947 to 71 they were the same country and minorities were persecuted in East, culminating in 1971 separation. What happened after 1971 in Bangladesh however, Pakistan needn't answer.
 
Last edited:
I am not sure about the numbers, I think in Pakistan (earlier West Pakistan) the minority % has been more or less stable. But in East Pakistan there was a huge decline, Pakistan army and leaders must be condemned for that because from 1947 to 71 they were the same country and minorities were persecuted in East, culminating in 1971 separation. What happened after 1971 in Bangladesh however, Pakistan needn't answer.

I am curious to see the level of decline in the east. E.g., what it was at time of partition, what it was in 1971, and in between. And how much of it could be attributed to immigration to India rather than getting killed. But, I don't think these diplomats are trying to portray that level of sophistication and nuances. They are straight up saying that from partition till now, the percent of minorities in Pakistan has declined from 23% to 3%.
 
By exposing India.

By exposing 27 Feb.

By exposing Modi’s narrative.

By exposing India’s oppression of Kashmiris.

You want more details?

And how mant countries agreed with this expose?

Going to UN and ranting means nothing if it has no support.

Any leader of any country can do it.

Btw India sent a UN diplomat to reply, thays the importance they attached to this speech of PM of Pakistan.

But you guys carry on.
 
I am not sure about the numbers, I think in Pakistan (earlier West Pakistan) the minority % has been more or less stable. But in East Pakistan there was a huge decline, Pakistan army and leaders must be condemned for that because from 1947 to 71 they were the same country and minorities were persecuted in East, culminating in 1971 separation. What happened after 1971 in Bangladesh however, Pakistan needn't answer.

we will not answer to someone who has been holding hostages 8 million minorities population .And yes we should take care of our minorities we have some issues no one should deny that.
 
Last edited:
I am not sure about the numbers, I think in Pakistan (earlier West Pakistan) the minority % has been more or less stable . But in East Pakistan there was a huge decline, Pakistan army and leaders must be condemned for that because from 1947 to 71 they were the same country and minorities were persecuted in East, culminating in 1971 separation. What happened after 1971 in Bangladesh however, Pakistan needn't answer.

Pakistan’s Hindu minority has actually grown from 1,5% in 1947 to 1,7% in 2019; of course discrimination and violence against Hindus is widespread in Pakistan, but when it comes to numbers, they’re actually growing.
 
Last edited:
And how mant countries agreed with this expose?

Going to UN and ranting means nothing if it has no support.

Any leader of any country can do it.

Btw India sent a UN diplomat to reply, thays the importance they attached to this speech of PM of Pakistan.

But you guys carry on.

we will definitely carry on.
 
Pakistan doesn’t deserve this man.

We deserve Nawaz and Zardari...

I find it so funny how some Pakistanis are trying to fit in their political agenda against this speech.

Take a bow, Imran, take a bow.

Brilliant.Loved it.Look at their faces .shattered.lolz
 
I am curious to see the level of decline in the east. E.g., what it was at time of partition, what it was in 1971, and in between. And how much of it could be attributed to immigration to India rather than getting killed. But, I don't think these diplomats are trying to portray that level of sophistication and nuances. They are straight up saying that from partition till now, the percent of minorities in Pakistan has declined from 23% to 3%.

Fake news is the norm in present day India, why should diplomats be left behind? They will have cheerleaders in our media, why should they care as long as they are hailed? Only treatment is to confront them with facts, but then they will prefer to retreat. Myth making is a real menace in Indian society, most people get their facts from Whatsapp forwards rather than research on their own. Things weren't this bad 10 years back.
 
Yes pakistanis decided amongst themselves that their PM has stolen the show.

Yes we decide.You been replying for every post shows me what he has done.I can understand a bit of human psychae.We think he has done it superbly and rightly feeling proud of him.
 
Fake news is the norm in present day India, why should diplomats be left behind? They will have cheerleaders in our media, why should they care as long as they are hailed? Only treatment is to confront them with facts, but then they will prefer to retreat. Myth making is a real menace in Indian society, most people get their facts from Whatsapp forwards rather than research on their own. Things weren't this bad 10 years back.

Why did it go like this in last 10 years any reason?
 
Fake news is the norm in present day India, why should diplomats be left behind? They will have cheerleaders in our media, why should they care as long as they are hailed? Only treatment is to confront them with facts, but then they will prefer to retreat. Myth making is a real menace in Indian society, most people get their facts from Whatsapp forwards rather than research on their own. Things weren't this bad 10 years back.

I mean, if they made the argument about how minorities were reduced in East Pakistan from 1947 to 1971, they would at least have plausible deniability. Plausible deniability, because who knows how much percent of the decline in East Pakistan was due to oppression at the time, and how much due to immigration. But the way they are presenting their claim, it can't be considered anything other than a bold-faced lie, that too at the UNGA.

For context (and to answer the question I asked Mamoon), in 1951 census 2% of west Pakistan was non-muslim. It's now 4%.
 
Why did it go like this in last 10 years any reason?

Social media tools became more accessible to gullible masses. I won't say illiterates because many highly educated professionals aren't left behind.

Rise of BJP and Sangh's capture of institutions, BJP introduced fake news in its campaign in 2014, probably the first time ever done by a political party. It has dedicated IT cells that morph videos/pictures, invent news, lie, fake etc for political reasons. Naturally this became a mainstay in Indian politics largely dominated by the ruling party. When politicians lead by example and have so much power to influence, naturally normal citizens will follow. Brainwashing from top to bottom.

Indian media, especially English has become a BJP mouthpiece barring a few exceptions. I don't know about Hindi but in English media fake news has been normalized, dissent is discouraged, fact checkers are shamed and castigated as anti-national. Too much sensationalism and fake nationalism. It is one thing for IT cells to create fake news, but when powerful media organizations lend credence, it becomes a disease.
 
Last edited:
Social media tools became more accessible to gullible masses. I won't say illiterates because many highly educated professionals aren't left behind.

Rise of BJP and Sangh's capture of institutions, BJP introduced fake news in its campaign in 2014, probably the first time ever done by a political party. It has dedicated IT cells that morph videos/pictures, invent news, lie, fake etc for political reasons. Naturally this became a mainstay in Indian politics largely dominated by the ruling party. When politicians lead by example and have so much power to influence, naturally normal citizens will follow. Brainwashing from top to bottom.

Indian media, especially English has become a BJP mouthpiece barring a few exceptions. I don't know about Hindi but in English media fake news has been normalized, dissent is discouraged, fact checkers are shamed and castigated as anti-national. Too much sensationalism and fake nationalism. It is one thing for IT cells to create fake news, but when powerful media organizations lend credence, it becomes a disease.

Thank you for the reply.Followed few of indian tv channels in 27th feb incident and there were hilarious things going on .I thought pakistani news channels were far better.
 
And how mant countries agreed with this expose?

Going to UN and ranting means nothing if it has no support.

Any leader of any country can do it.

Btw India sent a UN diplomat to reply, thays the importance they attached to this speech of PM of Pakistan.

But you guys carry on.

Of course when Hitmodi failed miserably and looked like a lost chicken compared to Imran Khan you had no choice but to come up with something different, but the same rant, terrorist bla bla, come up with something new at least.
 
The reply is pretty much the dictionary definition of whataboutism even if we accept everything being said as the truth.
 
And how mant countries agreed with this expose?

Going to UN and ranting means nothing if it has no support.

Any leader of any country can do it.

Btw India sent a UN diplomat to reply, thays the importance they attached to this speech of PM of Pakistan.

But you guys carry on.

You're actually so ignorant.
"Sent a diplomat to a UN reply"
Mate that's the procedure. The diplomats reply.
Did you actually think that Modi would come up just to reply??? LOL
 
Brilliant reply, showing Imran a high quality mirror. Alice Wells, the top U.S. official for South Asia has also giving him a fitting response.

Pakistan’s new found love for humanity and morality is not fooling anyone except our emotional, gullible public. We don’t have a shred of credibility considering our dark history and also our dark present.

It was also important that our hypocrisy regarding the detention of Chinese Muslims gets highlighted at the UN level, and Alice Wells has done well to point it out.

The Indian response lacked one point though - they should have mentioned that the UN Resolution 1947 has not been implemented because of Pakistan. It is a step-by-step proposal - to get to point 2 and you have to fulfill point 1, and that is Pakistan’s job.

If we really care for the freedom of Kashmiris and their right to a plebiscite, why don’t we perform our duty and fulfill point 1?

Why not put diplomatic pressure on India by demanding them to do their part according to the resolution after doing ours?

Seems like you was born as a india's worshiper and shameless. 2 Combo's which best describes you.
 
Seems like you was born as a india's worshiper and shameless. 2 Combo's which best describes you.

I have some friends who find fault in whatever Pakistan does, but they at least do not cheer whatever India does like *******. This guy seems to be another level.
 
Expected reply from India. They have no valid reply or defence.

Only people who will support this reply are RSS extremists and the a few traitors...

They will always fall back to history even when IK explained what happened and what is happening now with respect to home grown terrorists...

Indian insecurity is rife and only getting worse.
 
Funnily enough, I was actually expecting a response on the 300+ terrorists killed in Balakot by Indian forces and how they went inside Pakistan and carried out a bollywood-style-iconic-circus. At least that would have saved face.

When you have to feed lies to 1.2b back home to get into power, and a man comes out on the highest platform and exposes this in front of world leaders like a piece of cake and you actually don't have anything to say back to that? That is quite an eye-opener.

Half of the reply speech looked like an English language lesson in history rather than an actual response on current affairs. 10 seconds of the speech went towards the current issue of Kashmir, stating 'mainstreaming development' - lol? Development in which local people need to participate from inside their walls of their houses? Or development in which local people are not invited to participate?

I don't agree with Imran Khan on some of his internal policies, but this is a man that every Pakistani should be proud of. Pakistan has never had a more stronger voice than now, and this is something we all need to stand together and push forward.
 
Speeches without sexual appeal have little impact as also mentioned by my dear friend [MENTION=93712]MenInG[/MENTION]

India should have had Modi read out this rather well articulated rebutal. It was actually quite perfect but it wasn't something that would arouse UN or world community to feel empathy. .
 
Expected reply from India. They have no valid reply or defence.

Only people who will support this reply are RSS extremists and the a few traitors...

They will always fall back to history even when IK explained what happened and what is happening now with respect to home grown terrorists...

Indian insecurity is rife and only getting worse.

Keep dreaming...
 
Brilliant reply, showing Imran a high quality mirror. Alice Wells, the top U.S. official for South Asia has also giving him a fitting response.

Pakistan’s new found love for humanity and morality is not fooling anyone except our emotional, gullible public. We don’t have a shred of credibility considering our dark history and also our dark present.

It was also important that our hypocrisy regarding the detention of Chinese Muslims gets highlighted at the UN level, and Alice Wells has done well to point it out.

The Indian response lacked one point though - they should have mentioned that the UN Resolution 1947 has not been implemented because of Pakistan. It is a step-by-step proposal - to get to point 2 and you have to fulfill point 1, and that is Pakistan’s job.

If we really care for the freedom of Kashmiris and their right to a plebiscite, why don’t we perform our duty and fulfill point 1?

Why not put diplomatic pressure on India by demanding them to do their part according to the resolution after doing ours?

Brilliant reply? What a surprise a loser like you thinks it's brilliant.
 
Expected reply from India. They have no valid reply or defence.

Only people who will support this reply are RSS extremists and the a few traitors...

They will always fall back to history even when IK explained what happened and what is happening now with respect to home grown terrorists...

Indian insecurity is rife and only getting worse.

Lol. India is so insecure that PM Modi had not mentioned Pakistan even once. That is what I call a royal snub. On the contrary, PM Khan is obsessed with Modi and RSS.

Whoever does not endorse Imran Khan is either RSS extremist or traitor. Such is the level of bigotry on this forum lately. Well boys, after you are done with chest thumping, let me know if all this results into any tangible benefit for Pakistan. Real diplomacy does not lie on nonsense rhetorical speech.
 
Lol. India is so insecure that PM Modi had not mentioned Pakistan even once. That is what I call a royal snub. On the contrary, PM Khan is obsessed with Modi and RSS.

Whoever does not endorse Imran Khan is either RSS extremist or traitor. Such is the level of bigotry on this forum lately. Well boys, after you are done with chest thumping, let me know if all this results into any tangible benefit for Pakistan. Real diplomacy does not lie on nonsense rhetorical speech.

Modi said nothing because he can’t.
When the truth is staring you in the face, a mirror is held in front of you, there is little comeback other then trying to change the topic and try to divert it back to history which is what the Indians tried to do.

You don’t have to be an IK supporter or even Pakistani to see it for what it is.

IK’s speech was well structured. He spoke about homegrown terrorists, he didn’t deny it but he said what they are doing now to disband these. What was India’s reply to this?

He spoke about steps taken by his government to promote peace, india’s Reply?

I’m sorry but blind nationalism is what has landed you with an extremist RSS government.
 
Lol. India is so insecure that PM Modi had not mentioned Pakistan even once. That is what I call a royal snub. On the contrary, PM Khan is obsessed with Modi and RSS.

Whoever does not endorse Imran Khan is either RSS extremist or traitor. Such is the level of bigotry on this forum lately. Well boys, after you are done with chest thumping, let me know if all this results into any tangible benefit for Pakistan. Real diplomacy does not lie on nonsense rhetorical speech.

Modi can't reply- the guy is your NS- no streanh
 
Lol. India is so insecure that PM Modi had not mentioned Pakistan even once. That is what I call a royal snub. On the contrary, PM Khan is obsessed with Modi and RSS.

Whoever does not endorse Imran Khan is either RSS extremist or traitor. Such is the level of bigotry on this forum lately. Well boys, after you are done with chest thumping, let me know if all this results into any tangible benefit for Pakistan. Real diplomacy does not lie on nonsense rhetorical speech.

Pakistan is concerned with India because of the Kashmir curfew and what's happened since then.

Before that, India was not a focal point of discussion in Pakistan, whether that's on TV, politicians' statements, etc.

India was a non-entity in the Pakistan PM elections. While on the contrary, there was a statement about Pakistan almost every day during the Indian PM elections with the BJP President Amit Shah leading the way.
 
Lol. India is so insecure that PM Modi had not mentioned Pakistan even once. That is what I call a royal snub. On the contrary, PM Khan is obsessed with Modi and RSS.

Whoever does not endorse Imran Khan is either RSS extremist or traitor. Such is the level of bigotry on this forum lately. Well boys, after you are done with chest thumping, let me know if all this results into any tangible benefit for Pakistan. Real diplomacy does not lie on nonsense rhetorical speech.

Lol, you have no idea what you are talking about. India or HitModi are only relevant in Pakistan because of Kashmir. Apart from that no channel or politician talk about India. But if you look at the situation in your country people get elected as PM primarily on background of spreading lies about Pakistan. Your every channel is obsessed with Pakistan. You turn on an Indian newz channel and all you hear is Pakistan this and Pakistan that.
 
India was a non-entity in the Pakistan PM elections. While on the contrary, there was a statement about Pakistan almost every day during the Indian PM elections with the BJP President Amit Shah leading the way.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Indian right to opponents: "Go to Pakistan."<br><br>Indian right to Kashmiris: "You are Pakistani."<br><br>Indian liberals to Indian right: "Don't make us a Hindu Pakistan."<br><br>Indian elections: "Pakistan, Pakistan, Pakistan."<br><br>Indians at the UN: "It's offensive to mention us with Pakistan."🤔</p>— Ahsan Butt (@ahsanib) <a href="https://twitter.com/ahsanib/status/1176541663931457536?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 24, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Brilliant reply, showing Imran a high quality mirror. Alice Wells, the top U.S. official for South Asia has also giving him a fitting response.

Pakistan’s new found love for humanity and morality is not fooling anyone except our emotional, gullible public. We don’t have a shred of credibility considering our dark history and also our dark present.

It was also important that our hypocrisy regarding the detention of Chinese Muslims gets highlighted at the UN level, and Alice Wells has done well to point it out.

The Indian response lacked one point though - they should have mentioned that the UN Resolution 1947 has not been implemented because of Pakistan. It is a step-by-step proposal - to get to point 2 and you have to fulfill point 1, and that is Pakistan’s job.

If we really care for the freedom of Kashmiris and their right to a plebiscite, why don’t we perform our duty and fulfill point 1?

Why not put diplomatic pressure on India by demanding them to do their part according to the resolution after doing ours?

Absolute ** and hypocrisy.

You and your family are directly responsible for the failures of Pakistan with your corruption and propping up of traitors and thieves.

Why don't you start fixing wrongs within your control rather than bringing down the one person who has sacrificed so much for pathetic individuals like you?
 
well, what kind of reply is that ? Pakistan talked about kashmir, the reply should be on kashmir, instead beating around the bush, the world already know the history, india should stick to the current affairs.
 
well, we gonna reply back, the cycle will go on in UNGA.
whatever Imran khan said, its enough for the world to understand, take it as warning or threat.
 
Last edited:
India totally ignores every point IK made. They did not say anything about the 900,000 terrorist soldiers killing people in the valley. They uttered not a word on Kulbushan Yadav or Indian terrorism in Baluchistan. They did not even try to defend the RSS coz they can't, the whole world knows RSS killed Gandhi and they are indeed inspired by the Nazi's. India got hammered hard by IK and they know it so lets not try to pretend otherwise where as all they can talk about is "terrorism" without wanting to discuss why people turn terrorists. This nonsense of 300 terrorists killed is laughed at even by Indian people let alone Pakistanis or others:rp An unimaginative, tedious, boring and burdensome hogwash of a so called reply by Bharat.
 
Yes we decide.You been replying for every post shows me what he has done.I can understand a bit of human psychae.We think he has done it superbly and rightly feeling proud of him.

I am posting on a pakistani forum and talking to Pakistanis. Else Imrans speech affects in no way.

So unless Pakistan starts a war, i am unaffected by anything Imran says.
 
I am posting on a pakistani forum and talking to Pakistanis. Else Imrans speech affects in no way.

So unless Pakistan starts a war, i am unaffected by anything Imran says.

India will because Indian will have to, India will have no choice but to start a war.

Tell your boys to get them Khakhi chaddi ready.
 
Of course when Hitmodi failed miserably and looked like a lost chicken compared to Imran Khan you had no choice but to come up with something different, but the same rant, terrorist bla bla, come up with something new at least.

Looked lost?

Can you tell me what has Imran achieved? He gave a speech that Pakistanis liked. Thats it.

What else?
 
He has showed the World that Ind is under fascist control. I think that's not a small achievement.

Bhai sahib isn't making any sense anymore.

Here is a fun fact.

Before election Pakistan.

Before election cup of tea.

Before cup of tea, Pakistan will be decimated in hours.

Before, tell me one country that supports Pakistani narrative.

After, tell me at least 10 countries.

Countless example similar to above.

This is what IK has done to Kakhi chaddi wearing people in last one year.
 
He has showed the World that Ind is under fascist control. I think that's not a small achievement.

He has given the pakistani narrative. Like many pakistani leaders before him.

Has the world accepted it?

If not, then how does it matter?

Millions of Pakistanis agreeing to the speech of pakistani PM means zilch, when by Imrans own admission, there is no.pressure on India.
 
Bhai sahib isn't making any sense anymore.

Here is a fun fact.

Before election Pakistan.

Before election cup of tea.

Before cup of tea, Pakistan will be decimated in hours.

Before, tell me one country that supports Pakistani narrative.

After, tell me at least 10 countries.

Countless example similar to above.

This is what IK has done to Kakhi chaddi wearing people in last one year.

So which countries support Pakistan's narrative?

The same ones that supported it during Nawaz Sharif?
 
I am posting on a pakistani forum and talking to Pakistanis. Else Imrans speech affects in no way.

So unless Pakistan starts a war, i am unaffected by anything Imran says.
You are not the whole India or pakistan. we know what he is doing and he is doing it perfectly and we are loving it.
 
Last edited:
You are not the whole India or pakistan. we know what he is doing and he is doing it perfectly and we are loving it.

He is giving speeches that you guys love. His speeches do not affect India in anyway.

Pakistanis can love their leader as much as they want.
 
Now back to, "we got more money", lol.


Good thing is that these people are confined to India, not in first world country. Eat your money. lol

Money can actually buy food to eat. In any country.
 
kashmiris must be feeling relieved that atleast someone has put forwarded their case.They are not alone but they have to gain their independence on their own as I have posted multiple times. They have to continue their struggle on their own.
 
Tell which countries support Pakistan's narrative?

These days even traditional arab allies dont say much.

No! I will never engage myself in any debate with you, simply because It isn't worth discussing anything with someone who deviate when cornered (highlighted above that point in earlier comment) and who talks about "how rich they are" to defend every factual criticism.

Not worth the time.
 
He has given the pakistani narrative. Like many pakistani leaders before him.

Has the world accepted it?

If not, then how does it matter?

Millions of Pakistanis agreeing to the speech of pakistani PM means zilch, when by Imrans own admission, there is no.pressure on India.

The World has been aware that Ind is under extremist Fascist control. Look at the twitter trends yesterday, it will take time but Ind will be associated with a fascism and that is done achievement. It's up to us through social media to keep people aware.
 
Not a imran khan supporter but what a speech.
And love how hurt Indians are by it they trying their best not to show it but you see how he has upset them. Look at Indian media they are going mad and Arnab has to call a racist Islamphobic Katie Hopkins to talk against Islam and Pakistan. You can cherry pick a few lines and make it sound wrong but his speech has hurt Indians they can deny as much as they can. Front of the world he showed Indians their mirror of what they are sorry not all Indians but Modi and RSS mainly.
P.S. They killed 10 trees which was very painful lol..

Well done PM Imran Khan
 
Not a imran khan supporter but what a speech.
And love how hurt Indians are by it they trying their best not to show it but you see how he has upset them. Look at Indian media they are going mad and Arnab has to call a racist Islamphobic Katie Hopkins to talk against Islam and Pakistan. You can cherry pick a few lines and make it sound wrong but his speech has hurt Indians they can deny as much as they can. Front of the world he showed Indians their mirror of what they are sorry not all Indians but Modi and RSS mainly.
P.S. They killed 10 trees which was very painful lol..

Well done PM Imran Khan

Oh that will be pure entertainment, I'd like to see that.

Glad that repressive minds are getting help from each other to feel good about themselves. lol
 
View attachment 95207 [MENTION=138254]Syed1[/MENTION] :sarf2

"Kaisa diya.... acha nahi diya? hain @#$%? " :sarf2

ZomboMeme-20052017155339.jpg
 
Back
Top