Nervesofsteel
Debutant
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2020
- Runs
- 139
terrific performance so far. He is back i hope. i like gritty tough cricketers.
Thank you for seeing it that way. Unfortunately some people on here love timid cricketers.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
terrific performance so far. He is back i hope. i like gritty tough cricketers.
You keep going back to your Misbah hatred but are failing to suggest any blame on the players themselves, which is flawed thinking.
Disappointing from Shan following his big 100. It seems that he has been a victim of over correcting him self .
He focused so much on resolving his problem outside off stump, that he became a LBW candidate.
Test cricket is a tough school and one where you have to learn and adapt quickly .
Shan Masood has done more than enough to cement his position as Pakistan's premier opening batsman having ended the tour with an average of 44.75.
If Pakistan had won the first test, everyone here would be singing a different tune as I'm sure he had done enough in the first innings to claim the man of the match award. Thanks to Azhar Ali's inept captaincy and toothless bowling attack we couldn't wrap up what should have been an easy win.
As for Shan's haters and critics, you ought to be reminded that he averaged 39 in Australia, 38 in South African and c.45 in England.
Anyone calling for Sami Aslam and Imam-ul-Haq quite frankly needs a reality check. The former looked so overwhelmed during his last tour of Australia, I don't think he;ll ever recover from that. I've never seen a batsman more mentally destroyed than he was during that series. Even if he can somehow leave that behind him, I've seen enough to say that his deficient technique against the shorter ball will be exposed. He simply doesn't have the back foot shots to convince me that he will make the cut at international level. There's no wonder why this strokeless wonder has a strike rate of under 40 after 13 tests.
Imam-ul-Haq is just as bad against the shorter stuff and as expected he was beyond awful during the Australia tour.
Shan Masood is more than good enough for this below-average test side. Unless you can find 2 Pakistani openers who are capable of averaging 35+ in Australia, South Africa and England (individually or cumulatively), no one has any right to be calling for his dead.
It's sickening to see our fans bashing Pakistan's second best batsman in the side (since 2019).
And I think it's important to note that generally the conditions have been incredibly difficult for opening batsmen and he was up against two ATGs in this conditions who bowled phenomenally. Not to mention Woakes who is incredible in these conditions. All things considered, far from a failure but also not the standout tour that he needed to stamp his name on the world stage.
More than good enough for our standards.
Shan Masood has done more than enough to cement his position as Pakistan's premier opening batsman having ended the tour with an average of 44.75.
If Pakistan had won the first test, everyone here would be singing a different tune as I'm sure he had done enough in the first innings to claim the man of the match award. Thanks to Azhar Ali's inept captaincy and toothless bowling attack we couldn't wrap up what should have been an easy win.
As for Shan's haters and critics, you ought to be reminded that he averaged 39 in Australia, 38 in South African and c.45 in England.
Anyone calling for Sami Aslam and Imam-ul-Haq quite frankly needs a reality check. The former looked so overwhelmed during his last tour of Australia, I don't think he;ll ever recover from that. I've never seen a batsman more mentally destroyed than he was during that series. Even if he can somehow leave that behind him, I've seen enough to say that his deficient technique against the shorter ball will be exposed. He simply doesn't have the back foot shots to convince me that he will make the cut at international level. There's no wonder why this strokeless wonder has a strike rate of under 40 after 13 tests.
Imam-ul-Haq is just as bad against the shorter stuff and as expected he was beyond awful during the Australia tour.
Shan Masood is more than good enough for this below-average test side. Unless you can find 2 Pakistani openers who are capable of averaging 35+ in Australia, South Africa and England (individually or cumulatively), no one has any right to be calling for his dead.
It's sickening to see our fans bashing Pakistan's second best batsman in the side (since 2019).
His average for this tour is 36! not 45. He followed up his 156 with scores of 0,1, 4 and 18.
It’s a decent tour but if you take into consideration his opening innings one would have hoped he would had kicked on it at least in one other innings .
It’s a decent tour for him but just like Babar Azam one that got more disappointing as the series progressed .
Seems to be a one innings per series player.
Thanks for the correction. I forget about the second test because of the rain. I agree he’s been disappointing after his first innings but he has still surpassed my expectations. I didn’t expect him to average more 30 because I knew Anderson was going to be a tough tour.
An average of 35+ in Australia, South Africa and England is still more than good enough for this Pakistan team.
This notion of “hard work” being made synonymous with Shan Masood is interesting.
I am genuinely curious.
How exactly do you define “hard work” for a national level cricketer that sets him apart from the rest?
I say, perhaps Kohli is a hard worker.
Is Shan Masood in the same league of hard work as Kohli? Or his fans look at the bulging tummy of Yasir Shah, and compare it with Shan Masood, and arrive at the conclusion that Shan Masood must be working hard?
Seriously,
Has he been uploading his work out videos and daily practice drills for the past few years where he is getting advice from the coaches and documenting improvement?
Or it’s primarily a word of mouth that we hear from different quarters that “Shan Masood is working hard”?
In my view, he appears to have a very fragile technical skill as a batsman. And physically as a sportsman, he looks a bit fragile as well.
Where is the display of “hard work”? Does he have a lot of stamina? Is he a very fast runner? Is he an extra quick fielder?
One day these fans will get their wish with the likes Sami Aslam and etc. His batting performance alone will turn us into a laughing stock, like we witnessed some years ago with what Hafeez experienced against Steyn.
It's a good point you make about the challenge of facing Anderson and Broad in their home conditions. We shouldn't forget this was always going to be Shan's toughest examination. He did more than enough to seal us a test win and to come out with a mid-40 average and a big ton shows he has certainly surpassed expectations. I didn't think he'd average more 30.
Expectations being surpassed. You gotta be kidding me.
The guy has struggled for large parts of this tour. In his century he was dropped a few times and has been dropped several more times in subsequent innings.
I'm yet to be convinced by him.
Expectations being surpassed. You gotta be kidding me.
The guy has struggled for large parts of this tour. In his century he was dropped a few times and has been dropped several more times in subsequent innings.
I'm yet to be convinced by him.
Expectations being surpassed. You gotta be kidding me.
The guy has struggled for large parts of this tour. In his century he was dropped a few times and has been dropped several more times in subsequent innings.
I'm yet to be convinced by him.
But he "works hard". Isn't that enough?
But he "works hard". Isn't that enough?
Not only "working hard", he also performing better than most of his team-mates.. isn't that enough? ��
If only that was the criteria for a good batsman.
I've also heard some say he should be skipper as he speaks good English.
But he "works hard". Isn't that enough?
This guy used up all his lives.
The fact that he kept getting out to the same delivery time and time again is just frustrating. He shouldn’t be in our test side for now.
If it hadn’t been for England failing to take their chances he would never have made his century.
I’m not convinced by him and what makes matters worse is the audacity he has to review plumb LBW decisions out of arrogance and greed. If he genuinely thought those deliveries weren’t going to hit the stumps then he need to get his eyesight checked too. Back to the drawing board Shan!
0 1 4 18 - his last 4 scores.
The same mistakes being made.
An average of 31 after 43 Test innings.
I know our standards have dropped and some are easily pleased, but surely we can do better than this.
In the second innings of the first test he was unlucky to be caught down the leg side, the second test he faced tough seaming conditions, he got out to Jimmy Anderson due to Poor footwork in the first innings of the third test (50/50 as Anderson is the best bowler he will face and also hard to swallow as the pitch was flat), in the second innings he was determined to grind it out, the sad part is he got a life and then made an error of judgement against Broad.
Overall he didn't kick on from a good start in the series but i have seen enough of Shan Masood in the last year that he has put in the hard yards in the off season, in domestic cricket and is a much improved cricketer compared to when he first started his career. Some people might have an axe to grind with him because he doesn't do them any favors but his spot in the team is merited and he has every right to cash in on other future tours where conditions won't be as tough to open.
That's not necessarily true. His 4 failures after the 156, one of them was caught down the leg side, one of them was a badly judged leave and 2 of them were his head falling over on inswinging LBWs from over the wicket by the right hander.
In fact in the dismissals he has in his horrific record vs Anderson, the vast majority are wafting his bat outside the off stump and nicking off, in years gone by. He hasn't done that once this series.
While I agree his series has been average, he hasn't been making the same mistakes nor getting out to the same delivery all the time. He has proven he can work on and rectify areas of weakness, so should be persisted with in my opinion.
Pakistan haven't had a proper Test opener since Saeed Anwar. We've had Hafeez, Farhat, Butt, Taufeeq, Shehzad, Khurram Manzoor, Sami Aslam and now Masood. All pathetic, just about all averaging somewhere in the 30's
If Azhar is going to continue, he should just open - he's basically an opener already.
Expectations being surpassed. You gotta be kidding me.
The guy has struggled for large parts of this tour. In his century he was dropped a few times and has been dropped several more times in subsequent innings.
I'm yet to be convinced by him.
Should be replaced by Sami Aslam or Imam who can be very good if they gel with Younis.
A poor team like Pakistan cannot afford Shan’s gutsy and hardworking single digit scores.
That 150 certainly proved to be a fluke. He has technically all over the place and he was not convincing at all.
We have heard a lot about his hard work and work ethic but those are not substitutes for ability which he clearly lacks in abundance.
Shan Masood stats at the end of ENG series -
3rd highest run scorer for Pakistan - 5th highest with PAK-ENG combined.
Shan scored more runs alone than both England openers runs tally combined together.
Shan's batting average in the series is higher than both English openers combined batting average.
Shan finished with more runs & higher batting average in the series than Joe Root.
But but but...let's replace him with Sami Aslam or Imam Ul Haq![]()
Can someone actually score fluke runs against an England attack ?
He averaged 38, 39 and 36 in SA, Aus and Eng. That's good for an opener. Easily the 3rd best test batsman in the side.
The fact that Shan Masood is the side's best opener shows what a sorry state Pakistan cricket really is in.
Nothing against shan but I am pretty sure if sami aslam was given the same amount of opportunities his output would have been better.
They both should be in the team
I disagree even though shan is doing a decent job at the moment I don't think both him and abid are the future. Need to give some youngsters a go with the likes of zeeshan malik, Imran butt, sami aslam.
Imran butt and zeeshan malik defo have the potentional but right now shan and and sami should be given the opening spots in couple years imran butt and zeeshan malik will defo be in the team they are good
He averaged 38, 39 and 36 in SA, Aus and Eng. That's good for an opener. Easily the 3rd best test batsman in the side.
I agree about zeeshan malik he needs a season more but Imran butt should be with the squad.
Shan Masood b Usman Qadir 51 (32) Southern Punjab: 101-2 (10.4 ov)
Good start for him in the Nat T20.
Captain's knock today to lead his side to win
78* off 58
<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.250%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/48uo2t" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>
We’re lucky to have someone line him in Pakistan cricket. He might never be an elite player or an ATG, but he’s such a refreshing change from the crap like the Akmals.
Best captain in Pakistan right now.