[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] still waiting for you to address your comments that it was a mistake to remove Root as test captain, that removing him would make absolutely no difference to England losing match after match, how stokes is finished as a cricketer because of his dodgy knees and how he’s a quitter.
You put his initial success down to Bairstow’s purple patch. Are you going to put the onus on Brook now? Like all these players were missing under Root.
Even if he quits now, he’s put himself as the best Test captain of the past two decades ahead of the likes of Kohli and Smith.
Stokes got lucky. He is riding on the coat-tails of McCullum and made to look like a great captain which he is not.
McCullum is a maverick and he can be suicidal at times, we have seen that during his playing career and especially during his captaincy.
To his credit, the non-conventional approach that he has adopted for England is working so far. He has identified that England is not good enough to succeed by batting in an orthodox fashion and he has got them playing ODI cricket which has maximized the strengths of the batsmen that he has at his disposal and also rattled the opposition.
But all this Bazball stuff has nothing to do with Stokes. This could have been anyone else including Root. This is all down to McCullum.
Stokes’ on-field decisions have been average at best but winning makes everything look good, and England are winning because of McCullum not Stokes.
For example, enforcing follow-on was a really bad call. It almost cost England the match and he ran his bowlers into the ground, most of whom are not spring chickens.
Root was hounded out of captaincy but the real problem was that England were trying to play orthodox Test cricket when they were not good enough to play orthodox Test cricket.
Apart from Root and to an extent Pope, they did not have any batsmen at the time who could play classical Test knocks.
If Root was retained as captain and McCullum was brought in as coach, England would still be playing this Bazball stuff and everyone is saying Root got lucky.
However, since Root was replaced as well and they had a new coach and captain at the helm, it created this illusion that the captain (Stokes), had a lot to do with England changing their playing style but in reality, he did not.
Stokes is doing nothing except piggybacking McCullum and taking credit for his success. This is what you, [MENTION=53290]Markhor[/MENTION] and [MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION] fail to understand.