Babar_Azam_fan
Tape Ball Star
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
- Runs
- 874
- Post of the Week
- 1
Lmao, all he does is spread hate and toxicity towards Babar and loves nitpicking him.
Every player deserves to be croricsed. And Babar is no different
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lmao, all he does is spread hate and toxicity towards Babar and loves nitpicking him.
Go and read 70% of threads created by me. It's praising Babar Azam. He stopped improving and deserves criticism. Thanks for embarassing urself
He is a Pakistani version of Hashim Amla.
Amla is way better than Babar. Amla scored heavy against big teams and in pressure situation.
If Babar was Indian, no one would know that he exists other than IPL fans and the ardent Indian fans who keep tabs on their domestic players.
Please keep that in mind before embarrassing yourself by comparing him to the likes of Kohli and Rohit.
He is only comparable to fringe/support cast of Indian batting like Rahul, Agarwal, Iyer, Vihari etc.
The gap between the talent, skill and mentality of Pakistan and India is so great that our best batsman is only comparable to the fringe Indian batsmen.
In last 24 months, Kohli is a nobody. Babar and so many other batsmen have comfortable outscored him.
Babar reminds me of Rahane. Technically pretty solid but throws his wicket cheaply by playing a tame shot. Both pretty average vs spin.
Babar is miles ahead of Rahane in everything except for latter's great catching abilities in slips.Babar reminds me of Rahane. Technically pretty solid but throws his wicket cheaply by playing a tame shot. Both pretty average vs spin.
He is nowhere near
Smith, Williamson, Kohli, Root, Warner, Sharma, Pant, Taylor, De Kock, Maxwell, Buttler, Roy, Bairstow, Stokes, Rahul and Morgen in limited over cricket.
He is nowhere near
Smith, Williamson, Kohli, Root, Warner, Sharma, Pant, Taylor, De Kock, Maxwell, Buttler, Roy, Bairstow, Stokes, Rahul and Morgen in limited over cricket.
Yes and the sooner some of these cringeworthy Pakistanis who worship him on social media, realize that the better. He will still go down as Pakistan’s greatest limited overs batsman and that’s good enough for us. We should be grateful. Just don’t make him out to be as good as he’s not.
He is nowhere near
Smith, Williamson, Kohli, Root, Warner, Sharma, Pant, Taylor, De Kock, Maxwell, Buttler, Roy, Bairstow, Stokes, Rahul and Morgen in limited over cricket.
Babar is miles ahead of Rahane in everything except for latter's great catching abilities in slips.
Babar is a better ODI batsman than anyone who played the game in last 10 years except Kohli.
He is not even half the ODI batsman Rohit is.
Root and post 2014 Smith has been better as well.
He is better than Root. Rohit has worse average than him and same strike rate. Smith is a poor man's Babar in ODIs. He is much better than rest.
Only Kohli is better than him.
He is not even half the ODI batsman Rohit is.
Root and post 2014 Smith has been better as well.
Take a look at what Rohit has done post 2013 or what he <B>did in the 2019 World Cup</B>. Babar is not fit to tie his shoelaces. Babar will never have that type of impact.
Rohit is an ATG ODI opener. Probably the best ever.
Don’t judge his stats from 2007-2012 because post 2012 he has been a completely different player.
Babar is a poor man’s Root. There is no way he is a better ODI batsman than him.
Smith can do everything that Babar can but he can also accelerate. Is Babar capable of the type of knocks Smith played against India earlier this year? No chance.
He choked in semi final) There are dozen of batsman with better career stats than Rohit.
Smith averages 43, Root 50, Rohit 49, Babar 56. Only Kohli has been better than Babar.
Would you seriously take Babar in ODIs over Buttler, Roy, Bairstow, Warner and Taylor against any opposition on any occasion?
He choked in semi final) There are dozen of batsman with better career stats than Rohit.
Smith averages 43, Root 50, Rohit 49, Babar 56. Only Kohli has been better than Babar.
Sharma, Bairstow are miles ahead of babar in terms of impact. You don't judge player by their career average. If you have to compare rohit with babar then check against top side or their impact as well. Rohit's career average is low cause he used to bat at 4/5. As openers he is surely ahead. Bairstow on other hand averages like 50+ as opener at strike rate of 110 against top sides. Babar averages around 45 against top sides (Aus/Eng/NZ/Ind/SA) and that too he is more often scores impact less runs.
Sharma, Bairstow are miles ahead of babar in terms of impact. You don't judge player by their career average. If you have to compare rohit with babar then check against top side or their impact as well. Rohit's career average is low cause he used to bat at 4/5. As openers he is surely ahead. Bairstow on other hand averages like 50+ as opener at strike rate of 110 against top sides. Babar averages around 45 against top sides (Aus/Eng/NZ/Ind/SA) and that too he is more often scores impact less runs.
The 14th best Limited Overs batsman in the world today after Kohli, Rohit, Roy, Bairstow, Buttler, Taylor, Warner, Smith, Root, Stokes, Finch, Williamson, Maxwell. (In no particular order)
Nevertheless, Pakistani fans should be grateful that we have managed to produce an actual world class Limited Overs batsman. But don’t put him in places he doesn’t belong.
[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] would you say this is a fair assessment considering both shorter formats?The 14th best Limited Overs batsman in the world today after Kohli, Rohit, Roy, Bairstow, Buttler, Taylor, Warner, Smith, Root, Stokes, Finch, Williamson, Maxwell. (In no particular order)
Nevertheless, Pakistani fans should be grateful that we have managed to produce an actual world class Limited Overs batsman. But don’t put him in places he doesn’t belong.
Does stokes also include in that list?
[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] would you say this is a fair assessment considering both shorter formats?
That ton came 7 years ago! Also, it was Ishant who helped us win that game. Next pls!Rahane hit a 100 in England and won his side a match.
He captained in Australia with a C team against Hazelwood,Cummins,Lyon and Starc and scored a 100 at MCG and won a game for his side.
Good innings, but again these kind of innings are very far and few during last 7 years. That you could list only 3 such innings in last 7 years shows how hard its been for him to score any runs, home or away!He scored a 40+ on a minefield in South Africa in a low scoring game to help India win a match.
Pls do.Now let’s revisit your statement
Leave some others, there are quite a few better bats in English ODI side alone who are better bats than Babar in ODIsHe is better than Root. Rohit has worse average than him and same strike rate. Smith is a poor man's Babar in ODIs. He is much better than rest.
Only Kohli is better than him.
Babar is a mediocre batsman. He is in same league as Manish Pandey and Shreyas Iyer.
More similar to Manish Pandey, good vs pace and average vs spin. Unfortunately, Pandey played for a team which had lot of politics for playing XI and even after hitting a match winning 80 ball-hundred vs Australia, he was dropped by giving him more chances as finisher at no 5 or 6 instead of fixing the no 4 spot.
Babar is a mediocre batsman. He is in same league as Manish Pandey and Shreyas Iyer.
More similar to Manish Pandey, good vs pace and average vs spin. Unfortunately, Pandey played for a team which had lot of politics for playing XI and even after hitting a match winning 80 ball-hundred vs Australia, he was dropped by giving him more chances as finisher at no 5 or 6 instead of fixing the no 4 spot.
)
Ye kuch zyada ho gaya!![]()
He is one of the best pakistan batsman ever produced Just looking at his stats but unfortunately he playing with a team who having so many mediocre batsman .so can't his fault when other players don't performed he single handedly can't win many matches like Sachin .
lol yes. What next?
Babar Azam is worse than Azam Khan?
Pandey and Iyer are decent batsman too. Pandey has an IPL century and also won KKR an IPL final by chasing 200+ vs Punjab team that had Sehwag, Maxwell, Miller, Bailey and Mitchell Johnson. But like Babar, has lower strike rate for T20Is.
He is nowhere close to the best Pakistan batsman ever. Youngsters here may think the bar is lower but it isn't as low.
In Test cricket, Babar is not even in contention with 5 test hundreds and average of 42. He basically struggles vs mediocre spinners like Maharaj. In past, the likes of Inzamam, Younis, Miandad, Zaheer and Yousuf all scored truckload of runs vs quality spinners like Kumble, Herath, Harbhajan, Bedi and Chandra. He has long way to go.
Even in ODIs, he is nowhere close to the best. Saeed Anwar and Zaheer Abbas are comfortably more devastative batsman than Babar, Anwar scored 194 in that era, had he played in modern era, he would have easily hit two double hundreds and striking at close to 100.
Moreover, Anwar's issue vs swing bowling outside Asia won't have been exposed in this era and like Rohit, he too would have smashed tons for fun in England or Australia where 320+ runs target are so common these days. Inzamam was clutch too and a better match finisher than Babar.
In ODIs, Babar may have great stats but he will not be as good as Saeed Anwar, Zaheer Abbas or Inzamam if he doesn't play impactful knocks.
In Tests, he is not in a discussion.
In T20s also, the discussion will only start if he takes his strike rate over 130. A strike rate of 125 in T20 is same as strike rate of 80 in ODI.
Pretty much. I would also add the likes of Rahul, Pant, Miller etc. to this list.
Babar is the new Amla. He would always have great stats but you will always have a dozen players who will have more impact on the outcome of the match.
Not at all.
In a cricket mad population of 20 Crore, Babar Azam is the best batsman that Pakistan has. If you are that 1 in 20 Crore and it has been proved at the highest level, it means you are actually quite tough.
You can't be an elite player if you are not mentally tough. I am sorry but I don't agree with the OP here.
Babar is a mediocre batsman. He is in same league as Manish Pandey and Shreyas Iyer.
More similar to Manish Pandey, good vs pace and average vs spin. Unfortunately, Pandey played for a team which had lot of politics for playing XI and even after hitting a match winning 80 ball-hundred vs Australia, he was dropped by giving him more chances as finisher at no 5 or 6 instead of fixing the no 4 spot.
[MENTION=139595]Ab Fan[/MENTION] I think now u agree with me, just after 2 months lol
He also scored 2 centuries in the famous dustbowl tour of India in 2015 when the rest of the batsman including such heavyweights as AB, Kohli, Amla, Pujara, Peak Vijay, Home Dhawan, Bully Sharma etc. combined to hit zero.Rahane hit a 100 in England and won his side a match. He captained in Australia with a C team against Hazelwood,Cummins,Lyon and Starc and scored a 100 at MCG and won a game for his side. He scored a 40+ on a minefield in South Africa in a low scoring game to help India win a match.
Now let’s revisit your statement
He also scored 2 centuries in the famous dustbowl tour of India in 2015 when the rest of the batsman including such heavyweights as AB, Kohli, Amla, Pujara, Peak Vijay, Home Dhawan, Bully Sharma etc. combined to hit zero.
He was awful in that series till third test but cashed on heavily on a relatively good batting wicket in Delhi. That series de Villiers was the best batsman from both sides but Rahane cashed on the flatter wicket and from not even in top 5 run scorer, he ended being a leading run scorer of the series by margin of 1 run.
Babar is an elite top order bat. Superior to both Root and Smith.
He also scored 2 centuries in the famous dustbowl tour of India in 2015 when the rest of the batsman including such heavyweights as AB, Kohli, Amla, Pujara, Peak Vijay, Home Dhawan, Bully Sharma etc. combined to hit zero.