Why didn't he play?
They wanted to try out Karn Sharma.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why didn't he play?
Had to set up a thread like this.
If you had to pick one in your team, who would it be?
Mods - please add a poll - thanks!
They wanted to try out Karn Sharma.
Ashwin has not done well overseas yet no doubt, but he has shown clear improvement on the last two tours to Australia and England in 2014. He's going to get better.
Plus, people miss one crucial detail when criticizing his overseas record. He was unfairly dropped 3 times and didn't play on the one pitch which provided turn and was tailor-made for spin bowling on 3 tours. In England, he didn't play in the test where Moeen and Jadeja picked up cheap wickets. Didn't play at Durban which spun lots and Jaddu and Peterson had a great time. Then of course he didn't play at Adelaide where it turned quite a bit on day 3 and square on days 4 and 5.
Imagine if Yasir had been dropped before that last test in England. His statistics would look even more rubbish because he had 2 shocking matches after the first one. Spinners need a little bit of assistance from the pitch. This is true for both Yasir and Ashwin.
Yasir Shah, just like Ajmal, Swann or Herath before him, would never be dropped because he is a world-class spinner and has the complete faith of his captain.
Ashwin has absolutely no one but himself to blame for being dropped for those three matches. Hindsight is a wonderful thing but I'm sure the majority of India fans wanted him dropped back then as well.
Didn't eventually pan out this way, did it?![]()
Not sure what I said before but it's Adhwin now
If Yasir has good two matches then I'll pick him again
No clear-cut choice. Neutrals can change their choice on a match by match basis.
Ashwin had a bad last match in terms of picking up wickets and ended the England series with an average of >30, which is only his 2nd worst at home after the 2012 England series.
Dropped, as in for another spinner because he was rubbish. Shah was dropped because Pakistan needed four pacers on a seaming wicket.
Dropped, as in for another spinner because he was rubbish. Shah was dropped because Pakistan needed four pacers on a seaming wicket.
Dropped, as in for another spinner because he was rubbish. Shah was dropped because Pakistan needed four pacers on a seaming wicket.
Great post. I'm sure you took into consideration that Yasir bowled 4 overs and then 9 in the second innings of the NZ tests in addition to considering that Yasir has a 10fer and a 5fer- both of which match winning in England. You must also have considered the fact that Ashwin has just concluded a wonderful series in his home ground India where he has had awesome figures of 1/151 and 2/163 in return to Yasirs average figures in the flatter wickets of the away ground England also!Outside Asia, Ashwin averages 4 less than Yasir per wicket despite getting far difficult conditions to bowl at. So people calling Ashwin rubbish away need to check out their hero's performance too.
to be fair to Ashwin, the match was bad only in terms of stats. But he was by far the best bowler in the 2nd innings.
Shah was dropped because he couldn't buy a wicket in NZ. As for England tour, Ashwin averaged 33 on pitches where Yasir went wicketless for 200+ runs.
It should be in title that we have to choose on bowling alone.. may be things change but if batting.. ASHWIN
Sure. I didn't watch much of the series so mainly have to go by the stats.
Great post. I'm sure you took into consideration that Yasir bowled 4 overs and then 9 in the second innings of the NZ tests in addition to considering that Yasir has a 10fer and a 5fer- both of which match winning in England. You must also have considered the fact that Ashwin has just concluded a wonderful series in his home ground India where he has had awesome figures of 1/151 and 2/163 in return to Yasirs average figures in the flatter wickets of the away ground England also!
Great post. I'm sure you took into consideration that Yasir bowled 4 overs and then 9 in the second innings of the NZ tests in addition to considering that Yasir has a 10fer and a 5fer- both of which match winning in England. You must also have considered the fact that Ashwin has just concluded a wonderful series in his home ground India where he has had awesome figures of 1/151 and 2/163 in return to Yasirs average figures in the flatter wickets of the away ground England also!
Shah was dropped because he couldn't buy a wicket in NZ. As for England tour, Ashwin averaged 33 on pitches where Yasir went wicketless for 200+ runs.
If it were the case then I don't think Sohail Khan would be taking 5fers on such pitches. It was simply a case of batting masterclass and Yasir having an off day(it happens, he's human). If you were to nitpick such cases, explain Ashwins wonderful cases of 2/163 or 1/151 on a pitch which Jadeja managed a 10fer.Have you considered Yasir's average of 46 outside Asia? I bet not.
Have you also considered the nature of English surfaces both Yasir and Ashwin bowled on? Don't think so.
If it were the case then I don't think Sohail Khan would be taking 5fers on such pitches. It was simply a case of batting masterclass and Yasir having an off day(it happens, he's human). If you were to nitpick such cases, explain Ashwins wonderful cases of 2/163 or 1/151 on a pitch which Jadeja managed a 10fer.
I don't think there's much difference between Ashwin and Yasir(Yasir maybe edges it) in terms of performance as opposed to you who can't contain his childish bias. I just rate Yasir higher because of other circumstances.
But son, it is a bias. You're ignoring the impact and the performance of Yasir. Blindly going by stats doesn't show what has really happened...Why don't we instead analyse a bit more of Yasirs outside of Asia...Off day? You do realize that I am talking about Yasir's overall record outside Asia, right?
And before calling me biased, read what I am writing. Bias would be if I play blind to Ashwin's deficiencies away while bringing down Yasir for no reason. Am I doing that? No. I am only stating facts about Yasir's performances away. Yasir averaging 46 away is not my bias, but simply a fact.
and won us two matches..lets see what ashwin does after seeing him going wicketless on indian road..
But son, it is a bias. You're ignoring the impact and the performance of Yasir. Blindly going by stats doesn't show what has really happened...Why don't we instead analyse a bit more of Yasirs outside of Asia...
England:
Lords- Well lol. ATM Ashwin has done zilch to even compare to Yasir here.
Old Trafford- Failure by Yasir(World class batsman doing his thing)
Nottingham-Ditto..a failure
London-Match winning 5fer
NZ-bowler a total of 13 overs..4 in first innings, 9 when he's defending a paltry 100
Aus-Semi poor. Used horrendously by the captain as a container- bringing in a spinner from 11th over lol. And some overall ok bowling
So how is that awful? It's not amazing- it's decent overall. A few brilliant performances, some mediocre and some ok.
However, stats aside, judging on impact, Yasir has overall been good and a spinner who can win matches abroad is a world class spinner.
But son, it is a bias. You're ignoring the impact and the performance of Yasir. Blindly going by stats doesn't show what has really happened...Why don't we instead analyse a bit more of Yasirs outside of Asia...
England:
Lords- Well lol. ATM Ashwin has done zilch to even wipe Yasirs bum here.
Old Trafford- Failure by Yasir(World class batsman doing his thing)
Nottingham-Ditto..a failure
London-Match winning 5fer
NZ-bowler a total of 13 overs..4 in first innings, 9 when he's defending a paltry 100
Aus-Semi poor. Used horrendously by the captain as a container- bringing in a spinner from 11th over lol. And some overall ok bowling
So how is that awful? It's not amazing- it's decent overall. A few brilliant performances, some mediocre and some ok.
However, stats aside, judging on impact, Yasir has overall been good and a spinner who can win matches abroad is a world class spinner.
But son, it is a bias. You're ignoring the impact and the performance of Yasir. Blindly going by stats doesn't show what has really happened...Why don't we instead analyse a bit more of Yasirs outside of Asia...
England:
Lords- Well lol. ATM Ashwin has done zilch to even wipe Yasirs bum here.
Old Trafford- Failure by Yasir(World class batsman doing his thing)
Nottingham-Ditto..a failure
London-Match winning 5fer
NZ-bowler a total of 13 overs..4 in first innings, 9 when he's defending a paltry 100
Aus-Semi poor. Used horrendously by the captain as a container- bringing in a spinner from 11th over lol. And some overall ok bowling
So how is that awful? It's not amazing- it's decent overall. A few brilliant performances, some mediocre and some ok.
However, stats aside, judging on impact, Yasir has overall been good and a spinner who can win matches abroad is a world class spinner.
Yasir bowled less in NZ because he wasn't looking like getting wickets. Had he bowled more his numbers would have been even worse. He was indeed lucky in those terms to avoid further damage to his stats.![]()
ashwin obviously. better spinner, also younger.
Now you are the one finding ridiculous excuses for your bowler, and then you call me biased.
Let me use similar excuses. Dhoni sucked as a Test captain, and this is why Ashwin could never fulfil his potential away. Watch him own the world under Kohli's captaincy.![]()
Ok beta, let me clarify one thing, I am hardly a Pakistani supporter. Just because I am a fan of Yasir doesn't mean you label Pakistans pace attack my pace attack. And yes, Ishant bowled a damn good spell at lords(was as green as an apple tho) and it was hella impacting and I can remember it well because. Read in other threads, I label Paks pace attack lower than Bnglas and Indias. I also said that Ashwin is almost as good as Yasir. His recent 5fer on a relatively flatter wicket was pretty good and shows he has the potential to do well abroad. However I go by feats and not assumptions and opinions of a little beta's. As of yet Ashwin has failed to flatter abroad, altho am sure he can rectify that. Once he does, I will rate him on Yasirs level. You failed to comprehend that I rate Yasir better because he performs with a tactically poor captain as opposed to Ashwin doing awful when Dhoni was at the helm.Would you extend your "impact" logic to admit that Ishant is superior to your entire pace attack when it comes to winning matches away?
Or would you admit that Ajit Agarkar had a bigger impact in Australia than all your Wasim, Waqars and Akhtars combined?
Would you admit it, son?
Ok, what do you want me to do? Yasir can have his turn in the upcoming series(if there is one, if am not wrong). But you're sure asking for trouble if you're questioning the performance of 'greats' like Imran in the West Indies lol.Ashwin led India to a 2-0 win in WI, a country where "greats" like Imran, Wasim, Waqar etc etc have never been able to win a series in their lifetime.
Ok beta, let me clarify one thing, I am hardly a Pakistani supporter. Just because I am a fan of Yasir doesn't mean you label Pakistans pace attack my pace attack. And yes, Ishant bowled a damn good spell at lords(was as green as an apple tho) and it was hella impacting and I can remember it well because. Read in other threads, I label Paks pace attack lower than Bnglas and Indias. I also said that Ashwin is almost as good as Yasir. His recent 5fer on a relatively flatter wicket was pretty good and shows he has the potential to do well abroad. However I go by feats and not assumptions and opinions of a little beta's. As of yet Ashwin has failed to flatter abroad, altho am sure he can rectify that. Once he does, I will rate him on Yasirs level. You failed to comprehend that I rate Yasir better because he performs with a tactically poor captain as opposed to Ashwin doing awful when Dhoni was at the helm.
Learn to judge based on feats rather than assumptions, lad.
Ok, what do you want me to do? Yasir can have his turn in the upcoming series(if there is one, if am not wrong). But you're sure asking for trouble if you're questioning the performance of 'greats' like Imran in the West Indies lol.
you should see what he can do in those extra months.He bowled less because the pitch was green and assisting pacers, thus they needed to bowl more often. He only bowled more in the second innings when the match was lost. If you need to bowl your spinner for long periods on a green pitch then the pacers aren't doing their job.
By a few months...
Just because some posters are ready to support cricketers due to having the same nationality of them doesn't mean we'd also do that. Appreciating a good cricketer doesn't mean putting them on the pedestal of a God.Brilliant posts! posters being humiliated here, agree with your arguments 100% I think given that they are Indian it is difficult for them to see beyond their bias and those whom disagree with them immediately become alleged Pakistan fans, am in fact a mixed raced neutral
You guys are also ignoring that Yasir has a terrible captain to deal with, how in the hell is Yasir supposed to pick up wickets with the defensive feilds Misbah sets forcing him to bowl leg stump lines etc. Leg spinners are highly dependent on good captaincy. Kohli sets far better feilds for Ashwin.
Similar problem Ash had.
Ashwin had to bowl with spray gun pacers during his last tour to Aus and still matched Lyon's numbers in the 3 tests they both played.
Many a times he would go at 2.xx rpo when other pacers would be creamed at 4-5 rpo. Then eventually even he would go for a few runs due to set batsmen.
In England, he didn't have a crack at Lord's or Oval 2nd innings.
The 2 innings he bowled, we were bundled out cheaply (innings defeat) and still he did well as much as he could.
Ashwin's overseas record is terribly misleading. Even legendary offies struggle in Aus and he bowled in Aus mainly.
Overall...not much to separate between these 2. Depends on how you rate each other's potential.
Agreed that Yasir is managed badly by Misbah.
He bowled less because the pitch was green and assisting pacers, thus they needed to bowl more often. He only bowled more in the second innings when the match was lost. If you need to bowl your spinner for long periods on a green pitch then the pacers aren't doing their job.
yess...agreed....both are wonderful..both have shortcomings...on flat pitches i will go with yasir as he is leggie plus fields well,,,,any otherype of t codition then ash is excellent coz he does more with the bat which is priceless...On pitches that were entirely different to the kind of English pitches Ashwin bowled in. Yasir did win Pakistan 2 matches, and I wouldn't take anything away from that performance.
But for rest of the matches, he averaged 125 runs per wicket. So when you bash Ashwin for averaging 33 in England, maybe you should keep other factors in mind as well.
yess...agreed....both are wonderful..both have shortcomings...on flat pitches i will go with yasir as he is leggie plus fields well,,,,any otherype of t codition then ash is excellent coz he does more with the bat which is priceless...On pitches that were entirely different to the kind of English pitches Ashwin bowled in. Yasir did win Pakistan 2 matches, and I wouldn't take anything away from that performance.
But for rest of the matches, he averaged 125 runs per wicket. So when you bash Ashwin for averaging 33 in England, maybe you should keep other factors in mind as well.
I understand that, yet ppers don't take these things into consideration for Ashwin. For example, Yasir played all 4 tests in England and got 7 or 8 innings to prove his worth. Even if he failed in one or two matches, he got 4 tests to prove his worth as his place was never under any threat. Was not the same case with Ashwin. Was not picked in the first 3 matches and only picked in the last two when Jadeja had failed in the first 3 and India started getting a proper spanking on seaming wickets. He got to bowl after India were bowled out for 150 scores in the last 2 matches (similar to Pakistan's first match in NZ). Scoreboard pressure is something very important for spinners overseas. But Indian batting totally flopped in the last 2 matches in England and Ashwin only got to bowl with 140-150 runs on the board. Yet did well to pick 3 wickets and average 33 in the few overs he got to bowl.
Yet no one considers these things and just brands Ashwin as a "failure" in England. People just say Ashwin was dropped because he wasn't good enough. Brother [MENTION=139678]Zak_Fan[/MENTION] is probably using the same logic to the likes of Billoo.![]()
My post was in response to the claim that 'Yasir bowled less because he couldn't get wickets'.
I don't think Ashwin's bowling across 3 innings in England tells us much but overall he has struggled outside Asia/WI. I think he is a much improved bowler nowadays than he was before though, so expectations from him will be higher once India tours Eng/Aus/NZ/SA next.
Yasir hasn't even played on non-friendly spin tracks, how can you say he is better?
On pitches that were entirely different to the kind of English pitches Ashwin bowled in. Yasir did win Pakistan 2 matches, and I wouldn't take anything away from that performance.
But for rest of the matches, he averaged 125 runs per wicket. So when you bash Ashwin for averaging 33 in England, maybe you should keep other factors in mind as well.
Did you forget the first Test against England? A 5-fer in the first innings on a non spinning pitch. Can Ashwin perform like this on such a pitch? No.
3 overs, 38 runs
I still like Yasir, but as a bowler, he is far behind Ashwin.
Shah has been severely let down by the pacers and the management. He's overworked, unfit but still has to bowl at the opening batsmen in almost every innings. Next year's easy test schedule will do him a world of good.
However, it has to be said. Yasir Shah is no Saeed Ajmal. Ajmal carried our attack for a good three years and would have continued to do so if he wasn't banned. Shah has carried our attack for an year and a half but it is already taking its toll.
Maybe in India. Doesn't have any experience of bowling on rank turners after all.
Everywhere, and even you can't deny it with a straight face now.
Because of course, the last few months have shown us that Ashwin is not a failure in Australia, England and South Africa.