When did Steve smith put Sachin at no 2


. He said he wants to bat with him.
Also you don't understand the meaning of bias.
Bias is when you obviously don't believe in something but state it anyway due to an ego.
How is my list biased


. This fallacy of associating cricketers > posters needs to stop. It's fallacious for very obvious reasons lol.
@Sachin fan Let me make this clear since Indians keep filtering arguments based of agenda.
@Ab Fan does the same thing.
It is a common fact that While odi batting and t20 batting has gotten easier, test batting has gotten harder.
Shahid Afridi a tulla avergaes 37 in test cricket whereas he wouldn't even avg half of that in this era.
England is the only pitch where batting is easier now, every other pitch excluding aus which is more or less the same is harder and this is due to sides curating pitches to their liking to give them an advantage.
For example Bangladesh and pakistan using heaters and industrial fans to create minefields where everyone avg 17-21 is common. A prime Steve smith avg 66 and Joe root avg 50 avg 19 and 22 in Bangladesh. Does that mean Bangladesh is a top ranked side that dispatches batters easily?
Similarly Those Pakistani pitches were a disgrace. Sajid, noman, warrican had numbers that would make shane warne and murli blush even if both of them were bowling to Kenya.
The pitches where Ambrose got smacked by sachin were the same pitches were draws occurred 4x out of 5 and every tom dick and Harry team scored 400-500 consistently.
Similarly Misbah avg 100 in India whereas everyone knows it is impossible to achieve such a feat on spin mambas in India and on pitches where india can get bowled out for 45 in this era.
One makes you think Misbah was sone sort of Bradman in India but anyone who followed those games would know those pitches were a joke.
Its a also a fact that the no of draws from sachin era to smith era have decreased massively.
Smith has a higher avg then sachin in a bowling friendly era with Root having a similar avg to Ponting in a bowling friendly era, granted root increased due to england which is an exception.
While sachin is better then root due to his performance in Australia via an unchanged pitch, sachin is nowhere near as good as hes made out to be.
He and Ponting got a very easy to bat in as compared to what root and smith bat in.
Root is obviously > Ponting in test and this is coming from someone who views Ponting as the greatest overall cricketer of all time.
Lastly Sachin's record vs the top bowlers of his era excluding warne isnt good. Jimmy anderson, Mcgrath and many other encounters were one sided affairs while smith has struggled only against bumrah.
Root vs Bumrah is not as one sided as people think. Root avg 33 vs Bumrah now and despite bumrah dismissing him, root has tonked india for 700 runs and for 500 runs recently as well as smashed them in both dens. Under bumrah root has scored round about 3-4 centuries so its not one sided by any means, it is an extremely balanced rivalry unlike mcgrath vs sachin which was a comedy and only got worse with tennis elbow.