ArsenalFC
Tape Ball Regular
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2018
- Runs
- 338
OP looking silly here. To claim the likes of SL have a better pace attack is beyond a joke really.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude, its his first test and he is bowling in England, not hot UAE.So no excuses for fatigue.He just doesnt have it in him to sustain the intensity for longer periods.And such bowlers will never be successful in Tests.He was clearly tired all day and not bowling at 100% intensity.
Dude, its his first test and he is bowling in England, not hot UAE.So no excuses for fatigue.He just doesnt have it in him to sustain the intensity for longer periods.And such bowlers will never be successful in Tests.
He will get fitter and fitter.
Call him the best bowler from Asia after he finds out how to bowl on flat wickets and how to improve fitness.
Then he cannot be the best bowler in Asia in Tests.He is in currently in ODI though.Flat wickets isn’t a problem at all. Fitness I guess does need work in test matches.
Thank God for the Pakistani bowlers to shut these Indians upOP looking silly here. To claim the likes of SL have a better pace attack is beyond a joke really.
Thank God for the Pakistani bowlers to shut these Indians up
The OP has been praised by a few in past for his “unbiased views” but in reality most of his posting here at PP has been unnecessary hyperboles backed by no thought.
Lol at best bowling attack after getting team out once on helpful condition. They are not even in top 3 in my opinion.
The OP has been praised by a few in past for his “unbiased views” but in reality most of his posting here at PP has been unnecessary hyperboles backed by no thought.
What kind of speeds are Hasan, Amir and Abbas clocking?
Didn’t get to catch the match and cricinfo is not showing speeds on deliveries(I am almost certain that it used to...?)
Abbas was 82-85 consistently..hassan was 85-88/89, Amir also 83-85/86.
Thanks for the insight. Was unaware that Hasan is bowling quicker than Amir at the moment!Abbas was 82-85 consistently..hassan was 85-88/89, Amir also 83-85/86.
Abbas was 82-85 consistently..hassan was 85-88/89, Amir also 83-85/86.
And to think just a year ago our bowling line up had Sohail Khan who would huff and puff after three overs, Rahat Ali to guide the lesser beings, Wahab Riaz to spray it around, Imran Khan only selected because of his name. Amir was perhaps the only one holding the fort of the test bowling line up alongside Shah.
Now he has bowlers like Hasan and Abbas for company and you can see the improvement in Amir's and team's performance.
Also what impressed me most is the fact that Amir HAS the ability to absolutely crank it up when the bowl starts to reverse and bring in that middle overs Pakistan fast bowling magic. People on this forum harp about how we need Wahab since he's the 'enforcer'....Well what do you know? Amir was literally touching 90mph for an extended 6 over spell and absolutely made the English batsmen clueless with high quality reverse swing bowling!! That Braistow wicket was stuff Geeli Pappis are made off!!
Top notch from the lad!!
Amir was comfortably quicker then Hassan in second innings was consistently bowling 87-89
And to think just a year ago our bowling line up had Sohail Khan who would huff and puff after three overs, Rahat Ali to guide the lesser beings, Wahab Riaz to spray it around, Imran Khan only selected because of his name. Amir was perhaps the only one holding the fort of the test bowling line up alongside Shah.
Now he has bowlers like Hasan and Abbas for company and you can see the improvement in Amir's and team's performance.
Did I say they are the worst bowling lineup? Why are you getting upset here?its my opinion that they are not one of top three. You are preaching everyone to respect your opinion, why don’t you follow your own advice?They got them out twice and finished the match within 4 days. Anything else do you want from the worst bowling attack?
yeah youre probably right but overall on average hasan was slightly quicker but not by much,.,,Amir looked back to his best!!
There you go. As I said earlier, you can't say anything based on one Innings.
They are again struggling.
And you are as usual no idea what you are saying but bumping when eng still have not completed first inning yet
There you go. As I said earlier, you can't say anything based on one Innings.
They are again struggling.
And to think just a year ago our bowling line up had Sohail Khan who would huff and puff after three overs, Rahat Ali to guide the lesser beings, Wahab Riaz to spray it around, Imran Khan only selected because of his name. Amir was perhaps the only one holding the fort of the test bowling line up alongside Shah.
Now he has bowlers like Hasan and Abbas for company and you can see the improvement in Amir's and team's performance.
It is a flat wicket with hardly any movement. I’d love to see what India would do![]()
I thought England bowled on the same wicket. Also, how much cloudy should it be?
If it becomes more cloudy, play will be called off.
So you are saying eng wont be all out?How can England complete their first innings, when Pak bowlers can't take wickets?
So you are saying eng wont be all out?
So you are saying eng wont be all out?
It is a flat wicket with hardly any movement. I’d love to see what India would do![]()
Lol at your excuse. When eng bowled ball moved miles but pitch is flat when pak bowlers bowl.![]()
Lol at your excuse. When eng bowled ball moved miles but pitch is flat when pak bowlers bowl.![]()
Not before they score 500 runs.![]()
Bro, please use some sense.
Obviously Pakistan will bowl England out. But what's the use if they allow them to score 300 - 350.
Even ZIM will bowl England out for 600.
I have sense you just said eng won.t be get out so what does that mean?
Sorry it is not india 350 maximium
Did you not see Indian bowling recently? they never let SA, better team and better batting lineup than England, score more than 300.
Could you please read the post again. Anyways I'll help you. This time in upper case and in marked in quotes. I said,
"HOW CAN ENGLAND COMPLETE THEIR FIRST INNINGS, WHEN PAKISTAN BOWLERS CAN'T TAKE WICKETS?"
A 3rd class student would know an innings in tests would complete only if Bowlers get wickets. Another way possible is for 10 run outs, which I don't think will happen even in LOIS.
If Pak bowlers get Eng all out after 300 to 350, again it will be of no use.
Please tell me also who will win the football worldcup this year? please !!as you are time teller who knows nothings before it happen
Sorry bro. You didn't answer my question.
Anyways I have already posted around 5 posts today, which is a lot to me, as I don't spend time on these forums.
I thought you to be a sensible poster, Alas!
But how did SA still manage to win that series
a)pitches were bowling friendly
B)indian test batting was below par
This match is proving that in the previous game, Pakistan’s victory was due to england playing badly than pakistan being exceptional.
As you asked for the reason why we lost the series, these are the reasons.
Team selection was poor, lack of preparation and batsmen didn’t bat well in first 2 test matches. Bowling was top class through out even without proper preparation.
If you are saying this headingley pitch is not bowler friendly, then what your batsmen were doing scoring only 174, that too mostly scored by lower order and tail Enders on batsman friendly wicket?
So how did eng bowlers were unable to get out weak pak batting cheaply at lords ?when pak bowlers bowled them out cheaply.broad and anderson are very good in eng
Because two of their bowlers in their twilight of their career. Spinner played his first game. Other seamer was hit the deck bowler not suited for Lord’s.
You have no idea what are you talking broad is bowling quicker than he was in 2015/16 with extra zip and anderson is also still very good with the ball
Broad averaged 36 in 2017. He is clearly declining.
You have no idea what are you talking broad is bowling quicker than he was in 2015/16 with extra zip and anderson is also still very good with the ball
Hope you know what you are talking. These two together have taken 900 wickets. Now you are telling me Broad is getting better.![]()
I thought England bowled on the same wicket. Also, how much cloudy should it be?
If it becomes more cloudy, play will be called off.
After lord's test match some posters started chest thumping by saying that pak is the best test bowling lineup in the world....LOL.
Yes they are not as bad as the OP says but they are nowhere near SA,AUS.
IND TOUR OF ENG WILL DECIDE WHICH TEAM HAS A BETTER test bowling attack.
The worrying thing for Pakistan should be the lack of pace of their bowlers in Tests.None of them could even hit 145 kph this time and no more excuses of hot UAE.You need to find better fast bowlers who have the stamina and pace to bowl in Tests.
Is Wahab the only guy in Pakistan who can hit over 145? I dont think so.Please, not wahab again. We would have lost 2-0
Dismissing a team of 360 odd is respectable. Batting was the issueIs Wahab the only guy in Pakistan who can hit over 145? I dont think so.
Look at how they bowled and dismissed yours.Should have restricted them under 250.Dismissing a team of 360 odd is respectable. Batting was the issue
Look at how they bowled and dismissed yours.Should have restricted them under 250.
And i am not only talking about this series but for your future.