Will Indian pacers win the war of the quicks against England?

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,752
Indian pace attack is more than capable of handling England batting and it could well be a one-sided series.

Wonder if Ashwin will even figure in the top wicket takers list for this series?

===


Spin is no longer the only danger in India.

Some 60% of India's Test wickets have been taken by fast bowlers in the past four years, an increase of almost 20% on the previous 75 years.

Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Shami, Umesh Yadav and Ishant Sharma have done most of the damage - and England will be well aware of the threat posed by pace when the four-Test series gets under way in Chennai on Friday.

One almost became a policeman, another was more likely to be found asleep than at training.

BBC Sport speaks to those who have played with and coached the greatest fast bowling pack in India's history...

The friendly superstar - Jasprit Bumrah
Jasprit Bumrah

Among India's battery of quicks, Bumrah is undoubtedly the superstar.

The 27-year-old made his name - and his millions - in the Indian Premier League with Mumbai Indians, before an incredible start to his Test career.

"Virat [India captain Virat Kohli] loves him," says former India batsman Suresh Raina, who played with all four fast bowlers during his international career.

"Whenever he is in a difficult position he just wants to give the ball to Bumrah."

Bumrah is impeccably accurate, a skill honed in white-ball cricket, and in Tests is able to move the ball both ways at high speed.

Coming off a short run-up - a result of learning to bowl in a small back yard at the family home - Bumrah trots to the crease before whipping the ball towards the batsman at 90mph thanks to his rapid arm speed, front-on action and braced front leg.

Abishek Jhunjhunwala, who faced Bumrah early in his career, says: "We all thought 'Who is this guy? What is this action? How has he been picked to play for Mumbai Indians?'"

Bumrah is not your stereotypical angry fast bowler either. His smile is never far away on the field and he enjoys listening to relaxing music.

"He is one of the nicest people I have ever played with," Raina says. "He never celebrates like other fast bowlers. He is very calm."

The sleepy one - Mohammed Shami
Mohammed Shami

No fast bowler has as many wickets for India in the past four years as Shami.

The 30-year-old's relentless control and ability to move the ball in the air and off the pitch has made him a key player.

It was not always this way.

"He was someone who loved his food and loved to sleep," says Jhunjhunwala, Shami's team-mate at Bengal and his first room-mate in first-class cricket.

"Whenever we were not playing a game the other Bengal players would do something. He wouldn't come. He would literally be in bed all day - 18 hours out of 24 if we did not have a game.

"We all knew he had potential. It was always about his attitude. We all spoke to him about his fitness. We thought if he changed his attitude he would play for India."

After an impressive 2012-13 domestic season, Shami made his one-day debut for India in January 2013 and played his first Test later that year.

"That is when he realised he was not playing for fun any more and was playing for his country," says Jhunjhunwala.

Now more committed off the field, Shami remains relaxed on it.

"He is the quiet boy," Jhunjhunwala says. "There is no aggression. We used to tell him he had to start swearing at the batsman more. He wouldn't intimidate.

"Even in the dressing room he is not someone who will be chatting too much or jumping around."

Shami, like Umesh, will miss the first two Tests against England with injury but could return later in the series.

The one who was almost missed - Umesh Yadav

Umesh, 33, has largely been India's first replacement when Bumrah, Shami or Ishant have been injured in recent years, but still has a record to match the world's best.

Blessed with an athletic build, he unsettles batsmen with genuine pace.

Umesh is also the India fast bowler that almost never was.

After leaving school he applied to join the police. Had he gained another two points in the selection process his life may well have taken a different path.

Umesh was playing second division club cricket in Nagpur when an umpire spotted a quick but wayward bowler running in wearing studded boots rather than spikes.

That umpire was the brother of Pritam Gandhe, the captain of the local first-class team, Vidarbha, who invited Umesh to the nets.

"He did not have a clear run-up and was bowling from back behind the stumps, but was quick," says Gandhe, who had a 22-year first-class career. "I thought he had something."

Minimum 50 wickets. Strike-rate is average number of balls per wicket
The captain was convinced, the selectors and coach less so.

"Initially, people were not very keen," Gandhe says. "They said he was young, raw and not bowling a good line and length.

"My mind was clear. I was going to play him at any cost. If he bowled three balls on the spot per over it would be enough to get the opposition out."

Aged 21, Umesh - or "Babloo" as he is known - played for Vidarbha against Madhya Pradesh in the Ranji Trophy.

"He hit one batsman on the helmet and it cracked," Gandhe says. "He hit another on the chest guard and it cracked.

"When the first drinks break came [former India and Madhya Pradesh batsman] Hrishikesh Kanitkar came to me and said 'Who is this? I feel like am playing against a West Indies bowler.'"

Umesh took 4-72 in his first innings in first-class cricket. He has taken 148 in Tests for India since.

The funny one - Ishant Sharma

Ishant is the veteran of India's attack, having played 97 Tests. The tallest of the quartet, he generates awkward bounce and has increasingly targeted the pads with a fuller, more probing length.

A stint in county cricket with Sussex in 2018, which he credits with a significant improvement in his career, reunited him with captain Ben Brown, a regular opponent on the under-19 international circuit.

"We reminisced on those days, which was mainly Kohli smashing us and India knocking off our score in an hour and a half in a 50-over game," says Brown.

"Ishant is very funny and has a good sense of humour.

"We went out for a Wagamama's and he told us the best dish on the menu was the firecracker but it would be too spicy for us guys so told us not to order it.

"He did and it absolutely blew his head off. He was embarrassed he couldn't handle the heat."

Ishant, 32, may not have handled that heat but he can create it in the middle.

"He is a lovely guy off the field but seriously competitive on it," says Brown, before recounting a spell to former England batsman Ian Bell when Sussex met Warwickshire in the County Championship.

"There was an lbw decision we felt had gone against us and I had to go over and calm him down.

"He really ramped it up and bowled quick. He is a very fiery fast bowler."

Ishant looks set to become the first fast bowler to play 100 Tests for India. Their blossoming battery of quicks suggests he may not be the last.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/cricket/55812496
 
I think India's fast bowling department will outclass England's, even without Shami.

However, I don't think Bumrah will play all 4 matches, so England should look to capitalize on those opportunities.
 
England's batting is not in a good shape so it's hard to compare.
You can't expect Sibley, Burns to score many.
 
India’s seamers will come good simply because spinners will apply pressure as well. English batsmen will find it difficult to score runs against both seamer and spinners, which would make them take more risk as we saw with Australia. English seamers may apply pressure on Indians but moment spinners are on, runs will flow. Indian weather is quite hot and humid, which would take lot of toll on seamers bowling longer spells. If England had Swann type spinner then I would’ve given them high chances, but with Bess and Leach as their spinners, it’s going to be massacre.
 
India don’t really have “pacers”. They have a decent medium-fast seam ball attack that bowl well as a team.

But even then, if they try and fight seam vs seam, England will walk the series.

India’s strength will still be spin
 
If you can win in Australia, then England is gonna be much easier. Just from a mental perspective. Ofc a lot depends on weather, pitch and which England shows up in the game. They’re definitely beatable at home. Pakistan and SL have both shown that. Not as mentally tough as Aussies, easy to break in and pull of heists from them.
 
India don’t really have “pacers”. They have a decent medium-fast seam ball attack that bowl well as a team.

This. A bunch of medium/medium-fast work horses who can follow the plan given to them. Also, India is facing an England with a weak batting lineup, as one of the posters highlighted above. Won't be surprised if these bowlers end up doing well.
 
Last edited:
I Just think lot of people are lot over confident. Ishant is coming back from an injury -hope he fires from the word go, as its not easy to just plug and play. Jazz-Boom, similar although a lesser lay off, but he has not been himself since WI 2019 tour (where he bowled some of the most crazy diamond magical Yorkers spreading the stumps...wow) and needs to get that edge going. The biggest chance Eng have is in cold conditions at ahmd in the day night game. I feel the series will be a lot closer than people think. Go Indiaaaa.....
 
As an Englishman, I'm really hoping that India will be so confident in their seamers that they won't produce doctored spinning tracks.

Nine years ago we knew that if India produced spinning tracks we would defeat them with Swann and Panesar. They did produce Asian tracks, and we did beat them.

But our current spinners are not in the Ashwin class, although I don't feel that they are worse than Jadeja - they just aren't as familiar with the conditions.

What India might forget is that Anderson and Broad have been absolutely superb in the UAE.

Anderson in the UAE:
22 wickets in 6 Tests
Average 20.54
Strike rate 58.9
Economy 2.09

Broad in the UAE:
20 wickets in 6 Tests
Average 22.85
Strike rate 62.6
Economy 2.19

On spinning tracks, India will win 3-1 or 4-0.

But if they get overconfident in Bumrah and Shami and Ishant, and produce pitches which respond to pace bowling, then Anderson and Broad can win this series.
 
England's batting is not in a good shape so it's hard to compare.
You can't expect Sibley, Burns to score many.

Why can’t you? Each has two test centuries in short careers.

I think this top five (if Crawley plays) is the best England have fielded in several years.
 
England can handle the pacers. The spinners will pose the real challenges.
 
Why can’t you? Each has two test centuries in short careers.

I think this top five (if Crawley plays) is the best England have fielded in several years.

But are they in form? I guess only the results can tell.
 
I need to take a closer look at Indian bowlers before I am convinced by claims of Indian pace supremacy. I got taken to task on here for expecting Indians to produce spin friendly wickets, but if they go with wickets that truly give a decent chance to seamers, I could see England causing them some real problems.

Bumrah is the premier Indian fast bowlers, and that has as much to do with his unorthodox bowling angle as any normal factor which you would judge a fast bowler such as speed or bounce. I shall definitely take a look at this series to see if all the hype over Indian pacers is justified.
 
If you can win in Australia, then England is gonna be much easier. Just from a mental perspective. Ofc a lot depends on weather, pitch and which England shows up in the game. They’re definitely beatable at home. Pakistan and SL have both shown that. Not as mentally tough as Aussies, easy to break in and pull of heists from them.

The commentators were saying how unAustralian the team looked against India, going through the motions. I think they are overrated. Heavily reliant on two batsmen and with bowlers over the hill. They got complacent after 36 and expected India to give up.

Trouble is that they will now be stung and make changes in time for the Ashes.
 
Why can’t you? Each has two test centuries in short careers.

I think this top five (if Crawley plays) is the best England have fielded in several years.

I do rate Crawley, haven't yet put a judgment on Sibley but I really don't rate Burns at all.
Would have preferred Bairstow in his place.
 
Back
Top