What's new

2015 World Cup Result : India trounce South Africa by 130 runs

watch first 10 balls Virat faced , even against Rohit . Dhawan though was playing a lot of shots , luckily it worked for him & Steyn dint bowl in the right areas relatively . if this was a easy pitch we would not have scored 40 runs in first 11-12 overs .
lol you are being very generous.
 
Just look at the way India lifts their game and induces confidence in their fans. This is the same team that couldnt win a single game until the Pakistan game. There is a stark difference in between India and Pakistan, and unless that changes, nothing is going to chamge for Pakistan
No idea what it is but indians seem to lift themselves up in right time
 
Just look at the way India lifts their game and induces confidence in their fans. This is the same team that couldnt win a single game until the Pakistan game. There is a stark difference in between India and Pakistan, and unless that changes, nothing is going to chamge for Pakistan

I had ZERO confidence in this team before the start of the tournament, but glad to say I do now.
 
Trolls can be amusing. But he is one 3rd grade troll who can only spoil the threads.

This self proclaimed 60 year old grandpa never would never complain about pitches and stuff in non-India matches. It's only when India score runs, he gets his knickers in a twist.

Haven't your parents told you to respect 60 year old grandpas? You could say that he is trolling without busting a gasket.
 
Rahane looking good and it is criminal that he doesn't have better numbers. Needs big performances to show that he belongs in coloured jerseys.
 
Honestly speaking, the guy has been doing nothing but trying his best to spoil this thread. There are trolls but only a few of them have his exceptional ability to annoy the hell out of everyone.

I am getting to a point where I won't care about getting banned anymore. There are a few things he deserves to hear.
 
Rahane looking good and it is criminal that he doesn't have better numbers. Needs big performances to show that he belongs in coloured jerseys.
Poor guy is pigeonholed as a test bat. Was sent at 7 against Pakistan. He is in more fluent touch than Dhoni. Should play as many deliveries as possible.
 
Obviously modern, devalued, inflated batting records need a metric for converting them into what they really mean.

So I've come up with this as I get bored watching this batfest:

a) YOUR TEAM SCORES 300-320
- scale down the team and individual scores by 50%
- give the opposition 20 overs to knock off the revised target.

b) YOUR TEAM SCORES 320+
- abandon the match as a crime against cricket before the second innings, and reduce all team and individual scores to 0 as they are meaningless.

So congratulations to Dhawan on scoring what currently looks like superficially like a hundred.

But if the team scores 300-320, that gets scaled down to 50. And if they score 320+, it gets scaled down to 0.
 
Dhawan played well. So many runs square off the wicket. Don't bowl short and wide.
 
watch first 10 balls Virat faced , even against Rohit . Dhawan though was playing a lot of shots , luckily it worked for him & Steyn dint bowl in the right areas relatively . if this was a easy pitch we would not have scored 40 runs in first 11-12 overs .

The Indians have played cautiously. There hasn't been much on offer from the pitch. The pitch report said that there would be movement early on and even more under lights which is why it is surprising that there were no lethal outswingers from the Steyn-gun.
 
Junaid just took the award for the biggest troll. Tell me, is your gripe against Indians or against flat pitches or against batting friendly rules?

Cricket is not about being fair game. Market demand right now is to make batting friendly rules mainly because of Indian fan base.

Even with all these batting friendly rule and flat pitches, big bats. Imagine there is no over limit on bowlers, all of a sudden score comes down to 70-60 runs if not more. We don't take out batsman if he hit 100, but we do take out bowler after 10 overs.

Cricket as a sports is making a fast food kind of mistake (thinking fast food as real quality meal), cricket is beautiful game when there is contest between bat and ball, it's bad bet to take bowlers out of the game. Game will loose it's important nutritious component.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] according to you pitches are flat and are not providing any help to bowlers. So do you think this guy dhawan who is a certified FTB can become the highest run getter in this world cup?
 
Obviously modern, devalued, inflated batting records need a metric for converting them into what they really mean.

So I've come up with this as I get bored watching this batfest:

a) YOUR TEAM SCORES 300-320
- scale down the team and individual scores by 50%
- give the opposition 20 overs to knock off the revised target.

b) YOUR TEAM SCORES 320+
- abandon the match as a crime against cricket before the second innings, and reduce all team and individual scores to 0 as they are meaningless.

So congratulations to Dhawan on scoring what currently looks like superficially like a hundred.

But if the team scores 300-320, that gets scaled down to 50. And if they score 320+, it gets scaled down to 0.

Dude, my advise to you: Turn off the TV set and watch reruns of 1980's test matches. You are not meant for modern One day cricket
 
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] according to you pitches are flat and are not providing any help to bowlers. So do you think this guy dhawan who is a certified FTB can become the highest run getter in this world cup?

Maybe, and good luck to him if he does. It's not his fault that they are playing on this ridiculous tracks and destroying the game we love.

The fact that even players who can't play the moving ball or lifting ball are cashing in on the horrible conditions really just highlights how absolutely terrible England and Pakistan are.

But this isn't cricket. It's a crime against cricket.
 
Obviously modern, devalued, inflated batting records need a metric for converting them into what they really mean.

So I've come up with this as I get bored watching this batfest:

a) YOUR TEAM SCORES 300-320
- scale down the team and individual scores by 50%
- give the opposition 20 overs to knock off the revised target.

b) YOUR TEAM SCORES 320+
- abandon the match as a crime against cricket before the second innings, and reduce all team and individual scores to 0 as they are meaningless.

So congratulations to Dhawan on scoring what currently looks like superficially like a hundred.

But if the team scores 300-320, that gets scaled down to 50. And if they score 320+, it gets scaled down to 0.

India 196/2 (36.1 ov):41:
 
Obviously modern, devalued, inflated batting records need a metric for converting them into what they really mean.

So I've come up with this as I get bored watching this batfest:

a) YOUR TEAM SCORES 300-320
- scale down the team and individual scores by 50%
- give the opposition 20 overs to knock off the revised target.

b) YOUR TEAM SCORES 320+
- abandon the match as a crime against cricket before the second innings, and reduce all team and individual scores to 0 as they are meaningless.

So congratulations to Dhawan on scoring what currently looks like superficially like a hundred.

But if the team scores 300-320, that gets scaled down to 50. And if they score 320+, it gets scaled down to 0.

India 196/2 (36.1 ov) :41:
 
Obviously modern, devalued, inflated batting records need a metric for converting them into what they really mean.

So I've come up with this as I get bored watching this batfest:

a) YOUR TEAM SCORES 300-320
- scale down the team and individual scores by 50%
- give the opposition 20 overs to knock off the revised target.

b) YOUR TEAM SCORES 320+
- abandon the match as a crime against cricket before the second innings, and reduce all team and individual scores to 0 as they are meaningless.

So congratulations to Dhawan on scoring what currently looks like superficially like a hundred.

But if the team scores 300-320, that gets scaled down to 50. And if they score 320+, it gets scaled down to 0.

If South Africa doesn't score those runs doesn't it mean Indians bowled better? :13:
 
Rahane you beauty! I thought the wicket of Kohli came at wrong time as India had just started to score freely but boy he's made it look more easier.
 
All the IPL bashers take note, this is what international exposure, rubbing shoulders with the best players and hitting bowlers like Steyn in your domestic league does to your confidence: you develop the natural aggression to take on the best in the world.
 
Who said South Africa has world class bowling attack??? two useless spinners are PP overs...
 
Darn.. not the first and not the last time I'm envious of India's batting. Losing only one wicket per 100 runs, if that. Rahane having a field day.
 
Obviously modern, devalued, inflated batting records need a metric for converting them into what they really mean.

So I've come up with this as I get bored watching this batfest:

a) YOUR TEAM SCORES 300-320
- scale down the team and individual scores by 50%
- give the opposition 20 overs to knock off the revised target.

b) YOUR TEAM SCORES 320+
- abandon the match as a crime against cricket before the second innings, and reduce all team and individual scores to 0 as they are meaningless.

So congratulations to Dhawan on scoring what currently looks like superficially like a hundred.

But if the team scores 300-320, that gets scaled down to 50. And if they score 320+, it gets scaled down to 0.

Younis Khan loves this
 
Who said South Africa has world class bowling attack??? two useless spinners are PP overs...

There is a reason Zimbabwe hit South Africa for plenty but struggled against UAE. South African attack is nothing special in ODIs.
 
Rohit RunOut for a Duck - ABD
mCMJoGG.gif
 
Junaids has a template prepared for all occassions

India batting well - Pitch is flat
Pakistan losing on those same flat pitches - Quote Ed Hawkins book on fixing and bring up Mohali, Sydney
 
Back
Top