For the first point, How many times must I claim Australia was stronger and would have beaten India regardless But and I repeat But
Kohli and Rahane played rubbish plain and simple. Their is no and i repeat no excuse for kohli and rahane to play in such a manner, india could hahe lost by 25 to 50 runs rather them not evem making the mark.
kohli and rahane pulled a misbah and killed the game deapite the openers keeping the match intresting at the start and no backing was given to Dhoni even though Dhoni overseas is ordinary and is mostly an Asian beast
As for sehwag, How many times must I say that Sachin's shot was rubbish. It has nothing to do with mcgrath, if anything it's stupid and silly for him to play such a shot ahainat mcgrath as someone who's auppose t9 be the God of cricket should know that mcgrath can be negotiated by taking singles and attacking the other bowlers.
Sehwag understood this but Sachin played a rubbish stroke. The rest of the batters tried dueing that day but got dismissed however sachin's loft was an elementary mistake.
Just because the target is so high doesn't mean you can't at the very least settle, Sachin was already 4 of 5? He was rotating well? Just take a bit more time, get to 40 of 42 and start attacking the rest? Sehwag did it?
As for Inzi and Anwar, Anwar was a burnt corpse in 2003 followed by inzi who sucks in every icc event nothing new.
Lara underachieved 100% no doubt. But theirs nothing wrong with putting people who Indians claim are God's of cricket so high