Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He has been around for a while. But lobbyists kept useless guys in the side for far too long
What a shot by Mayank
Mayank is here to stay. Agree?
126/2 & Mayank goes .
If Aus dont bowl out India for less than 250, they have lost the series.
If India dont win this series 3-1 after winning the toss again, they would have failed miserably.
Amazing insight .
what he said was absolutely correct. Would have been embarassing to lose to this depleted Australian side even after winning the toss on batting friendly pitches.
How many times have Aus fielded a batting line up this bad?How many Asian teams have won a test series in Australia, in all these years of test cricket? Anyone who says that a series loss in Australia would be embarrassing either has no clue about cricket or just doesn't like India.
How many times have Aus fielded a batting line up this bad?
Australian Test summer is almost over and not a single 100, they've been playing on good pitches too![]()
How many Asian teams have won a test series in Australia, in all these years of test cricket? Anyone who says that a series loss in Australia would be embarrassing either has no clue about cricket or just doesn't like India.
How many times have Aus fielded a batting line up this bad?
Australian Test summer is almost over and not a single 100, they've been playing on good pitches too![]()
How many times have Aus fielded a batting line up this bad?
Australian Test summer is almost over and not a single 100, they've been playing on good pitches too![]()
They're facing the #1 team and bowlers in top form like Bumrah and Ishant. No wonder their batsmen aren't doing well. No South African scored a hundred when India toured them either.
When was the last time an Aussie batsmen didn't score a century at home.They're facing the #1 team and bowlers in top form like Bumrah and Ishant. No wonder their batsmen aren't doing well. No South African scored a hundred when India toured them either.
The same Indian team which has won series in SA and Eng?Of course giving credit to Indian bowlers is an alien concept to you. Keep crying.
Visitors would have taken 2-2 happily as they retain the Trophy .
What do you make of the pitch ? A result wicket or Draw a option here ?
The same Indian team which has won series in SA and Eng?
This Australian batting line up is rubbish, that's a fact. Every Australian will tell you this.
Name me one Australian batting line up that was worse than this in the last 2 decades. Heck can you remember an Australian summer where none of their batsmen scored a 100?Like i said you're one clueless guy. Continue crying.
It was just one opener who played freely so far. Let's see how others do.
The same Indian team which has won series in SA and Eng?
This Australian batting line up is rubbish, that's a fact. Every Australian will tell you this.
Nah, this batting line up is just terrible that they probably would have still lost a Test after batting first. They have no batting leaders who can take the responsibility of scoring the runs.It was all about toss mate. Had India won more tosses it would have won more matches. They always found themselves batting fourth. Only two matches they batted first and they won both of them.
Nah, this batting line up is just terrible that they probably would have still lost a Test after batting first. They have no batting leaders who can take the responsibility of scoring the runs.
Nah, this batting line up is just terrible that they probably would have still lost a Test after batting first. They have no batting leaders who can take the responsibility of scoring the runs.
Khawaja and Marsh have never been main guys, they've only managed to look good when they've had stars around them who take the pressure off them.
Pitch - a result surface or not ?
Funnily enough, this Aussie team actually won the only match where they batted first! Even this weak Aussie team was actually good enough to pull off a series win if they won 1/2 more tosses!
140-2, is a great score, especially when you are looking to win the series.
This third wicket is so crucial to Australia. Already on the back foot, on account of having to bat last, they need to get the Indians all out today. Lyon is already getting sharp turn on this pitch in 2nd session of first day. He will have to get wickets and the others will have to stop the flow of runs.
Yeah, those teams had Smith and Warner. Why so triggered by the fact this team has no batting leaders.I remember quiet few of them scoring runs for fun against English and NZ bowlers.
It can become 160/4 and Aus can take the game away.
It can become 160/4 and Aus can take the game away.
The same Indian team which has won series in SA and Eng?
This Australian batting line up is rubbish, that's a fact. Every Australian will tell you this.
And neither is this India team at full strength ... something that you will never address for obvious reasons.
Yeah, those teams had Smith and Warner. Why so triggered by the fact this team has no batting leaders.
Do you disagree?
This series was always going to be a lose-lose. You either beat up a weak Aus team missing their only two world class batsmen or you lost to a team missing their two batsmen.
Only way to avoid it was with emphatic wins, none of them have been really that. You put Smith and Warner into those games and the result probably changes.
Who are India missing?And neither is this India team at full strength ... something that you will never address for obvious reasons.
What?! Who else would you play for India?!
True! Need to break this partnership first.
Pujara is the big wicket and he can just dig in there and eat up deliveries. Pujara has already faced 1000+ balls this series.
I just don't understand how a batter batting at 3 gets million rums against NZ and England and struggles to reach double digits vs India.
It's really easy.I just don't understand how a better batting at 3 gets million rums against NZ and England and struggles to reach double digits vs India.
Who are India missing?
Ashwin?)
Would he even make the team ahead of Jadeja at this point.
Smith and Warner are a different ilk.
Rohit and Ishant, aren't these two meme cricketersAshwin, Shaw, Rohit, Saha and now Ishant these are all first choice players. You can cackle all you want but those are the facts.
What?! Who else would you play for India?!
Ashwin, Shaw, Rohit, Saha and now Ishant these are all first choice players. You can cackle all you want but those are the facts.
Would India have played Ishant ahead of Yadav in Sydney?Ishant and Ashwin would have played ahead of others. Let's see if it proves costly for Indians here.
If we score 350 plus, it wont matter. Most of the Aussie batsmen have never faced Kuldeep and would tough to pick his googly if he lands one on target.Ishant and Ashwin would have played ahead of others. Let's see if it proves costly for Indians here.
It's really easy.
You don't have the safety net of Warner or Smith there to bare the brunt of the pressure. They're the ones expected to do most of the scoring because they're the stars, everyone else are support players. They're not expected to score big runs and win games, that pressure is on Warner and Smith.
It's the same with India - Kohli and Pujara, NZ - Kane and Taylor.
It's really easy.
You don't have the safety net of Warner or Smith there to bare the brunt of the pressure. They're the ones expected to do most of the scoring because they're the stars, everyone else are support players. They're not expected to score big runs and win games, that pressure is on Warner and Smith.
It's the same with India - Kohli and Pujara, NZ - Kane and Taylor.
Rohit and Ishant, aren't these two meme cricketers)
Shaw has played 2 Tests. Saha)
The dude is a specialist keeper and will be displaced by Pant.
Please.
Rohit and Ishant, aren't these two meme cricketers)
Shaw has played 2 Tests. Saha)
The dude is a specialist keeper and will be displaced by Pant.
Please.
I have NZ-SL on in the background..Kiwi's are playing a ODI right now & just 6 posts on that thread . Any support for Blackcaps here ?
At 148/2 , 400+ looks on .
Would India have played Ishant ahead of Yadav in Sydney?
Rohit and Ishant, aren't these two meme cricketers)
Shaw has played 2 Tests. Saha)
The dude is a specialist keeper and will be displaced by Pant.
Please.
If we score 350 plus, it wont matter. Most of the Aussie batsmen have never faced Kuldeep and would tough to pick his googly if he lands one on target.
India winning a series in Australia when other teams are unable to draw or win a test match. A true no 1 indeed. So proud \m/
Who are India missing?
Ashwin?)
Would he even make the team ahead of Jadeja at this point.
Smith and Warner are a different ilk.
India winning a series in Australia when other teams are unable to draw or win a test match. A true no 1 indeed. So proud \m/
Shaw/Agarwal there's little difference to be made there, Agrawal has performed really well.PRithvi shaw is a future legend. India misses him more. Look at Agarwal. They played two walking wickets in the first 2 tests. That kinda offset Australia;s missing players. Pandya provides an excellent balance for India. He took fifer to win a test in England.
2 wickets here and you won't be saying that.
Shaw/Agarwal there's little difference to be made there, Agrawal has performed really well.
Difference between Ashwin and Jadeja is again negligible, their numbers are similar in this series. Heck, hasn't Jadeja performed better than Ashwin outside the SC? It might actually be an improvement.
You add Smith and Warner to this removing the duds who haven't performed, there will be a significant improvement in Australia's performance.