What's new

"Coming to Pakistan is not about money": ECB Chairman Richard Thompson

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,903
ECB chair Richard Thompson is determined to ensure cricket’s expanding international tournament schedule and the growth of franchise competitions do not compromise the importance of bilateral series.

Just over three months into his new role, Thompson is currently out in Pakistan for the first Test in Rawalpindi as England make their first tour of the country for 17 years.

The tour comes on the back of a poorly received three-match ODI series in Australia which began just three days after England's T20 World Cup triumph and saw them slump to a 3-0 defeat against the hosts.

That, believes Thompson, is a sign of how crowded the international calendar has become, and he warned against global governing body the ICC taking too much of a step back and allowing franchise cricket to fill any gaps as well.

"As much as we talk about the English domestic structure, I'd say the international structure is even more challenging," Thompson told former England captain and Sky Sports cricket expert Mike Atherton at lunch on day three.

"If the game just chases money, the game will devour itself and will play a very big price for that. Coming here [to Pakistan] is not about money - the slogan around the ground of 'One Game, One Passion' sums it up for me.

"What cricket can do, possibly more than any sport, is cross through geopolitics and unite countries, and it can't just be about money. We at the ECB have got to stand up to that. We need to go and support Pakistan, Bangladesh and other countries.

What cricket can do, possibly more than any sport, is cross through geopolitics and unite countries, and it can't just be about money. We at the ECB have got to stand up to that.

"It works on reciprocity; they visit us, we visit them, so how do we fix this in? Otherwise, you'll effectively have five nations playing against each other and the other nations will fall away - that would be wrong."

At present, the structure of the English domestic season will be the same in 2023 as it was this year, although Thompson is conscious of the need to bring the debate around which areas of the ECB's men's High-Performance Review to a close as soon as possible to give clarity on what 2024 onwards will look like.

The former Surrey chair and the ECB's recently appointed chief executive Richard Gould, formerly of Somerset and Surrey, were both vocal critics of The Hundred when it was first launched, although Thompson admits his stance has softened much since taking charge at the governing body.

Entering its third year in 2023, The Hundred recently attracted an offer of private equity investment reported to be in the region of £400m for a majority share of the tournament. That offer was passed on by the ECB, but Thompson wants to ensure it continues to flourish along with the T20 Vitality Blast, competed for by the 18 first-class counties.

"Private equity is awash in cricket and sports rights have never been worth more than they are at the moment, so I would expect more interest," Thompson said. "We said 'thank you very much, we'll come back when we're ready'.

"The last two years [of The Hundred] have proven us to be wrong on one area and right on another. What is has done for women's cricket and the investment Sky have put into The Hundred has been extraordinary.

"The reality of the schedule is the issue, and the reason Richard and I had some challenges with it was we recognised three domestic competitions and an increased international schedule was already causing problems

"Bringing a fourth in was only going to make that worse and what I want to ensure we don't do is marginalise the Blast, we don't want one to succeed at the expense of the other. We want them to co-exist together, so that's challenging, and we will find a solution to that however hard it is."

Thompson believes the need to create a workable domestic calendar is underlined by Will Smeed opting to sign a white-ball only contract with Somerset, having impressed in T20 for his county and in The Hundred for Birmingham Phoenix.

The 21-year-old batter has taken the decision despite having yet to make his County Championship debut and Thompson is in no doubt that should serve as something of a wake-up call for the game as a whole.

"Our schedule doesn't really encourage a player like Will Smeed to play in our domestic cricket given the schedule is unworkable," Thompson said.

"The one thing we all agree is we have to fix the schedule. That's a flashing amber light on the dashboard and we can't let it go red, by which I mean a whole slew of players taking a decision they would rather follow that path.

"It's not the Kerry Packer moment, but it's in that realm and... this is a good case in point that those players are coming through one of the best pathways in world cricket only to be lost to English cricket in a way we can't control.

"I can't accept that would just play out and we lose a generation of cricketers who would be playing for England."

https://www.skysports.com/cricket/n...schedules-and-hundred-private-equity-interest
 
I think its also a moral obligation for ENG to pay back Pakistan the support Pak gave by touring ENg after the pandemic. It did a lot of good for ECB's economy.
 
This prospect could turn the 100 format into something that (eventually) becomes one hundred per cent privatized and a breakaway / rebel league, maybe even something exclusive ie the only place which is licenced to host pro 100-ball cricket.
 
This prospect could turn the 100 format into something that (eventually) becomes one hundred per cent privatized and a breakaway / rebel league, maybe even something exclusive ie the only place which is licenced to host pro 100-ball cricket.

There realistically isn't a way to legally prevent anyone else playing their own 100 ball league.
 
Pak is a major Cricketing side. To defeat Pak on home territory is still a feather in the cap for any country:ht Eng would want to be on good Cricketing terms with Pak. Ya know the Pak side visiting Eng for a Test series is a money spinner for the ECB so they wouldn't want to upset us.
 
Last edited:
So the tour of Pakistan is to help us out?
 
While there are commercial aspects involved in any sport but, even the commercial value can be increased by having a wider spread quality within any sporting structure.

Pakistan hosting cricket again is obviously great for Pakistan cricket as it was without that for a long time but, its really good for cricket as a whole as well. As a flouring Pakistan cricket adds a lot to the overall value of the sport (Not talking about commercial share rather cricket as a product irrespective of the market sizes) as well and with cricket back in Pakistan young aspiring players can actually see the world stars play in front of them.

All this has a bigger and more profound impact on Pakistan cricket as well as the cricketing world possibly than many can imagine as of now.
 
The Pakistan England 1992 tour helped the ECB earn 7 million pounds which was big money back then. Even then the ECB only toured Pakistan again in 2000. Poor stuff
 
Back
Top