What's new

Could Jasprit Bumrah be India's greatest ever bowler?

All those amazed by Bumrah's pace from a short-ish run up should have a look at his arm and shoulder at the release. There is this awkward bend there which is explains his whip/slingshot release and high pace.

Mark Wood also generates similar pace from a short-ish run up but that's mainly down his high intensity runup (hence the ankle issues) and great rhythm.
 
I think he is a very good thinking bowler but with this run-up , the pace being generated is putting immense pressure on his shoulder & back . I fear a serious injury if he does not do something about his run-up .
 
I don't care what people say but for me, Bumrah is the best bowler in the world. Be it in Tests or even in LOI.

Love seeing him bowl.
 
I don't care what people say but for me, Bumrah is the best bowler in the world. Be it in Tests or even in LOI.

Love seeing him bowl.

Comfortably. Only Rabada comes close in tests. Unmatched in LoIs.
 
Comfortably. Only Rabada comes close in tests. Unmatched in LoIs.

I don't care what people say but for me, Bumrah is the best bowler in the world. Be it in Tests or even in LOI.

Love seeing him bowl.

39 test wickets and 8 tests so far. No on is going to be best with such a small sample size. let's him perform for 20-25 tests with similar output then he can be mentioned.
 
lol goes to show how poor Indian pacers have been in history.

Bumrah is an ok bowler, a man with a sling arm who doesn't really make the ball talk. He has decent pace and good accuracy , nothing more.

People saying he is the best in the world is pretty embarrassing. Rabada, Anderson, Abbass, Steyn, Philander, Cummings, Boult are all better.
 
lol goes to show how poor Indian pacers have been in history.

Bumrah is an ok bowler, a man with a sling arm who doesn't really make the ball talk. He has decent pace and good accuracy , nothing more.

People saying he is the best in the world is pretty embarrassing. Rabada, Anderson, Abbass, Steyn, Philander, Cummings, Boult are all better.

Because they all play in bouncy bowling pitch unlike India where pitch only suitable for spinner.
When these so called phast bowler come to India they are thrashed like gully mohala player.
He took more wicket than Cummings in ongoing series. He is only second to Lyon.
That show he is better than these world class Australian bowling side.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He is turning out to be a great bowler, probably the most difficult bowler to score against atm. If he stays fit, he could end up as one of the greatest Indian fast bowlers ever.
 
I don't care what people say but for me, Bumrah is the best bowler in the world. Be it in Tests or even in LOI.

Love seeing him bowl.

In ODI yes, in test, not even close.He is a good bowler though and deserve respect.
 
Because they all play in bouncy bowling pitch unlike India where pitch only suitable for spinner.
When these so called phast bowler come to India they are thrashed like gully mohala player.
He took more wicket than Cummings in ongoing series. He is only second to Lyon.
That show he is better than these world class Australian bowling side.

You can use any selective stats but he's yet to take more than 3 wickets in an innings(tests), playing 15 innings. As I wrote he has good pace and accuray but lacks important skills such as the swining the ball properly. Batsmen just need to play him straight and he wont be any real threat.

After 15 innings and never taking a 4fr, it's funny people claiming he's the best bolwer in India's history.
 
You can use any selective stats but he's yet to take more than 3 wickets in an innings(tests), playing 15 innings. As I wrote he has good pace and accuray but lacks important skills such as the swining the ball properly. Batsmen just need to play him straight and he wont be any real threat.

After 15 innings and never taking a 4fr, it's funny people claiming he's the best bolwer in India's history.

Your comments are factually incorrect. He has to 2 fivers in 8 tests. 39 wickets in 8 tests @ 23 is not bad.

The argument is that is he has the potential to be Indias greatest bowler. Which I would agree with since our best are Kapil, Zaheer and Srinath. All India greats (Kapil the bowler, Kapil the AR is ATG), but not ATGs. So if he plays 60-70 tests, takes around 250-300 tests @ 24-26. He would be Indias greatest bowler. Still not ATG, but a level below ATG.
 
You can use any selective stats but he's yet to take more than 3 wickets in an innings(tests), playing 15 innings. As I wrote he has good pace and accuray but lacks important skills such as the swining the ball properly. Batsmen just need to play him straight and he wont be any real threat.

After 15 innings and never taking a 4fr, it's funny people claiming he's the best bolwer in India's history.

:facepalm:

The guy has 2 5fers.

5>3, right?
 
Your comments are factually incorrect. He has to 2 fivers in 8 tests. 39 wickets in 8 tests @ 23 is not bad.

The argument is that is he has the potential to be Indias greatest bowler. Which I would agree with since our best are Kapil, Zaheer and Srinath. All India greats (Kapil the bowler, Kapil the AR is ATG), but not ATGs. So if he plays 60-70 tests, takes around 250-300 tests @ 24-26. He would be Indias greatest bowler. Still not ATG, but a level below ATG.

:facepalm:

The guy has 2 5fers.

5>3, right?

I've already acknolwedged this on another thread but wow 2michelles, the greatest Indian bowler of all time? Tell me you guys dont believe this?
 
I've already acknolwedged this on another thread but wow 2michelles, the greatest Indian bowler of all time? Tell me you guys dont believe this?

As I said, the cupboard is pretty bare when it comes to fast bowlers. So if he has near 25 avg stats with 4+ wickets a test for 50+ tests, he will become India's best pace bowler.
 
You can use any selective stats but he's yet to take more than 3 wickets in an innings(tests), playing 15 innings. As I wrote he has good pace and accuray but lacks important skills such as the swining the ball properly. Batsmen just need to play him straight and he wont be any real threat.

After 15 innings and never taking a 4fr, it's funny people claiming he's the best bolwer in India's history.

That's what I call blind hatred. He had already two 5fer and it's not like previous Pakistani bowler who bowl in pitches which favor bowler. He bowl in an era where batsmen got favor and that too in India spin bowling condition.
He will become one of the best Indian aand ad well as world also.
Remember he is bowler in an era which favor only batsmen.
So if he achieve 70% of previous so called great he will be better than them.
If we can mock a good batting by saying pitch favor batsmen then we should also consider so called Pakistani bowling legend avg bcz they bowl in an era which favor bowling and that too in bowling condition of Pakistan.
 
33/6

What a terrific spell of bowling from Bumrah.

All formats combined he is comfortably the best fast bowler in the world.
 
All 3 formats he is easily the best fast bowler in the world. In tests Rabada is ahead but Bumrah isn't too far behind.
The guy has pace,lethal Yorker, Good bouncer, bowls a disciplined line and best of all has a brain to boot as well. Amazing find for India.
 
Can't thank IPL enough for giving us this champ.

Even [MENTION=134981]Bhaag Viru Bhaag[/MENTION] will give the league credit here. :viru
 
Loved the slower ball today to get Shaun Marsh. Goes to show how much he's matured as a bowler.
 
Can someone share a video of the full over when Bumrah bowled that slower Yorker. Apparently he set up the batsman really well.
 
Air apparent: Bumrah shows pitch isn’t everything at MCG

"I own the air," was the motto of the Pakistani speedster Shoaib Akhtar. How did Shoaib take so many wickets on dry, lifeless pitches? By taking the fastest route to the stumps.

Jasprit Bumrah owned the air in Melbourne today. The young Indian paceman delivered a masterclass, routing the Australian batting in a style reminiscent of the great subcontinental fast bowlers. After two days of risk-averse cricket from both teams, the Bumrah-led assault was simply a joy to watch.

Watching Bumrah throughout the series, there had been a sense of a dam waiting to burst. With his physics-defying generation of pace, he had always been fascinating to the spectator and a constant threat to the batsmen, but his biggest haul so far had been three wickets. In Perth, he beat the bat more than some bowlers do in a year of Test cricket. His luck would surely turn.

On this day when luck turned, turned and turned again, the salient fact was the ensemble of Indian skill in the field, led by Bumrah. Unlike the Australians in India’s first innings, each of the Indian bowlers aimed at the stumps, forcing the Australian batsmen to play, a revival of direct attacking cricket that overturned the negativity of the first two days.

It was on the stroke of lunch that Bumrah took over. To Shaun Marsh, he bowled five balls of sharp pace, slanting close to the off-stump. The Australian, desperate to let everything go, watched the ball and left it decisively. One remained.

There is something of the Hindu mystic in Bumrah as he stutters in off a few steps, bracelets jiggling, elbows bracketed around the ball, the stiff arms releasing in the manner of a gymnast about to throw a cartwheel. How Bumrah propels the ball so fast off a spin-bowler’s run-up is a matter for study. Having taught himself to bowl growing up in Gujarat, his childhood ruptured by his father’s death from hepatitis, Bumrah was never tamed by a textbook. What worked, worked – particularly in one-day cricket, where he developed two lethal yorkers, one very fast and one hypnotically slow.

In the present series, his third after graduating to Test cricket, Bumrah had not yet used the slow one. Marsh braced for one last thunderbolt before lunch. In a blur, Bumrah wiped off a quarter of the ball’s pace. As it ballooned in the air, time froze. By the time Marsh came to, he had been struck on the ankle. He shook his head all the way to the changing room and, you suspect, all the way to the psychologist’s couch.

Bumrah’s spell – in the magical sense of the word – was only beginning. He owned the air. With another full delivery, he sliced through Travis Head, and when Jadeja also used the aerial route to deceive Mitchell Marsh, India had whittled Australia down to the tough nuts. Tim Paine and Patrick Cummins staged their customary stand, most of it while Bumrah was resting. Paine was dropped at the wicket and India lost an lbw review; the game felt like it might be turning, when instead it was waiting for more Bumrah. Presently, he came back to rifle through Paine and the tail and claim the big haul he deserved.

This moment had been looming – for Bumrah, for India. They were on the wrong side of the toss and other twists of fortune in Perth. They only needed a nod from luck to assert their superiority in skill. Questions about their desire were answered with a disciplined, dogged grind in their first innings. Now their bowlers had their day.

The pitch did not become any better for cricket; Bumrah and his teammates simply rendered it irrelevant. They didn’t just bowl Australia out; they taught them a lesson. Which Australia’s bowlers, in a helter-skelter final session, showed they were big enough to learn. The wheel of fortune completed its spin by rewarding Cummins and, through the bowlers’ grace, the beleaguered MCG curator. Just desserts all round, and India ended up owning the air. One more good day and they will also own the turf.

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricke...-isn-t-everything-at-mcg-20181228-p50oom.html

When was the last time an Indian pacer had an article like that dedicated just to him?! This guy is redefining not just Indian fast bowling, but also pace-bowling biomechanics. People bash his action, but it may just be the most efficient for modern day Cricket.
 
Can someone share a video of the full over when Bumrah bowled that slower Yorker. Apparently he set up the batsman really well.

Don't have the video but he bowled 5 balls on off stump and around off stump. Marsh was either defending them or letting them go and boom last ball before lunch he bowls the slower Yorker!
 
Jasprit Bumrah set aside injury concerns to bowl a remarkable death-over spell in the Indian Premier League, proving his mettle yet again ahead of the ICC Men's Cricket World Cup 2019.

A little over three years into his international career, Jasprit Bumrah has already built up quite a reputation. He is ranked No.1 in the MRF Tyres ICC ODI Rankings for bowlers and has a fantastic Twenty20 International record too.

It was through promising performances in the IPL that Bumrah first burst into prominence. In his initial years in the limelight, he was earmarked as being a white-ball death bowling specialist.

Since then Bumrah has evolved into a complete bowler. Since his Test debut in South Africa in early 2018 he has quickly emerged as one of the country's mainstays and was the joint leading wicket-taker in the Tests on the recent tour of Australia, when India won their maiden Test series on those shores to create history. His performances with the new ball have also improved tremendously, but his death bowling has become the stuff of dreams.

On Australia's recent limited-overs tour to India, when they swept the T20Is 2-0 and won the ODIs 3-2, Bumrah repeatedly stood out through his death-bowling exploits to make Australia work hard for each of those victories. It was evident that he had taken that form into the IPL, when on Thursday, 28 March, he conceded just eight runs from his last three overs for Mumbai Indians, while also picking up three wickets to be named Player of the Match on a batting friendly surface.

At one point, Royal Challengers Bangalore seemed to be in control of proceedings with Virat Kohli and AB de Villiers going strong in a chase of 188. The partnership had swelled to 49 runs, both batsmen looking set. That is when Rohit turned to Bumrah, who delivered by getting Kohli out with a steepler.

Jasprit Bumrah dismissed Virat Kohli at a key juncture in the match Jasprit Bumrah dismissed Virat Kohli at a key juncture in the match
"I was just focusing on my plan," said Bumrah while receiving his match award. "I was trying to be clear, trying to assess the wicket and to back my strength. So that was the plan for today, the same goes for every batsman.

"You know they (Kohli and de Villiers) are the best in the world, but you don't think like that. You think you have to back yourself and try to execute what is there."

He then went on to bowl the 17th and 19th overs of the game, in which he not only dismissed Shimron Hetmyer and Colin de Grandhomme, but also conceded just six runs in total to leave them requiring 17 from the final over, which Lasith Malinga successfully defended – albeit in slightly controversial circumstances.

Bumrah was characteristically modest when asked how he was able to tie batsmen down in the crunch overs on such a frequent basis, suggesting that his only thought process is to focus 'ball by ball' to avoid getting distracted by the complexity of the broader situation.

"You don't think so much, you just go ball by ball, focus on the situation which is given to you. You try to control the controllables because you know we are playing against the best in the world. So it can get difficult, but you try to back yourself in every situation and try to go ball by ball, not try to think too far ahead because in this game you take one or two wickets and the pressure is always back on the other side."

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/1142590
 
Fakhar Zaman thinks otherwise

Fakhar should be thanking the greatest Indian bowler of all time for extending his career by a couple years because of that no ball.

I'm glad Fakhar scored that century for us and won that final but I will admit that the knock was nothing but a fluke, he was too scratchy in the beginning and should have been out, any cricketing performance that rides massively on luck isn't worthy of rankings.
 
Brilliant figures for Bumrah in the warmup against New Zealand

4 overs and just runs and 1 wicket so far
 
Ye kuch zyada hogaya.

Think about it; all our ATG bowlers bowled when the conditions were all in favour of the bowlers. Here you have Jasprit Bumrah with Waz and Waq like stats in conditions and RULES that are in favour of the batsmen.
 
Think about it; all our ATG bowlers bowled when the conditions were all in favour of the bowlers. Here you have Jasprit Bumrah with Waz and Waq like stats in conditions and RULES that are in favour of the batsmen.

Comparing bowlers across eras is always going to be a blunder. Batsmen these days dont have the technique to play yorkers and tight line and length and are always looking for runs. Hence they provide more chances to any half decent bowler. And waz and waqar didnt have any more favourable conditions than Bumrah. They played in Pakistan on dry and flat pitches most of the time and developed the art of reverse swing. Talent finds a way just like Dale steyn did. So please think before making such comparisons.
 
Comparing bowlers across eras is always going to be a blunder. Batsmen these days dont have the technique to play yorkers and tight line and length and are always looking for runs. Hence they provide more chances to any half decent bowler. And waz and waqar didnt have any more favourable conditions than Bumrah. They played in Pakistan on dry and flat pitches most of the time and developed the art of reverse swing. Talent finds a way just like Dale steyn did. So please think before making such comparisons.

Batsmen these days don't have the technique to play yorkers? Which generation are you living in?

A batsmen playing 360 degrees wasn't even a thing when Waqar and co were playing, it is a thing now.
 
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/338920281" width="640" height="361" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; fullscreen" allowfullscreen></iframe>

This is gold.
 
Again, conditions back then favoured the bowlers.
Not necessary true. Todays batsman are alot more aggreesive and take alot more risks, due to t20 influence. Hence, give bowlers more chance to take their wickets .pre t20 cricket, batsman played more conservatively, took less risks and hence was harder for bowlers to take wickets.
 
Not necessary true. Todays batsman are alot more aggreesive and take alot more risks, due to t20 influence. Hence, give bowlers more chance to take their wickets .pre t20 cricket, batsman played more conservatively, took less risks and hence was harder for bowlers to take wickets.
Having said that, bumra is one of the best fast bowlers of this era.
 
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/338920281" width="640" height="361" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; fullscreen" allowfullscreen></iframe>

This is gold.

Rare sight for us Indians to see one of our pacers yorking good batsmen out.
 
Not necessary true. Todays batsman are alot more aggreesive and take alot more risks, due to t20 influence. Hence, give bowlers more chance to take their wickets .pre t20 cricket, batsman played more conservatively, took less risks and hence was harder for bowlers to take wickets.

So why aren't more wickets being taken?
 
So why aren't more wickets being taken?

I dont understand what you are saying. You can only take a maximum of 10 wickets in white ball cricket and a maximum of 20 wickets in red ball cricket. I dont know statisically if pre t20 cricket more or less or the same overall average number of wickets were taken as today.
Your point was that previous era' s had bowling friendly conditions as compared to todays conditions, which are batting friendly and therefore the bowlers today are better than yesteryears bowlers. I highlighted 1 point to challenge your assumption which was batsmans % risk taking, there are many other points i could have made to challenge your theory, such as flat wickets in the subcontinent e.g. pitches in india are far superior for bowlers today than they were in the 80s or 90s where they were fast bowlers graveyards. Anyway, this is a massive debate and i think its best to leave it as an open debate whether conditions favoured yesteryears bowlers more or less than todays bowlers.
 
Your point was that previous era' s had bowling friendly conditions as compared to todays conditions, which are batting friendly and therefore the bowlers today are better than yesteryears bowlers. I highlighted 1 point to challenge your assumption which was batsmans % risk taking, there are many other points i could have made to challenge your theory, such as flat wickets in the subcontinent e.g. pitches in india are far superior for bowlers today than they were in the 80s or 90s where they were fast bowlers graveyards. Anyway, this is a massive debate and i think its best to leave it as an open debate whether conditions favoured yesteryears bowlers more or less than todays bowlers.

:facepalm:

Yes agreed on the bolded part.
 
Bumrah is class. For some reason his name reminds me of a bollywood song called Bumro Bumro
 
bumrah averages better than all of them in both formats.

He is probably the best ever India produced

BUT

Not enough sample set. Long way to go especially to match Wasim, Waqar and Imran. These are ATG bowlers we are talking about
 
Longevity will be the true litmus test, even Irfan Pathan looked a world beater his first few seasons.

but Bumrah is certainly a top bowler, no doubt.
 
At present Bumrah can only be compared to someone like Shane Bond. Bumrah needs atleast 5 more great years to be compared against bowling greats.

Tests
[table=width: 500, class: grid, align: center]
[tr][td] Bond [/td][td]Mat [/td][td]Wkts [/td][td]Ave [/td][td]Econ [/td][td]SR [/td][td]5W [/td][td]10W [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]overall [/td][td]18 [/td][td]87 [/td][td]22.09 [/td][td]3.41 [/td][td]38.7 [/td][td]5 [/td][td]1 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]home [/td][td]9 [/td][td]49 [/td][td]19.79 [/td][td]3.31 [/td][td]35.8 [/td][td]2 [/td][td]0 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]away [/td][td]9 [/td][td]38 [/td][td]25.05 [/td][td]3.53 [/td][td]42.5 [/td][td]3 [/td][td]1 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td] [/td][td] [/td][td] [/td][td] [/td][td] [/td][td] [/td][td] [/td][td] [/td][/tr]
[tr][td] Bumrah [/td][td]Mat [/td][td]Wkts [/td][td]Ave [/td][td]Econ [/td][td]SR [/td][td]5W [/td][td]10W [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]overall [/td][td]10 [/td][td]49 [/td][td]21.89 [/td][td]2.66 [/td][td]49.3 [/td][td]3 [/td][td]0 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]away [/td][td]10 [/td][td]49 [/td][td]21.89 [/td][td]2.66 [/td][td]49.3 [/td][td]3 [/td][td]0 [/td][/tr]
[/table]

ODI's
[table=width: 500, class: grid, align: center]
[tr][td] Bond [/td][td]Mat [/td][td]Wkts [/td][td]Ave [/td][td]Econ [/td][td]SR [/td][td]4W [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]overall [/td][td]82 [/td][td]147 [/td][td]20.88 [/td][td]4.28 [/td][td]29.2 [/td][td]7 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]home [/td][td]22 [/td][td]40 [/td][td]19.17 [/td][td]4.05 [/td][td]28.4 [/td][td]1 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]away [/td][td]21 [/td][td]38 [/td][td]22.44 [/td][td]5 [/td][td]26.8 [/td][td]3 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]neutral [/td][td]39 [/td][td]69 [/td][td]21.01 [/td][td]4.07 [/td][td]30.9 [/td][td]3 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td] [/td][td] [/td][td] [/td][td] [/td][td] [/td][td] [/td][td] [/td][/tr]
[tr][td] Bumrah [/td][td]Mat [/td][td]Wkts [/td][td]Ave [/td][td]Econ [/td][td]SR [/td][td]4W [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]overall [/td][td]49 [/td][td]85 [/td][td]22.15 [/td][td]4.51 [/td][td]29.4 [/td][td]4 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]home [/td][td]25 [/td][td]39 [/td][td]28 [/td][td]4.97 [/td][td]33.7 [/td][td]1 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]away [/td][td]15 [/td][td]34 [/td][td]13.32 [/td][td]3.73 [/td][td]21.3 [/td][td]3 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]neutral [/td][td]9 [/td][td]12 [/td][td]28.16 [/td][td]4.39 [/td][td]38.4 [/td][td]0 [/td][/tr]
[/table]
 
In recent years, number of Pakistani batsmen & Indian bowlers looked promising in their first couple of years but then faded away. Hope its not the case with Bumrah & Babar.
 
I still think Anil Kumble will be the best ever Indian bowler after Bumrah's career is finished.
 
He has the potential to be the greatest Indian bowler.

He needs to break Kumble's record in Test and ODI cricket to be the greatest Indian bowler.
 
At present Bumrah can only be compared to someone like Shane Bond. Bumrah needs atleast 5 more great years to be compared against bowling greats.

Bond is my favourite bowler from the last 2 decades.

Rate him above everyone else as far as peak performances go.
 
He has the potential to be the greatest Indian bowler.

He needs to break Kumble's record in Test and ODI cricket to be the greatest Indian bowler.

Difficult for a paceman. No paceman has more wickets than kumble.

I think bumrah can end at a respectable 350-400 at a 22-23 average.
 
I still think Anil Kumble will be the best ever Indian bowler after Bumrah's career is finished.

He has the potential to be the greatest Indian bowler.

He needs to break Kumble's record in Test and ODI cricket to be the greatest Indian bowler.


Most Indians will be delighted if Bumrah manages even half of Kumble's test tally.

How many Pakistani bowlers have 400+ test wickets let alone 500 or 600.

Kumble is legendary.
 
Most Indians will be delighted if Bumrah manages even half of Kumble's test tally.

How many Pakistani bowlers have 400+ test wickets let alone 500 or 600.

Kumble is legendary.

What has Pakistani bowlers got to do with anything? Insecure much? This thread is about Bumrah being the greatest INDIAN bowler.
 
Kumble was a very good bowler in asia, not as good outside. I have a personal soft spot for javagal srinath. I think he is very under rated . Bumra may end up as the overal best indian bowler on all pitches worldwide, but i dont think he will come close to kumbles wicket tally. Even harbhajans wicket tally might be too much.
 
Most Indians will be delighted if Bumrah manages even half of Kumble's test tally.

How many Pakistani bowlers have 400+ test wickets let alone 500 or 600.

Kumble is legendary.

It is quality not quantity that matters. How many fast bowlers has India produced? 0!
 
It is quality not quantity that matters. How many fast bowlers has India produced? 0!

Someone with more test wickets than any Pakistani bowler fast or slow has managed.

You're welcome.
 
You are being disingenuine here. Pak produces predominantly fast bowle
Sorry pressed button by mistake.
Yes you are being disingenuine. Pak produces predominantly fast bowlers and india produces predominantly spin bowler(until recently). Fast bowlers careers are much shorter than spin bowlers due to the impact on the body of fast bowling. Thats why spinners can take 600, 700, 800 wickets and fast bowlers dont. Just an example from memory, harbajan went past akram's wicket tally in tests but it took him something like 6000 extra deliveries to take 1 more wicket than akram.
 
Yet not one cricketing legend/commentator rates Kumble above Wasim Akram.

Not about the number of wickets, but about the quality.

Happy scalping!

As a test match fast bowler, Wasim is well below his contemporaries than Kumble who's only sitting behind Warne and Murali as a spinner.
 
Sorry pressed button by mistake.
Yes you are being disingenuine. Pak produces predominantly fast bowlers and india produces predominantly spin bowler(until recently). Fast bowlers careers are much shorter than spin bowlers due to the impact on the body of fast bowling. Thats why spinners can take 600, 700, 800 wickets and fast bowlers dont. Just an example from memory, harbajan went past akram's wicket tally in tests but it took him something like 6000 extra deliveries to take 1 more wicket than akram.

I am starting to doubt your cricketing sense.

Spinners are meant to bowl the bulk of the overs and set batsmen up with tight bowling. The SR comparison is absurd. Of course Wasim is a much better bowler than Bhajji i don't have to look at stats to know that.

Wasim vs Kumble is a different matter. Kumble's won more tests for India than Wasim for Pakistan.
 
As a test match fast bowler, Wasim is well below his contemporaries than Kumble who's only sitting behind Warne and Murali as a spinner.

Wasim is rated as one of the best left arm bowlers the game has ever produced, if not, the best. He is more than often included in personal All Time IX of players, whereas Kumble doesn't even make it to the footnote.

So not sure what you are talking about, you must be on a wind up.
 
As a test match fast bowler, Wasim is well below his contemporaries than Kumble who's only sitting behind Warne and Murali as a spinner.
Great bowler when on song. But he picked more tail wickets than anyone else around that time. Still my favorite left arm pacer of al time. If you ask me he underachieved.
 
Back
Top