Mamoon
ATG
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Runs
- 108,086
- Post of the Week
- 12
As a Test batsman, Kohli is closer to the level of Ian Bell than he is to Younis Khan. Indians are not ready for this conversation, but they are never ready to face the truth.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As a Test batsman, Kohli is closer to the level of Ian Bell than he is to Younis Khan. Indians are not ready for this conversation, but they are never ready to face the truth.

Younis averages higher than Kohli in Australia, England and New Zealand. South Africa is the only place where Kohli has done better than him.YK has four hundreds in SENA in his whole career. I don’t rate him that high, pretty close to Kohli, Sehwag and two levels behind Dravid, Tendulkar and Gavaskar.
Younis averages higher than Kohli in Australia, England and New Zealand. South Africa is the only place where Kohli has done better than him.
The only reason Kohli has more runs and hundreds is because he has played a lot more Tests in these countries.
Younis has played 25% of his Tests in these countries. On the contrary, Kohli has played 40% of his Tests in these countries.
Younis is simply a far better Test batsman than Kohli and it is not up for debate anymore.
4 centuries is still very mediocre. Multiply it by two and you still get 8 centuries against Kohlis 12.Younis averages higher than Kohli in Australia, England and New Zealand. South Africa is the only place where Kohli has done better than him.
The only reason Kohli has more runs and hundreds is because he has played a lot more Tests in these countries.
Younis has played 25% of his Tests in these countries. On the contrary, Kohli has played 40% of his Tests in these countries.
Younis is simply a far better Test batsman than Kohli and it is not up for debate anymore.

Only Indian fans are deluded enough to have the audacity to compare a 50+ averaging batsman with someone who isn’t good enough to finish his career with an average of 47.4 centuries is still very mediocre. Multiply it by two and you still get 8 centuries against Kohlis 12.
Btw Kohli has 7 centuries in Australia thats more than Khans entire century tally in SENA.
Don’t tell me about his performance in Australia,lol. His average is inflated due to one dead rubber century on the flattest of all pattas, Pakistan didn’t draw a single test match in Aus.
A poster like you who changed his opinion by 180 degree doesn’t get to decide if its debatable or not.
I am sorry this is Bhagdad Bob level of delusion. I know you guys are being fed propaganda and you need to be patriotic but this is mental illness level of delusion.The Pakistani Air Force showed what they will do with the rest of India who tries to do the same
104 and 326 are high scores?Only Indian fans are deluded enough to have the audacity to compare a 50+ averaging batsman with someone who isn’t good enough to finish his career with an average of 47.
As far as the chest-thumping over Kohli’s SENA record is concerned, he averages a poor 38 after 30 Tests in England & New Zealand.
He has benefited from scoring runs on flat Australian pitches which is why it is comical to downplay Younis’ record in Australia.
Here are Australia’s scores in the Tests where Kohli has scored centuries in Australia:
604
572
530
517
326
104
Apart from the Perth Test last year where both teams got bundled cheaply in the first innings, none of his hundreds have come on pitches that can be considered as tough for batting.
Younis retired 8 years ago but even today, I bet he can school Kohli on how to play spin bowling.
Kohli has done nothing in his Test career that will give him superiority over Younis or any other 50+ averaging batsman.
An average of 46 for a middle-order batsman who’s hyped up as an ATG is beyond embarrassing.

If Younis is a poor man’s Dravid, then Kohli is a homeless man’s Dravid.For me, Younis Khan is basically poor mans Rahul Dravid.
Maybe you should learn to read properly before using emojis. I already mentioned the Perth Test from last year, and 326 is not a score that you’ll see on a bowling-friendly pitch. Also, it’s funny how you are completely ignoring all the other hundreds that came on pitches where Australia scored 500+.104 and 326 are high scores?![]()
I think it’s fair to say that the events of the last few days have proved that the collective IQ of Pakistanis is certainly higher than that of Indians.You can only school your low iq janta with this nonsense, not me.
This is one example of a low IQ assertion. Younis is not responsible for his bowlers not taking enough wickets to draw/win in Australia. If you score 175 and lose the match, the blame falls on others batsmen and on the bowlers not on you. You did your part.Kohlis runs in Australia have helped us draw and win matches, Younis has one century in a lost match and you have the gall of comparing Kohlis performance in Aus with him?
Kohli will be remembered for his exploits in white ball cricket which are phenomenal and also for having arguably the most dramatic fall from grace in history of Test cricket.Anyways, Kohli will be remembered decades after his retirement ( something which you said before you got hit on your head) as one the legendary batters, Yk is not even rated by his own nation.
Babar or anyone else has nothing to do with the fact that Kohli is not even good enough to retire with an average of 47 in Test cricket. If talking about Babar or others makes you feel better about it, carry on.Also, tell me one more thing? Will runs start flowing in 2025 for Babar or not?![]()
Which has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that he is not even good enough to retire with an average of 47 in Test cricket. The fact that you are bringing white ball cricket into the discussion now proves that you have accepted defeat and I can’t blame you because any middle-order Test batsman who retires with less than 10k runs and less than 50 average cannot be counted amongst the Test greats.Kohli has won more icc tournaments than Pakistan. Yk, Youhana, Inzi do not come close in terms of legacy.
And don't forget yk was never gven red carpet treatment like virat kohli. He was mostly in and out of team and bench player until 2010 where he also miss whole 2009-10 away tours of australia, england and new zealand due to politics in team when he was in his peak otherwise his away record would be even better. Thanks to misbah he brong stability from 2011 and he played regularly for 6 years and and retired with 10k runs with 7 hundreds in SENA. So he either tour SENA when he is young or he tour SENA when he is out of peak like 2014-2016 but still score 200 at the age of 41 in uk in 2016 when virat kohli of 36 can't even tour UK and run away and retire. Plus who forget his 55 plus average in 4th innings. A great Test player on league of sangakkara and dravid, but I think sangakkara is little overrated because he bashes bangladesh and zimbabwe a lot, around 25 percent of his runs are against them....Only Indian fans are deluded enough to have the audacity to compare a 50+ averaging batsman with someone who isn’t good enough to finish his career with an average of 47.
As far as the chest-thumping over Kohli’s SENA record is concerned, he averages a poor 38 after 30 Tests in England & New Zealand.
He has benefited from scoring runs on flat Australian pitches which is why it is comical to downplay Younis’ record in Australia.
Here are Australia’s scores in the Tests where Kohli has scored centuries in Australia:
604
572
530
517
326
104
Apart from the Perth Test last year where both teams got bundled cheaply in the first innings, none of his hundreds have come on pitches that can be considered as tough for batting.
Younis retired 8 years ago but even today, I bet he can school Kohli on how to play spin bowling.
Kohli has done nothing in his Test career that will give him superiority over Younis or any other 50+ averaging batsman.
An average of 46 for a middle-order batsman who’s hyped up as an ATG is beyond embarrassing.
Kohli fan boy alertFor me, Younis Khan is basically poor mans Rahul Dravid.
104 and 326 are high scores?
You can only school your low iq janta with this nonsense, not me.
Kohlis runs in Australia have helped us draw and win matches, Younis has one century in a lost match and you have the gall of comparing Kohlis performance in Aus with him?
Anyways, Kohli will be remembered decades after his retirement ( something which you said before you got hit on your head) as one the legendary batters, Yk is not even rated by his own nation.
Also, tell me one more thing? Will runs start flowing in 2025 for Babar or not?
Kohli has won more icc tournaments than Pakistan. Yk, Youhana, Inzi do not come close in terms of legacy.
Rahane led in 5 test matches winning 4, 2 of those 4 in Australia & drawing 1.Test captaincy records of Indian cricket team leaders since 2014
Under Virat Kohli’s leadership, India played 68 matches, winning 40, losing 17, and drawing 11, resulting in a commendable win percentage of 58.82%. In contrast, under other captains like MS Dhoni, Rohit Sharma, Ajinkya Rahane, Jasprit Bumrah, and KL Rahul, the team played 46 matches, securing 20 wins, 18 losses, and 8 draws, with a significantly lower win percentage of 43.48%.
Should have played list A matches vs touring Australia A. Chose to spend time at NCA having net sessions.Virat Kohli now holds 39 ducks in international cricket among batters occupying positions 1 to 7, followed by Rohit Sharma and Sachin Tendulkar.
Similar things were said for the T20 and Test sides and Kohli is not missed in either formatHis name was the main crowd puller in the test series and many Indians have said this ODI series is only because of him too.
Maybe India needs him more than they are willing to let on.
That's a lie as Karun and Sai have proven to be worse then Kohli and Gill has consistently shown he's a flat track bully.Similar things were said for the T20 and Test sides and Kohli is not missed in either format
Talking about test only, in t20 they aint missedThat's a lie as Karun and Sai have proven to be worse then Kohli and Gill has consistently shown he's a flat track bully.
You are always missed until a proper replacement comes along.
For example a washed up David Warner is still better then Konstas, Labu, Mcsweeney etc etc as an opener .
Rohit isn't missed due to Jaiswal I agree but you need a replacement.
The replacement doesnt have to be > the batter in prime, but they do have to better then their washed up selves.
What is a lie? Gill is the one who has replaced Kohli at #4 in Test cricket.That's a lie as Karun and Sai have proven to be worse then Kohli and Gill has consistently shown he's a flat track bully.
You are always missed until a proper replacement comes along.
For example a washed up David Warner is still better then Konstas, Labu, Mcsweeney etc etc as an opener .
Rohit isn't missed due to Jaiswal I agree but you need a replacement.
The replacement doesnt have to be > the batter in prime, but they do have to better then their washed up selves.
What is a lie? Gill is the one who has replaced Kohli at #4 in Test cricket.
And he has done remarkably well in England.
Yes gill replaced Kohli in the squad by already being in the squad during kohli era and batting with him.What is a lie? Gill is the one who has replaced Kohli at #4 in Test cricket.
And he has done remarkably well in England.
.Gill replaced Kohli at #4 . #3 is the toughest place to bat in Test cricket in recent timesYes gill replaced Kohli in the squad by already being in the squad during kohli era and batting with him.
What a replacement.
So gill replaced kohli and Karun and Sai replaced Gill.
It seems I'm the only poster who speaks the unbiased truth nowadays.
(PS: Still love you Nikhil bro)
Gill at no 4 got 2 easy opposition in wi and even kohli was smoking Bangladesh in the series at home.Gill replaced Kohli at #4 . #3 is the toughest place to bat in Test cricket in recent times
Nobody does well there - Pope, Labuschagne etc.
The moment Kohli retired and Gill started batting at #4, his numbers improved dramatically. Kohli was sucking the life out of the batting at #4 in recent years.
Feels like a goodbye
Even if you consider him an FTB , which I don't think he is, there is no way anyone can say Kohli would've done better than Gill at #4 in England.Gill at no 4 got 2 easy opposition in wi and even kohli was smoking Bangladesh in the series at home.
At no 4 he then got 2 uber flat tracks vs England and then failed in the following 3 games after once england stopped going that route? Excluding 4th test where he failed for some reason.
Gill is a quality player. But he's a certified ftb, I have never seen him perform otherwise which even kohli was able to score a century on the Perth flat track den.
I forward gill at no 4, but lets stop pretending as if he's kohli's replacement.
A replacement is someone who isnt in the squad or playing 11 and is now replacing a guy who has either been dropped or retired.
The no 3 thing, I agree with. No complaints their elder bro.
AlrightE. Makes sense.Even if you consider him an FTB , which I don't think he is, there is no way anyone can say Kohli would've done better than Gill at #4 in England.
Even peak would've struggled to match Gill's output
Besides, my original argument also included T20 cricket where folks here were convinced that India would become a middling side without RoKo.
That clearly hasn't happened.
Yet another duck for Kohli in the 2nd ODI against Australia... tyring to open his own poultry farm???
Just retire bro
Agree. The ODI's are just so the broadcaster can make $$$. Playing on the Sharma, Kohli return.His name was the main crowd puller in the test series and many Indians have said this ODI series is only because of him too.
Maybe India needs him more than they are willing to let on.
Also Rinku , Sarfaraz , Sudharshan , GaekwadImagine playing Rohit & Kohli when u have Jaiswal , Tilak & Abhishek
Both Kohli and Sharma are hogging. India have Jaiswal, Abhishek Sharma, Varma all waiting for top order slot. Players that are very much ready for the playing eleven.India can win even without him. He is not an X Factor anymore. He is just hogging a spot unnecessarily now
BCCI should have given Gill a break from bilateral ODIs. Playing 7 tests in 3 months time is a lot of workload. Plus they needlessly picked him for Asia cup T20Is.India needs the experience of Rohit and Kohli.
In the 3 match ODI series, again it had to be them to pull us over the line. None of the youngsters stepped up ironically in a series the sword was hanging over the seniors. Shubman Gill turned out to be the biggest loser of the series, this was his moment to shine and a player of his hype should have won at least 1/3 games for us on his own.
We won in SA ODI series with Sai sudarshan, Samson playing the crucial role. Samson made a century in the decider.Imagine playing Rohit & Kohli when u have Jaiswal , Tilak & Abhishek
Yes better get them than persisting with oldiesWe won in SA ODI series with Sai sudarshan, Samson playing the crucial role. Samson made a century in the decider.
BCCI should have given Gill a break from bilateral ODIs. Playing 7 tests in 3 months time is a lot of workload. Plus they needlessly picked him for Asia cup T20Is.
Kane Williamson and Joe Root if he again starts at 3Virat is still the best middle order batsman in ODIs.. Even this lesser version of him is the best the world has to offer
Name me one batter who is better than Virat in ODIs at no 3 anywhere
Nowhere near Virat in ODIs... What were their stats in champions trophy or world cup?Kane Williamson and Joe Root if he again starts at 3