What's new

England [158/4] beat Australia [157/7] by 6 wickets in the 2nd T20I, lead series 2-0

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
England may have won the first game by two runs after an Australia middle-order collapse, but not before they suffered a middle-order meltdown themselves. The teams will look for answers ahead of the second T20I.

Overview

England v Australia, 2nd T20I
The Ageas Bowl, Southampton
Sunday, 6 September, 14:15pm local time, 13:15pm GMT

Australia were in pole position to win the first game after a cracking start to the chase by their openers, but the failure to close out the game has put the spotlight back on their middle order struggles in T20I cricket.

Over the last two years, Glenn Maxwell has been Australia's most prolific run-scorer from positions between No.4 to No.7, scoring 349 runs at 38.77 but no other batsman has aggregated even hundred runs when batting in those positions. Australia will hope for the likes of Carey and Stoinis to come good, while Marnus Labuschagne could be in line for a T20I debut.

England's middle-order concerns haven't been quite as grave but with Ben Stokes absent for this series and Moeen Ali struggling with form, the bulk of the burden to score has fallen on Eoin Morgan's shoulders. The home team are experimenting with Tom Banton, usually a top-order batsman, in the middle order and could well give him more chances to get used to batting there.

The teams, occupying the top spots on the MRF Tyres ICC Men's T20I Rankings, have exceptional resources in the opening and bowlers' departments. It is unlikely either side will consider major changes in those areas from their personnel in the first game, except for purposes of experimentation.

Remember the last time

After openers Aaron Finch and David Warner made fifties, Australia looked on par for a comfortable win, requiring only 39 runs off their last six overs with nine wickets in hand.

But a double-strike from Adil Rashid to remove Smith and Maxwell sent Australia into a spiral. As panic ensued, Australia were finally stopped at 160/6, falling two runs short of victory.

Jos Buttler (44 off 29) and Dawid Malan (66 off 43) had been the main contributors to England's score. No other member from the batting order got into double figures until lower-order man Chris Jordan propped up the score with a useful eight-ball 14*.

What they said:

Eoin Morgan, England captain: "To try and win the game is the priority, so you have to chase your tail a little bit or come up with different things. I'm delighted the guys showed belief and courage to do something to take wickets, and that was displayed a lot in the last six overs when we held our length a lot because it was the hardest to hit."

Aaron Finch, Australia captain: "We knew that England were going to keep coming hard and they executed really well. We just struggled to find the boundary a bit in that 12-18 over mark. That is something to keep working on and that's not the first time it's happened, so as long as the boys keep learning and improve at it, lesson learned."

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/1810237
 
Australia batting first. Both teams unchanged .

If I was Australia I would have brought Mitch Marsh in and Josh Phillipe.
 
Australia batting first. Both teams unchanged .

If I was Australia I would have brought Mitch Marsh in and Josh Phillipe.

Australia have won the toss and have opted to bat

Teams:

England (Playing XI): Jos Buttler(w), Jonny Bairstow, Dawid Malan, Tom Banton, Eoin Morgan(c), Moeen Ali, Chris Jordan, Tom Curran, Adil Rashid, Jofra Archer, Mark Wood

Australia (Playing XI): Aaron Finch(c), David Warner, Steven Smith, Glenn Maxwell, Alex Carey(w), Marcus Stoinis, Ashton Agar, Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc, Kane Richardson, Adam Zampa
 
Stonis statistically is better an opener in T20s, Justin Langer said he would prefer for him to open but he can't because of Warner and Finch. So if he isn't opening I wouldn't play him over Mitch Marsh who is a very good hitter and good finisher. People confuse Marsh the test player for Marsh the LO player . He is a very good LO player.
 
England players have been fined 20 per cent of their match fees for maintaining a slow over-rate against Australia in the first T20I in Southampton on Friday.

Chris Broad of the Emirates ICC Elite Panel of Match Referees imposed the sanction after Eoin Morgan’s side was ruled to be one over short of the target after time allowances were taken into consideration.

In accordance with Article 2.22 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which relates to minimum over-rate offences, players are fined 20 per cent of their match fees for every over their side fails to bowl in the allotted time.

Morgan pleaded guilty to the offence and accepted the proposed sanction, so there was no need for a formal hearing.

On-field umpires Martin Saggers and Alex Wharf, third umpire David Millns and fourth umpire Mike Burns leveled the charge.\\

https://www.icc-cricket.com/media-releases/1812205
 
Australia batting first. Both teams unchanged .

If I was Australia I would have brought Mitch Marsh in and Josh Phillipe.

Phillipe is a pretty good talent. Not sure how Stoinis is making it as a pure batsman, Aussies already have six bowling options with 3 pacers and 3 spinners including Maxwell.
 
Wow that carried. Looks like more pace in this wicket.
 
EOIN MORGAN says England would have bowled if they had won the toss so everybody is happy on that front and it is an unchanged side for the hosts as well...

"When you can win a game in that fashion, it says a lot about the character of the team. Equally, we need to improve in a lot of areas to be contenders today so hopefully we can do that today.

"There were certain elements to our batting where we could have established more partnerships to post a more substantial total than we did. In the first 10 overs of our bowling needed a little bit of improvement but having had another game under our belt, we feel better for it. Hopefully, today can be out day."


AARON FINCH confirms Australia are unchanged from the first match but says they can be flexible with their batting order...

"It looks a decent wicket again, perhaps with the sun out it might slow down a bit later on but it's only 40 overs so you've got to do whatever you do first, well.

"[Changing the batting order] is something we've talked about, we can be flexible but we've been pretty consistent over the last 12 or 18 months so it's one of those things, based on conditions you can look to change it around as much as you want."
 
Winning the toss and batting first in T20s is not a very common or statistics supported decision. Maybe last match's impact.
 
t0w0QdvfTO6j9SFDZaS7_image%20%289%29.jpg


Archer on fire.
 
Nice to see two genuine quicks share the new ball...as opposed to a left arm spinner darting it in.
 
Wow, Archer is bowling at some unreal pace.

In LOIs he is generally pacy more often than not. Same is the case with someone younger like Shaheen who bowls mid 135-140 kph in tests but, goes upto 145 kph and + in LOIs.
 
It has been a poor toss to win for Aus till now.
 
Doesnt look an easy wicket against new ball atleast
 
Eoin Morgan is a gun captain. Such a shame he's not a great Test batsman otherwise England would be winning way more Tests under his captaincy than they are under Root.
 
Just like this hit n giggle cricket is the great world talents Hafeez and Wahab's level. This is also Archer's level.
 
Getting worse for Australia. Needless run out just as they were rebuilding.
 
Definitely not the best T20 pitches I have seen.
 
Morgan is the best LOI skipper of the last decade alongside or after Dhoni in my opinion. Their ability to get the best out of every single player is outstanding.
 
Now this is what you call real pace - Archer and Wood clocking Over 90mph ball after ball in these spells.

We were getting excited by Naseem Shah getting upto 88mph on effort ballls.
 
There's nothing fast about Naseem. We don't have a single fast bowler in the country who can crank it up to 155kph. And a fast bowler is one whose average speed is 90mph, not 86mph with the occasional ball of 90-91mph.
 
Now this is what you call real pace - Archer and Wood clocking Over 90mph ball after ball in these spells.

We were getting excited by Naseem Shah getting upto 88mph on effort ballls.

To be honest cant really compare Tests and LOIs pace. Didnt see Archer touching 90mph ball after ball in Test series, if I am not wrong Naseem was faster in terms of average pace in the series.

In in T20s vs Eng even Shaheen clicked 146-147 kph few times. That bowl to Bairstow was pretty quick too.

Its easier to ball at pace in T20s when you only have to ball 4 overs and to an extent in ODIs where you have to ball 10 overs. In tests you can be asked to ball over 20 overs in an innings so it requires a lot more fitness to maintain that.
 
Last edited:
There were excuses aplenty about Naseem Shah, how he needed to warm up, how he would start to bowl real quick but didn't actually happen etc etc.
 
To be honest cant really compare Tests and LOIs pace. Didnt see Archer touching 90mph ball after ball in Test series, if I am not wrong Naseem was faster in terms of average pace in the series.

In in T20s vs Eng even Shaheen clicked 146-147 kph few times. That bowl to Bairstow was pretty quick too.

Its easier to ball at pace in T20s when you only have to ball 4 overs and to an extent in ODIs where you have to ball 10 overs. In tests you can be asked to ball over 20 overs in an innings so it requires a lot more fitness to maintain that.

Yes, but we were told that Naseem would be bowling 90+ rockets in the Tests.
 
It's not just the pace guys, it's the skill. Archer's been getting the ball to move too.

Depressing watching this to be honest after seeing Pakistan these past two months. Fielding and bowling is on another level.
 
Naseem Shah bowled 64 out of his 132 deliveries at 145 kph+ in PSL 2020. Thought its worth mentioning considering the speed discussion on the thread.
 
It's not just the pace guys, it's the skill. Archer's been getting the ball to move too.

Depressing watching this to be honest after seeing Pakistan these past two months. Fielding and bowling is on another level.

This wicket at Southampton has allowed the ball to move, even Wood and Curran who are not known for movement were moving it. We didnt see much movement in tests throughout the summer from him. That being said Archer is undoubtedly skillful but the he has 5-8 times or more for FC experience than Pak’s young pacers and his body at 25 years of age is much more mature. So not really comparable in my opinion.
 
There's nothing fast about Naseem. We don't have a single fast bowler in the country who can crank it up to 155kph. And a fast bowler is one whose average speed is 90mph, not 86mph with the occasional ball of 90-91mph.
Exactly, as an example if we look back at the late 90s and take the Pakistan v India test series in 1999.

Venkatesh Prasad bowled mainly at about 80/81mph on average , Wasim/Waqar past their best and quickest but still looked noticeably sharper than Prasad and averaged about 85/86mph with effort balls 87/88mph - and then there was Shoaib averaging about 91/92mph with effort balls in mid 90 mph range.

The point is Prasad (medium pacer) -> Wasim/Waqar (fast medium) -> Shoaib (fast)
They all had a difference about 5mph in speed And 5 mph makes a massive difference.

Now we are seeing our quickest upcoming bowlers In Pakistan bowling about as quick as Wasim/Waqar did near the end of their careers in their 30s when they were well past their peaks.
 
Why are posters comparing a youngster who played only handful matches with Archer.?
 
Why are posters comparing a youngster who played only handful matches with Archer.?

Probably because he was over hyped to the moon, but the reality was quite different unfortunately.
 
Probably because he was over hyped to the moon, but the reality was quite different unfortunately.
For his age and experience he was rightly hyped, however, we can hope he will develop well and learn more ball skills. He has already dlivered in dead pitches of Pakistan even if it was lesser opposition
 
Last edited:
For his age and experience he was rightly hyped, however, we can hope he will develop well and learn more ball skills. He has already dlivered in dead pitches of Pakistan even if it was lesser opposition

Absolutely, your statement confirms he's still way too raw and not ready for competitive international cricket.
 
Australia really in big big trouble. Maxwell isn't looking convincing, but will help him that Rashid is off to be honest. Seems unable to pick a googly.
 
Feels like Aus play one batsman too short. Their bowling strategy is aggressive but could do with an extra batsman in a situation like this.
 
This is second consecutive match where Smith has bottled it. Just pathetic from a Gun player
 
As if Maxcell was anything about grace but. Oh Boy !! is this stance ugly or what.
with such stance he would always be reaching out for anything slightly outside
off stump

Australia batting standards and stock have depleted to such an extent is really
difficult to fathom. Likes of maxi and stionios are not taking them anywhere
 
Last edited:
Teams all over the world have found him out and his ugly new
stance is clearly indicating that he is trying his way out by going
crazy ugly.
 
Don't know what to make of Maxwell, seems to be one of the most bi-polar form players I've seen. Will either play an absolute blinder who has the crowd wondering "how did he do that?" with every second shot, or he'll look painfully out of form like he can't middle a single ball like today.
 
Archer makes a lot of difference with his yorkers unfortunate he didn't play against Pak, would had been interesting to see how Hafeez handled him.
 
Lol... Ashton was trying to get Cummins on strike says everything about Aussie batsmen :)) lol
 
Poor last over from Archer, 16 from it. Not to forget he was bowling to Agar and Cummins. Should have stuck with his yorkers.
 
AUS 157/7 (20.0)

Finch 40 (33)
Stoinis 35 (26)
Maxwell 25 (18)

Jordan 2/40 (4.0)
Wood 1/25 (4.0)
Rashid 1/25 (4.0)
Archer 1/31 (4.0)

England require 158 runs from 20 overs (7.9 RPO) to win.
 
Back
Top