What's new

England [294 & 329] beat Australia [225 & 263] by 135 runs in the 5th Ashes Test to draw series 2-2

Smith’s gonna go for quick runs now and lose wicket in process.

Heck England have gotten him out only once this series without an extenuating circumstance like quick runs needed or batting with tail etc
 
ENG 294
AUS 179/7 (55.1) CRR: 3.24
Day 2: 3rd Session - Australia trail by 115 runs
 
Smith’s gonna go for quick runs now and lose wicket in process.

Heck England have gotten him out only once this series without an extenuating circumstance like quick runs needed or batting with tail etc

Full credit to England tho, they have made that situation themselves. Australia is a straight middle ranked team without Smith.
 
A captain should bat first nearly 90% of the time.

Tim Paine is proving his outstanding mediocrity as time progresses.
 
Curran proving he is not a one-trick-pony.

Don’t know any left-armer who swings it in as much as him as consistently.

Boult does it but on occasion.
 
Smith gone for 80!

ENG 294
AUS 187/8 (61.1) CRR: 3.06
Day 2: 3rd Session - Australia trail by 107 runs
 
By dropping that easy catch of Smith, Root's humiliation is complete. Contrast between the two is so glaring, Smith keeps on dominating other members of Fab 4 whenever they go head to head in test cricket and ICC WC KOs. Only in WT20s and stupid LOI bilaterals does Kohli dominate Smith when India and Australia face off. Out of 7 or 8 test series only once has Smith been dominated by one of his rivals, Kane Williamson some 3 years back IIRC. That Kohli vs Smith battle in 2014-15 was almost equal if one takes into account the difference in quality of bowling attacks, all other contests have been beatdowns and Root has faced the brunt of it. That settles the Aussie's superiority, we are watching a mythical beast in all its glory.
 
By dropping that easy catch of Smith, Root's humiliation is complete. Contrast between the two is so glaring, Smith keeps on dominating other members of Fab 4 whenever they go head to head in test cricket and ICC WC KOs. Only in WT20s and stupid LOI bilaterals does Kohli dominate Smith when India and Australia face off. Out of 7 or 8 test series only once has Smith been dominated by one of his rivals, Kane Williamson some 3 years back IIRC. That Kohli vs Smith battle in 2014-15 was almost equal if one takes into account the difference in quality of bowling attacks, all other contests have been beatdowns and Root has faced the brunt of it. That settles the Aussie's superiority, we are watching a mythical beast in all its glory.

Hope he crosses the 800 mark in the second innings.

Deserves it.
 
That didn't look out, the umpire should have checked more he should have zoomed in on ultra edge. There seemed to be daylight between bat and ball when ultra edge showed.

There wasn't a frame as the ball passed the bat, but there was a clear noise as the ball passed the toe.
 
We will be having a result, for sure.

England in strong position and the fact that it's Australia batting last is a good sign for England.

A wonderful gesture by Australian captain, Tim Paine, to England as although he retained Ashes thanks to Steven Smith and a couple of his fast bowlers, he seems to have thrown away a great chance of winning a test series in England against England after almost 18 years by opting to bowl.
 
Last edited:
ENG 294
AUS 225/9 (68.4) CRR: 3.28
Day 2: 3rd Session - Australia trail by 69 runs

5fer for Archer!
 
ENG 294
AUS 225/9 (68.4) CRR: 3.28
Day 2: 3rd Session - Australia trail by 69 runs

5fer for Archer!

ENG 294
AUS 225-all out (68.5) CRR: 3.27
Day 2: 3rd Session - Australia trail by 69 runs
 
Typical England, save their best performance of the series for when the Ashes has already been decided.
 
Great to see Curran do well in his end-of-season opportunity. Making the selectors look daft.
 
Stumps day 2

Eng 7/0 leading by 78 in their second innings. England: 294 & 9/0 * (4 overs)
Australia: 225
 
England have a tremendous opportunity of making this 2-2. A drawn series at home isn’t great, but it is not bad by any means.

It will be best for England if they ignore the disappointment of failing to regain the Ashes and focus on protecting a proud 18 year old record.

Nonetheless, in spite of Australia’s best batsman having the series of his life and England’s best batsman producing only one impactful innings, England find themselves in a position where they could realistically level the series. I think this illustrates that overall, England are the better side.

With a few tweaks, they are better positioned than Australia to face India in the inaugural World Test Championship Final at Lord’s in 2021.

Huge day tomorrow - if England are still batting at stumps, Australia would go home without a series victory.

England will rue the opportunity of letting Australia score 284 after reducing them for 122/8. Yes Smith played a blinder, but the absence of Anderson’s experience seriously hurt England when it came to dismissing Siddle. They failed to bowl at the right lengths.

Had England reduced Australia to a sub 200 score, the entire dynamic of the series could have been different.

Paine had a complete stinker by opting to bowl here, but I guess justice has been served for the amount of luck that Australia have had in this series.
 
To add to the above, not playing Archer in the first Test was a big blunder. He may not have been 100% fit, but he could still have made the difference in the first innings.

Furthermore, England have to find a way to play S. Curran in every game. He is a feisty little dynamite who rarely fails to impress with both bat and ball. He has a lot of talent and a bucketload of character and healthy aggression.
 
To add to the above, not playing Archer in the first Test was a big blunder. He may not have been 100% fit, but he could still have made the difference in the first innings.

Furthermore, England have to find a way to play S. Curran in every game. He is a feisty little dynamite who rarely fails to impress with both bat and ball. He has a lot of talent and a bucketload of character and healthy aggression.

Remember that Anderson broke down after four overs. Last two years he averages 16 in English tests. It was right to pick him.
 
England have a tremendous opportunity of making this 2-2. A drawn series at home isn’t great, but it is not bad by any means.

It will be best for England if they ignore the disappointment of failing to regain the Ashes and focus on protecting a proud 18 year old record.

Nonetheless, in spite of Australia’s best batsman having the series of his life and England’s best batsman producing only one impactful innings, England find themselves in a position where they could realistically level the series. <B>I think this illustrates that overall, England are the better side</B>.

With a few tweaks, they are better positioned than Australia to face India in the inaugural World Test Championship Final at Lord’s in 2021.

Huge day tomorrow - if England are still batting at stumps, Australia would go home without a series victory.

England will rue the opportunity of letting Australia score 284 after reducing them for 122/8. Yes Smith played a blinder, but the absence of Anderson’s experience seriously hurt England when it came to dismissing Siddle. They failed to bowl at the right lengths.

Had England reduced Australia to a sub 200 score, the entire dynamic of the series could have been different.

Paine had a complete stinker by opting to bowl here, but I guess justice has been served for the amount of luck that Australia have had in this series.

Not at all. The differences have been:-

1. England best batsmen you mentioned was never great enough to play lots of impactful knocks in this series while the best bat from Australia had in him which he already showcased 2 years back in previous Ashes and did it again.

2. Jimmy has always been poor Vs Australia. I have no doubt that he won't have made much difference in the result as it has always been Broad, the go-to man for England and Archer has further strengthened England bowling.

3. The fact that it took Stokes to play an inning of his lifetime to win a test Vs Australia at home speaks all we have to know about who is the better side between the two.

4. There is not much that seperates both team in batting except you get in Smith in place of Root and that itself makes quite a big difference in test cricket. In bowling department, Lyon disappointed Australia quite like Leach who couldn't do much with bowl for England but the Pacers balance out.

Overall, in England conditions, the difference in these two sides had been Joe Root- getting replaced by Steven Smith and there we have the result.
 
Last edited:
Poor performance from smith today. He should have taken aus to lead of couple of runs atleast. Aus on backfoot now i guess. Curran has been impressive!
 
To add to the above, not playing Archer in the first Test was a big blunder. He may not have been 100% fit, but he could still have made the difference in the first innings.

Furthermore, England have to find a way to play S. Curran in every game. He is a feisty little dynamite who rarely fails to impress with both bat and ball. He has a lot of talent and a bucketload of character and healthy aggression.

It’s surprising that Curran, who was instrumental in beating India 4-1, only got his first game of the series now.
 
Jofra Archer claimed his second Test six-for and Steve Smith hit 80 as England secured a 69-run lead in the final Ashes Test against Australia.


England began the day on 271/8 and extended their innings by 23 runs, with Jack Leach again demonstrating his capable technique. Jos Buttler fell for 70, unable to build on his heroics from the previous evening, while Mitchell Marsh finished proceedings off, bowling Leach to claim his first Test five-for.

With the bat, it was a familiar story for Australia. Once again, the openers fell cheaply, Archer getting both to edge behind in an exemplary new-ball spell, and once again Steve Smith and Marnus Labuschagne rebuilt.

The latter outscored his senior partner, but having made 48 he was pinned LBW by Archer to dash his hopes of a half-century. Matthew Wade and Marsh each hung around in useful stands, but both fell before reaching 20, the former struck in front by the impressive Sam Curran, and the latter picking out fine leg off Archer with a pull shot.

From 160/4, Australia soon found themselves 166/7 as Curran struck twice in two balls, nicking off Tim Paine before swinging one devastatingly back into Pat Cummins, who reviewed to no avail.

Watching all the while was Smith, who proceeded in his usual fashion past 50, taking his run of consecutive half-centuries against England to 10. No one else has as many against a single opponent. He enjoyed one moment of good fortune, when Joe Root dropped him off Curran at first slip, but otherwise he was untroubled, and it seemed a fourth century of the series beckoned.

Instead, Chris Woakes achieved the seemingly impossible, beating Smith’s leg-side flick and dismissing the Australian talisman for 80 – his lowest score of the series. Nathan Lyon swung his bat merrily to lift Australia past 200, and when he was dropped off Archer, Leach spilling what would have been the seamer’s fifth wicket at fine leg, it appeared England were rattled.

Smith starred again before Woakes removed him unexpectedlySmith starred again before Woakes removed him unexpectedly
Archer, however, wasn’t and resolved to simply do it himself, a knuckleball yorker rattling the base of the stumps. He did have Rory Burns’ splendid catch to thank for his sixth, the opener diving and plucking at gully before running off to prepare to face the new ball.

He and Joe Denly, who had since the end of the first day become a father for the second time, just about made it to the close, though there were some moments of alarm. Denly edged to Harris in the cordon, who shelled the chance, while off the last ball of the day, Burns was given LBW, only for a review to show it pitched outside leg.

There is the prospect of plenty more fierce bowling to come tomorrow, but with England leading by 78 runs, they will know if they can battle through it, they could carve a match-defining lead.

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/1342505
 
England have a tremendous opportunity of making this 2-2. A drawn series at home isn’t great, but it is not bad by any means.

It will be best for England if they ignore the disappointment of failing to regain the Ashes and focus on protecting a proud 18 year old record.

Nonetheless, in spite of Australia’s best batsman having the series of his life and England’s best batsman producing only one impactful innings, England find themselves in a position where they could realistically level the series. I think this illustrates that overall, England are the better side.

With a few tweaks, they are better positioned than Australia to face India in the inaugural World Test Championship Final at Lord’s in 2021.

Huge day tomorrow - if England are still batting at stumps, Australia would go home without a series victory.

England will rue the opportunity of letting Australia score 284 after reducing them for 122/8. Yes Smith played a blinder, but the absence of Anderson’s experience seriously hurt England when it came to dismissing Siddle. They failed to bowl at the right lengths.

Had England reduced Australia to a sub 200 score, the entire dynamic of the series could have been different.

Paine had a complete stinker by opting to bowl here, but I guess justice has been served for the amount of luck that Australia have had in this series.

I agree with this except that ENG are better than AUS.

Let’s see. Combined Side.....

Burns
Denly (has got some runs unlike AUS openers)
Saffer import
New Bradman
Roooooooot
Stokes
Paine
Cummins
Archer
Broad
Lyon

Hmmm, that’s six ENG players.
 
I find it difficult to measure the quality of Australia’s XI as a whole, purely given the presence of Smith. With his Bradmanesque batting average and the influence that he can hold over the direction of a match, he is worth 3 or 4 players on his own.

Cummins is also a stunning bowler, although certainly not as far ahead of his peers as Smith is. (Archer has been almost as good as Cummins this series - whereas the next best batter to Smith is several planets behind him.)
 
Am shocked as to why England did not pick Sam Curran earlier in the series, his bowling is perfect for English conditions. For me England's batting is what has cost them this series, not one single batsman has looked solid in this series and Root does not even look like an elite batsman
 
I agree with this except that ENG are better than AUS.

Let’s see. Combined Side.....

Burns
Denly (has got some runs unlike AUS openers)
Saffer import
New Bradman
Roooooooot
Stokes
Paine
Cummins
Archer
Broad
Lyon

Hmmm, that’s six ENG players.

Broad 19 wickets @ 29
Hazelwood 20 wickets @ 19
 
So funny how Mamoon and some English fans are coming out after finally winning a day in a 5 match test series. Its all about taking the Urn and Australia have retained it even they lose this so Mamoon keep making yourself happy with your stupid comments and theories.

Australia have played better cricket and are deservedly retaining the Ashes. Let it sink in.
 
How can England be the better team despite getting humiliated in last Ashes down under. And England's best batsman averages 48 in tests amd 20 something this year sorry to burst your bubble but Root was never that good in first place. Root hasnt scored a 100 in last 10 Ashes test.
Just hope that Eng collapse tommorow and stop some people from doing Bhangra after Eng draw an Ashes "at home"
 
Not at all. The differences have been:-

1. England best batsmen you mentioned was never great enough to play lots of impactful knocks in this series while the best bat from Australia had in him which he already showcased 2 years back in previous Ashes and did it again.

Root has hit a wall in the last couple of years, but he has been able to play big knocks at home in the past. He had a dominant Ashes in 2015, he scored massacred Pakistan at old Trafford and he scored 180+ on his captaincy debut against South Africa. This is only the second summer in succession where he hasn’t been able to score big yet. A pre-2018 version of Root would have scored a big hundred by now, which would probably have changed the outlook of this series.

2. Jimmy has always been poor Vs Australia. I have no doubt that he won't have made much difference in the result as it has always been Broad, the go-to man for England and Archer has further strengthened England bowling.

He hasn’t been too bad at home though. Plus, at this stage of his career, he has completely mastery of bowling in England and this Australian lineup is poor with the exception of Smith. Anderson would have struggled against the latter, but I really do think he could have made a difference overall. Archer and Broad have been really good but Woakes has been average.

I really like Woakes, but as long as Anderson is around, he shouldn’t be starting. Anderson, Archer and Broad make for a superior attack.


3. The fact that it took Stokes to play an inning of his lifetime to win a test Vs Australia at home speaks all we have to know about who is the better side between the two.

Stokes is an all-time great and an incredible performer under pressure. He literally did it over and over again at the World Cup and he has done it twice in this series. I think it is a strength of England to have a player like him - someone who can do something special under pressure time and time again.

There is not much that seperates both team in batting except you get in Smith in place of Root and that itself makes quite a big difference in test cricket. In bowling department, Lyon disappointed Australia quite like Leach who couldn't do much with bowl for England but the Pacers balance out.

Overall, in England conditions, the difference in these two sides had been Joe Root- getting replaced by Steven Smith and there we have the result.

If you take Smith and Root out, I believe England have the better lineup, especially because Warner cannot bat in England. In Australia, it would be a different story. England’s support players have more potential than Australian support players in my view, although Labuschagne looks very good.
 
So funny how Mamoon and some English fans are coming out after finally winning a day in a 5 match test series. Its all about taking the Urn and Australia have retained it even they lose this so Mamoon keep making yourself happy with your stupid comments and theories.

Australia have played better cricket and are deservedly retaining the Ashes. Let it sink in.

It is not about the urn only. There is a bigger context at play now, the World Test Championship. Drawing the series 2-2 instead of losing 2-1 or 3-1 would significantly boost England’s chances of playing India in the final in two years time.

I don’t think England would mind Australia retaining the urn if they end up winning the Test Championship anyway.
 
How can England be the better team despite getting humiliated in last Ashes down under. And England's best batsman averages 48 in tests amd 20 something this year sorry to burst your bubble but Root was never that good in first place. Root hasnt scored a 100 in last 10 Ashes test.
Just hope that Eng collapse tommorow and stop some people from doing Bhangra after Eng draw an Ashes "at home"

Root has sixteen test hundreds and is third youngest to 7000 test runs, so he was “that good in the first place”.

Just can’t combine captaincy with major run scoring, particularly when his top three are so weak and he is forced to bat out of position.
 
It is not about the urn only. There is a bigger context at play now, the World Test Championship.

I don’t t think England would mind Australia retaining the urn if they end up winning the Test Championship anyway.

Yeah, we do. It’s always about the urn.
 
Root has hit a wall in the last couple of years, but he has been able to play big knocks at home in the past. He had a dominant Ashes in 2015, he scored massacred Pakistan at old Trafford and he scored 180+ on his captaincy debut against South Africa. This is only the second summer in succession where he hasn’t been able to score big yet. A pre-2018 version of Root would have scored a big hundred by now, which would probably have changed the outlook of this series.



He hasn’t been too bad at home though. Plus, at this stage of his career, he has completely mastery of bowling in England and this Australian lineup is poor with the exception of Smith. Anderson would have struggled against the latter, but I really do think he could have made a difference overall. Archer and Broad have been really good but Woakes has been average.

I really like Woakes, but as long as Anderson is around, he shouldn’t be starting. Anderson, Archer and Broad make for a superior attack.




Stokes is an all-time great and an incredible performer under pressure. He literally did it over and over again at the World Cup and he has done it twice in this series. I think it is a strength of England to have a player like him - someone who can do something special under pressure time and time again.



If you take Smith and Root out, I believe England have the better lineup, especially because Warner cannot bat in England. In Australia, it would be a different story. England’s support players have more potential than Australian support players in my view, although Labuschagne looks very good.

If I am not wrong, test championship fixture is such that everyone is having equal number of test matches home and away.

The current version of Root has been very mediocre and no match to pre-2016 Root but even that version of Root was well behind Smith as a test batter, particularly in terms of dominating bowling everywhere.

All-conditions combined, India and Australia obviously looks the two major teams to battle out as far as test championship is concerned.

England overall are not inferior because of the difference between Smith and Root but also the fact that Australian bowling would fare a lot better than England bowling away.

At this point, it's tough to say if England are even distant 3rd favourites because Kiwis have done better than them in the past two years.

India
Australia
New Zealand
England/South Africa/Pakistan/Sri Lanka

The top 3 are the major contenders for test championship and the rest are distant 4th.
 
Broad 19 wickets @ 29
Hazelwood 20 wickets @ 19

Interesting to see Broad averaging near 30 given that this has still been one of Broad’s better series in a while.

Hazelwood strikes me as one of those bowlers that is actually top quality but never seems to get the praise or recognition that he really deserves.
 
Great to see Curran do well in his end-of-season opportunity. Making the selectors look daft.

How was this guy not selected in the first place? Wasn’t he the one who dealt death blows to India last year? England selectors lack vision and common sense.
 
The selectors have had a ‘mare this Ashes. Yes there is currently a limited amount of talent to work with, but you have to make the most of what you do have, and they have failed to do so.
 
Yeah, we do. It’s always about the urn.

Generally speaking, yes. However, I would argue that winning the inaugural Test Championship would be a huge deal for England, as it would make the joint Test and ODI Champions.

After all, they did put the Test team on the back burner to win the World Cup.
 
How was this guy not selected in the first place? Wasn’t he the one who dealt death blows to India last year? England selectors lack vision and common sense.

He went backwards in WI. Then Archer emerged. But yeah, he should have played in hindsight, maybe for Woakes.
 
He went backwards in WI. Then Archer emerged. But yeah, he should have played in hindsight, maybe for Woakes.

Sam Curran should have played ahead of either Denly/Buttler. He is clearly the better batsman in test format and a more than handy bowler.
 
Generally speaking, yes. However, I would argue that winning the inaugural Test Championship would be a huge deal for England, as it would make the joint Test and ODI Champions.

After all, they did put the Test team on the back burner to win the World Cup.

India will be the champion

England chances :)))
 
Generally speaking, yes. However, I would argue that winning the inaugural Test Championship would be a huge deal for England, as it would make the joint Test and ODI Champions.

After all, they did put the Test team on the back burner to win the World Cup.

England s test team is not good enough to win the test championship there's to many gaping holes, plus Anderson and broad won't be around for much longer plus no spinning quality which concludes to a average test side I'm afraid
 
Sam Curran should have played ahead of either Denly/Buttler. He is clearly the better batsman in test format and a more than handy bowler.

Not seeing how you think Curran is a better test batsman that Denly and Buttler.

He’s a bowling all-rounder at this stage. Needs to get a yard of pace on him, but that will come.
 
Not seeing how you think Curran is a better test batsman that Denly and Buttler.

He’s a bowling all-rounder at this stage. Needs to get a yard of pace on him, but that will come.

Believe it or not R, Curran’s Test match batting average is considerably higher than Denly’s and similar to Buttler’s.
 
England's game to lose.

AUS 225
ENG 294, 27/0 (12.3) CRR: 2.16
Day 3: 1st Session - England lead by 96 runs
 
Generally speaking, yes. However, I would argue that winning the inaugural Test Championship would be a huge deal for England, as it would make the joint Test and ODI Champions.

After all, they did put the Test team on the back burner to win the World Cup.

Congrats on England getting to the final of the Test Championship. Just because your supported team couldn't win back the Ashes at home you coming with stupid theories that drawing the series is guaranteed a test championship final place. Get a grip and stop making a fool of yourself. This England team is not making the test championship final. And your world class batsmen Root is a mental midget which has been proven.
You take Stokes and Smith out this series and Australia would win the series.

And its all about the Urn ask any English fans unlike yourself. Stop embarrassing yourself more and saying it don't matter as drawing series is guarantee England making it to the Test Championship final which this England team will never do so carry satisfying yourself like a fool.
 
Burns gone

AUS 225
ENG 294, 58/1 (17.0) CRR: 3.41
Day 3: 1st Session - England lead by 127 runs
 
can we just slap tim paine's face for choosing to field???

they lost the game now. Even smith can't save them.
 
Good start for England. Their problem is the no.4 spot, they have to get a specialist bat in or play Root and get Pope at 3.

Stokes is an all-rounder and should bat at 5 only. Bairstow or Buttler, anyone at 6 but as specialist and Foakes at 7 taking gloves on.
 
Where does Paine's toss decision rank among the worst blunders by captains in the history of cricket? In recent times only Kohli's idiotic decision in the CT2017 final comes close.
 
Where does Paine's toss decision rank among the worst blunders by captains in the history of cricket? In recent times only Kohli's idiotic decision in the CT2017 final comes close.

nothing beat a the CT2017 decision *****.
this is a close second though.
 
When Aussies opted to bat, I thought it was a wrong call - then they dropped couple of sitters in 1st morning session!!!! Smith has kept them in the Test still, but don't think Aussies will chase 300 here - Poms are 70-30 ahead, new ball hasn't done any damage for the first time in this series.
 
Where does Paine's toss decision rank among the worst blunders by captains in the history of cricket? In recent times only Kohli's idiotic decision in the CT2017 final comes close.

Conisdering they almost lost 2nd test match after electing to field first. Playing Siddle ahead of Pattinson or Starc was another dumb call by the mangement
 
390 runs for Burns in ten innings. A good return against these fine opening bowlers. Not as good as Strauss, but good enough.
 
Surprise, surprise - this is 3rd innings of the game and this guy Lyon has taken so far both wickets that have gone down!!!!!!
 
Denly could cement his place today.

Burns already has.
 
Root looks exhausted. He has played every England game this year and Big Bash too. He needs six months off.
 
Congrats to England. A monumentally stupid decision by the aussie skipper at the toss has cost them a rare Ashes victory abroad.
Eng will delighted with 2-2 after being outplayed the entire series.
 
AUS 225
ENG 294, 88/2 (30.0) CRR: 2.93
Day 3: Lunch Break - England lead by 157 runs
 
Australia's Weaknesses:-

1. Paine as a captain and batsmen in the team. A good wicket-keeper though but again doesn't know how to use reviews.

2. Batting is poor. Starc and Siddle are weak link in the bowling department and Lyon seems to have past it as well.

Strength:-

1. Steven Smith
2. Pat Cummins

Time for Australia to play Wade as wicket-keeper batsmen and drop Paine and get in M Marsh.
 
Denly averages 15 in the 1st innings and averages 41 in the 2nd innings. How odd.
 
Did Stokes use up all of his good karma in the run chase at Headingley? He has looked very scratchy and out of form since then.
 
AUS 225
ENG 294, 140/2 (47.0) CRR: 2.98
Day 3: 2nd Session - England lead by 209 runs
 
India will be the champion

England chances :)))

England s test team is not good enough to win the test championship there's to many gaping holes, plus Anderson and broad won't be around for much longer plus no spinning quality which concludes to a average test side I'm afraid

Congrats on England getting to the final of the Test Championship. Just because your supported team couldn't win back the Ashes at home you coming with stupid theories that drawing the series is guaranteed a test championship final place. Get a grip and stop making a fool of yourself. This England team is not making the test championship final. And your world class batsmen Root is a mental midget which has been proven.
You take Stokes and Smith out this series and Australia would win the series.

And its all about the Urn ask any English fans unlike yourself. Stop embarrassing yourself more and saying it don't matter as drawing series is guarantee England making it to the Test Championship final which this England team will never do so carry satisfying yourself like a fool.

England is third in rankings. India is guaranteed to finish top at the end of the cycle, which means it us pretty much down to England, Australia and New Zealand to finish second.

South Africa is second at the moment but it will falter because of its transition period, and Pakistan is rubbish.

With a bit of planning, England have every chance of finishing ahead of Australia and New Zealand.

India is the best in the world by a distance, but England has their number at home. The prospect of England winning the Test Championship doesn’t sound outlandish at all, which is why winning this game and leveling the series 2-2 is so critical.
 
England is third in rankings. India is guaranteed to finish top at the end of the cycle, which means it us pretty much down to England, Australia and New Zealand to finish second.

South Africa is second at the moment but it will falter because of its transition period, and Pakistan is rubbish.

With a bit of planning, England have every chance of finishing ahead of Australia and New Zealand.

India is the best in the world by a distance, but England has their number at home. The prospect of England winning the Test Championship doesn’t sound outlandish at all, which is why winning this game and leveling the series 2-2 is so critical.

Your tripe is irrelevant, you do more circles than a clock!
 
Soft ball, flat pitch, tired bowlers, Stokes with runs at his back.
 
AUS 225
ENG 294, 218/3 (65.3) CRR: 3.33
Day 3: 3rd Session - England lead by 287 runs

All over for Australia I feel but then they have Smith....
 
AUS 225
ENG 294, 218/3 (65.3) CRR: 3.33
Day 3: 3rd Session - England lead by 287 runs

All over for Australia I feel but then they have Smith....

Even Smith surely can't rescue em this time, paine to be fired immediately following this test
 
AUS 225
ENG 294, 249/4 (72.0) CRR: 3.46
Day 3: 3rd Session - England lead by 318 runs
 
Back
Top