JibranAnsari
ODI Captain
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2010
- Runs
- 46,975
Pakistanis would just stay to find players to blameLOL. True.
A real fan would stay till the end (win or loss).![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pakistanis would just stay to find players to blameLOL. True.
A real fan would stay till the end (win or loss).![]()
Ben stokes has bowled 44 overs in the match and has batted over 250 balls
What a player what a leader....
Moral victory? England showed they were able to adapt their game to win in the circumstances of the game, as good sides do.India can take a massive moral victory here.
They forced England to change their bazball style and change their pitches but still took them to tea on day 5.
So much guts and character shown across both sides with a special mention for Stokes and Jadeja efforts on the final day.
A great test match.
But lot of Indians eat beef lmaoI actually had a bit of beef biryani once they went for Tea break.
Once I returned, I saw England won.
Fittingly, I enjoyed an Indian defeat after consuming beef biryani.
Agreed pitch had not much tbhPitches like these are what test cricket needs. Not pitches where batsmen score tons for fun and bowlers struggle to maintain an ER of 4 RPO.
I do have to admit one thing. @Ab Fan
Jadeja has been a superhero with the bat this series. I hate jadeja but he deserves credit.
He has Impressed and shut up many of his critics this season.
Bumrah as a tail ender is like a proper tulla bro no sense of situations thats where naseem shah is so good at with his stubborn battingHe did the same in the 1st Test.
It was the kind of pitch that demanded alot of application and concentration from the batsmen. Out of the Indian batsmen, only Rahul and Jadeja showed thatAgreed pitch had not much tbh
Our moron batsmen threw it away.
Indian fans - 'Losser' teams fan yet deluded and arrogant.Oh here comes the fans of Loser's team who won 2 SENA test since 2018.![]()
![]()
Indian fans - 'Losser' teams fan yet deluded and arrogant.
Game got close very close, hence the situational blame lies on Bumrah. If India had lost by 70 runs no one would have blamed Bumrah for poor shot selection. Of course in overall context Indian batsmen failed to chase down a modest total.Blaming Bumrah and Siraj for this loss is peak stupidity lol. What exactly were Gill, Pant, Nair, Jaiswal, Reddy, and Sundar doing? Vacationing?![]()
I still dont understand how @Devadwal can keep misspelling words on a consistent basis.Indian fans - 'Losser' teams fan yet deluded and arrogant.
India is the least talented cricketing nation in the world.
With everything possible at their disposal they dish out performances like these?
I mean they cheat as well
Character. I am not comparing records. That street fighter qualityMiandad Nha. Miandad one of the best batsmen of his time. Jadeja isn’t the best or even top 5 in this gen as a batter
India won 60% of the sessions in this series. Lost key moments. Can happen with inexperienced team. 5 times they scored 350 plus in a row. This match was lost on those key moments. India got nervous late evening unncessarily and cost wickets with stupid shots. With KOhli and Rohit we would be staring at 0-3 loss. No thanks. Finally Indian batting has started clicking apart from this innings.Talent is not the issue, arrogance, haughtiness and choking on the big stage is. Also it was madness for them to let Kohli and Rohit go this soon, yes they had a bad tour of Australia but they could have turned it around in England where the flat low bounce pitches would have favoured them, they would not have done much worse than Nair or Reddy with the bat. Test Cricket is the premier format and you need experience in this format.
They retired?Talent is not the issue, arrogance, haughtiness and choking on the big stage is. Also it was madness for them to let Kohli and Rohit go this soon, yes they had a bad tour of Australia but they could have turned it around in England where the flat low bounce pitches would have favoured them, they would not have done much worse than Nair or Reddy with the bat. Test Cricket is the premier format and you need experience in this format.
Like?England have won but still
THIS IS A RUBBISH SQUAD, WITH SOME AWFUL PLAYERS, ENG MUST BRING 4 TO 5 CHANGES
India won 60% of the sessions in this series. Lost key moments. Can happen with inexperienced team. 5 times they scored 350 plus in a row. This match was lost on those key moments. India got nervous late evening unncessarily and cost wickets with stupid shots. With KOhli and Rohit we would be staring at 0-3 loss. No thanks. Finally Indian batting has started clicking apart from this innings.
They retired?
Bring in Bairstow for Pope, Bethell for Crawley, Wood and Atkinson for tired and exhausted Carse and woakesLike?
Bethell is a replacement for stokes not Crawley but stokes has performed with the ball and is captain.Bring in Bairstow for Pope, Bethell for Crawley, Wood and Atkinson for tired and exhausted Carse and woakes
No way. Kohli didn't even do that in his peak scoring two big centuries in on tests. why didn't Root score then?Let's be honest, if Gill, KL, Pant and Jadeja can score runs on these wickets, so could Rohit and Kohli.
BairstowBring in Bairstow for Pope, Bethell for Crawley, Wood and Atkinson for tired and exhausted Carse and woakes
No way. Kohli didn't even do that in his peak scoring two big centuries in on tests. why didn't Root score then?
He recently scored two centuries, one in county and other in vitality blast...He is a good basher in Eng conditionsBethell is a replacement for stokes not Crawley but stokes has performed with the ball and is captain.
And you are giving too much credit to Bairstow. He is washed up and he wasnt a good test cricketer anyway.
Getting Kohli out doesn't need rocket science. Just throw it wide. He will edge it. He got out like 9 out of 10 tiems in Australia on all sorts of tracks. He occupied that key no.4 spot for far too long. Finally we got a replacement.The wickets in this series is much easier than the ones he encountered in 2014, 2018 & 2021. He also would not have to contend with Anderson and Broad.
In hindsight their inclusion may make sense but selectors didn't know pitches would be so flat. I mean pathetic test batsman Gill has already scored 600 runs in the series.Yes, they were told clearly by the selectors to move on. Rohit was told he would not be picked for the English series. Kohli was told that the English tour would be his final chance and the BCCI were not interested in making him captain.
AlrightE but I feel England wont change anything. Crawley is defo going nowhere.He recently scored two centuries, one in county and other in vitality blast...He is a good basher in Eng conditions
How much ROot score on the same match? You don't get shellacking with world no.1 and no.2 batsman in your side against a Bumrahless side.In hindsight their inclusion may make sense but selectors didn't know pitches would be so flat. I mean pathetic test batsman Gill has already scored 600 runs in the series.
Kohli finished as as test cricketer 5 years and selectors expected another failed away tour.
Rohit actually never was a test player and batted like a tailender in Aus.
By your logic Root is less of a test player than Gill because he could not score in that same matchHow much ROot score on the same match? You don't get shellacking with world no.1 and no.2 batsman in your side against a Bumrahless side.
It needed an ATG knock from Jadeja for India to win. He played a great one but misses out on converting it as an all time great knock. We shouldn’t blame him for not being able to produce an all time great knock there.Gone but good effort. @Ab Fan
I change my mind about Jadeja. Herculean effort. Good going. I admit defeat.
That is a strawman logic you are using. If GIll can score Kohli can score is your argument. ROot is clearly a better test batsman than Kohli an d inform. He didn't score. How can you assume Kohli would ahve scored?By your logic Root is less of a test player than Gill because he could not score in that same match
Not current Kohli and RohitLet's be honest, if Gill, KL, Pant and Jadeja can score runs on these wickets, so could Rohit and Kohli.
He should have taken the chance when batting with Siraj. He didn't even tried to attack.It needed an ATG knock from Jadeja for India to win. He played a great one but misses out on converting it as an all time great knock. We shouldn’t blame him for not being able to produce an all time great knock there.![]()
For which bit?Highlight of the day though was Gavaskar and Ashwin crying about umpiring and technology.
Rasputin EffectBumrah should be dropped for the 4rth test for his stupid shot.
I'm amazed at how brain-dead some of these players r. The last thing you should be doing is hittin the ball in the air. Clown.
KL Rahul's dismissal and general biasness of umpiring against IndiaFor which bit?
KL Rahul's dismissal and general biasness of umpiring against India
India in Transition? Rohit was never a player to loose in test cricket and Kohli was already done. Surely Gill has filled his shoes already . Transition happens when you loose players that were backbone and instrumental in team wins. Kohli Rohit lost 3-0 to NZ at homeMultiple posters tagged me but I am travelling lads...so havn't had a chance to watch the game. However feels good as a proud Britisher to be on the winning side again. Congratulations to all my fellow countrymen too @KingKhanWC @DeadlyVenom @Cpt. Rishwat and others.
We must also give credit to this talented Indian side. They are a side in transition and yet taking all 3 test matches so far all the way to 5th day. We never expected a Kohli less India will give our full strength side so much competition and that too at home in our conditions. No wonder we British public loves India play in our shores and always gives them 5 test matches wheever they come here.
At the end of the day, test cricket is the winner.
Rajdeep.
True. Crawley, Pope, Bashir need to go.England have won but still
THIS IS A RUBBISH SQUAD, WITH SOME AWFUL PLAYERS, ENG MUST BRING 4 TO 5 CHANGES
Transition has multiple meanings.India in Transition? Rohit was never a player to loose in test cricket and Kohli was already done. Surely Gill has filled his shoes already . Transition happens when you loose players that were backbone and instrumental in team wins. Kohli Rohit lost 3-0 to NZ at home
Rahul was plumb. India had a few umpires calls at Edgbaston, England had a few in this match. Sunni losing his marblesKL Rahul's dismissal and general biasness of umpiring against India
Haha bro. I am no Indian supporter. I can however overrate the opposition most of the time.Post of the year?
My deal Gulam...India has recently lost five senior players—Kohli, Rohit, Ashwin, Rahane, and Pujara—who were the backbone of their Test cricket side for quite some time. As a result, the team is clearly in a transitional phase, with a young captain and relatively inexperienced players. We Britishers thought we will run them over like we did during Jalianwala Bagh Massacre. However, the Indian team has shown remarkable resilience and grit across all three games so far, even managing to win one. This performance deserves respect, and the ECB’s decision to schedule five-Test series against them each time now seems fully justified. Hopefully you will not ask such juvenile question in future.India in Transition? Rohit was never a player to loose in test cricket and Kohli was already done. Surely Gill has filled his shoes already . Transition happens when you loose players that were backbone and instrumental in team wins. Kohli Rohit lost 3-0 to NZ at home
I already mentioned both Kohli and Rohit in my post , they were never key factors in recent overseas Test wins. As for Rahane, his last Test was in July 2023 against West Indies, and he hasn’t featured in any squad since. Pujara hasn’t played a Test since the WTC Final in June 2023 over 2 years now.My deal Gulam...India has recently lost five senior players—Kohli, Rohit, Ashwin, Rahane, and Pujara—who were the backbone of their Test cricket side for quite some time. As a result, the team is clearly in a transitional phase, with a young captain and relatively inexperienced players. We Britishers thought we will run them over like we did during Jalianwala Bagh Massacre. However, the Indian team has shown remarkable resilience and grit across all three games so far, even managing to win one. This performance deserves respect, and the ECB’s decision to schedule five-Test series against them each time now seems fully justified. Hopefully you will not ask such juvenile question in future.
#
That is a strawman logic you are using. If GIll can score Kohli can score is your argument. ROot is clearly a better test batsman than Kohli an d inform. He didn't score. How can you assume Kohli would ahve scored?
Wondering why they gave Sachin the Man of the Match ahead of Afridi or Saqlain?Ironically, this was exactly the same way that Srinath got out in the 1999 chennai test vs Pakistan. One of the most heartbreaking test losses in my lifetime. The worst overall loss was 2003 WC final
I'm sure being the home team played a part but SRT deserved the man of the match for it. Single handedly took the team close against a legendary bowling attackWondering why they gave Sachin the Man of the Match ahead of Afridi or Saqlain?
3Rd one yes. I dont think the 1st test was close.Shaping up as an epic series so far.
Two close wins for England. The 2nd Test belting was still exciting for everyone else stepping up in Bumrah's absence and Gill stamping his arrival in style.
As a neutral, really enjoyable.
Whether they are useful or useless is not the point here. He was occupying no.4 spot a critical spot for too long. Pujara was at no.3 for long. Rohit as opener for long. So replacing that positions is called transition. So it is more or less complete transition. You probably use your logic to downplay it. But it is not true.I already mentioned both Kohli and Rohit in my post , they were never key factors in recent overseas Test wins. As for Rahane, his last Test was in July 2023 against West Indies, and he hasn’t featured in any squad since. Pujara hasn’t played a Test since the WTC Final in June 2023 over 2 years now.
Regarding Ashwin yes, a great spinner overall, but let’s not pretend he’s been impactful in England. His record in UK conditions is modest at best, so his absence doesn’t drastically weaken the side.
This isn’t a case of a team in complete transition it’s mostly the same unit that’s been playing under Rohit. Let’s not overplay the “transitional phase” card every time results don’t go India’s way.
yes logic is needed to dismantle this transition narrative. We can say Eng is in transition too. they lost Jimmy and Broad.. Hence Gill was able to score 600 Runs in 2 gamesWhether they are useful or useless is not the point here. He was occupying no.4 spot a critical spot for too long. Pujara was at no.3 for long. Rohit as opener for long. So replacing that positions is called transition. So it is more or less complete transition. You probably use your logic to downplay it. But it is not true.
Indian team is in transition bro. Its not like they had the same openers, The same no 3 who is now a no 4, the same wicket keeper, the same ace allrounder jadeja, the same bowlers barring Shami etc etc.yes logic is needed to dismantle this transition narrative. We can say Eng is in transition too. they lost Jimmy and Broad.. Hence Gill was able to score 600 Runs in 2 games
Yea. They are in transition too in the bowling. Our bowling and batting are in transition. But nobody scored 600 against India lolyes logic is needed to dismantle this transition narrative. We can say Eng is in transition too. they lost Jimmy and Broad.. Hence Gill was able to score 600 Runs in 2 games
Clutch players are not easy to find......If Only India had a bowler like Boland and not Bumrah.
Boland is the greatest test bowler of this generation
Oh noserious ball tampering and pitch doctoring by India. they are using advanced stealth technology to do it
@The Bald Eagle