Gone
Local Club Star
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
- Runs
- 1,721
He gloved it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Our players are idiots. Second time weve reviewed it after gloving it. Also they shouldve checked on snicko too like they always do. Wonder why they didnt this time
First of all the overs remaining are more than 100, so it can be achieved.
If I say we aren't winning, then what's the point of the batsmen carrying on? Shouldn't they declare?
Not giving up at this stage is not crazy or delusional, if I say we will win after we lose then that would mean I am crazy or delusional.
1. One error and we are down to tail of Pakistan.
2. Pakistan doesn't bat at R/R of 4.5 required to win this game in 100 overs or so.
3. If you say Pakistan will win AFTER they LOSE it is 100 percent delusional, but to say Pakistan will win WHEN EVERY SIGN SHOWS that they would be lucky to escape with a draw, IT HIS NOTHING SHORT OF EUPHORIC THINKING.
4. Anyhow, I don't mind you thinking we can win, I just wish you realize, that you are just isolating yourself by ridiculous assertions that you make.
England lost the Test, we didn't win.
England lost the Test, we didn't win.
We just can't help but feed Woakes wickets.
lol, what a joke of a team.
Would love to see the Englishmen mocking the push-up celebration after this thumping comes to an end.
One team wins and the other loses.
If you don't want to give credit to the winning team, by blaming the losing team, that's your prerogative.
But it makes you look funny to do this.
We lost this Test more than England lost the first one.![]()
Giving wickets to Moen who is bowling pies is worse. Same mistake India did. Over-attacking him. Esp in Pakistans case when there was no point in hitting fancy sixes
If I say we will win after we lose, then call me delusional, other wise your choice of words may only be due to me not agreeing with you or the majority.
England have been brilliant in this match, Pakistan wasn't in the last match.
This is not corruption of mind, but my thinking is in a way realistic, because the match is still not over, when the match isn't over why should anyone give up? Yes, the probability of winning may be low, but still one should fight till the end, and when it is lost officially, then one must accept defeat.No it's based on logical assumptions.
And that's why I am surprised, that someone who uses logic in religion and actually believes in Islam as a logical religion, would lose all logic when it comes to sporting scenarios.
Logic should be used in every field of life.
If 99 percent believe Pakistan can't win, it is because that is logical result. It's not because that's their own opinion and you have a different opinion.
History has proved that from this point on, LOGIC SUGGESTS, SIDES lose.
Defying logic is the hardest thing in this world, and the chances of that are one in million.
It's okay to even believe in that.
BUT WHEN YOU SAY IN EVERY MATCH THAT LOGIC WILL BE DEFIED, it no longer becomes just a difference of opinion, but corruption of mind.
Hope you understand what I mean.
Don't want to psychoanalyze you on a cricket forum![]()
Pakistan was brilliant in last Test, while England not.
And vice versa in this match.
If I say we will win after we lose, then call me delusional, other wise your choice of words may only be due to me not agreeing with you or the majority.
Giving wickets to Moen who is bowling pies is worse. Same mistake India did. Over-attacking him. Esp in Pakistans case when there was no point in hitting fancy sixes
England have been brilliant in this match, Pakistan wasn't in the last match.
And Pakistan was in last game.
You don't want to give credit then it's your opinion but doesn't change a thing!
This is not corruption of mind, but my thinking is in a way realistic, because the match is still not over, when the match isn't over why should anyone give up? Yes, the probability of winning may be low, but still one should fight till the end, and when it is lost officially, then one must accept defeat.
I didn't see anything wrong with the celebration...nothing offensive or obnoxious....was rather sweet
Oh bhai only Yasir was outstanding, our overall team performance was below par at Lord's.
Can some one kindly answer . Why was shafiq given out if onfield umpire gave it not out . Is it because it was hitting leg stump rather than clipping it?
I'm done with this match.
Can some one kindly answer . Why was shafiq given out if onfield umpire gave it not out . Is it because it was hitting leg stump rather than clipping it?
They aren't defeated, officially. Be realistic, not emotional.Must accept defeat?
Lol, even if one doesn't they are defeated.
No choice either way.
Yasir was brilliant, Pakistan was average.
England have had a good collective effort here, with Root the standout player.
Oh bhai only Yasir was outstanding, our overall team performance was below par at Lord's.
Yasir picked up 5 wickets in first innings and 5 in second.
Other bowlers managed to pick up 10 wickets.
Unless you claim that they had no influence whatsoever in making England 63-4 in 2nd innings.
Can some one kindly answer . Why was shafiq given out if onfield umpire gave it not out . Is it because it was hitting leg stump rather than clipping it?
lol, and who you were calling will flunk the moment he'll step out of sub continent.
On contrary, Misbah's 100 and Asad's contribution towards 339 in first innings total didn't mean anything right, BRAVO![]()
What the hell was that
Whatever I was calling Yasir doesn't matter, he performed brilliantly there. Yes he got some lucky wickets but it was a quality effort.
Misbah failed in the second innings and Shafiq was good but not outstanding.
Rest were failures apart from Amir, who was okay.