England vs Bangladesh | 2nd Test | Old Trafford | Jun 4-8 2010

Status
Not open for further replies.

Friend786

First Class Captain
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Runs
5,782
Big Picture

Steven Finn claimed nine wickets on a flat deck at Lord's, but the pacier Old Trafford wicket could be much more to his liking © Getty Images
Related Links
Players/Officials: Steven Finn | Andrew Strauss | Tamim Iqbal
Matches: England v Bangladesh at Manchester
Series/Tournaments: Bangladesh tour of England, Ireland and Scotland
Teams: Bangladesh | England
It was comfortable in the end, but for the first four days of the Lord's Test, England were made to graft for their rewards against a Bangladesh team that exceeded expectations, and even dominated significant passages of a match that most observers had expected to be over long before the end of the Bank Holiday weekend. But thanks to the bold endeavours of Tamim Iqbal, who blazed a thrilling century from 94 balls, and Shahadat Hossain, who became the first Bangladeshi to etch his name on the honours boards with five first-innings wickets, the underdogs emerged with credit from an entertaining encounter.

All the same, the final margin of victory was emphatic - England hurtled home by eight wickets, having enforced the follow-on and knocked off their target of 160 in a single session - and as Andrew Strauss admitted after the match, he expects better from his charges in this week's second Test, now that they have worked off their early-season rust. In Jonathan Trott, they have a batsman in a rich vein of form following his under-rated 226 in the first innings, while Steven Finn is the talk of Manchester following his nine-wicket haul on a typically flat Lord's deck. Old Trafford is renowned for its pace and bounce, and if he finds the right length to exploit the conditions, another fat haul could be heading his way.

Seeing as Bangladesh claimed six wickets in their entire Test campaign in 2005, and managed to lose two matches inside seven sessions on that ill-fated trip, the extent of their development has already been showcased. The challenge now is to build on the foundations that they laid in the Lord's Test, and try their utmost to hang in for a draw - a result that would represent a major step towards their acceptance as a top-flight Test nation. Given the gung-ho style in which they go about their work, however, that might be expecting too much, but a fighting performance would still put them in a good frame of mind for the three ODIs that follow at the start of next month.

Form guide (last five completed matches)
England WWWLD Bangladesh LLLLL
Watch out for...
Steven Finn has never played a first-class match at Old Trafford - in his brief career, Middlesex have habitually been wallowing in the second division, out of contact with the top-flight Lancastrians - but when quizzed on the conditions, his eyes lit up at the prospect of playing at a pace-friendly venue where Steve Harmison produced arguably the last great performance of his England career, against Pakistan in 2006. As Finn's Middlesex mentor, Angus Fraser, pointed out, the benefits of honing his technique on puddings is that he will be all the more ready to cash in when conditions are in his favour. After three Tests of hard graft, this match could be bonanza-time.

Mushfiqur Rahim made his Test debut on the 2005 tour, and acquitted himself well during the recent home series with a battling 95 in the second innings at Chittagong. Scores of 16 and 0 at Lord's last week were a disappointment, but they do not detract from a high-calibre cricketer who has the mindset to bat for long periods, not to mention a diminutive 5'2" frame that cannot help but disrupt bowlers' lengths. He will want to sign off from this series with a significant contribution.

Team news
The four-bowlers-versus-five question reared its head midway through the Lord's Test, at a time when England were struggling to dislodge an obdurate Bangladeshi top-order, but it's unlikely that any changes to the balance of the side will be unveiled for this match, especially now that the likeliest candidate to bat No. 7 in a five-man attack, Tim Bresnan, is sitting out the game with a stress fracture in his foot. Ajmal Shahzad is getting used to being leapfrogged in the final XI, but having waited patiently for his chance, he could well make his debut at the expense of the late inclusion to the squad, Ryan Sidebottom.

England (probable) 1 Andrew Strauss (capt), 2 Alastair Cook, 3 Jonathan Trott, 4 Kevin Pietersen, 5 Ian Bell, 6 Eoin Morgan, 7 Matt Prior (wk), 8 Ajmal Shahzad, 9 Graeme Swann, 10 James Andeson, 11 Steven Finn

Bangladesh's top-order batsmen acquitted themselves as best they could at Lord's, with significant contributions from Nos. 1 to 4. More will be expected of the middle order at Old Trafford, particularly the captain and wicketkeeper axis of Shakib Al Hasan and Mushfiqur Rahim, but it is the bowling that will be the greatest concern to Jamie Siddons and the Bangladesh thinktank. Aside from Shahadat, the seamers were ineffectual at Lord's, and Shafiul Islam will come into the side at the expense of either Rubel Hossain or, more likely, the Lord's debutant, Robiul Islam, with the second spinner, Abdul Razzak, also an option. Tamim, meanwhile, gave Bangladesh a minor scare when he missed training on Wednesday, but he is expected to be passed fit despite the ongoing concerns over his injured wrist.

Bangladesh (probable) 1 Tamim Iqbal, 2 Imrul Kayes, 3 Junaid Siddique, 4 Jahurul Islam, 5 Mohammad Ashraful, 6 Shakib Al Hasan (capt), 7 Mahmudullah, 8 Mushfiqur Rahim (wk), 9 Shafiul Islam, 10 Rubel Hossain, 11 Shahadat Hossain

Pitch and conditions
Manchester is not renowned for the most cheerful weather in the world, but the sun has been shining in recent days and the balmy conditions will doubtless be a boon to the Bangladeshis, who visibly struggled whenever the clouds took hold at Lord's. However, if Old Trafford's wicket plays up to its trampoline reputation, it will doubtless be a challenge come rain or shine.
Stats and Trivia
Their dominance isn't quite as comprehensive as it used to be, but England are still the only Full Member nation never to have lost an international match against Bangladesh
Bangladesh have only played one previous international fixture at Old Trafford, and that finished up as a ten-wicket defeat in June 2005, as Australia exacted emphatic revenge for their humiliation at Cardiff in the preceding week.
Quotes
"I know the way I bat sometimes looks fantastic, and sometimes looks ugly, but I am happy with the way I play my natural game."
Tamim Iqbal has no plans to temper his style after wowing the Lord's crowd during the first Test

"They are definitely getting closer because more of their batsmen have the belief they can get decent scores. But, like most sides, if you keep chipping away and pressurising them, eventually you will see a collapse of some sort."
Andrew Strauss expects another victory in the second Test, but doesn't expect it to be handed to England on a plate

http://www.cricinfo.com/england-v-bangladesh-2010/content/current/story/461853.html
 
bangladesh : abdur razzaq in for rubel hossain and shafiul islam in for robiul islam
 
Looking at the recent matches played by BD, I don't expect them to win this one either, but Good Luck
 
The suns out in manchester and wicket tends to be good for batting with a bit of pace in it so england should enjoy batting here!
 
BD players wearing black armbands because of the devastating fire in Dhaka
 
Shahadat Hossain dealing in fours...lol
six 4's so far in three overs, 34/0
 
Looks like it will be a long day in the Sun for the Bangla boys.

Their bowling attack really is pop gun like!
 
England looks to pile up runs here Bangladesh poor with the ball so far.
 
England | 1-48 | 12 Overs | Strauss 21 | England won the and toss elected to bat first
 
Last edited:
J Trott is out!!!!, He scored a double century in the first match's first innings to help England get to that mammoth total.

No luck today!!
 
England 48/2

BD need to capitalize on this and not let any partnership build from here.!!
 
Pretty nippy pace from Shafiul so far, quite impressed.

Must be the genetics. :akhtar
 
7.2 shafiul islam to andrew strauss 145.5kph!!!

shame on you india, playing cricket since 1930s and not one fast bowler.
bangladesh already have TWO!!!(rubel hossain the other one)
 
waqar akram said:
7.2 shafiul islam to andrew strauss 145.5kph!!!

shame on you india, playing cricket since 1930s and not one fast bowler.
bangladesh already have TWO!!!(rubel hossain the other one)
even Boycott and Agnew are saying he is quit nippy....How ever that is beyond nippy. and forget about india producing Fast bowlers.......
 
Friend786 said:
well it is abdur razzaq ! abdul razzaq is in pakistan team !

Its originally named Abdur Razzak from Bangladesh.

And Abdul Razzaq from Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
waqar akram said:
7.2 shafiul islam to andrew strauss 145.5kph!!!

shame on you india, playing cricket since 1930s and not one fast bowler.
bangladesh already have TWO!!!(rubel hossain the other one)

Bangladesh also short their bowlers as well.
 
Bangladesh strikes again Cook gone.

Razzak take first ball wicket.
 
If Bangla can get one more before lunch it defo will be their 1st session!
 
Lunch - Day 1 | England | 3-92 | 28 Overs | England won the and toss elected to bat first
 
Amjid Javed said:
Looks like it will be a long day in the Sun for the Bangla boys.

Their bowling attack really is pop gun like!

Might still be a long day in the sun, but the Bangles have cleaned up our top order. Depends what KP and Bell the Bangla-bully do.
 
Very important session for BD about to begin. Striking early would be key. Bell has an unbelievable average against BD. Lets go Raj-Shakib-Riyad. Spin them out.
 
What is that red construction piece at the ground. Must have been recently built but looks really ugly, at least should have painted it white.
 
90MPH said:
What is that red construction piece at the ground. Must have been recently built but looks really ugly, at least should have painted it white.

Its meant to be the Media centre!
 
Friend786 said:
lets see what eoin morgan does in this situation !
Yea...this will be a good judge of whether he can actually adapt his game to tests. He could really be on his way to establishing himself in the test team if he has a good day.

Bell is a very good player of spin though (as long as its not Warne!).
 
It loook so so so ridiculous a player throw away his wicket in test cricket ...

this 63 is a waste for a team..

u get in used to of the conditions.. and then gift ur wicket .. put pressure on the upcoming batsman come on ..

this is not they way a establish test batsman should play... attacking cricket is different . this is stupidity
 
adnan yasin said:
It loook so so so ridiculous a player throw away his wicket in test cricket ...

this 63 is a waste for a team..

u get in used to of the conditions.. and then gift ur wicket .. put pressure on the upcoming batsman come on ..

this is not they way a establish test batsman should play... attacking cricket is different . this is stupidity

The man was in attacking mood never know when got out going in attacking or defensive play.
 
Big innings for Prior. Keiswetter breathing down his neck.
 
farhan1 said:
The man was in attacking mood never know when got out going in attacking or defensive play.



Point is .. in test cricket u dont throw away ur wicket.. let the bowler out you.. thats the test of a bowler..
 
Wow, Bangladesh surprisingly doing a decent job here. If they can somehow keep England to under 350 then they can possibly set the game up if they bat like they did at Lord's.
 
adnan yasin said:
Point is .. in test cricket u dont throw away ur wicket.. let the bowler out you.. thats the test of a bowler..

But if you go for attacking you will throw away wicket. Thats what he did.
 
they need to get bell who always seems to score against bengals...
 
Rizwan25 said:
Bangladesh looks capable to upset Pakistan in a test match.

How Pakistan come into the match its Bangladesh taking on England not Pakistan. your post irrelevent.
 
farhan1 said:
How Pakistan come into the match its Bangladesh taking on England not Pakistan. your post irrelevent.

Is it taboo give opinion on matter which is not directly relevant to this game?

Well, my point was Bangladesh has improved a lot as a test team.
 
Last edited:
Rizwan25 said:
Is it taboo give opinion on matter which is not directly relevant to this game?

Well, my point was Bangladesh have improved a lot as a test team.

I agree with your point but Pakistan will not play Bangladesh in near future specially in Test cricket.
 
farhan1 said:
I agree with your point but Pakistan will not play Bangladesh in near future specially in Test cricket.

Yeah I know but I was just saying if we play them in the near future, they are pretty much capable of upsetting us.
 
Rizwan25 said:
Yeah I know but I was just saying if we play them in the near future, they are pretty much capable of upsetting us.

The time will tell................................ at the moment they playing England.
 
Last edited:
Stumps - Day 1 | England | 5-275 | 83 Overs | Bell 87*, Prior 21*
 
farhan1 said:
But if you go for attacking you will throw away wicket. Thats what he did.


bhai thats wat i m saying .. this thing should not happen in test cricket ...
 
waqar akram said:
7.2 shafiul islam to andrew strauss 145.5kph!!!

shame on you india, playing cricket since 1930s and not one fast bowler.
bangladesh already have TWO!!!(rubel hossain the other one)

fish is a meat, which comes from animals, and hence contains essential "high quality" amino acids --> proteins. humans need essential amino acids, which is why they are called "essential", and athletes are super-humans and require even more protein.
 
DOOSRA95 said:
if he is doing it against so called better bowlers why not banglas......you wat i'm sayin.that's my point

All he said that they need to get him out because he scores a lot of runs against them (averages around 200). He wasn't being critical of them.
 
If B'desh can get two quick wickets in the morning on Day 2, then game on.
 
What kind of umpiring is this?

1. At Lords Finn gets lbw which was pitched way outside the off hit high in line and hawk-eye showing going way high and outside of the leg. The Finger goes up.

Raj's ball pitched in line, hit Prior in line, hawk-eye showing hitting leg stump and the finger never shows up?

2. At Lords, end of the day dark as hell, Eng has no clue how to get BD batsmen out. The game goes on. Not only that fast bowlers bowling. Batsmen can't see the ball and wicket falls. Yup now the umpires can call for light.

Today the play stopped at 83 overs for bad light? Because Prior was troubled by the spinners? Even when the light is okay!!

+++
Pak beware: You will play against 13 on the field.
 
Last edited:
BD-fan said:
What kind of umpiring is this?

1. At Lords Finn gets lbw which was pitched way outside the off hit high in line and hawk-eye showing going way high and outside of the leg. The Finger goes up.

Raj's ball pitched in line, hit Prior in line, hawk-eye showing hitting leg stump and the finger never shows up?

2. At Lords, end of the day dark as hell, Eng has no clue how to get BD batsmen out. The game goes on. Not only that fast bowlers bowling. Batsmen can't see the ball and wicket falls. Yup now the umpires can call for light.

Today the play stopped at 83 overs for bad light? Because Prior was troubled by the spinners? Even when the light is okay!!

+++
Pak beware: You will play against 13 on the field.

But I guess you have to concede that in the last test, Cook was given out incorrectly in both innings. And I believe atleast one of them was really bad.

We desperately need UDRS in all tests now. It is sickening that such a good thing is available and some cost issues are not allowing it to be used. Absolutely pathetic stuff from all the concerned authorities.
 
looks a bit ordinary on paper for us, but I still reckon that 400 should be enough to create pressure with the new ball, as long as they don't let Tamim run away. In recent home summers, Old Trafford has been kind to our spinners, so hopefully Swann has a part to play once again. I'd always prefer taking the plunge and batting first on a track that could deteriorate a lot, so we'll always be in the game.
 
The wicket isn't as easy as Lords, BD might roll over here.
 
I wonder how they will bowl at Tamim this time? Two men back for the hook and Finn keep bouncing him?
 
I think Swanny might have a field day when they get out in the field.
 
Swann had a seriously disappointing game on the flat Lord's wicket, 0-100 no less. but he could rip them out on this one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top