minhasuz
Local Club Captain
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Runs
- 2,213
can anyone please provide updates when the match begins?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
amarmak said:192-6 after 41.1
Junaid khan getting two wickets in the 41st over. Tanno also gone.
dblock said:gul will be gud to have against sl.
Our bowling attack without him is no comparison.
amarmak said:he has a lot to prove at test level... i hope he does well.
Akhtar gul and tanno will be in the squad for sure. My concern is tannos capability after the first 10 overs.
usman_ash14 said:how are the techniques of these guys?
asifp said:the 3 games I have seen catching has been worst than school cricket.
Because he hasn't scored a 100 since he beat up on Bangladesh in his debut test. Averaged 29 since.Savak said:Depressing to see Akhtar hit around the park. Dropped catches added further insult to injury. But i was impressed by Yasir Hameed. One thing i always liked about him is that he always played his natural game irrespective of the bowler he was up against. Why did we stop persevering with him?
Savak said:Depressing to see Akhtar hit around the park. Dropped catches added further insult to injury. But i was impressed by Yasir Hameed. One thing i always liked about him is that he always played his natural game irrespective of the bowler he was up against. Why did we stop persevering with him?
Random Aussie said:Why? Even at his best and fittest he always got hit around the park anyway.
If you bowl that fast you are going to cost runs.
I would be happy if I were you Savak that he is on the field and bowling 10ish overs without dying.
Random Aussie said:Why? Even at his best and fittest he always got hit around the park anyway.
If you bowl that fast you are going to cost runs.
I would be happy if I were you Savak that he is on the field and bowling 10ish overs without dying.
Random Aussie said:Why? Even at his best and fittest he always got hit around the park anyway.
If you bowl that fast you are going to cost runs.
I would be happy if I were you Savak that he is on the field and bowling 10ish overs without dying.
asifp said:Akhtar looks fat, out of shape,
his run has changed completely
and not even close to being the fastest bowler in the world.
The commentators just said that he lost 10kgs. 10kgs more on him and he would look like Ranatunga
asifp said:Akhtar looks fat, out of shape,
his run has changed completely
and not even close to being the fastest bowler in the world.
The commentators just said that he lost 10kgs. 10kgs more on him and he would look like Ranatunga
Sparhawk said:You are exaggerating quite freely there. Akhtar is a little overweight, at most 5-10 pounds i would say, wouldn't call that fat. But his run up doesn't look smooth.
blinding light said:Akhtar looked fat! Once a person drops something like 10 kgs, there is a GREAT difference to see, no matter how obese they are.. Akhtar at max looked as if he's only dropped perhaps 4 kgs, MAX.. Not more than 4.. He may have been a pregnant walrus, but atm, it seems as if he's only gotten an abortion..