pillionrider
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2015
- Runs
- 6,651
The softie argument I don't buy. I can't claim to have watched his career fully, cuz I find him boringBrother, I respect you, but we both know that is cap. He is not fairly rated.
The 1st argument that indians on social media portray is that he is a softie and only scores easy runs on flat tracks. Hilarious cause thats Shubman Gill.
Root avg 50 in every country excluding Aus and Dustbowls? Where he still avg 35, 47 and 45 lol.
2nd argument is the avg bit it ignores that his avg has been 58 now for 6 years. It keeps rising and rising which is a rare sight to behold.
Lastly I still dont get how people rate many including Ponting > Him?
Their avg is now extremely similar? And root country record is better? He has more match wins then Ponting as well?
How is he worse then Ponting?
My list has now been upgraded to putting him one spot below dravid and Ponting due to his 100 upping his avg?
He jumped from no 19 to no 13 in my list now?
Very soon he'll reach 5-8?
He isn't fairly rated by any means when people have the audacity to put people like Sanga > him

Some of the criticism has maybe come because of his inability to score big in Australia and against pace bowling that's on fire. Maybe the latter bit is where the softie argument comes from.
No way Sanga is above him btw. But as I've argued before - just wait for a few years after he retires, for his place in history to not be coloured by current sentimentality.
Just as an example, a month back Nasser and Atherton were putting together a combined India-England post-2000s team and he didn't find a spot. KP did. It's not just about runs. This is a sport watched by people. There is only so much credit you can give to the numbers aspect.