Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 27,376
He hasn't played them at home. Has he?
He got injured so he missed those two series. I want to see him bowl more on Asian pitches especially since Ashwin has retired.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
He hasn't played them at home. Has he?
Wasim had nearly 700 wickets, Bumrah barely has 300. There is no way Bumrah crosses Wasim on any longevity. Wasim did it over two decades, on dead tracks while Bumrah plays on pitches completely made for India in India and then helpful tracks abroad.Bumrah is just trailing Wasim. Even though Imran was also great but not gonna bring him in this talk.
Bumrah is just gonna cross Wasim based on his longevity otherwise Wasim is 1 step ahead but BUMRAH IS CLASS;
Jaspreet bumrah has 440 international wickets, wasim have more than 800 wickets..This year he has 86 wickets in all format , another four years if he averages 60 wickets per year he will cross 700 international wickets mark ..Wasim had nearly 700 wickets, Bumrah barely has 300. There is no way Bumrah crosses Wasim on any longevity. Wasim did it over two decades, on dead tracks while Bumrah plays on pitches completely made for India in India and then helpful tracks abroad.
And to add, none of the bowlers on that list I posted had questionable actions.
Funny a lot of Pak posters on PP consider Shoaib Akhtar a legend with 177 Test wicketsBumrah has 203 wickets with the red ball and 238 wickets with the white ball.
100 test wickets with the same figures and he will be hailed as a ATG.
Same with white ball.
And some people don't realise that Indian pitches are made for spinners not Bumrah.
What desperation!!!!
Funny a lot of Pak posters on PP consider Shoaib Akhtar a legend with 177 Test wickets
The less aid about his performance against Australia and India, the top 2 batting line ups of his time, the better.
Bumrah has 203 wickets with the red ball and 238 wickets with the white ball.
100 test wickets with the same figures and he will be hailed as a ATG.
Same with white ball.
And some people don't realise that Indian pitches are made for spinners not Bumrah.
What desperation!!!!
There are drama movies, action movies, comedy movies, and classics. You cannot compare like that.
Shoaib Akhtar was more than cricket. He was one and only. He cannot be compared with anyone.
Yea, don't think anyone else apart from him and Asif were banned for injecting themselves with nandrolone.There are drama movies, action movies, comedy movies, and classics. You cannot compare like that.
Shoaib Akhtar was more than cricket. He was one and only. He cannot be compared with anyone.
Let's see. He is 31. Hopefully BCCI manages him well in the next 6 months.
He will have one month off after Sydney.
Then the CT and IPL.
The England series starts 20th June. It's a very long series.
Let's see when he gets rested.
Funny a lot of Pak posters on PP consider Shoaib Akhtar a legend with 177 Test wickets
The less said about his performance against Australia and India, the top 2 batting line ups of his time, the better.
This seems more like a nostalgia than a fact.
There are many players who have come,contributed in changing the way the game is played and have entertained the world around and got admired for their skills set. Shahid Afridi was one of them too.
Haha bad boys of cricket! Definitely, the guys your parents warn you aboutYea, don't think anyone else apart from him and Asif were banned for injecting themselves with nandrolone.
Cricket is entertainment, not a 9-5 job with profits, losses, and spreadsheets. Shoaib Akhtar wasn’t just a bowler, he was an experience—his pace, personality, and antics made him truly unique.
Pakistan has produced three larger-than-life cricketers: Shahid Afridi, Imran Khan, and Shoaib Akhtar.
It’s interesting you mention Afridi—his influence was huge. Without him, KPK and Afghan cricket might not have gained the passion for cricket they have today.
I am not stopping anyone from doing what they want to do. Take out your calculators and spreadsheets and get to work.Then you shouldn’t say Shoaib is beyond cricket because every team has such larger than life cricketers. You already mentioned 3 for Pakistan.
Ultimately ,Shoaib will be rated for his output and obviously context will be valued but not these over the top reasonings because it could be used for many such non deserving cricketers.
I am not stopping anyone from doing what they want to do. Take out your calculators and spreadsheets and get to work.
This analysis misses the real point—it’s not just about averages or wickets, it’s about *vibes*! Cricket is entertainment, and the true measure is how many fans drop everything to tune in. Anyone here tracking GRPs or TRPs?Probably true because you cant view every single cricketer in the world with the same way. That’s why you have to watch the game and then also take spreadsheets and calculator and do the complete analysis. It requires you to do both things.
No he need to play every icc tourney ..He need another ICC trophy in his resume..Test matches are important, so is ICC tournies...At the end of the day his contribution in icc tournies will be remembered as his exploits in major test series..I hope Bumrah don't play CT. It is a meaningless tournament and we have enough white ball bowlers. No need to stretch Bumrah. I also wanted him to rest in IPL and come fresh straight in England tour. But we know he can't skip IPL.
He first needs to sort out his ugly run up and dodgy bowling action before he can be compered to greats
Bumrah has a 45 avg vs NZ while wasim doesn't avg 40+ against any team and you're claiming he'll easily go >>>> Wasim?He will surpass Wasim in Tests easily. Wasim was a good bowler playing in great team but underachieved in Tests.
Bumrah is a great bowler playing in a mediocre team and seems way above everyone else.
All formats combined, Wasim is ahead in my opinion and Bumrah will have to win World Cup Final to go past him or McGrath.
Wasim akram was average bowler against good quality team in his era ..Bumrah has a 45 avg vs NZ while wasim doesn't avg 40+ against any team and you're claiming he'll easily go >>>> Wasim?
Wasim dominated for 2 decades on flat tracks with facing far superior test batters?
The best test batter of this era is Joe root considering steve smith fizzled out?
I repeat root is the best batter of this era which shows how crap the test batters of this era compares to the old?
Indians need to stop overglorfying everything.
Span | Mat | Inns | Overs | Mdns | Runs | Wkts | BBI | BBM | Avg | Econ | SR | 5w | 10w | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
overview | 1985-2002 | 104 | 181 | 3771.1 | 871 | 9779 | 414 | 7/119 | 11/110 | 23.62 | 2.59 | 54.6 | 25 | 5 |
Span | Mat | Inns | Overs | Mdns | Runs | Wkts | BBI | BBM | Avg | Econ | SR | 5w | 10w | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vs Australia | 1990-1999 | 13 | 21 | 498.2 | 102 | 1288 | 50 | 6/62 | 11/160 | 25.76 | 2.58 | 59.8 | 4 | 1 |
vs Bangladesh | 2001-2002 | 2 | 3 | 21.4 | 4 | 54 | 0 | - | - | - | 2.49 | - | 0 | 0 |
vs England | 1987-2001 | 18 | 30 | 663.4 | 150 | 1748 | 57 | 6/67 | 9/103 | 30.66 | 2.63 | 69.8 | 2 | 0 |
vs India | 1987-1999 | 12 | 21 | 488.0 | 104 | 1299 | 45 | 5/96 | 7/142 | 28.86 | 2.66 | 65.0 | 2 | 0 |
vs New Zealand | 1985-1995 | 9 | 17 | 421.0 | 106 | 1021 | 60 | 7/119 | 11/179 | 17.01 | 2.42 | 42.1 | 6 | 2 |
vs South Africa | 1995-1998 | 4 | 7 | 141.0 | 35 | 387 | 13 | 4/42 | 5/88 | 29.76 | 2.74 | 65.0 | 0 | 0 |
vs Sri Lanka | 1985-2000 | 19 | 32 | 545.4 | 152 | 1340 | 63 | 5/43 | 8/73 | 21.26 | 2.45 | 51.9 | 3 | 0 |
vs West Indies | 1986-2000 | 17 | 32 | 591.4 | 121 | 1645 | 79 | 6/61 | 11/110 | 20.82 | 2.78 | 44.9 | 4 | 1 |
vs Zimbabwe | 1993-1998 | 10 | 18 | 400.1 | 97 | 997 | 47 | 6/48 | 10/106 | 21.21 |
He averages around 29 against best 4 teams of that era ...Bumrah has a 45 avg vs NZ while wasim doesn't avg 40+ against any team and you're claiming he'll easily go >>>> Wasim?
Wasim dominated for 2 decades on flat tracks with facing far superior test batters?
The best test batter of this era is Joe root considering steve smith fizzled out?
I repeat root is the best batter of this era which shows how crap the test batters of this era compares to the old?
Indians need to stop overglorfying everything.
None of that will change the fact that wasim retired woth 414 wickets followed by 23 avg in test followed by notable having a 45 avg stain againat any team.He averages around 29 against best 4 teams of that era ...
If thats the case for Wasim that he bowled on dead pitches , then Indian batsmen’s stats should also be seen along similar lines, where Bumrah is getting helpful pitches other bowlers are as well, so Kohli with his mediocre average is better than any Pakistani batsman?Wasim had nearly 700 wickets, Bumrah barely has 300. There is no way Bumrah crosses Wasim on any longevity. Wasim did it over two decades, on dead tracks while Bumrah plays on pitches completely made for India in India and then helpful tracks abroad.
And to add, none of the bowlers on that list I posted had questionable actions.
Wasim has also won an odi cup for his country followed by never avg 45 against any team in test cricket.If thats the case for Wasim that he bowled on dead pitches , then Indian batsmen’s stats should also be seen along similar lines, where Bumrah is getting helpful pitches other bowlers are as well, so Kohli with his mediocre average is better than any Pakistani batsman?
Atleast have some consistency in logic for batsmen and bowlers if pitches are more bowling friendly now.
My point is only on the basis used for comparison, I have already said Wasim is greater and will definitely end up greater.Wasim has also won an odi cup for his country followed by never avg 45 against any team in test cricket.
Atm he has nearly 2.5X the number of test and odi wickets, followed by 5 10 wicket hauls + 25 5 wicket hauls in test cricket.
Bumrah has 0 10 wicket hauls, and a horrific avg againat NZ.
To top it off while that 19avg is very impressive, he's 31, will turn 32 in 2025 and will keep aging and will likely decline as pacers do. Pollock and mcgrath are exceptions for obvious reasons.
For Bumrah to be in contention he needs many many more wickets, followed by a few 10 wicket hauls, followed by improving that 45 avg against NZ, followed by maintaining consistency for a few more years and not fizzle put like kohli and Steve smith, followed by not chocking non stop in odi events.
Bumrah is class, but Indians need to cool it on ranking people as no 1 for virtually no reason.
None of that will change the fact that he was an average bowler against best four teams of his entire career..He can't fix that now.None of that will change the fact that wasim retired woth 414 wickets followed by 23 avg in test followed by notable having a 45 avg stain againat any team.
Bumrah needs to fix that 45 red flag vs NZ and actually win an odi cup or atleast keep his own performance up in odi cups. Since he has terrible numbers in crunch moments
Well hopefully Bumrah can fix that 45 avg, pick up a few 10 wicket hauls and improve his choke status in odi knockouts.None of that will change the fact that he was an average bowler against best four teams of his entire career..He can't fix that now.
How so?Bumrah is just trailing Wasim. Even though Imran was also great but not gonna bring him in this talk.
Bumrah is just gonna cross Wasim based on his longevity otherwise Wasim is 1 step ahead but BUMRAH IS CLASS;
How would bumrah be doing in 90s world batsman without a central contact, trainers, dieticians etc etc ? That sword is double edged right??How so?
how would Wasim be doing in todays world with a central contract, trainers, dieticians etc etc?
Wasim akram was average bowler against good quality team in his era ..
Career Averages
vs Team
Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI BBM Avg Econ SR 5w 10w overview 1985-2002 104 181 3771.1 871 9779 414 7/119 11/110 23.62 2.59 54.6 25 5
Span Mat Inns Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI BBM Avg Econ SR 5w 10w vs Australia 1990-1999 13 21 498.2 102 1288 50 6/62 11/160 25.76 2.58 59.8 4 1 vs Bangladesh 2001-2002 2 3 21.4 4 54 0 - - - 2.49 - 0 0 vs England 1987-2001 18 30 663.4 150 1748 57 6/67 9/103 30.66 2.63 69.8 2 0 vs India 1987-1999 12 21 488.0 104 1299 45 5/96 7/142 28.86 2.66 65.0 2 0 vs New Zealand 1985-1995 9 17 421.0 106 1021 60 7/119 11/179 17.01 2.42 42.1 6 2 vs South Africa 1995-1998 4 7 141.0 35 387 13 4/42 5/88 29.76 2.74 65.0 0 0 vs Sri Lanka 1985-2000 19 32 545.4 152 1340 63 5/43 8/73 21.26 2.45 51.9 3 0 vs West Indies 1986-2000 17 32 591.4 121 1645 79 6/61 11/110 20.82 2.78 44.9 4 1 vs Zimbabwe 1993-1998 10 18 400.1 97 997 47 6/48 10/106 21.21
How so?
how would Wasim be doing in todays world with a central contract, trainers, dieticians etc etc?
Chances are He wouldn't have even made it to international cricketHow would bumrah be doing in 90s world batsman without a central contact, trainers, dieticians etc etc ? That sword is double edged right??
Logic dies a tragic death infront of your arguments..think before talking dear..Chances are He wouldn't have even made it to international cricket
Logic dies a tragic death infront of your arguments..think before talking dear..
In 90's hyperextension rule also didn't exist just saying. He would have either gotten banned or maybe he might have lucked out like sohaib akhtar did who also had a hyperextension extension.How would bumrah be doing in 90s world batsman without a central contact, trainers, dieticians etc etc ? That sword is double edged right??
An Illegal Bowling Action is defined as a bowling action where a bowler’s Elbow Extension exceeds 15 degrees, measured from the point at which the bowling arm reaches the horizontal until the point at which the ball is released (any Elbow Hyperextension shall be discounted for the purposes of determining an Illegal Bowling Action)I'm sorry but you think Bumrah would have made it in the 80's?
His action would have been called long before making it to international cricket and no one would have heard of him.
Try explaining hyperextension to cricket coaches in the 80's
I'm sorry but why are you quoting me these laws? There is another thread to discuss Bumrah's hyperextension and the fact that he hasn't been tested as yet...An Illegal Bowling Action is defined as a bowling action where a bowler’s Elbow Extension exceeds 15 degrees, measured from the point at which the bowling arm reaches the horizontal until the point at which the ball is released (any Elbow Hyperextension shall be discounted for the purposes of determining an Illegal Bowling Action)
This is ICC law ..If you have seperate laws for cricket you can call him whatever you want .. nobody cares..
If Wasim and Waqar made their debut in current era they would have failed dope test and been banned for ball tempering and fixing. They would share jail cell with Amir and Salaman Butt.I'm sorry but why are you quoting me these laws? There is another thread to discuss Bumrah's hyperextension and the fact that he hasn't been tested as yet...
What I stated was that in the 80's, Wasim made his debut in 1984 and Waqar in 1988, the likelihood is that Bumrah wouldn't have made it to firstclsss cricket let alone international cricket because either his action he would have been discarded by the coaches....
Chuckie is anything but 'pure'. He's an experiment in genetic mutation. He is the offspring of scientistsIf Wasim and Waqar made their debut in current era they would have failed dope test and been banned for ball tempering and fixing. They would share jail cell with Amir and Salaman Butt.
Dont mix a pure athlete like Bumrah with those junkies.
A person must play the hand they are given when it comes to genetics. You can't chose it.Chuckie is anything but 'pure'. He's an experiment in genetic mutation. He is the offspring of scientists
If Wasim and Waqar made their debut in current era they would have failed dope test and been banned for ball tempering and fixing. They would share jail cell with Amir and Salaman Butt.
If Wasim and Waqar made their debut in current era they would have failed dope test and been banned for ball tempering and fixing. They would share jail cell with Amir and Salaman Butt.
Dont mix a pure athlete like Bumrah with those junkies.
Indian caught were punished. You are welcome to criticise any Indian fixers. We don't make them heroes.Nothing like throwing out a little bit of nonsense to try and make oneself feel better.
Firstly, the match fixing bookies were Indian and the first fixers to be caught was an Indian....
Secondly, to say if one or two players took dope then that means they would all have taken it? Did McGrath, Gilispie, Lee also take diarreritic?
The fact that Bumrah would have never made it in the 80's is as clear as the ball taking edge off Jaiswals bat...
Keep going though, it's amusing to watch
Indian caught were punished. You are welcome to criticise any Indian fixers. We don't make them heroes.
Wasim and Waqar were arrested with drug possession in West Indies. McGrath and Lee were not.
Look it up if you don't believe me.
Haha.If we mention Indian cricket and its players enough times there will probably be another 100m new users by the end of 2025...
So you think criminals and junkies would have made in modern era? Didn't England drop Alex Hales for drugs.Wasim and Waqar were caught with recreational drugs on a beach in the carribean... is this how they managed to get reverse swing? Oh, that was actually 9 years after Wasin made his debut...
The great Viv Richards experimented with marijuana... I'm sure plenty others did too...
None of this detracts from my initial point that Bumrah wouldn't have made it to international cricket had he been playing in the 80's...
Context
A freak with natural talent ?. QuiteA person must play the hand they are given when it comes to genetics. You can't chose it.
But your players chose to fix, temper and take drugs.
Even when given genetic advantage from the Gods they chose to take drugs and somehow ended up with genital warts too
Don't compare Bumrah with these kind of peoples.
It’s disappointing to see some Pakistani fans calling Bumrah’s action illegal. As a Pakistani fan myself, I don’t agree with this view. Not every action undergoes scrutiny, and unless there is concrete evidence, no judgment can be made.
What truly stands out about Bumrah is the way he has shaped his career. He prioritized Test cricket, worked tirelessly on his fitness, and consistently improved his skills. It’s his champion mindset and ambitious goals that set him apart. He wasn’t as much of a threat when he debuted as he is now—a testament to his growth and dedication.
However, where I disagree with some Indian fans is the claim that Bumrah is better than “any Pakistani fast bowler.” That assertion is equally absurd. You can’t compare a player with potential GOAT status to those who are already cemented as all-time greats.
Their insecurity alone is testament to his dubious bowlingIt’s disappointing to see some Pakistani fans calling Bumrah’s action illegal. As a Pakistani fan myself, I don’t agree with this view. Not every action undergoes scrutiny, and unless there is concrete evidence, no judgment can be made.
What truly stands out about Bumrah is the way he has shaped his career. He prioritized Test cricket, worked tirelessly on his fitness, and consistently improved his skills. It’s his champion mindset and ambitious goals that set him apart. He wasn’t as much of a threat when he debuted as he is now—a testament to his growth and dedication.
However, where I disagree with some Indian fans is the claim that Bumrah is better than “any Pakistani fast bowler.” That assertion is equally absurd. You can’t compare a player with potential GOAT status to those who are already cemented as all-time greats.
The problem with comparing bowlers across eras is that there are too many variables.He's taken advantage of a shocking era of test match cricket in which a 42 year old Jimmy Anderson had to be forced to retire as he was still pretty much holding his own against all batsman. That tells me the bats are bellow elite level standard. ( Majority of them)
The problem with comparing bowlers across eras is that there are too many variables.
Playing devils advocate, if the bats are below elite level standard, then why isn’t everyone else averaging below 20 and tearing through SENA teams day after day like Bumrah. Hes better than the rest of his times, which is my point about the absurdity in comparing across eras.
No one's comparing eras. If it wasn't for his questionable action, I'd happily admit he's the best of this era.
But there's a GLARING fact. 90's and 00's bowlers and batsman were Gold standard. STATS dont lie.
As for other bowlers, batsman and teams of present, They don't see Test cricket as a priority as it once was, and we all know why.
Yes but you either didn’t understand my rhetorical question or didn’t chose to answer it.
The same phenomenon should apply to all the fast bowlers today. Why aren’t Shaheen, Naseem, Nitish Rana, Saini, Siraj, K Shahzad, and all the other bowlers tearing though the supposed lower quality batting and teams that don’t care as much about test cricket? They aren’t!, which was my point. And this shows/means there are some bowlers that are very special and Bumrah is one of them.
I’ll keep it shorter and sweeter. I appreciate the nostalgia but this is neither logical nor data-driven.Il keep it short and sweet. There was far better Top drawer test cricketers throughout the 90's and 00's compared to what ive seen in the last decade.
I think he is a troll from border
100 test wickets with the same figures? That's Marshall's level.100 test wickets with the same figures and he will be hailed as a ATG.
I think @Mamoon came up with new account to Take on pakistan fan's.
You mean hope he gets injured and breaks down.Well hopefully Bumrah can fix that 45 avg, pick up a few 10 wicket hauls and improve his choke status in odi knockouts.
Let's hope and pray and keep our fingers crossed.
You are correct. Fan can go on and on about reverse and all other factors, but when all said and done, you got to pick wickets cheaply and quickly as bowler. During Waqar's peak, NZ was poor team and SL was certified minnow due to winning only 2-3 tests till early 90s in their entire history.Waqar and Wasim had their peaks in a time when reverse swing was an unknown commodity but Bhumrah in the present era where reverse swing is a widely known art, where batsmen have big heavier bats, where bowlers have a much demanding workload across all formats has proven to be better than Wasim, Waqar.
Wasim and Waqar, both have not great record in lively away pitches in matches involving 6 out of 8 test teams. Sl was minnow till mid 90s and NZ was a poor team in 90s.If thats the case for Wasim that he bowled on dead pitches ,
I'm a huge fan of Bumrah just saying. I really like him as a bowler and cricketer.You mean hope he gets injured and breaks down.
WasimI'm a huge fan of Bumrah just saying. I really like him as a bowler and cricketer.
Bit I am not delusional and won't place him > some bowlers just because some Indians don't have a damn clue on how to scale
I have never come across any commie or analyst anointing waqar aa the. Best ever bowler in the world.Wasim and Waqar, both have not great record in lively away pitches in matches involving 6 out of 8 test teams. Sl was minnow till mid 90s and NZ was a poor team in 90s.
Wasim averages 27-28 and Waqar Averages 29-30 in macthes involving Pak, Aus, Eng, Ind, WI, SA when playing away. Hadlee, McGrath, Ambrose, Donald, Walsh all did far better. So plenty of bowlers who did well in the same era.
Home, Away , Over all - 2 Ws don't have a great record against good teams.
Thats not how it works.Wasim
Then bunrah due to longevity
Then imran
Then shami waqar etc
Shoaib
Vaas is not that good.
Neither is zak khan .
Kapil should be just below top 5
Srinath in top 8
EODYou are correct. Fan can go on and on about reverse and all other factors, but when all said and done, you got to pick wickets cheaply and quickly as bowler. During Waqar's peak, NZ was poor team and SL was certified minnow due to winning only 2-3 tests till early 90s in their entire history.
In matches involving Pak, Aus, Eng, WI, SA, Ind ( 6 out of 8 test teams )
View attachment 149162
I know some one will bring the excuse about how hard it was to do well due to Pakistani pitches,
Here are 2Ws away tests in matches involving the same 6 test teams.
View attachment 149163
Any elite test bowlers don't have average of 27-29 .
Anyone bringing up how great batsmen were in those days, look at Hadlee, Ambrose, McGrath, Donald, Walsh -- All had far better output. I mean you have literally 5-6 bowlers doing well so no excuse of era and since we are looking at away record, no excuse of Pakistani pitches.
Wasim and Waqar both were very good test bowler but not an elite level test bowler. Wasim massively underachieved in my opinion. I tuned up to watch Wasim bowl and he was that good when it came to skills and troubling batsmen, but you got to take wickets cheaply and quickly against good teams. That's what makes you a better bowler.
He will get 300 wickets. Will play 70 games max. That's more than enough. I think he retires with an average of 21 22Thats not how it works.
The biggest issue with bumrah atm is that he faces the same issue that prevented Pointing to be ranked in the class of sachin, Lara, Smith, Kallis etc in test cricket.
And that is despite having their talent, his record in India was a huge huge red flag which prevented him from reach said tier ala avg 26.
Bumrah avg 45 vs NZ which atm no great bowler such as Mcgrath, Marshall, Wasim, Imran has. Avg of 35 is pathetic and hence puts bumrah as the pointing of bowling rather then the sachin or bradman of bowling that he's being hyped up to be.
Furthermore in terms of wicket tally he is way way way way behind wasim + Imran. Then you have to consider he has zero 20 wicket hauls in test cricket.
And his odi tournament record in crunch games is a joke as he suffers from the same choke mentality that India usually suffers from.
He has time but he needs to improve this but it seems Indians are already desperately wanting to crowm him king and don't actually have arguments as to why excluding that 19 avg
However he's already 31 and ik for a fact he won't maintain that 19 avg. It'll increase, so what will be the excuse then?