I think the disgusting and delusional jingoistic social media accounts from India have made the Indian version of events look highly implausible and this has been taken as a victory by the PAK side
However , I find that the PAK government/military claims have been as ridiculous if not more than the corresponding claims from the Indian government/military.
First of all, the superiority of the PAF has to be acknowledged. There is evidence that at least 3 of our fighters have been downed, including one Rafale whereas there is no evidence that we took down a single jet of theirs.
Whether it was because of their tactics or the greater range of the PL-15 air to air missiles , there can be no doubt that India suffered more reversals in aerial combat and the deflection from Indian military spokespersons suggests the same.
However, it does seem that the drone and missile attacks by India on Pakistani airbases , while their impact has been exaggerated , was far more effective than the counter offensive from PAK.
Runways and even hangars have been damaged on the other side as confirmed by satellite imagery and verified by independent open source intel .
On the other hand, PAK only really got to Udhampur and even then only damaged non airfield buildings at that.
Suggests that S400 and Akash were more effective than whatever Chinese tech PAK uses as part of air defence. To some extent while PAF is superior to IAF , they are also more reliant on PAF for air defence than the Indian side is.
This is all based on the evidence we have got so far. Subject to revision with more information in the coming days.
Latest NYT article has confirmed pretty much everything that I posted here. It's the only conclusion one can come to from good open source intel and from the satellite imagery available.

India and Pakistan Talked Big, but Satellite Imagery Shows Limited Damage
While the attacks were widespread, the damage was far more contained than both sides claimed.