What's new

How will cricket fans remember India’s ICC Champions Trophy 2025 win: unfair advantage or well-deserved victory?

How will cricket fans remember India’s ICC Champions Trophy 2025 win?


  • Total voters
    65
Pakistan had more advantage than anyone else and prepared better than any other team for this Asia Cup.
They started preparations in the UAE in August, played a Tri-Series until September 7th. From September 9th onwards, the Asia Cup began, you can’t ask for better preparation than that. And yet… no one’s talking about this unfair advantage?

With all that unfair advantage and months of preparation… still got thrashed 3-0 by India. :D
Lol all of that practice only to lose all 3 games

Cricket in Pakistan is dead

PakCricket subreddit is dead lol
 
Team B2 had to play 2 matches in 2 days so that teams A1 and A2 could play each other on a Sunday.
India beaten the day lights of pak after playing Hong Kong on day 1 and pak on day 2 in 2018.in 23 too, india played matches on consecutive days .
 
Great post by a Pakistani from reddit:

You know , Shoaib Akhtar never lets you forget that one yorker to Dravid or the time he bowled Sachin. He repeats it like a badge of honor, as if one delivery defined an era. But that’s the essence of Pakistan cricket — obsessed with moments, while ignoring the full picture. Sachin and Dravid, the supposed victims, never bragged about one ball. They spoke through 20,000 runs, centuries in Adelaide, match-saving marathons in Kolkata, and years of consistency. Shoaib remembers a flash. Sachin and Dravid built legacies.

And that’s the contrast between Pakistan and India. Pakistan will forever romanticize Sharjah sixes, Wasim’s reverse swing, Waqar’s yorkers, or that one Champions Trophy final. They did have golden eras — Imran lifting 1992, the Wasim-Waqar-Shoaib storm in the 90s. But greatness is not a lightning strike; it is a lighthouse. And India has been that lighthouse. World Cups? India leads Pakistan 8-0. T20 World Cups? India dominates. Asia Cups? India leads. ICC trophies? India has more in the cabinet, with multiple finals appearances. Pakistan clings to 1992 and 2017 like family heirlooms; India keeps adding fresh chapters every decade.

Look globally and the gap widens. Pakistan’s record in Australia, England, and South Africa is littered with collapses and inconsistency. India, brick by brick, turned weaknesses into strengths: winning in Australia twice, leading series in England, and creating a talent factory through the IPL. Pakistan’s brilliance was mercurial, often undone by politics and fragility. India’s rise has been systematic, sustainable, and relentless.

So was Pakistan ever “world-beating”? On a given day, yes — a Shoaib yorker at 100 mph, a Wasim spell that bent physics. But those were flashes of lightning. India became the entire sky. Shoaib will always talk about that one ball. India will always point to the scoreboard.
 
Those combinations and permutations based on table points, how is that favorable scheduling?
If India had lost even one match, they would’ve ended up playing back-to-back games.
It’s not India’s fault that they won all their matches.
Since you have asked the right question I will tell you how ind (and pakistan) were favoured at the expense of other teams.

In a fair format two teams finishing at the same position in different groups would be equivalent. Not here. See how.

Group A
Only pak or ind could realistically finish at A2. So if you are either of those teams you are looking at a spread out schedule with 2 guaranteed and three potential sunday matches.

Group B
SL, Afg, BD could finish B2. If you are in group B then you know if you finish second you have to play 2 back to back matches.

So no even if ind lost one match they’d still be A2 and have a much easier schedule compared to B2.

BD the team that did finish B2, ended up resting players against ind which directly impacted tournament results. BD posters have not made a fuss about it but doesn’t mean it’s not facts.
 
Lol i personally don’t count it :qdkcheeky

Even in Asia cup, didn’t BD rest 3-4 players against ind because of scheduling?

Yeah. BD had to play back to back which was unfair. Anyway, I don't think Asia Cup 2025 was a farce overall. It had some good quality games.

But, CT 2025 was definitely a farce. NZ had to travel from Pakistan to UAE to Pakistan to again UAE. India didn't have to travel at all. Also, Australia didn't send their full team for CT 2025. So, the event was farcical.
 
Since you have asked the right question I will tell you how ind (and pakistan) were favoured at the expense of other teams.

In a fair format two teams finishing at the same position in different groups would be equivalent. Not here. See how.

Group A
Only pak or ind could realistically finish at A2. So if you are either of those teams you are looking at a spread out schedule with 2 guaranteed and three potential sunday matches.

Group B
SL, Afg, BD could finish B2. If you are in group B then you know if you finish second you have to play 2 back to back matches.

So no even if ind lost one match they’d still be A2 and have a much easier schedule compared to B2.

BD the team that did finish B2, ended up resting players against ind which directly impacted tournament results. BD posters have not made a fuss about it but doesn’t mean it’s not facts.
You'd be a scheduler's nightmare. By your standards, there's not a tournament in the world that would not have a asterisk on it. Name me a tournament and i'll show you a team in there that got the short end of the stick due to scheduling issues

The funny thing here is that it barely makes a difference. Bangladesh was only there to make up the numbers. The only 3 teams of any relevance were India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka and they all got treated pretty equally. If Bangladesh really wanted to avoid playing a back to back game, all they had to go was top Group B.
 
You'd be a scheduler's nightmare. By your standards, there's not a tournament in the world that would not have a asterisk on it. Name me a tournament and i'll show you a team in there that got the short end of the stick due to scheduling issues

The funny thing here is that it barely makes a difference. Bangladesh was only there to make up the numbers. The only 3 teams of any relevance were India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka and they all got treated pretty equally. If Bangladesh really wanted to avoid playing a back to back game, all they had to go was top Group B.

Bangladesh finished 3rd. They were not there to make up numbers. They went to Asia Cup finals 3 times.

Also, what's up with "make up number" business? You are trying to introduce caste system in cricket. That kind of discriminatory garbage has no place in cricket.

I hope your young daughter will not inherit your garbage caste mentality. :inti
 
Yeah. BD had to play back to back which was unfair. Anyway, I don't think Asia Cup 2025 was a farce overall. It had some good quality games.

But, CT 2025 was definitely a farce. NZ had to travel from Pakistan to UAE to Pakistan to again UAE. India didn't have to travel at all. Also, Australia didn't send their full team for CT 2025. So, the event was farcical.

You are still crying? :ROFLMAO:
 
Yeah. BD had to play back to back which was unfair. Anyway, I don't think Asia Cup 2025 was a farce overall. It had some good quality games.

But, CT 2025 was definitely a farce. NZ had to travel from Pakistan to UAE to Pakistan to again UAE. India didn't have to travel at all. Also, Australia didn't send their full team for CT 2025. So, the event was farcical.
UAE to Pakistan is a 3 hour flight, same as Bangalore to Delhi.
Stop crying.
 
Lol i personally don’t count it :qdkcheeky

Even in Asia cup, didn’t BD rest 3-4 players against ind because of scheduling?
Bangladesh can field 14 players instead of 12 and still they wont be able to beat India in the current state. Thats how wide the skill gap is.

They know it’s a losing game against India and hence rested players as they have a better chance against Pakistan.

Truth will hurt but it is what it is.

You can cry a river, find every possible excuse but on a given day, you needed players to execute. They wont give reasons. They just go and execute. Thats what it takes to be a match winner and the exact difference between India and other sides.
 
BD had to rest 3-4 players against ind in the recently concluded Asia cup because of scheduling. You guys won’t think this is unfair I guess.

They have a discriminatory caste system in India. What do they know about fairness?

They used to cry like lunatics when England used to "discriminate" against them before 2000. Indians now do far worse.

I would rather have England running the game than these Indian sanghis. England at least keep things professional and fairer.
 
BD had to rest 3-4 players against ind in the recently concluded Asia cup because of scheduling. You guys won’t think this is unfair I guess.
India travelled the longest in WC23 but have never complained. They had the most unfavorable schedule, yet they dominated every game except the final. We don't see India complaining about it right?

These reasons are what people with loser mentality do.
 
I would rather have England running the game than these Indian sanghis. England at least keep things professional and fairer.
Someone was talking about subservient mentality. Never seen more of such loser subservient mentality than this.

It doesn't matter who is leading the game but fairness should be there. You give up partial fairness because you like to be lead by the English rather than India??

So much for jazba and brave heartedness. Lol.
 
Bangladesh finished 3rd. They were not there to make up numbers. They went to Asia Cup finals 3 times.

Also, what's up with "make up number" business? You are trying to introduce caste system in cricket. That kind of discriminatory garbage has no place in cricket.

I hope your young daughter will not inherit your garbage caste mentality. :inti
Sorry to hurt your feelings but it's a harsh fact that in sport that some teams/players are there to make up the numbers. They're expected to give a decent fight and occasionally spoil the game for a contender but not considered anywhere near likely to win. Bangladesh has been playing the Asia Cup for 30 years or so now and it's pretty clear what they're here for by now.

If you believe that all teams/players go into every tournament with a chance to win, then I applaud your optimism and your naivety.

As far your comments about the caste system go, I'll ignore them as a usual reflection of your weird hang-ups regarding India and Indians.
 
Atherton, Hussain, Shami objected too. So many others as well. lol the world is watching. The scheduling help is obvious. ind fans want no one to notice
:yk2
You what the commentators are saying?

India played rubbish cricket yet, they went undefeated in the Asia Cup 2025. The gap is so huge that India’s bad day is greater than a Pakistans good day on the field.

Its not a virtue to brag but in the face of such comments, I have no qualms to brag about our Indian team.
 
You what the commentators are saying?

India played rubbish cricket yet, they went undefeated in the Asia Cup 2025. The gap is so huge that India’s bad day is greater than a Pakistans good day on the field.

Its not a virtue to brag but in the face of such comments, I have no qualms to brag about our Indian team.
Yes ind team is good but scheduling favours must end.
 
So, the advantage was for both India and Pakistan, agreed. Then why single out only India? And who scheduled all this?
It was Naqvi and his team, wasn’t it?

Yes naqvi and his team fixed it in favour of ind and pak. Agreed. At the expense of other teams.
 
Crying is his full-time job, PhD from the Bangabandhu Institute of Crying Technology
Bangladesh was never going to win and they will never win anything and he knows it. He had pinned his hopes on Pakistan to bring him some joy but that didn’t happen. So now he’s using Bangladesh’s fixture as an excuse for Pakistan’s loss. That’s just comical.
 
Back
Top