I understand this post of yours and respect your views here.
But you misunderstood my question, I’ll try and rephrase, “There are attacks happening in Bangladesh against Bangladeshi Hindus, this caused KKR (due to pressure from government) to release the player” do you think this was right thing to do given the circumstances?
Thanks for conveying you understood. I got your question the very first time. And also the trap you set out which you in advertently explained so eloquently in post #2735 on pg 35 in which you dignified the resident Indian Khatmal's cranial download with your response and thanks again for that.
Like I have said the Fizz matter is the culmination, the label that you apply on a bag/finished product - the straw that finally sunk the camel into the quicksand, an organic reaction and not a wake up in the middle of the night knee jerk reaction or a freudian slip reaction.
What you are expecting was justifying your version of stereotyping for the two answers in this situation- i.e if some one said- NAY- as per you they'r evolved, have critical thinking, donot get brainwashed and capable of thinking outside the square where as if someone said YAY - its typical subcontinental mentality, 'not evolved enough' (which in itself is highly objectionable )-- in ur own words-#2735 and by usage of 'subcontinent' i'd assume you do not live in the Indian subcontinent or maybe spent the major part of your life outside the Indian subcontinent.
Did the fact occur to you that your analysis of the two stereotypes also might reflect your own lack of tangential thinking or your rigidity to the train of thought that most 'locals' in the countries outside the Indian subcontinent where you reside or resided consider incompatible (for want of a better word) or at the least - not servicable with a vast majority of the processes and procedures,values, trends in their countries, or at the very minimum does not reflect 'broad thinking' as you have mentioned in your post?
I have challenged heaps of decisions by the BCCI, I have commented on the length of the IPL, the sheer unwanted volume of matches, the timing of the year when this is played and the damage this causes to bodies, and last not the least the obscene horse flesh trading of players in the live auctions - have repeatedly said i wish to hope and see at least one Indian player to stand up and say 'no one owns me but me' and walk away from the oodles of cash on offer, and i do not expect you to take notice of those posts at the time when i made them -hence why now am re-iterating that am not a BCCI fanboy at all.
Since you are asking, the answer is yes - considering the circumstances - the right decision was taken at the time. Like i have said, nothing against the player who i think is a fantastic bowler. But a stand had to be taken for the minority treatment in that country and also you need to understand, we have millions of them Rohingya illegal fence jumpers in our nation who contribute Shoonya-Sifr-Zilch-Zero to anything positive to our economy but heaps to everything negative.
Their esteemed PM has mentioned in a speech in China of their intentions to cut off India's north-eastern states from mainland India.
Not in my name, or my govt's name will we allow people of such intentions to make money off us!
For too long, 7 decades we have had govt's that appeased anybody and everybody in the name of their version of secularism that we were made to be apologist, we were the guys who always had to give way or look the other way, much similar to what was happening in mainly UK other parts of Europe and Canada specifically.
Suddenly with the advent of social media, greater awareness and also the advent of the current ruling disposition, a lot of Indians suddenly started being more assertive, started being lesser apologetic, started calling out a spade what it is and i suppose this change of mindset started sticking in the craw of a lot of people who were so used to our guys turning the other cheek.
Not anymore - a marker had to be laid, unfortunately the fizz matter was just one step in this.
Had BCB asked BCCI at the time for an explanation for his expulsion, one would have been provided i guess both parties would have moved on and we would not have the kerfluffle we have on our hands currently.
But BCB have scored a massive own goal, as the reasons for them not willing to play in India will be disected by a lot of nations who defo can put two and two together, thus (from BCB and Bangladesh pov)-giving unwanted attention to the unwanted and unsavoury happenings in Bangladesh. I am not sure if, given that it is election time in Bangladesh, the politicians wanted to whip up an Anti India or Anti Hindu sentiment and use that as a stick and wave it around for their political gains, but their actions in this particular case have put this matter out in the open.
The way this is panning out, i would not be surprised if Pakistan also pull out.
You asked - i answered. Cheers!