Who mentioned sarfraz? When did I mention sarfraz?
Keep sticking to that one game he played and again have amnesia over the next 4 consequective games he failed to perform in against semindecent attacks.
This is the issue with such medicore players.
Shehzad was the same, he consistently failed in many many games but after playing 100 games the one game he performs in which is the Bangladesh Asia cup semi final along with fawad alam, all sons are forgiven.
If you give someone 100+ games they'll eventually perform in one or 2, like nasir jamshed against 2012 India.
Rizwan has 100x more match losing innings then his winning ones.
He cost us aus semi final by taking 10 overs to get a meager 60, had he batted faster we'd win, its his fault we are 30 runs short.
He cost us the final against Sri Lanka by playing 55 of 49 and forcing every one else to bat at 9 an over when the atarget was only 159.
He failed an entire 2022 t20 wc.
He failed 4x in a row in this cup alone. On what basis is he replacing fakhar as a t20 opener besides glorified stat padding.
The guy bullies minnows and after playing 75+ games against quality attacks he has one good innings in 2021 against India and one good innings in 2023 against Sri Lanka.?
So? Shehzad, Yk in odi and other past failures had occasional wins due to playing that many games.
Look at fakhar, sure he fails and doesn't perform, but when he does, Pakistan either win, or get very very close such as his 194 against sa. When rizwan performs we still lose 90% of the time minus 3 exceptions on his 8 year career atm which are India and Sri lanka and new Zealand.