Imran Khan vs Nawaz Sharif - Debate

[HamzaSaeen]

If this takes place, it would be last nail in the coffin for PML-N, at least in Punjab. We all know why

 

[Kianig89]

I wish it happens

 

[*syed59*]

anything to get rid of anti Pakistan Nawaz and his fake politics... be it another type of incomplete promise machine

 

[Anfield]

He has been in politics for over 25 years, yet he can't come on tv and argue with a person who he calls "khilari and Anari" shameful really. You call yourself the leader of 200 Million people and you can't carry yourself in a debate to talk about your policies?

 

[UP]

The govt should make a law for major parties leaders to debate prior to the elections. Its vital for people to know what the next govt will do.

 

[Anfield]

Leaders Like Nawaz would never agree. If you have people like Bhuttos, Musharaffs, Iks they will agree to this in a heartbeat but not Taggas (dumb) like Nawaz Leagues.

P.S Not saying all of the above mentioned are great leaders but at least they know how to represent themselves in Media.

 

[saadibaba]

If this takes place, it would be last nail in the coffin for PML-N, at least in Punjab. We all know why

Not necessarily. Of course PTI fans will love it but doubt if it ends up changing the minds of people who are planning to vote for PML-N.

A lot depends on format, anchor who will conduct, type of questions asked, time given for response etc. Nawaz could be trained to memorize a few points and keep repeating them over and over again. He can claim credit for atomic bomb, finacial growth by twisting the numbers, recent bus service in Lahore, etc. Agaian there are a lot of ways to defend ones record so even though he may get bruised after the debate it might not be enough to bloody him. On the other hand, IK may come across too aggressive and hostile. A pro Nawaz anchor may be able to protect him to a point to not let him get totally embarrassed.

 

[Anfield]

A debate won't change anything, it's not like developed countries where your every word is scrutinized but that's not the point, the point why can't a guy who claims to be the leader of 200 Million people and has been in politics for over 25 years can't debate in Public?

Lat night at Malick's show, he couldn't answer one question properly. PML N has been critizing Zardasi and PPP constantly for past 6-8 months. Now, when Malick asked Mian Sahab, would he oppose zardari for relection, Nawaz couldn't answer.

 

[saadibaba]

Not defending Nawaz here but the art of debate should not be taken as a criteria for a good administrator or leader, not that Nawaz is a good leader or administrator but debating is a different art. Obviously one would expect a worldly leader like Nawaz to be at least decent in answering questions or debating. I'm not sure how Manhoman Singh is at debating even though he is an effective leader.

 

[PakPrince]

If this takes place, it would be last nail in the coffin for PML-N, at least in Punjab. We all know why

not really. Pakistan awaam doesnt work that way. If it did then PML-N would have lost it years ago with all the stupid stateents nawaz sharif makes. Boggles me that he's been in politics for 20 years and still cannot cobble up a few coherent sentences together without fluffing up somewhere..

A debate with Imran Khan will humiliate Nawaz Sharif, but really not make much change in terms of election results. It will be a good laugh though.

Though it won't happen. Nawaz has never appeared in a show which is not one on one and he even messes those up despite the fact that he knows in advance what line the anchor will take

 

[PakPrince]

Not defending Nawaz here but the art of debate should not be taken as a criteria for a good administrator or leader, not that Nawaz is a good leader or administrator but debating is a different art. Obviously one would expect a worldly leader like Nawaz to be at least decent in answering questions or debating. I'm not sure how Manhoman Singh is at debating even though he is an effective leader.

im sure manmohan does fine

he's cambrige grad and all....

 

[Markhor]

The problem with TV debates is that they turn elections into a kind of pop talent contest, with whoever is the best performer on the night winning.

Politics should be about policies, principles and the content of the manifesto, which it seems Sharif is reluctant to discuss, he knows himself he's hardly some Churchillian-like orator

However with the rapid expansion of the media in Pakistan, a TV debate would really connect millions of people to the political process. As mentioned, an impartial host and proper time for Q&As and argument between the leaders is required.

 

[lonex]

not really. Pakistan awaam doesnt work that way. If it did then PML-N would have lost it years ago with all the stupid stateents nawaz sharif makes. Boggles me that he's been in politics for 20 years and still cannot cobble up a few coherent sentences together without fluffing up somewhere..

A debate with Imran Khan will humiliate Nawaz Sharif, but really not make much change in terms of election results. It will be a good laugh though.

Though it won't happen. Nawaz has never appeared in a show which is not one on one and he even messes those up despite the fact that he knows in advance what line the anchor will take

my thoughts exactly, thank you for putting it together

 

[lonex]

The problem with TV debates is that they turn elections into a kind of pop talent contest, with whoever is the best performer on the night winning.

Politics should be about policies, principles and the content of the manifesto, which it seems Sharif is reluctant to discuss, he knows himself he's hardly some Churchillian-like orator

However with the rapid expansion of the media in Pakistan, a TV debate would really connect millions of people to the political process. As mentioned, an impartial host and proper time for Q&As and argument between the leaders is required.

A orator is usually a trait of good leader. Party chairman usually end up as prime minister, a leader who cant contest infront of another candidate, how would he coup with handling the image infront of other world leaders ? Nawaz as a premier confuses me and defies my logic.

 

[0tt0man]

I would've preferred a debate between IK and SS. Both are potential PM candidates from their respective parties.

PML(N) has rejected the demand as a matter of fact.

 

[saadibaba]

im sure manmohan does fine

he's cambrige grad and all....

Not sure about that. I've not seen him in a debate but in interviews he comes across as very meek and soft spoken. He does not give the impression of a good orator or debater. Obviously we all know how good of an administrator he has been for India.

 

[saadibaba]

A orator is usually a trait of good leader. Party chairman usually end up as prime minister, a leader who cant contest infront of another candidate, how would he coup with handling the image infront of other world leaders ? Nawaz as a premier confuses me and defies my logic.

I agree but again you have Z. Bhutto as a great orator who did pretty poorly for the country. In the end who would you rather have, a great orator who is a poor manager or a poor orator who is a great manager.

 

[cricketworm]

Not defending Nawaz here but the art of debate should not be taken as a criteria for a good administrator or leader, not that Nawaz is a good leader or administrator but debating is a different art. Obviously one would expect a worldly leader like Nawaz to be at least decent in answering questions or debating. I'm not sure how Manhoman Singh is at debating even though he is an effective leader.

I barely understand anything what Manmohan Singh says. I think it's his cunning plan to make people pay attention more attentively. You know this trick is usually done by many teachers and professors.

However,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-_nK3ZIX50

Sushma Swaraj is among the best debaters, this is my view from 12 years ago though. Arun Jaitley wasn't bad either.

 

[waqar_ahmad]

I agree but again you have Z. Bhutto as a great orator who did pretty poorly for the country. In the end who would you rather have, a great orator who is a poor manager or a poor orator who is a great manager.

ZAB was a very capable leader. Only that he used his abilities negatively.

 

[Wooster]

Not defending Nawaz here but the art of debate should not be taken as a criteria for a good administrator or leader, not that Nawaz is a good leader or administrator but debating is a different art. Obviously one would expect a worldly leader like Nawaz to be at least decent in answering questions or debating. I'm not sure how Manhoman Singh is at debating even though he is an effective leader.

What makes you think that MMS is an effective leader? First of all, he isn't even a leader, he's basically Sonia Gandhi's blue-turbaned lapdog (no personality of his own). Moreover, he's put India back by 10 years after all the hard word and progress the country made between 1991 and 2004. Admittedly he was the architect of the 1991 reform program (he was the visible face, Narsimha Rao was the real architect), but that was in his role as the Finance Minister. As a PM he's been totally ineffective in getting *anything* done.

To your point, he's a pathetic debater too (in addition to being a pathetic PM).

 

[saadibaba]

^^^

Interesting. Don't follow Indian politics that much so my impression was based on what I've read in western press. Still he is better than Zardari and Gillani/Raja Rental at least.

 

[cricketworm]

What makes you think that MMS is an effective leader? First of all, he isn't even a leader, he's basically Sonia Gandhi's blue-turbaned lapdog (no personality of his own). Moreover, he's put India back by 10 years after all the hard word and progress the country made between 1991 and 2004. Admittedly he was the architect of the 1991 reform program (he was the visible face, Narsimha Rao was the real architect), but that was in his role as the Finance Minister. As a PM he's been totally ineffective in getting *anything* done.

To your point, he's a pathetic debater too (in addition to being a pathetic PM).

To be fair to him, no democratic PM can do anything without support from his/her senators. Just because Sonia Gandhi is more vocal and poster-politician for Congress doesn't make her sole decision maker. No need to take a jab at his culture/religion.

 

[Wooster]

To be fair to him, no democratic PM can do anything without support from his/her senators. Just because Sonia Gandhi is more vocal and poster-politician for Congress doesn't make her sole decision maker. No need to take a jab at his culture/religion.

Steady on - just because I used some colorful language doesn't mean I was saying anything about his religion. Light blue colored turban is his signature outfit, that's all. That's the only thing that's remarkable about him anyway, everything else is pure garbage.

In the first term, he was dependent on the Marxists, so I am prepared to cut him some slack, but there should be no excuses during the second term. He's failed miserably - plain and simple. As a PM, he's responsible for complete breakdown of governance and utter lawlessness in the country.

 

[asifp]

It would be absurd for Nawaz to commit. Most Pakistanis dont even know the concept of debating, so why put himself in the position.

 

[Wooster]

^^^

Interesting. Don't follow Indian politics that much so my impression was based on what I've read in western press. Still he is better than Zardari and Gillani/Raja Rental at least.

Almost anyone can be better than Zardari!

Over the past few decades, India's been 'blessed' with losers like Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Deve Gowda, MMS, but these guys are nothing compared to your lot - who operate at entirely different level!

 

[cricketworm]

Steady on - just because I used some colorful language doesn't mean I was saying anything about his religion. Light blue colored turban is his signature outfit, that's all. That's the only thing that's remarkable about him anyway, everything else is pure garbage.

In the first term, he was dependent on the Marxists, so I am prepared to cut him some slack, but there should be no excuses during the second term. He's failed miserably - plain and simple. As a PM, he's responsible for complete breakdown of governance and utter lawlessness in the country.

Ok fair enough.

I haven't been following Indian politics and debates of parliament, which is just horrible for viewing, I read from here and there from wiki and headlines from news that foreign policy of Manmohan Singh hasn't been that bad. But recently, there is def. sluggishness with passing anti-corruption bill and pushing paddle re: security for women. Anyone can do condemning, he really had/has chance to make stricter law and give some strong suggestions to local police. He is def. going out of favor for indian public for sure.

 

[Wooster]

Ok fair enough.

I haven't been following Indian politics and debates of parliament, which is just horrible for viewing, I read from here and there from wiki and headlines from news that foreign policy of Manmohan Singh hasn't been that bad. But recently, there is def. sluggishness with passing anti-corruption bill and pushing paddle re: security for women. Anyone can do condemning, he really had/has chance to make stricter law and give some strong suggestions to local police. He is def. going out of favor for indian public for sure.

Additional legislation is almost a second-order requirement and can possibly wait. We need leadership that can implement what's already out there. India's anti-corruption and anti-rape laws are sufficiently mature (they could do with some tweaking but that's not super urgent), but how can you govern a country when you appoint an idiot like Sushil Shinde as your Home Minister?! This guy isn't good enough to be even a peon in the home ministry and you make him your czar of internal security? Ridiculous doesn't even begin to describe it.

 

[saadibaba]

^^^

Only Modi can fix India, hope he gets elected as PM in the coming elections.

 

[Wooster]

^^^

Only Modi can fix India, hope he gets elected as PM in the coming elections.

Not going to happen. BJP needs to win big in UP to have any chance of cobbling together a coalition under the NDA banner. That's not going to happen with UP vote split four-ways. At best they'll keep their seats from last time. You'll lose big in Karnataka but make up those numbers in Rajasthan. Which means, overall, they'll end up near about where they were last time. Congress will lose seats and smaller regional parties led by crooks like Mamata, Jaya, and Mulayam will gain.

All perfect recipe for a fractured mandate and 5 more years of mis-governance.

What will India give today for an Atal Behari Vajpayee?

 

[GentleMan]

Atal behari, may God never give such a PM to india..what a chameleon he was.

 

[shan]

Personaly i only want IK to win because of corruption Ganja and Ghardari do. And IK seem honest person at least when it comes to money. But i have very little respect for him overall, maybe this will change in future.

Couple of days ago i read in urdu news paper that he will destroye them like Ghazni destroyed Somnath Mandir. Somnath mandir was in ancient-Pakistan sindh which got destroyed by Ghazni. Shamefull stuff by IK and very offensive.

 

[Wooster]

Atal behari, may God never give such a PM to india..what a chameleon he was.

What are you talking about? He's the most respected politician in India since Nehru. Even his political opponents respect him (just like Bill Clinton is respected by almost everyone in the US).

 

[GentleMan]

What are you talking about? He's the most respected politician in India since Nehru. Even his political opponents respect him (just like Bill Clinton is respected by almost everyone in the US).

most respected my foot...most cowardly PM who did nothing except reciting crap poems..wore the mask of a moderate while having extremmist views, let kandahar happen and started the lolworthy operation parakram..i wonder what was his achievement that he has so many fans.

 

[Wooster]

Personaly i only want IK to win because of corruption Ganja and Ghardari do. And IK seem honest person at least when it comes to money. But i have very little respect for him overall, maybe this will change in future.

Couple of days ago i read in urdu news paper that he will destroye them like Ghazni destroyed Somnath Mandir. Somnath mandir was in ancient-Pakistan sindh which got destroyed by Ghazni. Shamefull stuff by IK and very offensive.

Not surprising at all. IK always was an extremist (e.g. he has a soft spot for the Taliban and we all know what the Taliban did to Bamiyan Buddhas and that young girl who's recovering in the UK). All the Pakistanis who're waiting for IK to win the election and take Pak to 21st century be prepared to be disappointed; IK is someone who'll make Zia-ul-Haq look like a modern progressive leader in comparison.

I realize this view wouldn't go down well here, but you read it here first.

 

[Wooster]

most respected my foot...most cowardly PM who did nothing except reciting crap poems..wore the mask of a moderate while having extremmist views, let kandahar happen and started the lolworthy operation parakram..i wonder what was his achievement that he has so many fans.

Not going to respond ... will take too long. Moreover the tone of your post suggests you've already made up your mind and will not be persuaded no matter what. ABV's legacy is secure, I doubt he's too worried about what one PP poster thinks about him.

 

[oyei]

Not surprising at all. IK always was an extremist (e.g. he has a soft spot for the Taliban and we all know what the Taliban did to Bamiyan Buddhas and that young girl who's recovering in the UK). All the Pakistanis who're waiting for IK to win the election and take Pak to 21st century be prepared to be disappointed; IK is someone who'll make Zia-ul-Haq look like a modern progressive leader in comparison.

I realize this view wouldn't go down well here, but you read it here first.

lol, talk about extreme opinion.

 

[shan]

Not surprising at all. IK always was an extremist (e.g. he has a soft spot for the Taliban and we all know what the Taliban did to Bamiyan Buddhas and that young girl who's recovering in the UK). All the Pakistanis who're waiting for IK to win the election and take Pak to 21st century be prepared to be disappointed; IK is someone who'll make Zia-ul-Haq look like a modern progressive leader in comparison.

I realize this view wouldn't go down well here, but you read it here first.

He has changed his tune recetly about Taliban for better, and its unfair to compare him with Zia. He doesnt want to bring Saudi system but UK like instituions in Pakistan. Thats why his comment was surprising, but i cant find any English source or video. And Pakistani urdu papers cant be taken seriously must of the times.

Also he never supported terrorists, he just thinks that its posible to convince taliban to surrender without army. I personaly think its not.

 

[saeedhk]

NS is too scared to debate with IK.

 

[GentleMan]

Shareef is too smart to debate with IK..why give your opponent any sort of advantage.

 

[HamzaSaeen]

I fail to understand that if Sharif is too smart to debate with IK (at least he says he is), why doesn't he floor IK once and for all?

 

[AZ]

The govt should make a law for major parties leaders to debate prior to the elections. Its vital for people to know what the next govt will do.

is it in fact part of law in Western countries?

all the parties issue their manifesto which is published on their websites, why don't you go read those if you want to know what they will do if in power.

 

[AZ]

I fail to understand that if Sharif is too smart to debate with IK (at least he says he is), why doesn't he floor IK once and for all?

when did he say that?

the logic is quite simple, it would be like a amateur boxer challenging Lennox Lewis to a fight.

even if Lewis wins no-one would appreciate him because he was a big name and the people will end up favoring the amateur, and if the amateur wins then Lewis would be completely embarrassed.

 

[waqar goraya]

Let alone Imran,Nawaz can not even debate with Zardari...

Masters of deception and dramabazi are these Sharif brothers...

 

[UP]

is it in fact part of law in Western countries?

all the parties issue their manifesto which is published on their websites, why don't you go read those if you want to know what they will do if in power.

Every election gets debated in Western countries including municipal level elections. The law is not needed when leaders are debating. The Law is needed in third world countries so ieaders are forced to debate.

Last time I checked the average joe in Pak doesn't know how to operate computers let alone opening websites (not including few educated young people). Could you please post N's manfesto here?

And on top of that they have energy issues - imagine opening the website and electricity goes off.

 

[HamzaSaeen]

when did he say that?

the logic is quite simple, it would be like a amateur boxer challenging Lennox Lewis to a fight.

even if Lewis wins no-one would appreciate him because he was a big name and the people will end up favoring the amateur, and if the amateur wins then Lewis would be completely embarrassed.

Didn't he state once that Imran has never formed a government, so his 'status' or whatever was not high enough to compete with Nawaz.

 

[TM Riddle]

Atal behari, may God never give such a PM to india..what a chameleon he was.

I m sure jyoti basu would have been a great pm for India lol

 

[AZ]

Every election gets debated in Western countries including municipal level elections. The law is not needed when leaders are debating. The Law is needed in third world countries so ieaders are forced to debate.

Last time I checked the average joe in Pak doesn't know how to operate computers let alone opening websites (not including few educated young people). Could you please post N's manfesto here?

And on top of that they have energy issues - imagine opening the website and electricity goes off.

so it is in fact not part of law then? got it.

and kudos for taking a swipe at the backward slums that are 3rd World countries, same place from where I assume your ancestors are from as well.

PMLN Manifesto - http://www.pmln.org/pmln-manifesto/

 

[AZ]

Didn't he state once that Imran has never formed a government, so his 'status' or whatever was not high enough to compete with Nawaz.

Who is the 'he' you are referring to?

 

[arsalan660]

when did he say that?

the logic is quite simple, it would be like a amateur boxer challenging Lennox Lewis to a fight.

even if Lewis wins no-one would appreciate him because he was a big name and the people will end up favoring the amateur, and if the amateur wins then Lewis would be completely embarrassed.

Exactly.

If NS accept it would be stupid because It will be Lose for PMLN and its a win win situation for IK.

Why would NS do a debate when he can achieve things without it and give IK more Popularity.

In other way IK play it smart, If NS accept it is more popularity and win for PTI and if NS reject he can make people think NS is scared and Coward.

 

[waqar goraya]

I know it has been their policy to pesent river as a pond for general masses ....

But then why their youth leaders aka Hamza Shahbaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz held a press conference immediately after Khan's rallies were not yet finished yesterday...

Infact Sharifs have been the dumbest politicians in Pakistan....They have just wated around 100 Billion rupees on Laptops,sasti roti,taxi and youth feativals schemes......And ask for people to vote them for these schemes..

They have every right to boast about their generosities if they paid for these schemes from their personal assets of Billions of Dollars...

 

[HamzaSaeen]

Who is the 'he' you are referring to?

Nawaz is the 'he'.

 

[0tt0man]

PML(N) declines PTI's offer of debate

Mushahidullah Khan. You legend )

پاکستان مسلم لیگ(ن) کے مرکزی سیکرٹری اطلاعات سینیٹرمشاہداللہ خا ن نے کہاہے کہ پی ٹی آئی کی جانب سے نواز شریف کے ساتھ ٹی وی مذاکرے کی بات محض تشہیری حربہ اور توجہ حاصل کرنے کی سستی کوشش ہے۔ انہو ںنے کہاکہ مذاکرے کی پیشکش نہایت ہی بچگانہ اور غیر سنجیدہ ہے۔ انہوں نے کہاکہ عمران عوام کو قابل عمل منشور اور عملی منصوبوں سے متاثر کرنے میں ناکام ہو چکا۔ مشاہداللہ خان نے ان خیالات کااظہارتحریک انصاف کی سیکرٹری اطلاعات شیریں مزاری کے ایک خط کے جواب میں کیاجس میں پاکستان مسلم لیگ(ن) کے قائدمحمدنوازشریف اورعمران خان کے درمیان ایک ٹی وی مذاکرے کی تجویزدی گئی ہے ۔مشاہداللہ خان نے کہاکہ کھلاڑی شاید کھیل کے بنیادی اصول بھی بھلا بیٹھا، فائنل راونڈ سے پہلے کوالیفائنگ راونڈ تو جیت لیں۔ انہوں نے کہاکہ عمران پہلے عوام سے رہنمائی کی اہلیت کا مینڈیٹ لے لیں پھر ساتھ بیٹھ کر مناظرہ بازی کا شوق پورا کری۔مشاہداللہ خان نے کہاکہ مسلم لیگ ن عمران کے میڈیا سٹنٹ کا حصہ بننے کو مسترد کرتی ہے۔ انہوں نے کہاکہ نواز شریف سے کا مقابلہ کرنا تھا تو ان کے مقابلے میں انتخاب لڑ لیتے۔ سراب کا حقیقت سے کوئی مقابلہ نہیں ہوتا۔ مشاہداللہ خان نے کہاکہ جب تک عمران اور ان کی جماعت اتخابات میں کامیابی نہیں حاصل کر لیتی اس وقت تک ان کی باتیں محض دیوانے کی بڑ ہی رہینگی۔انہو ں نے کہاکہ عمران کی پیشکش پر صرف یہی کہا جاسکتا ہے، “انوکھا لاڈلا کھلن کو مانگے چاند رے”۔

 

[endymion248]

The reason there won't be any debate on TV is that The great lion is a road leader who only needs to convince his people which he knows he can. Captaan, on the other hand, is a tv leader with no respect for the real people. But I don't blame him, it is to be expected from
a mere entertainer, from the grounds of cricket to the tamasha circus on ARY.

 

[waqar goraya]

The reason there won't be any debate on TV is that The great lion is a road leader who only needs to convince his people which he knows he can. Captaan, on the other hand, is a tv leader with no respect for the real people. But I don't blame him, it is to be expected from
a mere entertainer, from the grounds of cricket to the tamasha circus on ARY.

Imran is more active on roads and chowks than Nawaz.....

 

[the Great Khan]

I see there are still some budkismats from our country..

 

[UP]

so it is in fact not part of law then? got it.

and kudos for taking a swipe at the backward slums that are 3rd World countries, same place from where I assume your ancestors are from as well.

PMLN Manifesto - http://www.pmln.org/pmln-manifesto/

It doesn't matter if there's a law or not in other countries. The point is: leaders are debating against each other on the national level. Why would one waste time and money to write laws when people are debating? Laws are made to force certain things. In this case, some party(s) don't want to debate so that's why I'm calling for a law to compel them.

If you want to run a country, prove to the local people that you are capable enough to lead. Why hide like Nawaz? Why is he not debating against his rivals? show it to people that your policies are better than Khan's and more people will certainly vote for you.

Secondly, Pakistan is a third world country, the whole world knows that. If my ancestors are from there, it doesn't hide the fact that it is a slum.

Thank you for posting the manifesto. Could you now please teach the average joe in Pak to turn on the computer in thousands of villages and cities across the country?

If the light goes off due to energy crisis, well

 

[arsalan660]

Debate system cannot work here. If anchor by fault ask any tough question to IK PTI supporters will shout Lifafa anchor and vice versa.

 

[HamzaSaeen]

The reason there won't be any debate on TV is that The great lion is a road leader who only needs to convince his people which he knows he can. Captaan, on the other hand, is a tv leader with no respect for the real people. But I don't blame him, it is to be expected from
a mere entertainer, from the grounds of cricket to the tamasha circus on ARY.

a real 'road' leader- hiding and scared from IK? why?

 

[waqar goraya]

Debate system cannot work here. If anchor by fault ask any tough question to IK PTI supporters will shout Lifafa anchor and vice versa.

What works here then?

Electables ,biradaris ,laptops,jangla bus service,sasti roti,youth festivals...bribe paid in the name of development funds to attract electables and to make MPAs and MNAs loyal.....?

1250 Policemen,40 carore of annual expense on the security of a family of Khadim-e-aala..?


Slavery of public through thana/court culture?

What exactly matters here??

 

[Anfield]

How Will Nazaw Debate:

Q) Nawaz Sharif Pakistan mein aap terrorism kaisey kam kerein gay? yeh tou baht mushkil kaam hai? Aap kya kya strategy hogee?
Nawaz: Janab log tou yeh bhee kehtay thay Motorway nahee banay gee, banee thee kay nahee? Yeh log tou yeh bhee kehtay thay Pakistan Nuclear power bhee nahee banayge ga, Bana kay nahee? Janab.. humnay banaya? Issi terah Allah kay fazal say Janab yeh bhee kerein gay?

Q)aap mehngayee pe kaisey kaboon payeingay?
Nawaz Reply) jis terah humnay nuclear test ka tauhfa dya awam ko InshAllah issi terah hee hum mehngayee khatam kerkay tauha deyingay iss kaum ko. Aur janab yeh motorway ka bhee gift awam ko humnay hee dya tha.

Q) jab 5 baaryon mein kaam nahee ker sakay tou 6th mein kya kereingay?
Ans) ahaha ahaha janab yeh jo Anari Khilari hain... yeh tab kahan thay jab humnay motorway banayee, nuclear test kya MashAllah?

His will divert every reply towards building motorway and Nuclear Test. Calls himself the leader of 200 Million people and can't utter one sentence properly.

 

[waqar_ahmad]

What works here then?

Electables ,biradaris ,laptops,jangla bus service,sasti roti,youth festivals...bribe paid in the name of development funds to attract electables and to make MPAs and MNAs loyal.....?

1250 Policemen,40 carore of annual expense on the security of a family of Khadim-e-aala..?


Slavery of public through thana/court culture?

What exactly matters here??

All of the above. And this thana culture will never change. This is how these parties rule the people.

 

[arsalan660]

How Will Nazaw Debate:

Q) Nawaz Sharif Pakistan mein aap terrorism kaisey kam kerein gay? yeh tou baht mushkil kaam hai? Aap kya kya strategy hogee?
Nawaz: Janab log tou yeh bhee kehtay thay Motorway nahee banay gee, banee thee kay nahee? Yeh log tou yeh bhee kehtay thay Pakistan Nuclear power bhee nahee banayge ga, Bana kay nahee? Janab.. humnay banaya? Issi terah Allah kay fazal say Janab yeh bhee kerein gay?

Q)aap mehngayee pe kaisey kaboon payeingay?
Nawaz Reply) jis terah humnay nuclear test ka tauhfa dya awam ko InshAllah issi terah hee hum mehngayee khatam kerkay tauha deyingay iss kaum ko. Aur janab yeh motorway ka bhee gift awam ko humnay hee dya tha.

Q) jab 5 baaryon mein kaam nahee ker sakay tou 6th mein kya kereingay?
Ans) ahaha ahaha janab yeh jo Anari Khilari hain... yeh tab kahan thay jab humnay motorway banayee, nuclear test kya MashAllah?

His will divert every reply towards building motorway and Nuclear Test. Calls himself the leader of 200 Million people and can't utter one sentence properly.

Can we have Imran Khan's answer on that also?

 

[HamzaSaeen]

Can we have Imran Khan's answer on that also?

Oh please, Imran will give much better answers than that. He will explain his policies clearly.

 

[arsalan660]

Oh please, Imran will give much better answers than that. He will explain his policies clearly.

OP has good knowledge I just asked him to gave answer that IK would have given?

 

[Badsha]

These excuses of not a good debater ect is just BS.


You claim to be the leader of a nation yet you can't debate live on t.v with an "anaari" khilari without craping your pants.

 

[waqar_ahmad]

You can only debate if you have clear cut policies. PMLN does not have any clear cut policies. In fact, PTI is the only party that has a clearly defined and documented policy against terrorism. Whether someone agrees with it or not is a different matter

Does PMLN have a policy against it? No! In fact, PMLN are in bed with SSP, are they not?

 

[insaftak]

LOL Would love to hear Mian Sahab explaining live on tv how he will cut taxes to 10% and then build bullet trains, metro buses

Mian Sahab Paisa Kahan say aaye ga

 

[HamzaSaeen]

These excuses of not a good debater ect is just BS.


You claim to be the leader of a nation yet you can't debate live on t.v with an "anaari" khilari without craping your pants.

You can only debate if you have clear cut policies. PMLN does not have any clear cut policies. In fact, PTI is the only party that has a clearly defined and documented policy against terrorism. Whether someone agrees with it or not is a different matter

Does PMLN have a policy against it? No! In fact, PMLN are in bed with SSP, are they not?

+1. If Imran is such an 'anari khilari' then why doesn't NS come and debate with him, to finish him once and for all?

 

[spinDoc]

Why NS wont agree to a live debat with IK
<iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/video/embed?video_id=10151612526756672" width="540" height="360" frameborder="0"></iframe>

 

[insaftak]

^^

LOL I don't know how Mian Sahab made it to the top

 

[GujjarSher]

LOL Would love to hear Mian Sahab explaining live on tv how he will cut taxes to 10% and then build bullet trains, metro buses

Mian Sahab Paisa Kahan say aaye ga

Very easy to do, just get a loan from a bank and never pay it back

 

[Zechariah]

There is no debate.

Imran vs Nawaz is a clear choice. Nawaz has no vision - he thinks if you build motorways and bridges you become a super power.

Imran actually has a vision on what kind of Pakistan he wants to see.

No disrespect to Mian Saheb but like seriously the choice is quite clear.

 

[Anfield]

LOL Would love to hear Mian Sahab explaining live on tv how he will cut taxes to 10% and then build bullet trains, metro buses

Mian Sahab Paisa Kahan say aaye ga

His reply would be Janab if we can build Motorways, make this country a nuclear power why can't we cut back on taxes?

That's what he says in every jalsa..

 

[Lara400]

Even if it was too happen it will be a one sided match, Nawaz Sharif is so awful that he seems almost as if he is half asleep.

 

[spinDoc]

<iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/video/embed?video_id=10151611429561672" width="720" height="576" frameborder="0"></iframe>

 

[spinDoc]

 

[spinDoc]

^^

LOL I don't know how Mian Sahab made it to the top

i know .. general Zia

 

[Markhor]

i know .. general Zia

Haha, exactly !

Nawaz - The blue-eyed boy of Zia's dictatorship, now so-called 'lion of democracy'.

Jesus wept.

 

[endymion248]

Thankfully, the great Nawaz's ideas are not set in stone and he is ready to evolve following what he is exposed to. Would you rather have someone who makes the country suffer by not participating in elections (since, according to him, Batakh can solve all our issues in 40 days) or someone who is ready to cooperate with dictators if it means serving the people?

 

[HamzaSaeen]

Thankfully, the great Nawaz's ideas are not set in stone and he is ready to evolve following what he is exposed to. Would you rather have someone who makes the country suffer by not participating in elections (since, according to him, Batakh can solve all our issues in 40 days) or someone who is ready to cooperate with dictators if it means serving the people?

Please tell me one thing that Nawaz did. Don't start with laptop, metro bus etc. I am talking about basic necessities, i.e. jobs, rozgaar, economy, peace and the endless ground-level issues the common Pakistani faces. That's right, the amount of good he did for Pakistan's people is proportional to zero.